Translated and subtitled by Eugenia
My question concerns the current
situation in Ukraine. We all support your
actions and the special operation that is
underway there. Naturally, the most important
question, which, one way or another, all of us
have asked ourselves, is why this special
operation has started. Could it not have been
avoided? Rationally, we do understand and
support your actions, but as women we cannot
help but worry: for our family, relatives, for
those who are in Ukraine. We know that the
civilians are not impacted. But nevertheless,
tell us, reassure us: what are we to expect at
the end of this road? What will be the end
result of the military operation in Ukraine?
I will be brief but still will have to start,
as they say, from “the center of the field”. I
said about this at the start of the operation
and also spoke about this before this decision
has been made, a hard decision, without a doubt.
What is this about? The fact of the matter is
that after the anti-constitutional coup in
Ukraine, which, unfortunately, was strongly
supported by the Western countries – let us face
it. They do not even hide the fact that they
have spent $5 billion on it, not to mention
cookies given away on Maidan, and so on. And
after that, instead of bringing the situation
back on track, even if it had spiraled out of
control, even if it had been the act of the
overzealous locals – there is such legal term,
i.e. planned one thing, but the result turned
out to be something else – they still could
have, and should have, returned the situation
back onto the political track.
Have you seen "Help Tom with medical
expenses to fight leukemia"?
I thought you might be interested
in supporting this GoFundMe,
https://gofund.me/8b902e5a
More
details here
Please share the fundraiser on
your social media to help spread the
word. |
Furthermore, shortly before the coup, the
foreign ministers of the three countries came to
Kiev in 2014 and signed an agreement with the
Ukrainian government acting as guarantors of
this agreement to ensure that the situation
would be developing in the political sphere. But
nothing like that occurred. They organized a
coup d’état and supported the perpetrators. What
followed were the well-known events related to
the Crimea and the southeast of Ukraine,
Donbass, where people refused to support the
coup. As we know, the Crimea made a decision;
people came to vote in a referendum to return to
the Russian Federation. Naturally, yes,
naturally, we cannot but support that decision,
al the more so, since they felt they were in
danger from the nationalists and neo-Nazis.
There is strong evidence that they were
absolutely right in that.
Later, or, rather, in parallel, the events in
Donbass were taking place. What have these
events led to? People resisting the results of
the coup were persecuted. Eventually, the new
Kiev authorities initiated a military operation
on that territory. They have conducted two
large-scale punitive operations using of heavy
weapons and combat aviation. They directly
attacked Donetsk destroying the city squares
with aviation, using tanks and artillery. Both
these military campaigns failed. The Ukrainian
army suffered defeat. After that, so-called
Minsk agreements, or the Package of Measures, to
use the official term, have been concluded. The
agreements offered a path for a peaceful
settlement of the conflict.
We did everything we could to direct the
events along this path, to restore the
territorial integrity of Ukraine as well as to
protects the interests of the people living in
these territories. What did these people demand?
Nothing but the basic things: the right to speak
their mother tongue, i.e. the Russian, and
maintain their traditions and culture. These
were by no means extraordinary demands. But no.
These territories were put under economic
blockade; disconnected from the banking system;
the supplies of food were stopped; the payments
of the pensions and social assistance were
suspended. Sometimes, some handouts were given,
but in order to get those pensions and benefits
a person had to cross the separation line.
Now listen. I will now say something that may
sound rough but the situation compels me to say
it. You know that occasionally in some regions
packs of stray dogs attack people, injure or
even kill them (this is a separate problem, and
it is for the local authorities to deal with).
But then these animals are poisoned or shot
dead. But people of Donbass are not stray dogs.
Approximately 13,000-14,000 people have been
killed during these years. Over 500 children
have been killed or injured. But what is
particularly intolerable is that the so-called
“civilized” West has preferred all these years
to look the other way. All these years – 8
years! Eight years!
Moreover, lately the Kiev authorities started
to say openly and publicly that they are not
going to fulfill the Minsk agreements. They are
saying this from the TV screens and online. They
are saying this everywhere on the record: We
don’t like them; we will not do it. And all this
time, Russia has been accused of not fulfilling
the agreements. This is simply nonsense; the
theater of the absurd; white is called black and
black is called white. Lately, things got even
worse. Actually, the talk has started long ago,
but intensified of late. More and more often we
hear that Ukraine would be admitted into NATO.
Do you understand what this could lead to? Or
can lead to still?
If Ukraine is a NATO member, then according
to the North Atlantic Treaty, all other members
must support the country in case of a military
conflict. No one besides us has recognized
Crimea as a Russian territory. The yare
conducting military operations in Donbas but
also could move onto Crimea, and in such case we
would have to fight with the whole of NATO. What
is that? Do you understand the consequences? I
think everyone understands.
Now they (Ukraine) are talking about
acquiring the nuclear status, i.e. developing
nuclear weapons. We cannot possibly ignore such
things, particularly considering that we know
how the so-called West behaves with regard to
Russia. First, Ukraine has some nuclear
competence left from the Soviet time. As far as
enrichment and nuclear material are concerned,
they would be able to organize that work. They
have missile abilities: suffice is to mention
Yuzhmush. This company used to build
intercontinental ballistic missile equipment for
the Soviet Union. They could recover that
ability and do it. And those from across the
ocean would even help them do it. And after that
would say: “Well, we do not recognize the
nuclear status; they have done everything
themselves”. And then they would put these
complexes under control, and from that moment
on, from that very second, the fate of Russia
will be completely different. Because in that
case, our strategic adversaries would not even
need intercontinental ballistic missiles. They
would keep us right here at the nuclear
gunpoint, that is all. How could we disregard
such a thing? These are absolutely real threats,
not some far-fetched silly fantasy.
Our boys who are now fighting and risking
their lives, they are fighting and giving their
lives for our future, for the future of our
children. This is something perfectly obvious.
And the people who do not want to understand
that, particularly those among today’s leaders
(of Ukraine), have to understand that if they
keep doing what the have been doing – I have
spoken about this before – they put at risk the
very future of the Ukrainian statehood. If this
happens, that will be entirely their fault.
What is going on now? I have already
mentioned our objectives in this operation.
First, of course, is to protect the people
living in Donbass. How? By demilitarizing and
denazifying Ukraine as well as establishing its
neutral status. Why? Because the neutral status
means Ukraine will not be joining NATO. They
have it written in the Constitution that the
country will be joining NATO. You understand –
they have included that into the Constitution!
Denazification – what does this mean? I have
spoken with my Western colleagues about this.
They say:” What is the problem? You also have
the radical nationalists”. Yes, we do. But we do
not have them in the government, but everybody
agrees that they (the Ukrainians) do. Perhaps,
we have some idiots running around with
swastika, but do we support that at the
government level? Do thousands of people march
with torches and swastikas on the streets of our
capital or other cities in Russia, like it
happened in 1930s in Nazi Germany? Is something
like that happening in Russia? But it happens in
Ukraine, and it is supported. Do we support
those who killed the Russians, Jews, or the
Poles during the war? Do we hail them as heroes?
But in Ukraine, they do.
The current events are also very important.
Look, the foreign citizens have been taken
hostages in Sumy and Kharkov – over 6,000 young
people, students. They have been driven together
into a railway station and kept there for 3
days. Listen, they have been held there for the
third day. We have told everybody about this and
informed the current Ukrainian authorities. They
said: “Yes, yes, of course, we will deal this
this right now”. We have informed the leaders of
the major European countries, I personally
talked to them. “Yes, yes, we will put pressure
on Ukraine right now”. We informed the UN
Secretary-General: “Yes, yes, we will solve the
problem right away”. Nobody is doing anything.
People who are considered the citizens of
Ukraine are treated even worse. They are simply
used as a human shield. Right now, in this very
moment, this is happening in Mariupol. The Kiev
government called our military: ”Provide
humanitarian corridors so people could leave”.
Naturally, our people instantly responded, even
suspended the military activities, and were
observing what was happening. But no one was
allowed to leave. You understand, no one was
allowed out. They do not anybody leave but
instead use the people as a human shield. Who
are they? The neo-Nazis, of course.
We already observe the presence of the
militants from the Middle East and some European
countries. We know about them; we can hear them
speak on the radio. They are using so-called
jihad-mobiles, i.e. cars stuffed with
explosives, which they drive towards the Russian
troops. But they do not achieve anything, and
they will fail in the end. Who are they, then,
if not neo-Nazis? By such actions, they are
destroying their own country and their own
statehood.
That is why one of our key demands is
demilitarization. In other words, we are helping
people of Donbass by working towards the neutral
status of Ukraine and the demilitarization of
the country. We have to know with certainty what
weapons are there, where they are deployed, and
who controls them. A number of options are on
the table. We are discussing them now, including
with the Kiev government representatives in our
talks in Belarus. We are grateful to the
President Lukashenko for organizing the meetings
and helping us to conduct these negotiations.
Our proposals are on the table for the groups of
the negotiators from Kiev to study. We hope that
Kiev will respond positively to our proposals.
This is pretty much all I wanted to say.
Please, let us continue.
Schvidko, Yulia, the second pilot of the
Aeroflot airline. Vladimir Vladimirovich, good
afternoon. My question is about the current
situation. Many rumors are circulating about
possible introduction of the marshal law,
drafting of volunteers and reservists, and that
the draftees will be sent to Ukraine. Could you
clarify whether the marshal law will be declared
and whether the drafted soldiers will be
deployed to Ukraine.
Many of what we now see and what is happening
is undoubtedly a technique to fight against
Russia. By the way, the sanctions imposed today
are close to a declaration of a war. But
fortunately, we are not there yet. I believe
that our so-called “partners” still retain some
understanding of what a war would mean and what
danger it presents for everybody. That is
despite that irresponsible statements, such as
made by the British Foreign Minister, when she
blurted that NATO could involve itself in the
conflict. At that point, we had to immediately
make a decision to put our strategic forces on
high alert. They reacted by saying that they did
not mean anything of the sort. However, nobody
put the Minister in her place, and nobody
disavowed her statement. No one said anything to
us about that statement, like it was her
personal opinion, do not pay attention, or
something like that. Nothing. What are we
supposed to think about that? That is why we
reacted the way we did.
Now about your question. The marshal law is
introduced by the order of the President
supported by the Federation Council in the case
of the external aggression, specifically in the
regions where the military activity takes place.
We are not in that situation now, and I hope
will not be. This is first. The second point –
there is also, in addition to the marshal law, a
special status. This status is also declared by
the Federation Council in case of a significant
internal threat. The third regime is the state
of emergency, which is usually declared in
particular regions, although could also be
adopted in the entire territory of the country.
This regime is for technological and natural
disasters. Thanks God, this is also not
happening. We are not planning to declare any of
these regimes on the territory of the Russian
Federation. There is no need for that today.
We can see that attempts are being made to
stir up trouble in our society, which is again a
conformation of my words that we are dealing
with not just the radicals but with the
neo-Nazis. Here people are expressing their
opinion about what they like or dislike in our
action in Ukraine. But there, in Ukraine, people
that express the opinions similar to those
expressed by the so-called ‘liberal” part of our
society, are being detained on the streets and
shot – we do have confirmation of that. Our
special services are now collecting this
information and we will be presenting it soon.
Our liberal intellectuals are protesting,
whereas in Ukraine people that say anything in
favor of Russia are been executed without trial.
I repeat, that the marshal law is declared in
case of the external aggression, which I hope
will not happen despite irresponsible statements
of some officials. We hear that a no fly zone
should be established over the Ukrainian
territory. This is impossible to do in the
territory of Ukraine itself; this is only
possible to organize from the territories of the
neighboring countries. However, we will consider
any movement in this direction as active
participation in the military conflict by a
country, the territory of which is used to
create danger for our servicemen. We will in a
second consider them as a party to the military
conflict. I hope this is also understood, and it
will not come to that.
Only professional military personnel are
taking part in this operation, officers and
contract servicemen. Not a single drafted
soldier is participating, and we are not
planning to send them to Ukraine, and we will
not. I repeat only men who have made a voluntary
responsible decision in their lives – to defend
their country – are in Ukraine, and they are
doing their duty with honor. Why this is the
case, why we have the right to say these words,
I have just explained to you. This also applied
to reserve personnel undergoing periodic
military training – we are not planning to
deploy them to Ukraine. They are summoned to the
military training on the regular basis – this
happens now and will be happening in the future
– but we will not enlist these people for the
active military service, and they will not
participate in this conflict. We have sufficient
resources to achieve our objectives employing
only our professional army.
I would like to comment on the military
operation itself. I know many rumors and stories
are being circulating. I do not have much time
to learn about this, but I have been informed
that people talk a lot about what is happening
and how the operation is proceeding. All
analysts know what is going on, so I am not
going to reveal any secrets here. We could have
acted in many different ways. We could have
helped the Donbass republics directly on the
separation line, i.e. on the front, using our
Russian army to support them. But in such case,
considering the unconditional support by the
West of the radical nationalists, the Ukrainian
side would have received constant support by
weapons, material, ammunition, and all.
That is why our General Staff and the
Ministry of Defense decided on a different
strategy. First that was done is the elimination
of the military infrastructure. Not entirely,
but largely. The weapon depots, ammunition
depots, aviation, air defense systems. The
destruction of the air defense systems requires
certain time. You are civilians but you do work
in aviation. You understand that these systems
need to be uncovered and then destroyed; by now
this work is largely done. That is what brings
about the demands for a no fly zone. However, an
attempt to put this into effect would lead to
enormous and catastrophic consequences not only
for Europe, but also for the entire world. I do
believe that the people on the other side do
understand that. That is why we have chosen this
path, correctly, as it turned out. Our military
is working responsibly doing everything possible
to protect the civilians. Unfortunately, those
neo-Nazi bandits do not have any consideration
for the people. They even shoot their own
servicemen who do not want to continue fighting
– we do have evidence of that. Yes, those
nationalists, neo-Nazis shoot their own
servicemen. The nationalists are embedded in
practically every Ukrainian military unit,
several dozens of them in each, and they act in
such a cruel way.
I repeat one more time: we will not deploy
draftees or reservists to Ukraine to participate
in this military operation. I am convinced that
our army will achieve all our objectives. I do
not doubt that for a second. This is evident
from the way the operation is proceeding, which
is strictly according to the plan, to the
schedule; all is happening the way it had been
planned by the General Staff. Oh, regarding
volunteers, the young people who come to the
recruiting stations – we are grateful to them
for their patriotic sentiments, the desire to
support their country and its army in this time.
The very fact that they come is significant.
However, their help is not required at this
time. And I am convinced will not be needed. Now
I am turning towards the camera. They will see
me and hear what I am saying – thank you.
The views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Reader financed- No
Advertising - No Government Grants -
No Algorithm - This
Is Independent
Registration is not necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.