By Ilan Pappé
The
USA Today
reported that a photo that went viral about a
high-rise in the Ukraine being hit by Russian
bombing turned out to be a high-rise from the
Gaza Strip,
demolished
by the Israeli Air Force in May 2021. A few days
before that, the Ukrainian Foreign Minister
complained to the Israeli ambassador in Kiev
that “you’re treating us like Gaza”; he was
furious that Israel did not condemn the Russian
invasion and was only interested in evicting
Israeli citizens from the state (Haaretz,
February 17, 2022). It was a mixture of
reference to the Ukrainian evacuation of
Ukrainian spouses of Palestinian men from the
Gaza Strip in May 2021, as well as a reminder to
Israel of the Ukrainian president’s full support
for Israel’s assault on the Gaza Strip in that
month (I will return to that support towards the
end of this piece).
Israel’s
assaults on Gaza should, indeed, be mentioned
and considered when evaluating the present
crisis in the Ukraine. It is not a coincidence
that photos are being confused – there are not
many high-rises that were toppled in the
Ukraine, but there is an abundance of ruined
high-rises in the Gaza Strip. However, it is not
only the hypocrisy about Palestine that emerges
when we consider the Ukraine crisis in a wider
context; it is the overall Western double
standards that should be scrutinized, without,
for one moment, being indifferent to news and
images coming to us from the war zone in the
Ukraine: traumatized children, streams of
refugees, sights of buildings ruined by bombing
and the looming danger that this is only the
beginning of a human catastrophe at the heart of
Europe.
At the same
time, those of us experiencing, reporting and
digesting the human catastrophes in Palestine
cannot escape the hypocrisy of the West and we
can point to it without belittling, for a
moment, our human solidarity and empathy with
victims of any war. We need to do this, since
the moral dishonesty underwriting the deceitful
agenda set by the Western political elites and
media will once more allow them to hide their
own racism and impunity as it will continue to
provide immunity for Israel and its oppression
of the Palestinians. I detected four false
assumptions which are at the heart of the
Western elite’s engagement with the Ukraine
crisis, so far, and have framed them as four
lessons.
Have you seen "Help Tom with medical
expenses to fight leukemia"?
I
thought you might be interested in
supporting this GoFundMe,
https://gofund.me/8b902e5a
More
details here
Please share the
fundraiser on your social media to
help spread the word.
|
Lesson One: White Refugees are Welcome;
Others Less So
The
unprecedented collective EU decision to open up
its borders to the Ukrainian refugees, followed
by a more guarded policy by Britain, cannot go
unnoticed in comparison to the closure of most
of the European gates to the refugees coming
from the Arab world and Africa since 2015. The
clear racist prioritization, distinguishing
between life seekers on the basis of color,
religion and ethnicity is abhorrent, but
unlikely to change very soon. Some European
leaders are not even ashamed to broadcast their
racism publicly
as does
the Bulgarian Prime Minister, Kiril Petkov:
“These
[the Ukrainian refugees] are not the
refugees we are used to … these people are
Europeans. These people are intelligent,
they are educated people. … This is not the
refugee wave we have been used to, people we
were not sure about their identity, people
with unclear pasts, who could have been even
terrorists…”
He is not
alone. The Western media talks about “our kind
of refugees” all the time, and this racism is
manifested clearly on the border crossings
between the Ukraine and its European neighbours.
This racist attitude, with strong Islamophobic
undertones, is not going to change, since the
European leadership is still denying the
multi-ethnic and multicultural fabric of
societies all over the continent. A human
reality created by years of European colonialism
and imperialism that the current European
governments deny and ignore and, at the same
time, these governments pursue immigration
policies that are based on the very same racism
that permeated the colonialism and imperialism
of the past.
Lesson Two: You Can Invade Iraq but not
the Ukraine
The Western
media’s unwillingness to contextualize the
Russian decision to invade within a wider – and
obvious – analysis of how the rules of the
international game changed in 2003 is quite
bewildering. It is difficult to find any
analysis that points to the fact that the US and
Britain violated international law on a state’s
sovereignty when their armies, with a coalition
of Western countries, invaded Afghanistan and
Iraq. Occupying a whole country for the sake of
political ends was not invented in this century
by Vladimir Putin; it was introduced as a
justified tool of policy by the West.
Lesson Three: Sometimes Neo-Nazism Can Be
Tolerated
The analysis
also fails to highlight some of Putin’s valid
points about the Ukraine; which by no means
justify the invasion, but need our attention
even during the invasion. Up to the present
crisis, the progressive Western media outlets,
such as
The Nation, the
Guardian, the Washington Post
etc., warned us about the growing power of
neo-Nazi groups in the Ukraine that could impact
the future of Europe and beyond. The same
outlets today dismiss the significance of
neo-Nazism in the Ukraine.
The Nation
on February 22, 2019 reported:
“Today,
increasing reports of far-right violence,
ultra nationalism and erosion of basic
freedoms are giving the lie to the West’s
initial euphoria. There are neo-Nazi pogroms
against the Roma, rampant attacks on
feminists and LGBT groups, book bans, and
state-sponsored glorification of Nazi
collaborators.”
Two years
earlier, the
Washington Post
(June 15, 2017) warned, very perceptively, that
a Ukrainian clash with Russia should not allow
us to forget about the power of neo-Nazism in
the Ukraine:
“As
Ukraine’s fight against Russian-supported
separatists continues, Kiev faces another
threat to its long-term sovereignty:
powerful right-wing ultra-nationalist
groups. These groups are not shy about using
violence to achieve their goals, which are
certainly at odds with the tolerant
Western-oriented democracy Kiev ostensibly
seeks to become.”
However,
today, the
Washington Post
adopts a dismissive attitude and calls such a
description as a “false accusation”:
“Operating
in Ukraine are several nationalist
paramilitary groups, such as the Azov
movement and Right Sector, that espouse
neo-Nazi ideology. While high-profile, they
appear to have little public support. Only
one far-right party, Svoboda, is represented
in Ukraine’s parliament, and only holds one
seat.”
The previous
warnings of an outlet such as
The Hill
(November 9,
2017), the largest independent news site in the
USA, are forgotten:
“There
are, indeed, neo-Nazi formations in Ukraine.
This has been overwhelmingly confirmed by
nearly every major Western outlet. The fact
that analysts are able to dismiss it as
propaganda disseminated by Moscow is
profoundly disturbing. It is especially
disturbing given the current surge of
neo-Nazis and white supremacists across the
globe.”
Lesson Four: Hitting High-rises is only a
War Crime in Europe
The Ukrainian
establishment does not only have a connection
with these neo-Nazi groups and armies, it is
also disturbingly and embarrassingly
pro-Israeli. One of President Volodymyr
Zelensky’s first acts was to withdraw the
Ukraine from the United Nations Committee on the
Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the
Palestinian People – the only international
tribunal that makes sure the Nakba is not denied
or forgotten.
The decision
was initiated by the Ukrainian President; he had
no sympathy for the plight of the Palestinian
refugees, nor did he consider them to be victims
of any crime. In his interviews after the last
barbaric Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip
in May 2021, he
stated
that the only tragedy in Gaza was the one
suffered by the Israelis. If this is so, than
it is only the Russians who suffer in the
Ukraine.
But Zelensky
is not alone. When it comes to Palestine, the
hypocrisy reaches a new level. One empty
high-rise hit in the Ukraine dominated the news
and prompted deep analysis about human
brutality, Putin and inhumanity. These bombings
should be condemned, of course, but it seems
that those leading the condemnation among world
leaders were silent when Israel flattened the
town of Jenin in 2000, the Al-Dahaya
neighborhood in Beirut in 2006 and the city of
Gaza in one brutal wave after the other, over
the past fifteen years. No sanctions,
whatsoever, were even discussed, let alone
imposed, on Israel for its war crimes in 1948
and ever since. In fact, in most of the Western
countries which are leading the sanctions
against Russia today, even mentioning the
possibility of imposing sanctions against Israel
is illegal and framed as anti-Semitic.
Even when
genuine human solidarity in the West is justly
expressed with the Ukraine, we cannot overlook
its racist context and Europe-centric bias. The
massive solidarity of the West is reserved for
whoever is willing to join its bloc and sphere
of influence. This official empathy is nowhere
to be found when similar, and worse, violence is
directed against non-Europeans, in general, and
towards the Palestinians, in particular.
We can
navigate as conscientious persons between our
responses to calamities and our responsibility
to point out hypocrisy that in many ways paved
the way for such catastrophes. Legitimizing
internationally the invasion of sovereign
countries and licensing the continued
colonization and oppression of others, such as
Palestine and its people, will lead to more
tragedies, such as the Ukrainian one, in the
future, and everywhere on our planet.
Ilan Pappé is a professor at the
University of Exeter. He was formerly a senior
lecturer in political science at the University
of Haifa. He is the author of The Ethnic
Cleansing of Palestine, The Modern Middle East,
A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two
Peoples, and Ten Myths about Israel. Pappé is
described as one of Israel’s 'New Historians'
who, since the release of pertinent British and
Israeli government documents in the early 1980s,
have been rewriting the history of Israel’s
creation in 1948. He contributed this article to
The Palestine Chronicle.
The views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Reader financed- No
Advertising - No Government Grants -
No Algorithm - This
Is Independent
Registration is not necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.