Credible’ Source Reveals Scandal Bigger Than
Biden Bribery: FBI Election Interference
important to America’s future than unearthing
Biden family corruption is uncovering corrupt
bureaucrats who violate the rule of law.
Information Clearing House
-- Allegations that
then-Vice President Joe Biden agreed
to accept money from a foreign national to
affect policy decisions was
“highly credible” and used by the FBI in
multiple criminal investigations dating back to
the Obama administration. Friday’s
Fox News provides further insight into Sen.
Chuck Grassley’s focus on the FBI — as opposed
to the Biden family — as the primary scandal in
aren’t interested in whether or not the
accusations against [then]-Vice President Biden
are accurate,” Grassley said during an interview
last week discussing FBI Director Christopher
Wray’s refusal to comply with the congressional
subpoena issued for the FD-1023 form. That form,
dated June 30, 2020, included detailed
information from a CHS to the FBI regarding an
agreement by now-President Biden to deliver
preferred foreign policy positions for a $5
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Grassley revealed he had already seen the
FD-1023, Fox News’ Bill Hemmer queried: “How
damning is this document to the sitting U.S.
don’t know,” responded Grassley, a member of the
Senate Judiciary Committee. He stressed that
while “there’s accusations” in the FBI report,
the congressional oversight committees’ concern
is whether “the FBI does its job.” “That’s what
we want to know,” he continued.
Friday’s revelation that the CHS was “highly
credible” and had served as a source in multiple
prior criminal investigations — including ones
run under the Obama-Biden administration —
proves Grassley is properly focused on the FBI.
the CHS’s allegations offer more evidence of a
Biden family pay-to-play scandal, and unraveling
any criminal conduct by the Biden family remains
important. But more significant to the future of
our country is uncovering government actors
responsible for violating the rule of law:
America can survive select injustices, but it
cannot withstand a corrupt bureaucracy that
obstructs justice and interferes in elections.
that is precisely what occurred, according to
the whistleblower. He claimed that “in August
2020, FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian
Auten opened an assessment which was used by a
FBI Headquarters’ team to improperly discredit
negative Hunter Biden information as
disinformation and caused investigative activity
to cease.” The whistleblower further alleged
that the FBI HQ team that handled the Auten
assessment, after concluding the reporting was
disinformation, placed the information in a
restricted access sub-file that only the
particular agents who uncovered the CHS’s
information could access.
knowing the CHS behind the FD-1023 was not just
“trusted,” as Grassley had previously indicated,
but “highly credible,” and relied upon in
multiple criminal cases dating back to the last
time Biden worked for the executive branch,
makes the whistleblower’s accusations even more
damning because those additional facts mean the
agents had reason to believe the buried
accusations were true.
only does this evidence suggest FBI headquarters
obstructed justice, but the date of the CHS’s
report indicates those responsible for
misbranding the intel as disinformation sought
to interfere in the 2020 election.
Grassley’s colleague in the House, James Comer,
revealed, the CHS report was dated June 30,
2020, and while the allegations against
candidate Biden came from a “highly credible”
CHS, the FBI closed them. According to the
whistleblower, FBI headquarters closed out the
source even though some of the allegations had
already been verified and other details could
have been verified.
contrast, when the bureau received a vague tip
from an Australian diplomat of unknown veracity
that a low-level Trump volunteer had claimed the
Russians possessed dirt on Hillary Clinton,
within days FBI headquarters opened an
investigation into the Trump campaign.
Durham’s special counsel report recently lay
bare the impropriety of the FBI’s targeting of
the Trump campaign based on unverified gossip
from an unvetted source. Grassley is now
highlighting the converse: the FBI’s improper
branding of evidence from a “highly credible”
CHS as disinformation to protect the Democrat
candidate for president.
evidence of continuing political bias at the FBI
is Grassley’s primary concern, prompting him to
call for a “change in the culture.” That change
will be a long time coming, however, given that
Wray resisted the subpoena and appears poised to
fight Grassley and congressional oversight
committees every step of the way.
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Registration is not necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.