People's
Tribunal on the Iraq War Set to Open Thursday
By Real News
December 01,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Real
News" -CODEPINK cofounder Jodie Evans and attorney Inder Comar
say Bush administration officials to be held accountable
for the deaths, costs, and violations of international
law due to the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation
Transcript
KIM BROWN:
Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Kim Brown in
Baltimore.
So, to date, no one has been held accountable for the
disastrous war in Iraq where at least half a million
Iraqi civilians were killed and nearly 5,000 US troops
died. It's not hard to see that the lead-up to the war,
basically a campaign of disinformation and the
manipulation of intelligence, as anything short of
intentional. And, in an effort to ascribe responsibility
for what happened in Iraq and the lead up to the
invasion, there will be a people's tribunal on the war
and it will be held this weekend, December 1st and 2nd
at the University of the District of Columbia, sponsored
in part by Code Pink, and we will be live-streaming it
right her on The Real News Network.
And joining us to discuss and to preview the tribunal,
we're joined with Inder Comar, he is the Legal Director
at Comar LLP. He's also the Executive Director of Just
Atonement which is the legal non-profit dedicated to
tackling the issues of war and climate change. He lives
and works in San Francisco and in New York. And we're
also joined today with Jodie Evans, she's the Co-Founder
and Co-Director of Code Pink. Thank you both for so much
for being here.
JODIE EVANS: Thank you for having us.
INDER COMAR: Yes, thank you.
KIM BROWN: Well, Jodie, let's get started with you. So
you are a Co-Founder of Code Pink. Code Pink is putting
this tribunal together this weekend here in Washington,
DC. So give us an idea of what to expect over the two
days of testimony. I know there's different
presentations to be made on the 1st and on the 2nd.
JODIE EVANS: So, you know, the tribunal was created
because Obama said when he came into office, "We're
going to look forward and not backward." And by looking
forward and not backward weve missed the opportunity to
hold those accountable for the lies that took us into
the Iraq War and the costs are innumerable, but they're
not talked about.
And what's great is Inder Comar, who's an attorney, who
has the only lawsuit against the Bush Administration,
has been calling on accountability but this tribunal is
a people's tribunal that says, "Here are the lies. Here
are all the lies that happened." And we will hear from
Generals and members of the State Department, to the
media that perpetrated the lies and how they saw that
happening, including an editor at Fox News, who is the
editor to the White House where he was told to push the
lies, even though they knew they were lies. There'll be
someone from the CIA who talked about how, at the CIA,
they were told to try to drum up evidence that wasn't
available. We will hear from soldiers and families of
soldiers who were killed and who committed suicide. We
will hear from people in cities, the cost to the cities
and it ends with Ciara Taylor of Dream Defenders
exposing, you know, how these costs affect poverty,
racism, Islamophobia and the militarization of our
cities. And we see this around our country right now
where US cities look just like what's happening in
Baghdad or even Gaza.
And I was in Standing Rock last weekend, and there we
were crossing the river to stand against the drillers,
and above us were men in uniforms that looked like
military uniforms and behind them were tanks. So, we
want to show that it was lies that took us to war, it
was an illegal, immoral and unjust war and the
consequences, the costs of that war are innumerable.
They are global and they are local.
KIM BROWN: Inder, talk to us about your lawsuit that
Jodie just mentioned that you have pending.
INDER CUMAR: Yes, absolutely. So, I represent an Iraqi
woman who filed a lawsuit in 2013 against members of the
Bush Administration under international law, principles
of international law, alleging that members of the Bush
Administration, including President Bush, Vice President
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleezza
Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, committing whats known as the
Crime of Aggression against the People of Iraq. And, as
a result, led to trillions of dollars of military
expenditures and damages against the Iraqi people. And
so, the case is pending in the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeal. We had a scheduled hearing date on December 12,
which, if it happens, and it looks like it might, will
be deemed the first time since World War II that an
American judge or judges will hear allegations of
aggression against another country and whether or not
leaders should be responsible for that.
So, the case is really trying to make a point that
leadership should be held accountable for these acts.
And, you know, as part of the pleadings, we're making
the point that this just wasn't a mistake, it's not like
people mistakenly decided to invade Iraq. The
allegations are that this was intended, it was
intentional. It was knowing and it was illegal and
unlawful. And we're asking the courts to review the
allegations and the complaint, strip away the immunity
that was given to the defendants by the District Court
and to let the case proceed in a civil matter in the
District Court.
KIM BROWN: Jodie, at the end of the tribunal over the
weekend, what do you intend to do with this testimony
and the evidence presented? Do you intend to bring this
to maybe a larger body like the International Criminal
Court? Is this going to stay in the US or are we doing
something additional with this information once you all
have it, after people give their testimony?
JODIE EVANS: Since we started the tribunal we've been
collecting signatures to present to President Obama,
calling him to create a Commission on Truth and
Accountability, and also to stop the authorization of
the use of military force, 2001 and 2002. In addition,
the tribunal is going to live online and all the
tribunals that have happened before around the Iraq War
are partnered with this tribunal -- the World Tribunal
on Iraq, the Brussels Tribunal, the Russell Tribunal,
the Kuala Lumpur Tribunal -- and it's all the evidence
pulled together and it will be available in a way that's
easily accessible. I'd say we've created five books and
three documentaries, but they're in bite-sized pieces
where you're led in by a four-minute testimony into the
work of 15 years, and sometimes 25 years, of the person
testifying.
And so, we've learned in creating the tribunal that
there is a whole generation that's really grown up
inside the war on terror and doesn't know anything
different and knows little about the lives and the cost
of the Iraq War, all that affect them now and affect
their future. So, we hope to continue it as a tool,
continue for it to grow and continue it to support
raising the costs and the lies that take us to war,
including into 2017 when, as we know, when things get
bad, presidents like to take us to war where we can
raise it up easily and it's also been something really
united, the anti-war movement, we've come back together.
Many of the partners that have worked for the last 15
years together so that we can be united and ready or
whatever comes in 2017.
KIM BROWN: Inder, do you think anyone from the Bush
Administration ought to be indicted for war crimes as a
result of the role that they played leading up to the
Iraq invasion? And is there any possibility or an
opening for that?
INDER COMAR: Well, I think at minimum there needs to be
some type of legal proceeding, a legal investigation
into what happened in Iraq. I think as time goes on, it
comes abundantly clear that crimes were committed. And
we know for a fact that torture happened in Iraq and
probably in Afghanistan and Guantanamo and these places.
We knew for a fact that there were potentially war
crimes that have been committed. And what International
Law says and what the Nuremberg Trials say in law, is
that the root cause of all those war crimes is the
initial act, a crime of aggression, going to war
unlawfully, illegally.
So, I do think there needs to be at least a minimum of
legal investigation into what happened by a prosecutor
or by a court, with subpoena power, to investigate these
crimes and to remind leaders all over the world that
there are rules in place, there are laws in place,
especially when it comes to war and that after World War
II there was a system that was created that attempted to
unite nations around this principle of collective action
and collective security. The idea being that the world's
a safer place when countries can sit and discuss their
problems and not rush to war. And what we saw with Iraq,
unfortunately, was such a horrible attack(?) pattern
where leaders decided, I think, and what we allege in
the case, they decided intentionally to disregard all
those rules and norms to execute an invasion that they
had wanted to do and that ... was inspired by
neo-conservative ideology about American military
supremacy.
And that's going to make the world a much less safe
place. It has made the world a much less safe and secure
place for everybody, including Americans. People died,
so yeah, I think there does need to be at least some
type of investigation and, if warranted, under various
rules of procedure there ought to be indictments
involved.
KIM BROWN: Jodie, I know you mentioned that you wanted
to present this information collected at the tribunal to
the Obama Administration in hopes that he creates a
committee, I think as you mentioned, of Truth and
Accountability. But does President Obama have any
complicity here? We know he was not in power in 2003
when the Iraqi invasion began. However, he did promise
to end the war and if you Google the Iraqi War it says
it technically ended in 2011 but there are still
currently 5,000 US troops in Iraq right now, as far as,
from all points and purposes they are engaged in combat
activities. So does President Obama have any complicity
for the perpetuating the ongoing conflict in Iraq that
still engages US troops?
JODIE EVANS: Well, the people that we've been
interviewing in Iraq certainly believe so. But the
complicity is in a way he's turned his back on giving
Iraq to Iran. And that the process of who is in control
in Iraq right now is really mafias. And mafias that have
been building themselves up over 20 to 25 years, some of
them with the help of the United States, and that
because Obama doesn't like conflict, they feel that he's
not engaged. He hasn't responded to their needs and they
very much hold him accountable for what's happened.
But I think the United States is responsible for a lot
of what's happening the Middle East because we continue
to sell weapons to Saudi Arabia, this is... were kind of
above a proxy war being played out by Iran and Saudi
Arabia which has been going on for a very, very long
time. And it's really criminal that we've been the
weapon dealer for this war that so many people are at
the effect of. If you follow the thread it comes back to
United States and that's part of what we want to be able
to do in the tribunal is show some of these lies and
show where we try to obfuscate them by lying and by
really not showing where we're playing the game and
blaming it on others.
KIM BROWN: Indeed. Well, the People's Tribunal on the
War in Iraq will be held this weekend December 1st and
2nd at the University of the District of Columbia at
their Law School. It's being brought to you by Code Pink
and it will be live-streamed right here on The Real News
Network. Today we have been speaking with Inder Comar,
he is the Legal Director at Comar LLP, also the
Executive Director of Just Atonement. And we also have
been joined with Jodie Evans she is a Co-Founder and
Co-Director of Code Pink. Thank you both very much for
being here.
JODIE EVANS: Thank you for having us.
INDER COMAR: Thank you.
KIM BROWN: And thank you for watching The Real News
Network.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)