How the Real Story of a Migrant Boat Disaster
Escaped Our Attention
By Andrea Mazzarino
July 21, 2023:
Information Clearing House
-- "
Tom Dispatch
"
--
Seeking news coverage about
the Adriana, the boat crowded with some 700
people migrating to Europe to seek a better life
that
sank in mid-June off the coast of Greece, I
googled “migrant ship” and got 483,000 search
results in one second. Most of the people aboard
the Adriana had drowned in the Mediterranean,
among them about
100 children.
I did a similar search for
the Titan submersible, which disappeared the
same week in the North Atlantic. That
kludged-together pseudo-submarine was taking
four wealthy men and the 19-year-old son of one
of them to view the ruins of the famed passenger
ship, the Titanic. They all died when the Titan
imploded shortly after it dove. That Google
search came up with 79.3 million search results
in less than half a second.
Guardian journalist Arwa Mahdawi
wrote a powerful
column about the different kinds of
attention those two boats received. As she
astutely pointed out, we in the anglophone world
could hardly help but follow the story of the
Oceangate submersible’s ill-fated journey. After
all, it was the lead news story of the week
everywhere and commanded the attention of
three national militaries (to the tune of
tens of millions of dollars) for at least
five days.
Why do people care so much
about rich men who paid $250,000 apiece to make
what any skilled observer would have told them
was a treacherous journey, but not hundreds of
migrants determined to better their families’
lives, even if they had to risk life itself to
reach European shores?
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
The Adriana was quite another story. As
Mahdawi pointed out, the Greek Coast Guard
seemed preoccupied with whether the migrants on
that boat even “wanted” help, ignoring the fact
that many of those aboard the small trawler were
children trapped in the ship’s hull and that it
was visibly in danger.
On the other hand, few, she pointed out,
questioned whether the men in the submersible
wanted help—even though its hull was ludicrously
bolted shut from the outside prior to
departure, making rescue especially unlikely.
Glued to the coverage like many Americans, I
certainly didn’t think they should be ignored,
since every life matters.
But why do people care so much about rich men
who paid $250,000 apiece to make what any
skilled observer would have told them was a
treacherous journey, but not hundreds of
migrants determined to better their families’
lives, even if they had to risk life itself to
reach European shores? Part of the answer, I
suspect, lies in the very different reasons
those two groups of travelers set out on their
journeys and the kinds of things we value in a
world long shaped by Western military power.
An
American Preoccupation With the Military
I suspect that we Americans are easily
drawn to whatever seems vaguely military in
nature, even a “submersible” (rather than a
submarine) whose rescue efforts marshaled
the resources and expertise of so many U.S.
and allied naval forces. We found it
anything but boring to learn about U.S. Navy
underwater rescue ships and how low you can
drop before pressure is likely to capsize a
boat. The submersible story, in fact, spun
down so many military-style rabbit holes
that it was easy to forget what even
inspired it.
I’m a Navy spouse and my family, which
includes my partner, our two young kids, and
various pets, has been moving from one
military installation to another over the
past decade. In the various communities
where we’ve lived, during gatherings with
new friends and extended family, the
overwhelming interest in my spouse’s career
is obvious.
Typical questions have included: “What’s
a submarine’s hull made out of?” “How deep
can you go?” “What’s the plan if you sink?”
“What kind of camo do you wear?” And an
unforgettable (to me at least) comment from
one of our kids: “That blue camo makes you
guys look like blueberries. Do you really
want to hide if you fall in the water? What
if you need to be rescued?”
In our militarized
culture, we seize on the cosmetic parts like
the nature of submarines because they’re
easier to talk about than the kind of
suffering our military has actually caused
across a remarkably wide stretch of the
planet in this century.
Meanwhile, my career as a therapist for
military and refugee communities and as a
co-founder of Brown University’s
Costs of War Project, which might offer
a strange antiwar complement to my spouse’s
world, seldom even makes it into the
conversation.
Aside from the power and mystery our
military evokes with its fancy equipment, I
think many Americans love to express
interest in it because it seems like the
embodiment of civic virtue at a time
when otherwise we can agree on ever less. In
fact, after 20 years of America’s war on
terror in response to the September 11,
2001, attacks on the Pentagon and the World
Trade Center, references to our military are
remarkably widespread (if you’re paying
attention).
In our
militarized culture, we seize on the
cosmetic parts like the nature of submarines
because they’re easier to talk about than
the kind of suffering our military has
actually caused across a remarkably wide
stretch of the planet in this century. Most
of us will take fancy toys like subs over
exhausted servicemembers,
bloodied civilians, and frightened,
malnourished
migrants all too often fleeing the
damage of our war on terror.
Migration During Wartime
We live in an era marked by
mass migration, which has
increased over the past five decades. In
fact,
more people are now living in a country
other than where they were born than at any
other time in the last half-century.
Among the major
reasons people leave their homes as
migrants are certainly the search for
education and job opportunities, but never
forget those fleeing from armed conflict and
political persecution. And of course,
another
deeply related and more significant
reason is
climate change and the ever more
frequent and intense national disasters like
flooding and drought that it causes or
intensifies.
The migrants on the Adriana had
left Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya,
Palestine, and Pakistan for a variety of
reasons. Some of the
Pakistani men, for instance, were
seeking jobs that would allow them to house
and feed their desperate families. One
Syrian teenager, who ended up drowning,
had left the war-torn city of Kobani, hoping
to someday enter medical school in Germany—a
dream that was unlikely to be realized where
he lived due to bombed-out
schools and
hospitals.
All in all, the Costs
of War Project estimates that the war on
terror has led to the displacement of at
least 38 million people, many of whom fled
for their lives as fighting consumed their
worlds.
In my mind’s eye, however, a very
specific shadow loomed over so many of their
individual stories: America’s forever wars,
the series of military operations that began
with our 2001 invasion of Afghanistan (which
ended up involving us in air strikes and
other military activities in neighboring
Pakistan as well) and the similarly
disastrous invasion of Iraq in 2003. It
would, in the end, metastasize into
fighting, training foreign militaries, and
intelligence operations in some
85 countries, including each of the
countries the Adriana’s passengers hailed
from. All in all, the Costs of War Project
estimates that the war on terror has led to
the displacement of at least
38 million people, many of whom fled for
their lives as fighting consumed their
worlds.
The route taken by the Adriana through
the central Mediterranean Sea is a
particularly
common one for refugees fleeing armed
conflict and its aftermath. It’s also the
most deadly route in the world for
migrants—and getting deadlier by the year.
Before the Adriana went down, the number of
fatalities during the first three months of
2023 had already reached its highest point
in six years, at
441 people. And during the first half of
this year alone, according to UNICEF,
at least 289 children have drowned
trying to reach Europe.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned—even if
on a distinctly small scale—as a therapist
in military and refugee communities, it’s
this: A painful history almost invariably
precedes anyone’s decision to embark on a
journey as dangerous as those the migrants
of that ill-fated ship undertook. Though I’m
sure many on it would not have said that
they were fleeing “war,” it’s hard to
disentangle this country’s war on terror
from the reasons so many of them made their
journeys.
One
Syrian father who drowned had been
heading for Germany, hoping to help his
three-year-old son, who had leukemia and
needed a treatment unavailable in his
devastated country, an area that the U.S.
invasion of Iraq first threw into chaos and
where war has now deprived millions of
healthcare. Of course, it hardly need be
noted that his death only ensures his
family’s further impoverishment and his
son’s possible death from cancer, not to
mention what could happen if he and his mom
were forced to make a similar journey to
Europe to get care.
Pakistan’s War
Story
As many as
350 migrants on the Adriana were from
Pakistan where the U.S. had been funding and
fighting a counterinsurgency war—via drones
and air strikes—against Islamist militant
groups since
2004. The war on terror has both
directly and indirectly upended and
destroyed many lives in Pakistan in this
century. That includes
tens of thousands of deaths from air
strikes, but also the effects of a
refugee influx from neighboring
Afghanistan that stretched the country’s
already limited resources, not to speak of
the
deterioration of its tourism industry
and diminished international
investments. All in all, Pakistan has
lost more than
$150 billion dollars over the past 20
years in that fashion while, for ordinary
Pakistanis, the costs of living in an ever
more devastated country have only increased.
Not surprisingly, the number of jobs per
capita decreased.
One young man on the migrant ship was
traveling to Europe to seek a job so that he
could support his extended family. He had
sold 26 buffalo—his main source of income—to
pay for the journey and was among the
104 people who were finally rescued by
the Greek Coast Guard. After that rescue, he
was forced to return to Libya where he had
no clear plan for how to make it home.
Unlike most of the other Pakistanis on the
Adriana, he managed to escape with his life,
but his is not necessarily a happy ending.
As Zeeshan Usmani, Pakistani activist and
founder of the antiwar website
Pakistan Body Count, points out, “After
you’ve sacrificed so much in search of a
better life, you’d likely rather drown than
return home. You’ve given all you have.”
Rest Stops in a
Militarized World
We certainly learned much about the
heady conversations between the Titan’s
OceanGate CEO, his staff, and certain
estranged colleagues before that submersible
embarked on its ill-fated journey, and then
about the dim lighting and primitive
conditions inside the boat. Barely probed in
media coverage of the Adriana, however, was
what it was like for those migrants to make
the trip itself.
What particularly caught my attention was
the place from which they left on their
journey to hell and back—Libya. After all,
that country has quite a grim history to be
the debarkation point for so many migrants.
A
U.S.-led invasion in 2011 toppled
dictator Muammar Gaddafi, leaving the
country’s remote beaches even less policed
than they had been, while Libya itself was
divided between two competing governments
and a collection of affiliated militias.
In such a chaotic setting, as you might
imagine, conditions for migrants transiting
through Libya have only continued to
deteriorate. Many are kept in warehouses by
local authorities for weeks, even months,
sometimes without basic needs like blankets
and drinking water.
Some are even sold into slavery to local
residents, and those lucky enough to move on
toward European shores have to deal with
smugglers whose motives and practices, as
the Adriana’s story reminds us, are anything
but positive (and sometimes terrorizing).
Consider how you would
feel if you’d been adrift at sea, hungry,
thirsty, and fearful for your life, when men
in another boat armed and wearing masks
approached you, further rocking a boat that
was already threatening to capsize.
Onward, to the sea itself: When, some 13
hours after the first migrants called for
help, the Greek Coast Guard
finally responded, it sent a single ship
with a crew that
included four armed and masked men. The
Guard alleges that many of the migrants
refused help, waving the men away. Whether
or not this was the case, I can imagine
their fears that the Greeks, if not
smugglers, might at least be
allied with them. They also might have
feared that the Guard would set them and
their children, however young, on rafts to
continue drifting at sea, as
had happened recently with other migrant
ships approached by the Greeks.
If that sounds far-fetched to you, then
consider how you would feel if you’d been
adrift at sea, hungry, thirsty, and fearful
for your life, when men in another boat
armed and wearing masks approached you,
further rocking a boat that was already
threatening to capsize. My guess is: not
good.
Uncounted War
Deaths
It would be far-fetched to count people
like the migrants on the Adriana as “war
deaths.” But framing many of their deaths as
in some sense war-related should force us to
pay attention to ways in which fighting in
or around their countries of origin might
have impacted their fates. Paying attention
to war’s costs would, however, force us
Westerners to confront the blood on our
hands, as we not only supported (or at least
ignored) this country’s wars sufficiently to
let them continue for so long, while also
backing politicians in both the
U.S. and
Europe who did relatively little (or far
worse) to address the refugee crises that
emerged as a result.
To take language used by the Costs of War
Project’s
Stephanie Savell in her work on what the
project calls “indirect war deaths,”
migrants like the drowned Syrian teenager
seeking an education in Europe could be
considered “doubly
uncounted” war deaths because they
weren’t killed in battle and, as in his case
and others like it, their bodies will not be
recovered from the Mediterranean’s depths.
When we see stories like his, I think we
should all go deeper in our questioning of
just what happened, in part by retracing
those migrants’ steps to where they began
and trying to imagine why they left on such
arduous, dangerous journeys. Start with
war-gutted economies in countries where
millions find slim hope of the kind of
decent life that you or I are likely to take
for granted, including having a job, a home,
health care, and safety from armed violence.
I’ll bet that if you do ask more
questions, those migrants will start to seem
not just easier to relate to but like true
adventurers on this planet—and not those
billionaires who paid
$250,000 apiece for what even I could
have told you was an unlikely shot at making
it to the ocean floor alive.
Andrea Mazzarino co-founded Brown
University's Costs of War Project. She is an
activist and social worker interested in the
health impacts of war.
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Registration is not necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.