U.S. is shielding Israel from apartheid claim
and itself from complicity charges
By Ramona Wadi
May 03, 2021 "Information
Clearing House" - - "
MEM"
- The Palestinians
mentioned apartheid in connection with Israel long
before B'Tselem used the description. Now it is the
turn of Human Rights Watch (HRW) to — rightfully, if
belatedly — accuse Israel of apartheid in its latest
report
titled A Threshold Crossed: Israeli
Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and
Persecution. Also belated, but still welcome,
is HRW's recognition that the "temporary" nature of
Israel's military occupation of Palestine is no
longer an accurate depiction of an ongoing
colonisation process that the international
community has done nothing to halt.
HRW says that its
apartheid definition comes not from comparisons with
South Africa, but is based upon the systematic
violence of demographic change, oppression and
control of the Palestinian people. "When these three
elements occur together, they amount to the crime of
apartheid."
A US State Department
spokesperson said that the Biden administration
rejects HRW's report. "It is not the view of
this administration that Israel's actions constitute
apartheid," it announced, not surprisingly. The
department no doubt wishes to shield its client
state from the very serious apartheid allegation,
and itself from equally serious complicity charges.
Israel, of course, is
none too pleased at the renewed scrutiny of its
policies and actions. With a pending investigation
by the International Criminal Court which Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected, and
B'Tselem's January accusations of apartheid coming
from within, so to speak, the democratic façade
which has served the colonial state so well with the
international community has been dented.
How far reaching the
impact will be remains to be seen. The duality of
calling Israel an apartheid state while emphasising
its legitimacy is a contradiction that bolsters the
settler-colonial entity's policies and practices.
The same goes for the two-state compromise, which
has facilitated Israel's apartheid by placing the
burden upon the Palestinians to make concessions to
their coloniser.
Predictably, Israel's
Foreign Ministry accused HRW of an anti-Israel
agenda, the same allegation levelled at the UN and
its institutions despite the fact that the
international organisation has played a major role
in enabling the Zionist colonisation of Palestine.
"The fictional claims that HRW concocted are both
preposterous and false," bleated the ministry.
To call HRW out for
having an anti-Israel agenda is absurd. Many human
rights organisations, HRW included, have routinely
given Israel the benefit of the doubt in the past,
shifting the onus of blame upon Palestinians and
using terminology such as "conflict" to evade the
reality of settler-colonialism and related violence
by a nuclear-armed state against a largely civilian
population. Israel's "security" and "self-defence"
narrative, after all, is so widely promoted by the
UN and world leaders, that it is basically exempt
from criticism. Moreover, the Israeli narrative has
shielded it from accusations of war crimes and
apartheid for decades, due to the international
community's insistence on the Zionist state's
"legitimacy", despite its contempt for international
laws, conventions and institutions.
US President Joe
Biden's approach to Israel's apartheid practices
speaks volumes about Washington's insincere rhetoric
about Palestinians enjoying equal rights with
Israelis. It was only a few weeks ago that Secretary
of State Antony Blinken urged this to be rectified,
within the context of the two-state paradigm which
has contributed to the entrenching of Israel's
apartheid system.
The joint US-Israeli
expectation is that Israel will continue to commit
apartheid and other crimes while the international
community normalises and accepts them. Considering
the military aid that Israel receives from the US —
$3 billion every year — it is clear that
Biden and his successors will need to alter US
legislation, which precludes American aid going to
countries guilty of human rights abuses, rather than
admit that Israel is, indeed, an apartheid state.
No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is
Independent Media
Registration is necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.
|