September 01, 2023 -
Information Clearing House -
The Economist has taken a keen interest
in Australia lately, which if you know
anything about The Economist is something
you never want to see happen to your
country. Two articles published in the last
few days by the
notorious
propaganda outlet have celebrated the
fact that Australia appears to be the most
likely nation to follow the United States
into a hot war with China as it enmeshes
itself further and further with the US war
machine.
“Meanwhile, the ‘unbreakable’ defence
relationship with Australia is
deepening, following the AUKUS agreement
struck in March, amid a flurry of
equipment deals and military exercises.
Should war break out with China, the
Aussies seem the most willing to fight
at America’s side. Australian land, sea
and air bases are expanding to receive
more American forces. Under the AUKUS
deal, Australia is gaining its own
long-range weapons, such as
nuclear-powered (but not nuclear-armed)
submarines to be developed jointly with
America and Britain. The three partners
want to work on other military
technologies, from hypersonic missiles
to underwater drones.
“Taken together the ‘latticework’ of
security agreements, shows how America’s
long-heralded pivot to Asia is
accelerating.”
In “Australia
is becoming America’s military launch-pad
into Asia,” The Economist elaborates
upon this war partnership with tumescent
enthusiasm, calling it a “mateship” and
likening it to a “marriage”, and calling for
a rollback of US restrictions on sharing
military technology with Australia.
“If America ever goes to war with China,
American officials say the Aussies would be
the likeliest allies to be fighting with
them,” The Economist gushes, adding,
“Australia’s geographical advantage is that
it lies in what strategists call a
Goldilocks zone: well-placed to help America
to project power into Asia, but beyond the
range of most of China’s weapons. It is also
large, which helps America scatter its
forces to avoid giving China easy targets.”
The Economist cites White House “Asia
Tsar” Kurt Campbell reportedly saying of
Australia, “We have them locked in now for
the next 40 years.”
“Equally, though, Australia may have
America locked in for the same duration,”
The Economist hastens to add.
Well gosh, that’s a relief.
“How the world sees us,”
tweeted former Australian foreign
minister Bob Carr when sharing the Economist
article.
“Historians will be absolutely baffled by
what’s happening in Australia right now:
normally countries never voluntarily
relinquish their sovereignty and worsen
their own security position out of their own
accord. They normally have to lose a war and
be forced to do so,” commentator Arnaud
Bertrand
added to Carr’s quip.
As much as it pains me to admit it, The
Economist is absolutely correct. The
Australian government has been showing every
indication that it is fully willing to
charge into a hot war with its top trading
partner to please its masters in Washington,
both before and after the US puppet regime
in Canberra changed hands last year.
This sycophantic war-readiness was
humorously
mocked on Chinese state media back in
2021 by Impact Asia Capital co-founder
Charles Liu, who said he didn’t think the US
will actually fight a war with China over
Taiwan, but the Australians might be stupid
enough to fight it for them.
“US is not going to fight over Taiwan,”
Liu said. “It’s not going to conduct a war
over Taiwan. They may try to get Japanese to
do it, but Japanese won’t be so stupid to do
it. The only stupid ones who might get
involved are the Australians, sorry.”
He had nothing to be sorry about; he was
right. Australians are being very, very
stupid, and not just our government. A
recent
Lowy Institute poll found that eight in
ten Australians believe the nation’s
alliance with the United States is important
for Australia’s security, despite
three-quarters also saying they believe the
alliance makes Australia more likely to be
drawn into a war in Asia.
That’s just plain stupid. A war with
China is the absolute worst case security
scenario for Australia; anything that makes
war with China more likely is making us less
secure. Making bad decisions which hurt your
own interests is what stupid people do.
That’s not to say Australians are
naturally dimwitted; we’re
actually pretty clever as far as
populations go. What’s making us stupid in
this case is the fact that our nation has
the
most concentrated media ownership in the
western world, a massive chunk of which
is owned by
longtime US empire asset Rupert Murdoch.
This propaganda-conducive information
environment has been distorting Australia’s
understanding of the world so pervasively in
recent years that on more than one occasion
I’ve had total strangers start babbling at
me about the dangers of China completely out
of nowhere within minutes of striking up
conversation with them.
This artificially manipulated information
ecosystem has made Australians so
pants-on-head idiotic that they think the US
empire is filling their country up with war
machinery because it loves them and wants to
protect them from the Chinese. That’s as
stupid as it gets.
The single biggest lie being circulated
in Australia right now is that our
government is militarising against China as
a defensive
measure. China has literally zero history of
invading and occupying countries on the
other side of the planet. You know who
does have a very extensive history of
doing that? The United States. The military
superpower that Australia’s military is
becoming increasingly intertwined with. The
belief that we’re intertwining ourselves
with the world’s most aggressive,
destructive and war-horny military force as
a defensive
measure to protect ourselves against that
military force’s top rival (who hasn’t
dropped a bomb in decades) is transparently
false, and only a complete idiot would
believe it.
We’re not militarising to defend
ourselves against a future attack by China,
we’re militarising in preparation for a
future US-led attack
on the Chinese military. We’re militarising
in preparation to involve ourselves in an
unresolved civil war between Chinese people
that has nothing to do with us. China has
been sorting out its own affairs for
millennia and has managed to do so just fine
without the help of white people running in
firing military explosives at them, and
Taiwan is no exception.
The imperial media talk nonstop about how
the People’s Republic of China is preparing
to seize control of Taiwan using military
force, without ever mentioning the fact that
that’s exactly what the US empire is doing.
The US empire is preparing to wrest Taiwan
away from China to facilitate its long-term
agenda to balkanize, weaken and subjugate
its top rival.
Only a complete blithering imbecile would
believe any part of this is being done
defensively. It’s being done to secure
unipolar planetary domination for the
world’s most powerful and destructive
government, and only an absolute moron would
agree to risk their own country’s security
and economic interests to help facilitate
it.
My work is entirely reader-supported,
so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where
you can toss some money into my tip jar if
you want to. All my work is free to bootleg
and use in any way, shape or form; republish
it, translate it, use it on merchandise;
whatever you want. The best way to make sure
you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe
to the mailing list on Substack, which will get
you an email notification for everything I
publish. All works co-authored with my
husband Tim Foley.
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Registration is not necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.
See
also
The views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)