If
the United States can spy on China, why
can’t China spy on the U.S.?
By
Max Boot
June 19, 2023:
Information Clearing
House
--Washington’s badly
frayed relations with China were just
starting to recover from the
Chinese spy balloon
that traversed the United States in
early February before being shot down
over the Atlantic Ocean. Secretary of
State Antony Blinken, who had been
forced to postpone his trip to Beijing
because of all the hot air about the
balloon flight,
had finally rescheduled his visit
for June 18. Then, last week, came word
of a Chinese spy station in Cuba. In
truth, there is nothing particularly
scandalous about the latest revelations.
It all began with
a Wall Street Journal story
on Thursday: “Cuba to Host Secret Chinese
Spy Base Focusing on U.S.” The article
reported, citing anonymous U.S. officials
“familiar with highly classified
intelligence,” that “China has agreed to pay
cash-strapped Cuba several billion dollars
to allow it to build the eavesdropping
station” and described this as a “brash new
geopolitical challenge by Beijing to the
U.S.”
Cue
the predictable outrage
from Capitol Hill.
“We are deeply disturbed by reports that
Havana and Beijing are working together to
target the United States and our people,”
said a
joint statement
from the chair of the Senate Intelligence
Committee, Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), and the
vice chair, Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). “We must
be clear that it would be unacceptable for
China to establish an intelligence facility
within 100 miles of Florida and the United
States.”
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
The chair of the House Intelligence
Committee, Michael R. Turner (R-Ohio), said
in a tweet
that he was “deeply troubled” by the report
and added, “If true, this would be yet
another act of Chinese aggression.” The No.
3 House Republican, Elise Stefanik (N.Y.),
cited this
as further evidence that “[President] Biden
has continually allowed Communist China to
take advantage of his weak leadership and
chip away at our national security.”
Then on Saturday, the White House said
in a statement
that China already had a spy base in
Cuba. According to Biden administration
officials, they inherited this issue from
former president
Donald Trump
and have been working through diplomatic
means to counter Chinese
intelligence-gathering in Cuba and
elsewhere.
China might be upgrading its intelligence
presence in Cuba, but the presence itself
isn’t all that new — or shocking. The Soviet
Union had its largest
overseas listening post
near Lourdes, Cuba, for decades. The United
States was willing to risk war to remove
Soviet nuclear missiles from Cuba but
tolerated those signals collection efforts.
That’s because Washington has long
recognized that nations have a right to spy
on one another.
Indeed, the United States can hardly call
out Chinese spying with a straight face when
the U.S. intelligence community undoubtedly
operates the largest signals-collection
network in the world. Revelations from
Edward Snowden,
the Discord leaks
and other sources make clear the U.S.
National Security Agency vacuums up vast
amounts of communications from around the
globe, spying on friends and foes alike.
China knows all about U.S. collection
efforts — not least because, after the
establishment of relations between Beijing
and Washington in the 1970s, China hosted
NSA spy stations near its border with the
Soviet Union. The Kremlin was undoubtedly
unhappy about
Project Chestnut
but had to live with it.
Nowadays, the United States regularly
cooperates in intelligence-gathering on
China with allies such as Australia and New
Zealand and sends its own surveillance
aircraft near Chinese airspace. After a
Chinese fighter aircraft
flew too close
in late May to a U.S. RC-135 aircraft (a
signals intelligence platform known as the
Rivet Joint) flying over the South China
Sea, U.S. officials indignantly and
rightly complained.
But if the United States is allowed to spy
near China, why isn’t China allowed to spy
near the United States?
“We
should not be the least bit surprised by the
possibility of a Chinese listening post in
Cuba. The two countries have had an
intelligence relationship for decades,” Paul
Heer, a former U.S. national intelligence
officer for East Asia, told me. “And any
intelligence collection the Chinese do from
Cuba would be roughly equivalent to U.S.
collection against China from our Allied
listening posts and surveillance missions in
the Western Pacific.”
Heer
suggested that “this story is being blown
way out of proportion, perhaps (or
presumably) by folks in Washington who are
trying to subvert the Biden administration’s
efforts to revive engagement with Beijing.”
U.S. relations with Cuba could also suffer
collateral damage from the latest
revelations. Biden had lifted some
Trump-era sanctions,
but he has not normalized ties with Cuba,
which has been under U.S. sanctions for more
than 60 years. Is it any wonder that Cuba,
facing a
severe economic crisis
aggravated by its central planning policies,
might look to China for financial support?
“By leaving most of Trump’s sanctions in
place, the administration has left the
Cubans no choice but to seek foreign patrons
wherever they can find them if they want to
survive,” William LeoGrande, a Latin America
specialist at American University, told me.
The
revelations should highlight the need for
the United States to lift its sanctions and
engage with Cuba to offset China’s
influence. But, more likely, they will have
the opposite effect — making it politically
impossible for Biden to improve relations
with Cuba anytime soon.
The bottom line is that we need to be more
selective in our outrage. China carrying out
genocidal policies against the Uyghurs,
crushing freedom in Hong Kong
or
imprisoning dissidents
— that’s truly outrageous. Even
sending a spy balloon
over the United States was unacceptable,
although the balloon’s path was most likely
inadvertent and not a calculated challenge
from Beijing. China collecting signals
intelligence from Cuba might be a cause for
American discomfort, but it’s no outrage,
and it’s no reason to blow up efforts to
improve relations with Beijing.
Max
Boot is a Washington Post columnist, a
senior fellow at the Council on Foreign
Relations and the author of “The Road Not
Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American
Tragedy in Vietnam.”
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Registration is not necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.
|