The announcement last week by the United
States of the largest military aid
package in its history – to Israel – was
a win for both sides.
Israeli prime
minister Benjamin Netanyahu could boast
that his lobbying had boosted aid from
$3.1 billion a year to $3.8bn – a 22 per
cent increase – for a decade starting in
2019.
Mr Netanyahu has presented this as a
rebuff to those who accuse him of
jeopardising Israeli security interests
with his government’s repeated affronts
to the White House.
In the past weeks alone, defence
minister Avigdor Lieberman has compared
last year’s nuclear deal between
Washington and Iran with the 1938 Munich
pact, which bolstered Hitler; and Mr
Netanyahu has implied that US opposition
to settlement expansion is the same as
support for the “ethnic cleansing” of
Jews.
American president Barack Obama,
meanwhile, hopes to stifle his own
critics who insinuate that he is
anti-Israel. The deal should serve as a
fillip too for Hillary Clinton, the
Democratic party’s candidate to succeed
Mr Obama in November’s election.
In reality, however, the Obama
administration has quietly punished Mr
Netanyahu for his misbehaviour. Israeli
expectations of a $4.5bn-a-year deal
were whittled down after Mr Netanyahu
stalled negotiations last year as he
sought to recruit Congress to his battle
against the Iran deal.
In fact, Israel already receives
roughly $3.8bn – if Congress’s
assistance on developing missile defence
programmes is factored in. Notably,
Israel has been forced to promise not to
approach Congress for extra funds.
The deal takes into account neither
inflation nor the dollar’s depreciation
against the shekel.
A bigger blow still is the White
House’s demand to phase out a special
exemption that allowed Israel to spend
nearly 40 per cent of aid locally on
weapon and fuel purchases. Israel will
soon have to buy all its armaments from
the US, ending what amounted to a
subsidy to its own arms industry.
Nonetheless, Washington’s renewed
military largesse – in the face of
almost continual insults – inevitably
fuels claims that the Israeli tail is
wagging the US dog. Even The New York
Times has described the aid package as
“too big”.
Since the 1973 war, Israel has
received at least $100bn in military
aid, with more assistance hidden from
view. Back in the 1970s, Washington paid
half of Israel’s military budget. Today
it still foots a fifth of the bill,
despite Israel’s economic success.
But the US expects a return on its
massive investment. As the late Israeli
politician-general Ariel Sharon once
observed, Israel has been a US
“aircraft carrier” in the Middle East,
acting as the regional bully and
carrying out operations that benefit
Washington.
Almost no one blames the US for
Israeli attacks that wiped out Iraq’s
and Syria’s nuclear programmes. A
nuclear-armed Iraq or Syria would have
deterred later US-backed moves at regime
overthrow, as well as countering the
strategic advantage Israel derives from
its own nuclear arsenal.
In addition, Israel’s US-sponsored
military prowess is a triple boon to the
US weapons industry, the country’s most
powerful lobby. Public funds are
siphoned off to let Israel buy goodies
from American arms makers. That, in
turn, serves as a shop window for other
customers and spurs an endless and
lucrative game of catch-up in the rest
of the Middle East.
The first F-35 fighter jets to arrive
in Israel in December – their various
components produced in 46 US states –
will increase the clamour for the
cutting-edge warplane.
Israel is also a “front-line
laboratory”, as former Israeli army
negotiator Eival Gilady admitted at the
weekend, that develops and field-tests
new technology Washington can later use
itself.
The US is planning to buy back the
missile interception system Iron Dome –
which neutralises battlefield threats of
retaliation – it largely paid for.
Israel works closely too with the US in
developing cyberwarfare, such as the
Stuxnet worm that damaged Iran’s
civilian nuclear programme.
But the clearest message from
Israel’s new aid package is one
delivered to the Palestinians:
Washington sees no pressing strategic
interest in ending the occupation. It
stood up to Mr Netanyahu over the Iran
deal but will not risk a damaging clash
over Palestinian statehood.
Some believe that Mr Obama signed the
aid package to win the credibility
necessary to overcome his domestic
Israel lobby and pull a rabbit from the
hat: an initiative, unveiled shortly
before he leaves office, that corners Mr
Netanyahu into making peace.
Hopes have been raised by an expected
meeting at the United Nations in New
York on Wednesday. But their first talks
in 10 months are planned only to
demonstrate unity to confound critics of
the aid deal.
If Mr Obama really wanted to pressure
Mr Netanyahu, he would have used the aid
agreement as leverage. Now Mr Netanyahu
need not fear US financial retaliation,
even as he intensifies effective
annexation of the West Bank.
Mr Netanyahu has drawn the right
lesson from the aid deal – he can act
against the Palestinians with continuing
US impunity.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/2016-09-19/palestinians-lose-in-us-military-aid-deal-with-israel/#sthash.fL4Eq28N.dpuf
Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton - Final
Presidential Debate 2016
Video
Trump vs Clinton Last Presidential Debate -
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (10/19/2016)
Posted October 20, 2016
Transcript
Chris Wallace: I'm Chris Wallace of Fox
News. And I welcome you to the third and
final of the 2016 presidential debates
between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
and Donald J. Trump.
This
debate is sponsored by the commission on
presidential debates. The commission has
designed the format, six roughly 15-minute
segments with two-minute answers to the
first question, then open discussion for the
rest of each segment. Both campaigns have
agreed to those rules. For the record, I
decided the topics and the questions in each
topic. None of those questions has been
shared with the commission or the two
candidates. The audience here in the hall
has promised to remain silent. No cheers,
boos, or other interruptions, so we and you
can focus on what the candidates have to
say. No noise except right now as we welcome
the Democratic nominee for president,
Secretary Clinton, and the Republican
nominee for president, Mr. Trump.
Secretary Clinton, Mr. Trump, welcome. Let's
get right to it. The first topic is the
Supreme Court. We — you both talked briefly
about the court in the last debate, but I
want to drill down on this because the next
president will almost certainly have at
least one appointment and likely or possibly
two or three appointments, which means that
you will in effect determine the balance of
the court for what could be the next quarter
century. First of all, where do you want to
see the court take the country? And
secondly, what's your view on how the
Constitution should be interpreted? Do the
founders' words mean what they say, or is it
a living document to be applied flexibly
according to changing circumstances? In this
segment, Secretary Clinton, go first, you
have two minutes.
Hillary Clinton: Thank you very much, Chris,
and thanks to UNLV for hosting us. When we
talk about the Supreme Court it really
raises the central issue in this election,
namely, what kind of country are we going to
be? What kind of opportunities will we
provide for our citizens?
What
kind of rights will Americans have? And I
feel strongly that the Supreme Court needs
to stand on the side of the American people,
not on the side of the powerful corporations
and the wealthy.
For
me, that means that we need a Supreme Court
that will stand up on behalf of women's
rights, on behalf of the rights of the LGBT
community, that will stand up and say no to
Citizens United, a decision that
has undermined the election system in the
country because of the way it permits dark,
unaccountable money to come into our
electoral system. I have major disagreements
with my opponent about these issues and
others that will be before the Supreme
Court, but I feel that at this point in our
country's history, it is important that we
not reverse marriage equality, that we not
reverse Roe v. Wade, that we stand
up against Citizens United, we
stand up for the rights of people in the
workplace, that we stand up and basically
say the Supreme Court should represent all
of us. That's how I see the court, and the
kind of people that I would be looking to
nominate to the court would be in the great
tradition of standing up to the powerful,
standing up on behalf of our rights as
Americans, and I look forward to having that
opportunity.
I
would hope that the Senate would do its job
and confirm the nominee that President Obama
has sent to them. That's the way the
Constitution fundamentally should operate.
The president nominates and then the Senate
advises and consents or not.
But
they go forward with the process.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton, thank you. Mr.
Trump, same question. Where do you want to
see the court take the country, and how do
you believe the Constitution should be
interpreted?
Donald
Trump: Well, first of all, it's great to be
with you and thank you, everybody. The
Supreme Court, it's what it's all about. Our
country is so, so, just so imperative that
we have the right justices. Something
happened recently where Justice Ginsburg
made some very inappropriate statements
toward me and toward a tremendous number of
people, many, many millions of people that I
represent, and she was forced to apologize,
and apologize she did. But these were
statements that should never, ever have been
made.
We
need a Supreme Court that, in my opinion, is
going to uphold the Second Amendment and all
amendments, but the Second Amendment, which
is under absolute siege. I believe if my
opponent should win this race, which I truly
don't think will happen, we will have a
Second Amendment which will be a very, very
small replica of what it is right now. But I
feel that it's absolutely important that we
recall because of the fact that it is under
such trauma. I feel that the justices that I
am going to appoint — and I've named 20 of
them — the justices that I'm going to
appoint will be pro-life, they will have a
conservative bent, they will be protecting
the Second Amendment, they are great
scholars in all cases, and they're people of
tremendous respect. They will interpret the
Constitution the way the founders wanted it
interpreted.
And I
believe that's very, very important. I don't
think we should have justices appointed that
decide what they want to hear.
It's
all about the Constitution of — and so
important, the Constitution the way it was
meant to be and those are the people that I
will appoint.
Wallace: We now have 10 minutes for open
discussion. I want to focus on two issues
that in fact by the justices that you name
could end up changing the existing law of
the land. First is one that you mentioned,
Mr. Trump, and that is guns. Secretary
Clinton, you said last year, and let me
quote, the Supreme Court is wrong on the
Second Amendment.
Now,
in fact, in the 2008 Heller case,
the court ruled that there is a
constitutional right to bear arms but a
right that is reasonably limited. Those were
the words of Judge Antonin Scalia, who wrote
the decision. What's wrong with that?
Clinton: Well, first of all, I support the
Second Amendment. I lived in Arkansas for 18
wonderful years. I represented upstate New
York. I understand and respect the tradition
of gun ownership. It goes back to the
founding of our country. But I also believe
that there can be and must be reasonable
regulation. Because I support the Second
Amendment doesn't mean that I want people
who shouldn't have guns to be able to
threaten you, kill you or members of your
family.
And so
when I think about what we need to do, we
have 33,000 people a year who die from guns.
I think we need comprehensive background
checks. We need to close the online
loophole, close the gun show loophole. There
are other matters that I think are sensible
that are the kind of reforms that would make
a difference that are not in any way
conflicting with the Second Amendment.
You
mentioned the Heller decision, and
what I was saying that you reference, Chris,
was that I disagreed with the way the court
applied the Second Amendment in that case.
Because what the District of Columbia was
trying to do was protect toddlers from guns.
They wanted people with guns to safely store
them, and the court didn't accept that
reasonable regulation, but they've accepted
many other.
I see
no conflict between saving people's lives
and defending the Second Amendment.
Wallace: Let me bring Mr. Trump in here. The
bipartisan open debate coalition got
millions of votes on questions to ask here,
and this was, in fact, one of the top
questions that they got. How will you ensure
the Second Amendment is protected? You just
heard Secretary Clinton's answer. Does she
persuade you that, while you may differ on
regulation, that she supports a Second
Amendment right to bear arms?
Trump:
The DC v. Heller decision was very
strongly and she was extremely angry about
it. I watched. She was very, very angry when
upheld. And Justice Scalia was so involved,
and it was a well-crafted decision, but
Hillary was extremely upset, extremely
angry, and people that believe in the Second
Amendment and believe in it very strongly
were very upset with what she had to say.
Wallace: Let me bring in Secretary Clinton.
Were you extremely upset?
Clinton: Well, I was upset because,
unfortunately, dozens of toddlers injure
themselves, even kill people with guns
because, unfortunately, not everyone who has
loaded guns in their homes takes appropriate
precautions.
But
there's no doubt that I respect the Second
Amendment, that I also believe there's an
individual right to bear arms. That is not
in conflict with sensible, commonsense
regulation. And you know, look, I understand
that Donald's been strongly supported by the
NRA, the gun lobby's on his side, they're
running millions of dollars of ads against
me. And I regret that, because what I would
like to see is for people to come together
and say of course we're going to protect and
defend the Second Amendment, but we're going
to do it in a way that tries to save some of
these 33,000 lives that we lose every year.
Wallace: Let me bring Mr. Trump back into
that. Because, in fact, you oppose any
limits on assault weapons, any limits on
magazines. You support a national right to
carry law. Why, sir?
Trump:
Let me just tell you before we go any
further, in Chicago, which has the toughest
gun laws in the United States, probably you
could say by far they have more gun violence
than any other city. So we have the toughest
laws and you have tremendous gun violence.
I am a
very strong supporter of the Second
Amendment. And I don't know if Hillary was
saying it in a sarcastic manner, but I'm
very proud to have the endorsement of the
NRA. It's the earliest endorsement they've
ever given to anybody who ran for president.
I'm very honored by all of that.
We are
going to appoint justices. This is the best
way to help the Second Amendment. We're
going to appoint justices that will feel
very seriously about the Second Amendment.
That will not do damage to the Second
Amendment.
Wallace: Let's pick up on another issue
which divides you and the justices that
whoever ends up winning this election
appoints could have a dramatic effect there,
and that's the issue of abortion. Mr. Trump,
you're pro-life. But I want to ask you
specifically, do you want the court,
including the justices that you will name,
to overturn Roe v. Wade, which
includes, in fact states, a woman's right to
abortion?
Trump:
Well, if that would happen, because I am
pro-life and I will be appointing pro-life
judges, I would think that that would go
back to the individual states.
Wallace: But I'm asking you specifically —
Trump:
If they overturned it, it will go back to
the states.
Wallace: What I'm asking you, sir, is do you
want to see the court overturn? You just
said you want to see the court protect the
Second Amendment. Do you want to see the
court overturn Roe v. Wade?
Trump:
If we put another two or perhaps three
justices on, that will happen. And that will
happen automatically in my opinion because
I'm putting pro-life justices on the court.
I will say this, it will go back to the
states and the states will then make a
determination.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton?
Clinton: I strongly support Roe v. Wade,
which guarantees a constitutional right to a
woman to make the most intimate, most
difficult in many cases decisions about her
health care that one can imagine. And in
this case it's not only about Roe v.
Wade. It is about what's happening
right now in America. So many states are
putting very stringent regulations on women
that block them from exercising that choice
to the extent that they are defunding
Planned Parenthood, which, of course,
provides all kinds of cancer screenings and
other benefits for women in our country.
Donald
has said he's in favor of defunding Planned
Parenthood. He even supported shutting the
government down to defund Planned
Parenthood. I will defend Planned
Parenthood. I will defend Roe v. Wade,
and I will defend women's rights to make
their own health care decisions.
Wallace: Secretary —
Clinton: And we've come too far to have that
turn back now. Indeed, he said women should
be punished, that there should be some form
of punishment for women who obtain
abortions. And I could just not be more
opposed to that kind of thinking.
Wallace: I'm going to give you a chance to
respond, but I want to ask you, Secretary
Clinton, how far you believe the right to
abortion goes. You have been quoted as
saying that the fetus has no constitutional
rights. You also voted against a ban on
late-term partial-birth abortions. Why?
Clinton: Because Roe v. Wade very
clearly sets out that there can be
regulations on abortion so long as the life
and the health of the mother are taken into
account. And when I voted as a senator, I
did not think that that was the case. The
kinds of cases that fall at the end of
pregnancy are often the most heartbreaking,
painful decisions for families to make. I
have met with women who toward the end of
their pregnancy get the worst news one could
get, that their health is in jeopardy if
they continue to carry to term or that
something terrible has happened or just been
discovered about the pregnancy. I do not
think the United States government should be
stepping in and making those most personal
of decisions. So you can regulate if you are
doing so with the life and the health of the
mother taken into account.
Wallace: Mr. Trump, your reaction, and
particularly on this issue of late-term
partial birth abortion.
Trump:
I think it's terrible if you go with what
Hillary is saying in the ninth month you can
take the baby and rip the baby out of the
womb of the mother just prior to the birth
of the baby.
Now,
you can say that that's okay, and Hillary
can say that that's okay, but it's not okay
with me. Because based on what she's saying
and based on where she's going and where
she's been, you can take the baby and rip
the baby out of the womb in the ninth month,
only the final day. And that's not
acceptable.
Clinton: Well, that is not what happens in
these cases. And using that kind of scare
rhetoric is just terribly unfortunate. You
should meet with some of the women that I've
met with. Women I've known over the course
of my life.
This
is one of the worst possible choices that
any woman and her family has to make. I do
not believe the government should be making
it. I've been to countries where governments
forced women to have abortions like they did
in China or force women to bear children
like they used to do in Romania. I can tell
you the government has no business in the
decisions that women make with their
families in accordance with their faith,
with medical advice, and I will stand up for
that right.
Wallace: All right. Just briefly, I want to
move on.
Trump:
And honestly, nobody has business doing what
I just said, doing that as late as one or
two or three or four days prior to birth,
nobody has that.
Wallace: All right. Let's move on to the
subject of immigration, and there is almost
no issue that separates the two of you more
than the issue of immigration.
Actually, there are a lot of issues. Mr.
Trump, you want to build a wall. Secretary
Clinton, you've offered no specific plan for
how you want to secure our southern border.
Mr.
Trump, you are calling for major
deportations. Secretary Clinton, you say
within your first 100 days as president
you'll offer a package that includes a
pathway to citizenship. The question really
is why are you right and your opponent
wrong? Mr. Trump, you go first in this
segment. You have two minutes.
Trump:
First of all, she wants to give amnesty,
which is a disaster and very unfair to all
the people who are waiting in line for many
years. We need strong borders. In the
audience tonight we have four mothers of — I
mean, these are unbelievable people that
I've gotten to know over a period of years
whose children have been killed, brutally
killed by people who came into the country
illegally. You have mothers, fathers,
relatives all over the county. They're
coming in illegally.
Drugs
are pouring in through the border. We have
no country if we have no border. Hillary
wants to give amnesty, she wants to have
open borders.
As you
know, the Border Patrol agency, 16,500-plus
ICE last week endorsed me. First time
they've ever endorsed a candidate. It means
their job is tougher, but they know what's
going on. They know it better than anybody.
They want strong borders. They feel we have
to have strong borders. I was up in New
Hampshire, the biggest complaint they have
with all the problems going on in the world,
many of the problems caused by Hillary
Clinton and by Barack Obama, all of the
problems, their single biggest problem is
heroin that pours across our southern
borders, just pouring and destroying their
youth. It's poisoning the blood of their
youth and plenty of other people.
We
have to have strong borders. We have to keep
the drugs out of our country. Right now
we're getting the drugs, they're getting the
cash. We need strong borders. We absolute —
we cannot give amnesty.
Now I
want to build a wall. We need the wall. The
border patrol, ICE, they all want the wall.
We stop the drugs, shore up the border.
One of
my first acts will be to get all of the drug
lords, we have some bad, bad people in this
country that have to go out. We'll get them
out, secure the border, and once the border
is secured, at a later date we'll make a
determination as to the rest. But we have
some bad hombres here and we're going to get
them out.
Wallace: Mr. Trump, thank you. Same question
to you, Secretary Clinton, basically why are
you right and Mr. Trump is wrong?
Clinton: As he was talking, I was thinking
about a young girl I met here in Las Vegas,
Carla, who was very worried that her parents
might be deported because she was born in
this country but they were not. They work
hard and do everything they can to give her
a good life. And you're right, I don't want
to rip families apart. I don't want to be
sending parents away from children. I don't
want to see the deportation force that
Donald has talked about in action in our
country. We have 11 million undocumented
people. They have 4 million American citizen
children — 15 million people. He said as
recently as a few weeks ago in Phoenix that
every undocumented person would be subject
to deportation.
Now,
here's what that means. It means you would
have to have a massive law enforcement
presence where law enforcement officers
would be going school to school, home to
home, business to business, rounding up
people who are undocumented, and we would
then have to put them on trains, on buses,
to get them out of our country. I think that
is an idea that is not in keeping with who
we are as a nation. I think it's an idea
that would rip our country apart. I have
been for border security for years.
I
voted for border security in the United
States Senate. And my comprehensive
immigration reform plan of course includes
border security. But I want to put our
resources where I think they're most needed
— getting rid of any violent person, anybody
who should be deported, we should deport
them. When it comes to the wall that Donald
talks about building, he went to Mexico. He
had a meeting with the Mexican president.
Didn't even raise it. He choked, then got
into a Twitter war because the Mexican
president said, “We're not paying for that
wall.”
So I
think we are both a nation of immigrants and
we are a nation of laws and that we can act
accordingly. That's why I'm introducing
immigration reform within the first 100 days
with a path to citizenship.
Trump:
Chris, I think it's an issue to respond to.
First of all, I had a very good meeting with
the president of Mexico. Very nice man. We
will be doing very much better with Mexico
on trade deals, believe me, than the NAFTA
deal by her husband, one of the worst deals
of any kind signed by anybody. It's a
disaster. Hillary Clinton wanted the wall.
Hillary Clinton fought for the wall in 2006
or thereabouts.
Now,
she never gets anything done, so naturally
the wall wasn't built. But Hillary Clinton
want the wall. We're a country of laws. And
by the way —
Wallace: I'd like to hear from Secretary
Clinton.
Clinton: I voted for border security, and
there are —
Trump:
And the wall.
Clinton: There are some limited places where
that was appropriate. There’s also going to
be new technology and how best to deploy
that. But it is clear, when you look at what
Donald has been proposing — he started his
campaign bashing immigrants, calling Mexican
immigrants rapists and criminals and drug
dealers — that he has a very different view
about what we should do to deal with
immigrants. Now, what I am also arguing is
that bringing undocumented immigrants out
from the shadows, putting them in the formal
economy, will be good because employers
can't exploit them and undercut their wages.
Donald
knows a lot about this; he used undocumented
labor to build Trump Tower. He underpaid
undocumented workers, and when they
complained he said what a lot of [people]
do, you complain I'll get you deported. I
want to get the economy working and not let
employers like Donald exploit undocumented
workers that hurts them and undocumented
workers.
Trump:
President Obama has moved millions of people
out. Nobody knows about it, nobody talks
about it. But under Obama, millions of
people have been moved out of this country,
they've been deported. She doesn't want to
say that, but that's what's happened. And
that's what's happened big league. As far as
moving these people out and moving, we have
a country or we don't. We're a country of
laws. We either have a border or we don't.
You can come back in and you can become a
citizen, but it's very unfair — we have
million of people that did it the right way.
They're on line, they're waiting. We're
going to speed up the process big league
because it's very inefficient. But they're
in line and they're waiting to become
citizens. Very unfair that somebody runs
across the border, becomes a citizen. Under
her plan you have open borders. You would
have a disaster on trade. And you'll have a
disaster with your open borders. What she
doesn't say is that president Obama has
deported millions and millions of people
just the way it is. Wallace: Secretary
Clinton -- Clinton: We will not have open
borders. That is a rank mischaracterization.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton? Clinton: We'll
have secure borders but we'll also have
reform. This used to be a bipartisan issue.
Ronald Reagan was the last president --
Wallace: Excuse me. Secretary Clinton.
Clinton: Designed immigration reform and
George W. Bush supported it as well.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton, I want to clear
up your position on this issue because in a
speech you gave to a Brazilian bank for
which you were paid $225,000 we've learned
from the Wikileaks that you said this and I
want to quote, my dream is a hemispheric
common market with open trade and open
borders —Trump: Thank you.
Wallace: So that's the question. Please,
quiet, everybody. Is that your dream, open
borders?
Clinton: Well, if you went on to read the
rest of the sentence, I was talking about
energy. You know, we trade more energy with
our neighbors than we trade with the rest of
the world combined. And I do want us to have
an electric grid, energy system that crosses
borders. I think that would be a great
benefit to us. But you are very clearly
quoting from wikileaks and what's really
important about wikileaks is that the
Russian government has engaged in espionage
against Americans. They have hacked American
websites, American accounts of private
people, of institutions, then they have
given that information to Wikileaks for the
purpose of putting it on the internet.
This
has come from the highest levels of the
Russian government, clearly from Putin
himself, in an effort, as 17 of our
intelligence agencies have confirmed to
influence our election. So I actually think
the most important question of this evening,
Chris, is finally will Donald Trump admit
and condemn that the Russians are doing this
and make it clear that he will not have the
help of Putin in this election, that he
rejects Russian espionage against Americans
which he actually encouraged in the past?
Those
are the questions we need answered. We've
never had anything like this happen in any
of our elections before.
Trump:
That was a great pivot off the fact that she
wants open borders, okay? How did we get off
to Putin?
Wallace: Hold on.
Trump:
No, no.
Wallace: Hold on, folks. Because this is
going to end up getting out of control.
Let's try to keep it quiet for the
candidates and for the American people.
Trump:
Just to finish on the borders --
Wallace: Yes.
Trump:
She wants open borders. People are going to
pour into our country. People are going to
come in from Syria. She wants 550% more
people than Barack Obama, and he has
thousands and thousands of people. They have
no idea where they come from and you see, we
are going to stop radical islamic terrorism
in this country. She won't even mention the
words and neither will president Obama. So I
just want to tell you, she wants open
borders.
Now we
can talk about Putin. I don't know Putin. He
said nice things about me. If we got along
well, that would be good.
If
Russia and the United States got along well
and went after ISIS, that would be good. He
has no respect for her. He has no respect
for our president. And I'll tell you what,
we're in very serious trouble because we
have a country with tremendous numbers of
nuclear warheads, 1,800, by the way, where
they expanded and we didn't — 1800 nuclear
warheads, and she's playing chicken. Look —
[Crosstalk]
Clinton: Well, that's because he'd rather
have a puppet as president.
Trump:
No puppet, no puppet.
Clinton: And it's pretty clear --
Trump:
You're the puppet.
Clinton: It's pretty clear you won't admit.
Trump:
No, you're the puppet.
Clinton: That the Russians have engaged in
cyber attacks against the United States of
America, that you encouraged espionage
against our people, that you are willing to
spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish
list, rake up nato, do whatever he wants to
do, and that you continue to get help from
him because he has a very clear favorite in
this race so I think this is such an
unprecedented situation, we've never had a
foreign government trying to interfere in
our election.
We
have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian
and military, who have all concluded that
these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks
come from the highest levels of the Kremlin
and they are designed to influence our
election. I find that deeply disturbing.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton --
Trump:
She has no idea whether it's Russia, China
or anybody else.
Clinton: I am not quoting myself.
Trump:
She has no idea.
Clinton: There are 17 --
Trump:
You have no idea.
Clinton: 17 intelligence. Do you doubt? 17
military --
Trump:
Our country has no idea.
Clinton: And civilian agencies.
Trump:
I doubt it.
Clinton: He'd rather believe Vladimir Putin
than the military and civilian intelligence
professionals who are sworn to protect us. I
find that just absolutely —
Trump:
She doesn't like Putin because Putin has
outsmarted her at every step of the way.
Wallace: Mr. Trump --
Trump:
Excuse me.
Wallace: Mr. Trump --
Trump:
Putin has outsmarted her.
Wallace: Mr. Trump, I do get to ask some
questions.
Trump:
Yes.
Wallace: I would like to ask you this direct
question. The top national security
officials of this country do believe that
Russia is behind these hacks. Even if you
don't know for sure whether they are, do you
condemn any interference by Russia in the
American election?
Trump:
By Russia or anybody else.
Wallace: You condemn their interference?
Trump:
Of course I condemn. Of course. I don't know
Putin. I have no idea —
Wallace: I'm not asking you that.
Trump:
This is not my best friend. But if the
United States got along with Russia,
wouldn't be so bad. Let me tell you, Putin
has outsmarted her and Obama at every single
step of the way. Whether it's Syria. You
name it. Missiles. Take a look at the
start-up that they signed. The Russians have
said, according to many, many reports, I
can't believe they allowed us to do this.
They create warheads and we can't. The
Russians can't believe it. She's been
outsmarted by Putin. All you have to do is
look at the Middle East. They've taken over.
We've spent $6 trillion. They've taken over
the Middle East. She has been outsmarted and
outplayed worse than anybody I've ever seen
in any government whatsoever.
Wallace: We're a long way away from
immigration, but I'm going to let you finish
this topic. You have about 45 seconds.
Trump:
And she always will be.
Clinton: I find it ironic that he's raising
nuclear weapons. This is a person who has
been very cavalier, even casual about the
use of nuclear weapons.
Trump:
Wrong.
Clinton: Japan, Korea, even Saudi Arabia. He
said if we have them, why don't we use them,
which I think is terrifying. The bottom line
on nuclear weapons is that when the
president gives the order, it must be
followed. There's about four minutes between
the order being given and the people
responsible for launching nuclear weapons to
do so. And that's why 10 people who have had
that awesome responsibility have come out
and in an unprecedented way said they would
not trust Donald Trump with the nuclear
codes or to have his finger on the nuclear
button.
Trump:
I have 200 generals and admirals, 21
endorsing me, 21 congressional medal of
honor recipients. As far as Japan and other
countries, we are being ripped off by
everybody — we're defending other country.
We're spending a fortune doing it. They have
the bargain of the century. All I said is we
have to renegotiate these agreements because
our country cannot afford to defend Saudi
Arabia, Japan, Germany, South Korea and many
other places. We cannot continue to afford.
She took that as saying nuclear weapons.
Look,
she's been proven to be a liar on so many
different ways. This is just another lie.
Clinton: Well, I'm just quoting you --
Trump:
There's no quote. You're not going to find a
quote from me.
Clinton: Nuclear competition in Asia, you
said, you know, go ahead, enjoy yourselves,
folks. That kind of --
Trump:
And defend yourselves. And defend
yourselves. I didn't say nuclear. And defend
yourselves.
Clinton: United States has kept the peace
through our alliances. Donald wants to tear
up our alliances. I think it makes the world
safer and, frankly, it makes the United
States safer. I would work with our allies
in Asia, in Europe, in the middle East and
elsewhere. That's the only way we're going
to --
Wallace: We're going to move on to the next
topic, which is the economy. And I hope we
handle that as well as we did immigration.
You also have very different ideas about how
to get the economy growing faster. Secretary
Clinton, in your plan, government plays a
big role. You see more government spending,
more entitlements more tax credit, more
penalties. Mr. Trump you want to get
government out with less regulation. We'll
drill down into this a little more. But in
this overview, please explain to me why you
think your plan will create more jobs and
growth for this country and your opponent's
plan will not. In this round, you go first,
Secretary Clinton.
Clinton: I think when the middle class
thrives, America thrives. And so my plan is
based on growing the economy, giving middle
class families many more opportunities.
I want
us to have the biggest jobs program since
World War II, jobs and infrastructure and
advanced manufacturing. I think we can
compete with high wage countries, and I
believe we should. New jobs and clean energy
not only to fight climate change, which is a
serious problem, but to create new
opportunities and new business I want us to
do more to help small businesses.
I want
to raise the minimum wage because people who
live in poverty, who work full-time should
not still be in poverty. I want to make sure
that women get equal pay for the work we do.
I feel strongly we have to have an education
system that starts with preschool and goes
through college. That's why I want more
technical education in high schools and
community colleges, real apprenticeships to
prepare people for the real jobs of the
future. I want to make college debt free and
for families making less than $125,000, you
will not get a division bill from a public
college or university if the plan that I
worked on with Bernie Sanders is enacted.
And
we're going to work hard to make sure that
it is. Because we are going to go where the
money is. Most of the gains in the last
years since the great recession have gone to
the very top. So we'll have the wealthy pay
their fair share.
We'll
have corporations make a contribution
greater than they are now to our country. [I
have] a plan that has been analyzed by
independent experts which said that it could
produce 10 million new jobs. By contrast,
Donald's plan has been analyzed to conclude
it might lose jobs. Why? Because his whole
plan is to give the biggest tax breaks ever
to the wealthy and to corporations adding
$20 trillion to our debt and pausing the
kind of dislocation that we have seen before
because it truly will be trickle-down
economics on steroids.
So the
plan I have I think will actually produce
greater opportunities. The plan he has will
cost us jobs and possibly lead to another
great recession.
Wallace: Secretary, thank you. Mr. Trump,
why will your plan create more jobs and
growth?
Trump:
Her plan is going to raise taxes and even
double your taxes. Her tax plan is a
disaster. And she can say all she wants
about college tuition and I'm a big
proponent, we're going to do a lot of things
for college tuition, but the rest of the
public's going be paying for it. We'll have
a massive, massive tax increase under
Hillary Clinton's plan.
But
I'd like to start off where we left because
when I said Japan and Germany and I'm not to
single them out, South Korea, these are very
rich, powerful countries. Saudi Arabia,
nothing but money. We protect Saudi Arabia.
Why aren't they paying?
She
immediately, when she heard this, I
questioned and I questioned NATO, why aren't
the NATO questions paying, because they
weren't paying. Since I did this, a year
ago, all of a sudden they're paying. I've
been given a lot of credit for it. All of a
sudden they're starting to pay up.
They
have to pay up. We're protecting people.
They have to pay up. I'm a big fan of NATO,
but they have to pay up. She comes out and
said, we love our allies, we think our
allies are great. It's awfully hard to get
them to pay up when you have somebody saying
we think how great they are. We have to tell
Japan in a very nice way, we have to tell
Germany, all of these countries, South
Korea, we have to say, you have to help us
out. We have during his regime, during
President Obama's regime, we've doubled our
national debt. We're up to $20 trillion.
So my
plan, we're going to re-negotiate trade
deals. We'll have more free trade than we
have right now, but we have horrible deals.
Our jobs are being taken out. NAFTA, one of
the worst deals ever. Our jobs are being
sucked out of our economy. You look at all
of the places that I just left, you go the
Pennsylvania, you go to Ohio, you go to
Florida, you go to any of them, upstate New
York, our jobs have fled to Mexico and other
places. We're bringing our jobs back. I'm
going to renegotiate NAFTA.
And if
I can't make a great deal, then we're going
to terminate nafta and great new deals.
We'll have trade, but we'll terminate it,
we'll make a great trade deal. And if we
can't, we're going to go a separate way
because it has been a disaster.
We're
going to cut taxes massively. We'll cut
business taxes massively. They're going to
start hiring people. We're going to bring
the $2.5 trillion that's offshore back into
the country. We're going to start the engine
rolling again because right now our country
is dying at 1 percent GDP.
Clinton: Let me translate that if I can,
Chris. Because --
Trump:
You can't.
Clinton: Fact is, he's going to advocate for
the largest tax cuts we've ever seen.
Three
times more than the tax cuts under the Bush
administration. I have said repeatedly
throughout this campaign, I will not raise
taxes on anyone making $250,000 or less. I
also will not add a penny to the debt. I
have costed out what I'm going to do. He
will, through his massive tax cuts, add $20
trillion to the debt. He mentioned the debt.
We know how to get control of the debt.
When
my husband was president, we went from a
$300 billion deficit to a $200 billion
surplus and we're actually on the path to
eliminating the national debt. When
President Obama came into office he
inherited the worst economic disaster since
the great depression. He has cut the deficit
by two-thirds.
So
yes, one of the ways you go after the debt.
One of the ways you create jobs is by
investing in people. I do have investments,
investments in new jobs, investments in
education, skill training and the
opportunities for people who get ahead and
stay ahead. That's the kind of approach --
Wallace: Secretary.
Clinton: That will work. Cutting taxes on
the wealthy. We tried that. It has not
worked the way that it has been --
Wallace: Secretary Clinton, I want to pursue
your plan. Because in many ways it is
similar to the Obama stimulus plan in 2009,
which has led to the slowest GDP growth
since 1949.
Trump:
Correct.
Wallace: Thank you, secretary. You told me
in July when we spoke that the problem is
that president Obama didn't get to do enough
in what he was trying to do with this
stimulus. So is your plan basically even
more of the Obama stimulus?
Clinton: Well, it's a combination, Chris.
Let me say that when you inherit the level
of economic catastrophe that president Obama
inherited, it was a real touch and go
situation.
I was
in the senate before I became secretary of
state. I've never seen people as physically
distraught as the bush administration team
was because of what was happening to the
economy.
I
personally believe that the steps that
president Obama took saved the economy. He
doesn't get the credit he deserves for
taking some very hard positions, but it was
a terrible recession. So now we've dug
ourselves out of it. We're standing, but
we're not yet running. So what I am
proposing is that we invest from the middle
out and the ground up, not the top down.
That
is not going to work. That's why what I have
put forward doesn't add a penny to the debt,
but it is the kind of approach that will
enable more people to take those new jobs,
higher paying jobs.
We're
beginning to see some increase in incomes
and we certainly have had a long string of
increasing jobs. We've got to do more to get
the whole economy moving, and that's what I
believe I will be able to do.
Wallace: Mr. Trump, even conservative
economists who have looked at your plan say
that the numbers don't add up, that your
idea, and you've talked about 25 million
jobs created, 4%.
Trump:
Over a ten-year period.
Wallace: Growth is unrealistic. And they say
you talk a lot about growing the energy
industry. They say with oil prices as they
are right now, that's unrealistic as well.
Your response?
Trump:
So I just left some high representatives of
India. They're growing at 8 percent. China
is growing at 7 percent. And that for them
is a catastrophically low number. We are
growing, our last report came out and it's
right around the 1 percent level and I think
it's going down. Last week, as you know, the
end of last week, they came out with an
anemic jobs report. A terrible jobs report.
In fact, I said is that the last jobs report
before the election? Because if it is, I
should win easily. It was so bad. The report
was so bad. Look, our country is stagnant.
We've lost our jobs. We've lost our
businesses.
We're
not making things anymore, relatively
speaking, our product is pouring in from
China, pouring in from Vietnam, pouring in
from all over the world. I've visited so
many communities, this has been such an
incredible education for me, Chris. I've
gotten to know so many — I've developed so
many friends over the last year. And they
cry when they see what's happened. I pass
factories that were thriving 20, 25 years
ago and because of the bill that her husband
signed and she blessed a hundred percent, it
is just horrible what's happened to these
people in these communities. She can say
that her husband did well, but boy, did they
suffer as NAFTA kicked in because it didn't
really kick in very much but it kicked in
after they left. Boy, did they suffer. That
was one of the worst things that's ever been
signed by our country. Now she wants to sign
transpacific partnership.
She
lied when she said she didn't call it the
gold standard in one of the debates. She
totally lied and they fact checked and said
I was right.
Wallace: I want to give you a chance to
briefly speak to that and I want to pivot to
-- Trump: And that was -- Wallace:
Obamacare. Clinton: Let me say, number one,
when I saw the final agreement for TPP, I
said I was against it. It didn't meet my
test. I've had the same test. Does it create
jobs, raise incomes and further our national
security? I'm against it now, I'll be
against it after the election, I'll be
against it when I'm President.
There's only one of us on this stages that
actually shipped jobs to Mexico because
that's Donald. He shipped jobs to 12
countries including Mexico, but he mentioned
China. One of the biggest problems we have
with China is the illegal dumping of steel
and aluminum into our markets.
I've
fought against that as a senator, I stood up
against it as secretary of state, Donald has
bought Chinese steel and aluminum. The Trump
Hotel here in las Vegas was made with
Chinese steel. He goes around with crocodile
tears about how terrible it is, but he has
given jobs to Chinese steel workers, not
American teal workers —
Wallace: Mr. Trump?
Trump:
That's the kind of approach that's going to
work. We'll pull the country together. We'll
have trade agreements that we enforce. I'll
have trade prosecutor for the first time in
history. We're going to enforce those
agreements and look for businesses that help
us by buying American products.
I ask
a simple question. She's been doing this for
30 years. Why didn't you do it over the last
15, 20 years? You were very much involved —
excuse me, my turn. You were very much
involved in every aspect of this country,
very much.
And
you do have experience. I say the one thing
you have over me is experience, but it's bad
experience because what you've done is
turned out badly. For 30 years you've been
in a position to help and if you say that I
used theater or I use something else make it
impossible for me to do that.
You
talk, but you don't get anything done,
Hillary. You don't, just like when you ran
the state department, $6 billion is missing.
How do you miss $6 billion? You ran the
state department. It was either stolen, they
don't know, it's gone — 6 billion. If you
become president, this country is going to
be in some mess, believe me.
Clinton: Well, first of all, what he just
said about the state department is not only
untrue, it's been did you debunked numerous
times. But I think it's really an important
issue he raised the 30 years of experience.
Let me
just talk briefly about that. You know, back
in the 1970s, I worked for Children's
Defense Fund, and I was taking on
discrimination against African-American kids
in schools. He was getting sued by the
Justice Department for racial discrimination
in his apartment buildings.
In the
1980s, I was working to reform the schools
in Arkansas. He was bore rogue $14 million
from his father to start his businesses. In
the 1990s, I went to Beijing and I said
women's rights are human rights. He insulted
a former miss universe, Alicia Machado,
called her an eating machine.
Trump:
Give me a break.
Clinton: And on the day when I was in the
situation room, monitoring the raid that
brought Osama bin Laden to justice, he was
host "The Celebrity Apprentice." So I'm
happy to compare my 30 years of experience,
what I've done for this country, trying to
help in every way I could, especially kids
and families get ahead and stay ahead with
your 30 years. And I'll let the American
people make that decision.
Trump:
Well, I think I did a much better job. I
built a massive company, a great company,
some of the greatest assets anywhere in the
world worth many, many billions of dollars.
I started with a $1 million loan. I agree
with that. It's a $1 million loan. But I
built a phenomenal company. And if we could
run our country the way I've run my company,
we would have a country that you would be so
proud of, you would even be proud of it.
And
frankly, when you look at her real record,
take a look at Syria. Take a look at the
migration. Take a look at Libya. Take a look
at Iraq. She gave us ISIS because her and
Obama created this small vacuum. A small
group came out of that huge vacuum. We
should have never been in Iraq. But once we
were there, we never should have got out the
way they wanted to get out. She gave us ISIS
as sure as you are sitting there. And what
happened is now ISIS is in 32 countries. And
now I listen how she is going to get rid of
ISIS. She is going to get rid of nobody.
Wallace: All right. We are going to get to
foreign hot spots in a few moments. But the
next segment is fitness to be president of
the United States. Mr. Trump, at the last
debate you said your talk about grabbing
women was just that, talk, and that you had
never actually done it. And since then, as
we all know, nine women have come forward
and said you either groped them or kissed
them without their consent. Why would so
many different women from so many different
circumstances over so many different years,
why would they all in this last couple of
weeks make up -- you deny this. Why would
they all make up these stories. And since
this is a question for both of you,
secretary Clinton, Mr. Trump says what your
husband did and that you defended was even
worse. Mr. Trump, you go first.
Trump:
Well, first of all, those stories have been
largely debunked. Those people, I don't know
those people. I have a feeling how they
came. I believe it was her campaign that did
it. Just like if you look at what came out
today on the clips where I was wondering
what happened with my rally in Chicago and
other rallies where we had such violence.
She is the one — and Obama — that caused the
violence. They hired people. They paid them
$1500 and they're on tape saying be violent,
cause fights, do bad things. I would say the
only way, because the stories are all
totally false. I have to say that. And I
didn't even apologize to my wife who is
sitting right here because I didn't do
anything. I didn't know any of these women.
I didn't see these women. These women, the
woman on the plane, I think they want either
fame or her campaign did it. And I think
it's her campaign. When I saw what they did,
which is a criminal act, by the way, where
they're telling people to go out and start
fistfights and start violence, I tell you
what, in particular in Chicago, people were
hurt and people could have been killed in
that riot.
And
that was now all on tape started by her. I
believe, Chris, that she got these people to
step forward. If it wasn't, they get their
ten minutes of fame. But they were all
totally — it was all fiction. It was lies
and it was fiction.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton?
Clinton: Well, at the last debate we heard
Donald talking about what he did to women.
And after that a number of women have come
forward saying that's exactly what he did to
them. Now what was his response? Well, he
held a number of big rallies where he said
that he could not possibly have done those
things to those women because they were not
attractive enough for --
Trump:
I did not say that. I did not say that.
Clinton: In fact, he went on to say --
Wallace: Sir, her two minutes.
Trump:
I did not say that.
Wallace: Her two minutes.
Clinton: He went on to say look at her. I
don't think so. About another woman, he said
that wouldn't be my first choice. He
attacked the woman reporter writing the
story, called her disgusting as he has
called a number of women during this
campaign. Donald thinks belittling women
makes him bigger. He goes after their
dignity, their self-worth, and I don't think
there is a woman anywhere who doesn't know
what that feels like.
So we
now know what Donald thinks and what he says
and how he acts towards women. That's who
Donald is. I think it's really up to all of
us to demonstrate who we are and who our
country is and to stand up and be very clear
about what we expect from our next
president, how we want to bring our country
together where we don't want to have the
kind of pitting of people one against the
other, where instead we celebrate our
diversity, we lift people up.
And we
make our country even greater. America is
great because America is good. And it really
is up to all of us to make that true, now
and in the future in particular for our
children and our grandchildren.
Wallace: Mr. Trump --
Trump:
Nobody has more respect for women than I do.
Nobody. Nobody has more respect.
[Audience Reaction]
Wallace: Please, everybody.
Trump:
And frankly, those stories have been largely
debunked. And I really want to talk about
something slightly different. She mentions
this. Which is all fiction, all a
fictionalized. Probable or possibly started
by her and her very sleazy campaign. But I
will tell you what isn't fictionalized are
her e-mails where she destroyed 33,000
e-mails criminally, criminally, after
getting a subpoena from the United States
Congress.
What
happened to the FBI? I don't know. We have a
great general, four-star general today. You
read it in all the papers, going to
potentially serve five years in jail for
lying to the FBI. One lie. She's lied
hundreds of times to the people, to
congress, and to the FBI. He is going to
probably go to jail. This is a four-star
general. And she gets away with it, and she
can run for presidency of the United States?
That's really what you should be talking
about. Not fiction where somebody wants fame
or where they come out of their crooked
campaign.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton?
Clinton: Well, every time Donald has pushed
on something which is obviously
uncomfortable like what these women are
saying, he immediately goes to denying
responsibility. And it's not just about
women. He never apologizes or says he is
sorry for anything. So we know what he has
said and what he has done to women. But he
also went after a disabled reporter —
Trump:
Wrong.
Clinton: He mocked and Mr and Mrs. Khan on
national television. He went after Mr. And
Mrs. Khan, the parents of Han who died
serving our country, a gold star family
because of their religion. He went after
John McCain, a prisoner of war. Said he
prefers people who aren't captured. He went
after a federal judge, born in Indiana but
who Donald said couldn't be trusted to try
the fraud and racketeering case against
Trump University because his parents were
Mexican.
So
it's not one thing. This is a pattern, a
pattern of divisiveness of a very dark and
in many ways dangerous vision of our country
where he incites violence, where he applauds
people who are pushing and pulling and
punching at his rallies. That is not who
America is. And I hope that as we move in
the last weeks of this campaign, more and
more people will understand what's at stake
in this election. It really does come down
to what kind of country we are going to
have.
Trump:
So sad when she talks about violence at my
rallies and she caused the violence. It's on
tape. Now the other things are false, but
honestly, I'd love to talk about getting rid
of ISIS. And I'd love to talk about other
things.
Wallace: Okay.
Trump:
But the other charges as she knows are
frauds.
Wallace: In this bucket about fitness to be
president, there has been a lot of
developments over the last ten days since
the last debate. I'd like to ask you about
them. These are questions that the American
people have. Secretary Clinton, during your
2009 senate confirmation hearing, you
promised to avoid even the appearance of a
conflict of interest with your dealing with
the Clinton Foundation while you were
secretary of state. But e-mails show that
donors got special access to you.
Those
seeking grants for Haiti relief were
considered simply from non-donors, and some
of those donors got contract, government
contracts, active money. Can you really say
you kept your pledge to that senate
committee, and what happened and what went
on between you and the Clinton foundation.
Why isn't it what Mr. Trump calls pay to
play.
Clinton: Well, everything I did as secretary
of state was in furtherance of our country's
interests and our values. The state
department said that. I think that's been
proven. But I am happy. In fact, I am
thrilled to talk about the Clinton
Foundation.
Because it’s a world-renowned charity. I'm
so proud of the work it does. I could talk
for the rest of the debate. I know I don't
have the time to do that. But just briefly,
the Clinton foundation made it possible for
11 million people around the world with
HIV/AIDS to afford treatment. That's about
half of all the people in the world who are
getting treatment.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton --
Clinton: In partnership with the American
Health Association, we have made
environments in schools including healthier
lunches.
Wallace: Secretary, respectfully, this is an
open discussion.
Clinton: Well it is.
Wallace: I asked a specific question, pay or
the play.
Clinton: But there is no evidence --
Wallace: Let's ask Mr. Trump.
[
Overlapping dialog ]
Trump:
It's a criminal enterprise. Saudi Arabia
giving $25 million. Qatar, all of these
companies. You talk about women and women's
rights. So these are people that push gays
off buildings. These are people that kill
women and treat women horribly. And yet you
take their money. So I'd like to ask you
right now why don't you give back the money
that you have taken from certain countries
that treat certain groups of people so
horribly? Why don't you give back the money?
I
think it would be great gesture. Because she
takes a tremendous amount of money. And you
take a look at the people of Haiti. I was in
little Haiti the other day in Florida. And I
want to tell you, they hate the Clintons
because what's happened in Haiti with the
Clinton Foundation is a disgrace. And you
know it and they know it and everybody knows
it.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton?
Clinton: Well, very quickly at the Clinton
Foundation spend 90% of all the money that
is donated on behalf of programs around the
world and in our own country. I'm very proud
of that. We are the highest rating from the
watchdogs that follow foundations.
And
I'd be happy to compare what we do with the
Trump Foundation, which took money from
other people and bought a six-foot portrait
of Donald. I mean, who does that? It just
was astonishing. But when it comes to Haiti,
Haiti is the poorest country in our
hemisphere. The earthquake and the
hurricane, it has devastated Haiti.
Bill
and have I been involved in trying to help
Haiti for many years. The Clinton Foundation
raised $30 million to help Haiti after the
catastrophic earthquake and all of the
terrible problems the people there had.
We've done things to help small businesses,
agriculture, and so much else. And we're
going to keep working to help Haiti because
it's an important part of the American
experience.
Trump:
I'd like to mention one thing: Trump
Foundation, small foundation. People
contribute. I contribute. The money — 100%
goes to different charity, including a lot
of military. I don't get anything. I don't
buy boats. I don't buy planes. What happens,
the money goes in —
Wallace: Wasn't some of the money used to
settle your lawsuit, sir?
Trump:
No, we put up the American flag. And that's
it. They put up the American flag. We fought
for the right in palm beach to put up the
American flag.
Wallace: But there was a penalty imposed by
Palm Beach County.
Trump:
There was.
Wallace: The money came from your
foundation.
Trump:
There was.
Wallace: Instead of Mar-a-Lago.
Trump:
Went to Fisher House, where they build
houses, the money that you're talking about
went to Fisher House, where they build
houses for veterans and disabled.
Clinton: But of course there is no way we
can know whether any of that is true because
he hasn't released his tax returns. He is
the first candidate ever to run for
president in the last 40 plus years who has
not released his tax returns. Serving what
he says about charity or anything else we
can't prove it. You can look at our tax
returns. We've got them all out there. But
what is really troubling is that we learned
in the last debate he has not paid a penny
in federal income tax. And we were talking
about immigrants a few minutes ago, Chris.
Half of all immigrants, undocumented
immigrants in our country actually pay
federal income tax. We have undocumented
immigrants in America who are paying more
federal income tax than a billionaire. I
find that just astonishing.
Trump:
We're entitled because of the laws that
people like her passed to take massive
amounts of depreciation and other charges,
and we do it. And all of our donors, just
about all of them, I know [Warren] Buffett
took hundreds of millions of dollars, George
Soros took hundreds of millions of dollars.
Let me just explain.
Wallace: We heard this.
Trump:
Most of her donors have done the same thing
as I do.
Wallace: Folks we have heard this.
Trump:
Hillary, what you should have done, you
should have changed the law when you a
United States senator.
Wallace: We heard this.
Trump:
Because your donors and your special
interests are doing the same thing as I do,
except even more. So you should have changed
the law, but you won't change the law
because you take in so much money. I mean, I
sat in my apartment today on a very
beautiful hotel down the street.
Clinton: Made with Chinese steel.
Trump:
I will tell you, I sat there watching ad
after false ad, all paid for by your friends
on wall Street that gave so much money
because they know you're going to protect
them. And frankly, you should have changed
the laws. If you don't like what I did, you
should have changed the laws.
Wallace: Mr. Trump, I want to ask you about
one last question in this topic. You have
been warning at rallies recently that this
election is rigged and that Hillary Clinton
is in the process of trying to steal it from
you. Your running mate Governor Pence
pledged on Sunday that he and you, his
words, will absolutely accept the result of
this election. Today your daughter Ivanka
said the same thing. I want to ask you here
on this stage tonight do, you make the same
commitment that you will absolutely, sir,
that you will absolutely accept the result
of this election?
Trump:
I will look at it at the time. I'm not
looking at anything now. I will look at it
at the time. What I've seen, what I've seen
is so bad. First of all, the media is so
dishonest and so corrupt. And the pile-on is
so amazing. The New York Times actually
wrote an article about it, that they don't
even care. It's so dishonest. And they have
poisoned the minds of the voters. But
unfortunately for them, I think the voters
are seeing through it. I think they're going
to see through it. We'll find out on
November 8.
Wallace: But sir —
Trump:
Excuse me, Chris, if you look at your voter
rolls, you will see millions of people
registered to vote. This isn't coming from
me, from fury report and other places.
Millions of people that are registered to
vote that shouldn't be registered to vote.
So let
me just give you one other thing as I talk
about the corrupt media. I talk about the
millions of people. I tell you one other
thing. She shouldn't be allowed to run.
She's guilty of a very, very serious crime.
She should not be allowed to run. And just
in that respect I say it's rigged. Because
she should never -- Chris, she should never
have been allowed to run for the presidency
based on what she did with e-mails and so
many other things.
Wallace: Sir, there is a tradition in this
country, in fact one of the primes of this
country is the peaceful transition of power.
And that no matter how hard fought a
campaign is, that at the end of the
campaign, that the loser concedes to the
winner. Not saying that you're necessarily
going to be the loser or the winner. But
that the loser concedes to the winner, and
that the country comes together in part for
the good of the country. Are you saying
you're not prepared now to commit to that
principle?
Trump:
What I'm saying is I'll tell you at the
time. I'll keep you in suspense, okay?
Clinton: Let me respond to that, because
that's horrifying.
Every
time Donald thinks things are not going in
his direction, he claims whatever it is is
rigged against him. The FBI conducted a
year-long investigation into my e-mails.
They concluded there was no case. He said
the FBI was rigged. He lost the Iowa caucus.
He lost the Wisconsin primary.
He
said the Republican primary was rigged
against him. Then Trump University gets sued
for fraud and racketeering. He claims the
court system and the federal judge is rigged
against him. There was even a time when he
didn't get an Emmy for his TV program three
years in a row and he started tweeting that
the Emmys were rigged.
Trump:
Should have gotten it.
Clinton: This is a mind-set. This is how
Donald thinks. And it's funny, but it's also
really troubling.
Trump:
Okay.
Clinton: Now that is not the way our
democracy works. We've been around for 240
years. We've had free and fair election.
We've accepted the outcomes when we may not
have liked them. And that is what must be
expected of anyone standing on a debate
stage during a general election. You know,
president Obama said the other day when
you're whining --
Wallace: — Hold on, folks, hold on, folks.
Clinton: Before you're even finished, it
shows you're not up to doing the job. And
let's, you know, let's be clear about what
he is saying and what that means. He is
denigrating, he is talking down our
democracy.
And I
for one am appalled that somebody who is the
nominee of one of our two major parties
would take that kind of position.
Trump:
I think what the FBI did and the Department
of Justice did including meeting with her
husband, the attorney general in the back of
an airplane on the tarmac in Arizona, I
think it's disgraceful. I think it's a
disgrace.
Wallace: All right.
Trump:
I think we've never had a situation so bad
as. This.
Wallace: Hold on, folks. This doesn't do any
good for anyone. Let's please continue the
debate and move on to the subject of foreign
hot spots. The Iraqi defensive to take back
Mosul has begun. If they're successful in
pushing ISIS out of that city and out of all
of Iraq, the question then becomes what
happens the day after. And that's something
that whichever -- whoever of you ends up as
president is going to have to confront. Will
you put U.S. troops into that vacuum to make
sure ISIS doesn't come back or isn't
replaced by something even worse? Secretary
Clinton, you go first in this segment. You
have two minutes.
Clinton: Well, I am encouraged that there is
an effort led by the Iraqi army, supported
by Kurdish
forces
and also given the help and advice from the
number of special forces and Americans on
the ground. I will not support putting
American forces into Iraq as a force. I
don't think that is in our interest and I
don't think it would be smart to do. Chris,
I think that would be a big red flag waving
for ISIS to reconstitute itself. The goal
here is to take back Mosul. It's going to be
a hard fight. I've got no illusions about
that. And then continue to press into Syria
to begin to take back and move on Raqqah,
which is the ISIS headquarters.
I am
hopeful that the hard work that American
military advisers have done will pay off,
and that we will see a really successful
military operation. But we know we've got
lots of work to do. Syria will remain a
hotbed as terrorism as long as the civil war
aided and abetted by the Iranians and the
Russians continue.
So I
have said look, we need to keep our eye on
ISIS. That's why I want to have an
intelligence surge that protect us here at
home while we have to go after them from the
air, on the ground, online. Why we have to
make sure here at home we don't let
terrorists buy weapons. If you're too
dangerous to fly, you're too dangerous to
buy a gun. And I'm going to continue to push
for a no-fly zone and safe havens within
Syria. Not only to help protect the iranians
and prevent the constant outflow of
refugees, but to frankly gain some leverage
on both the Syrian government and the
Russians so that perhaps we can have the
kind of serious negotiation necessary to
bring the conflict to an end and go forward
on a political track.
Wallace: Mr. Trump, same question. If we are
able to push ISIS out of mosul and out of
Iraq, would you be willing to put U.S.
Troops in there to prevent their return or
something else?
Trump:
Let me tell you, Mosul is so sad. We had
Mosul. But when she left, she took everybody
out, we lost Mosul. Now we're fight again to
get Mosul. The problem with Mosul and what
they wanted to do is they wanted to get the
leaders of ISIS who they felt were in Mosul.
About three months ago, I started reading
that they want to get the leaders. And
they're going to attack Mosul. Whatever
happened to the element of surprise? Okay?
We announce we're going after Mosul. I've
been reading about going after mosul now for
how long? Three months? These people have
all left. They've all left. The element of
surprise. Douglas MacArthur, George Patton
spinning in their graves when they see the
stupidity of our country. So we're now
fighting for mosul that we had. All she had
to do is stay there. Now we're going in to
get it. But you know who is big winner in
mosul is going to be after we eventually get
it? And the only reason they did it is
because she is running for the office of
president, and they want to look tough. They
want to look good.
He
violated the red line in the sand. And he
made so many mistakes. Made all mistakes.
That's why we have the great migration. But
she wanted to look good for the election. So
they're going in. But who is going to Mosul,
really? By the way, much tougher than they
thought.
Much
tougher, going to be more deaths than they
thought. But the leaders we wanted to get
are all gone because they're smart. They
said what do we need this for? So Mosul is
going to be a wonderful thing, and Iran
should write us a letter of thank you, just
like really stupid, the stupidest deal of
all time.
A deal
that is going to give Iran absolutely
nuclear weapons. Iran should write us yet
another letter saying thank you very much.
Because Iran, as I said many years ago, Iran
is taking over Iraq. Something they've
wanted to do forever. But we've made it so
easy for them. So we're now going to take
Mosul. And you know who is going to be the
beneficiary? Iran. Boy are they making — I
mean, they are outsmarting. Look, you're not
there. You might be involved in that
decision. But you were there when you took
everybody out of Mosul and out of Iraq. You
shouldn't have been in Iraq. But you did
vote for it. You shouldn't have been in
Iraq. But once you were in Iraq, you should
have never left the way.
Wallace: Sir, your two minutes are up.
Trump:
The point is the winner is going to be Iran.
Clinton: Well, once again, Donald is
implying that he didn't support the invasion
of Iraq. I said it was a mistake. I said
that years ago. He has consistently defined
knight --
Trump:
Wrong.
Clinton: What is a very clear fact.
Trump:
Wrong.
Clinton: That before the invasion he
supported it. I just want everybody to go
Google it. Google Donald Trump Iraq and you
will see the dozens of sources which verify
that he was for the invasion of Iraq.
Trump:
Wrong.
Clinton: And you can actually hear the audio
of him saying that. Now why does that
matter? Well, it matters because he has not
told the truth about that position. I guess
he believes it makes him look better now to
contrast with me because I did vote for it.
What's really important here is to
understand all the interplay. Mosul is a
Sunni city. Mosul is on the border of Syria.
And yes, we do need to go after Baghdadi,
just like we went after bin laden while you
were doing Celebrity Apprentice,
and we brought him to justice. We need to go
after the leadership, but we need to get rid
of them, get rid of their fighters, their
estimated several thousand fighters in
Mosul.
They've been digging underground. They've
been prepared to defend. It's going to be
tough fighting. I think we can take back
mosul and move on into Syria and take
bacharach ca. This is what we have to do.
I'm just amazed that he seems to think that
the Iraqi government and our allies and
everybody else launched the attack on mosul
to help me in this election. But that's how
Donald thinks, you know. Looking for some --
Trump:
Chris, we don't gain anything. Iran is
taking over Iraq.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton --
Trump:
Iran is taking over Iraq.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton --
Trump:
We would have gained if we had surprise.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton, it's an open
discussion. Secretary, secretary, please let
Mr. Trump speak. Go ahead.
Clinton: And he proves it every time he
talks.
Trump:
No, you are the one that is unfit. Wikileaks
just came out. John Podesta said some
horrible things about you. And boy was he
right. He said some beauties. And you know,
Bernie Sanders, he said you have bad
judgment. You do. And if you think that
going into mosul after we let the world know
we're going in and all of the people that we
really wanted, the leaders, they're all
gone. If you think that was good, then you
do. Now John Podesta said you have terrible
instincts. Bernie Sanders said you have bad
judgment. I agree with both.
Clinton: Well, you should ask Bernie Sanders
who he is supporting for president. And he
has said --
Trump:
Which is a big mistake.
Clinton: And campaigned for me around the
country. You the most dangerous person to
run for president in the modern history of
America. I think he is right.
Wallace: Let's turn to Aleppo. Mr. Trump, in
the last debate, you were both asked about
the situation in the Syrian city of Aleppo.
And I want to follow up on that because you
said several things in that debate which
were not true, sir. You said that Aleppo has
basically fallen. In fact, there are — it's
a catastrophe.
Trump:
It is a catastrophe.
[Crosstalk]
Wallace: Are a quarter million people still
living there and being slaughtered.
Trump:
That's right. And they're being slaughtered
because of bad decisions.
Wallace: If I may just finish here. And you
also said that ISIS -- that Syria and Russia
are busy fighting ISIS. In fact, they have
been the ones who have been bombing and
shelling eastern Aleppo. And they just
announced a humanitarian pause, in effect
admit Thanksgiving have been bombing and
shelling Aleppo. Would you like to clear
that up, sir?
Trump:
Well, Aleppo is a disaster. It's a
humanitarian nightmare. But it has fallen
from any standpoint. Whether you need to
sign a document, take a look at Aleppo. It
is so sad when you see what's happened. And
a lot of this is because of Hillary Clinton.
Because what has happened, by fighting
Assad, who turned out to be a lot tougher
than she thought, and now she is going to
say oh, he loves Assad, he's just much
tougher and much smarter than her and Obama.
And everyone thought he was gone two years
ago, three years ago. He aligned with
Russia. He now also aligned with Iran. Who
we made very powerful. We gave them $150
billion back. We give them $1.7 billion in
cash. I mean cash, bundles of cash as big as
this stage. We gave them $1.7 billion.
Now
they have aligned, he has aligned with
Russia and with Iran. They don't want ISIS.
But they have other things because we're
backing, we're backing rebels. We don't know
who the rebels are. We're giving them lots
of money, lots of everything. We don't know
who the rebels are. And when and if, and
it's not going to happen because you have
Russia and you have Iran now. But if they
ever did overthrow Assad, you might end up
as bad as Assad is, and he is a bad guy.
But
you may very well end up with worse than
Assad. If she did nothing, we'd be in much
better shape. And this is what has caused
the great migration where she has taken in
tens of thousands of Syrian refugees who
probably in many case, not probably, who are
definitely in many cases ISIS aligned. And
we now have them in our country and wait
until you see this is going to be the great
Trojan horse.
And
wait until you see what happens in the
coming years. Lots of luck, Hillary. Thanks
a lot for doing a great job.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton, you have talked
about in the last debate and again today
that you would impose a no-fly zone to try
to protect top the killing there. President
Obama has refused to do that because he
fears it's going to draw us closer, deeper
into the conflict. And general Joseph
Dunford, the chairman of the joint chiefs of
staff there says you want to impose a no-fly
zone, chances are you're going to get into a
war, his words, with Syria and Russia. So
the question I have, if you impose a no-fly
zone, first of all, how do you respond to
their concerns? Secondly, if you impose a
no-fly zone and a Russian plane violates
that, does president Putin shoot that plane
down?
Clinton: First of all, I think a no-fly zone
could save lives and could hasten the end of
the conflict. I'm well aware of the really
legitimate concerns you have expressed from
both the president and the general. This
would not be done just on the first day.
This would take a lot of negotiation, and it
would also take making it clear to the
Russians and the Syrians that our purpose
here was to provide safe Zones on the
ground.
We've
had millions of people leave Syria. And
those millions of people inside Syria who
have been dislocated. So I think we could
strike a deal and make a it very clear to
the Russians and the Syrians that this was
something that we believe was in the best
interests of the people on the ground in
Syria. It would help was our fight against
ISIS. But I want to respond to what Donald
said about refugees. He has made these
claims repeatedly. I am not going to let
anyone into this country who is not vetted,
who we do not have confidence in.
But
I'm not going to slam the door on women and
children. That picture of that little
4-year-old boy in Aleppo with the blood
coming down his face while he sat in an
ambulance is haunting. And so we are going
to do very careful, thorough vetting that
does not solve our internal challenges with
ISIS and our
need
to stop radicalization, to work with
American Muslim communities who are on the
front lines to identify and prevent attacks.
In fact, the killer of the dozens of people
at the nightclub in Orlando, the pulse
nightclub was born in queens, the same place
Donald was born. So let's be clear about
what the threat is and how we are best going
to be able to meet it. And yes, some of that
threat emanates from over in Syria and Iraq,
and we've got to keep fighting. And I will
defeat ISIS. And some of it is we have to up
our game and be much smarter here at home.
Wallace: I want to get into our final
segment.
Trump:
But I just have to, it's so ridiculous. She
will defeat ISIS. We should have never let
ISIS in the first place. And right now
they're in 32 countries. Wait, one second.
They have, and a ceasefire three weeks ago.
A ceasefire, United States, Russian, Syria.
And during the ceasefire, Russia took over
vast swatches of land and then said we don't
want the ceasefire anymore. We're so
outplayed on missiles, on ceasefires. She
was not there so I assume she has nothing to
do with it. But our country is so outplayed
by Putin and Assad and by Iran. Nobody can
believe how stupid our leadership is.
Wallace: Mr. Trump, Secretary Clinton, we
need to move on to our final segment. And
that is the national debt, which has not
been discussed until tonight. Our national
debt a share of gdp is now 70 percent.
That's the highest since just after World
War II. But the nonpartisan Committee for
Responsible Budget says Secretary Clinton,
under your plan, debt would rise to 86
percent of GPD over the next 10 years. Mr.
Trump, under your plan, they say it would
rise to 105 percent of GDP over the next 10
years. Question is, why are both of you
ignoring this problem? Mr. Trump, you go
first.
Trump:
I say they're wrong because I'm going to
create tremendous jobs. And we're bringing
gdp from really 1 percent, which is what it
is now. And if she got in it would be less
than zero. But we're bringing it from 1
percent up to 4 percent. I think you can go
higher, to 5 or 6 percent. We have a
tremendous machine. We will have created a
tremendous economic machine. To do that,
we're taking back jobs. We're not going to
let our countries be raided by other
countries where we don't make our product
anymore. It's very sad. I'm going to create
a kind of country that we were from the
standpoint of industry. We used to be there.
We have given it up. We have become very,
very sloppy. We've had people that are
political ax making the biggest deal in the
world. Bigger than companies. You take these
big companies.
These
trade deals are far bigger than companies.
Yet we don't use our great leaders. Many of
whom back me and many of whom back Hillary,
I must say. But we don't use those people.
These are the greatest negotiators in the
world. We are the greatest business people
in the world. We have to use them to
negotiate our trade deals. We use political
hacks. We use people that get the position
because they made a campaign contribution.
And they're dealing with China and people
who have very much smarter than they are. We
have to use our great people. We will create
an economic machine the likes of which we
haven't seen in many decades. And people,
Chris, will again go back to work. And
they'll make a lot of money. And we'll have
companies that will grow and expand and
start from new.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton?
Clinton: Well, first when I hear Donald talk
about that and his slogan is “Make America
Great Again.” I wonder when he thought
America was great. And before he rushes and
says “Before you and president Obama were
there,” I think it's important to recognize
that he has been criticizing our government
for decades. You know, back in 1987, he took
out a $100,000 ad in the New York Times
during the time when President Reagan was
president and basically said exactly what he
just said now, that we were the
laughingstock of the world.
He was
criticizing President Reagan. This is the
way Donald thinks about himself, puts
himself into, you know, the middle and says
I alone can fix it, as he said on the
convention stage. But if you look at the
debt, which is the issue you asked about,
Chris, I pay for everything I'm proposing.
I do
not add a penny to the national debt. I take
that very seriously because I do think it's
one of the issues we've got to come to grips
with.
So
when I talk about how we're going to pay for
education, how we're going to invest in
infrastructure, how we're going to get the
cost of prescription drugs down, and a lot
of the other issues that people talk to me
about all the time, I've made it very clear,
we are going where the money is.
We are
going to ask the wealthy corporations to pay
their fair share. And there is no evidence
whatsoever that that will slow down or
diminish our growth. In fact, I think just
the opposite. We'll have what economists
call middle outgrowth. We've got to get back
to rebuilding the middle class. The families
of America. That's where growth will come
from. That's why I want to invest in you. I
want to invest in your family. And I think
that's the smartest way to grow the economy,
to make the economy fairer. And we just have
a big disagreement about this. It may be
because of our experience. He started off
with his dad as a millionaire. I started off
with my dad as a small businessman.
Trump:
We've heard this before. We've heard this
before.
Clinton: I think it's a difference that
affects how we see the world and what we
want to do with the economy.
Wallace: Time.
Trump:
Thank you, Hillary. Could I just respond?
Wallace: Well, no. Because we're running out
of time.
Trump:
Reagan was very strongly on trade. I
disagreed with him. We should have been much
tougher on trade even then. I've been
waiting for years. Nobody does it right. And
frankly now we're going to do it right.
Wallace: The one last area I want to get
into in this debate is the fact that the
biggest driver of our debt is entitlements,
which is 60 percent of all federal spending.
Now the committee for federal — responsible
federal budget has looked at both of your
plans and they say neither of you has a
serious plan that is going to solve the fact
that Medicare is going to run out of money
in the 2020s. Social Security is going to
run out of money in the 2030s. And at that
time, recipients are going to take huge cuts
in their benefits.
So in
effect, the final question I want to ask you
in this regard, and let me start with you,
Mr. Trump, would President Trump make a deal
to save Medicare and Social Security that
included both tax increases and benefit cuts
in effect a grand bargain on entitlements?
Trump:
I'm cutting tax. We're going to grow the
economy. It's going grow at a record rate.
Wallace: But that's not going to help
entitlements.
Trump:
It's going to totally help you. And one
thing we have to do, repeal and replace the
disaster known as Obamacare. It's destroying
our country. It's destroying businesses. We
have to repeal and replace Obamacare. You
take a look at the kind of numbers that that
will cost us in the year '17.
It is
a disaster. If we don't repeal and replace
it's probably going to die of its own
weight. But Obamacare has to go. It's — the
premiums are going up 60, 70, 80 percent.
Next
year they're going to go up over 100
percent. And I'm really glad that the
premiums have started at least the people
see what is happening because she wants to
keep Obamacare. And she wants to make it's
even worse. And it can't get any worse. Bad
Hillary Clinton — at the most we have to
repeal and replace.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton, same question.
At this point, social security and medicare
are going to run out. Will you as president
consider a grand bargain, a deal that
includes both tax increases and benefit cuts
to try to save both fronts?
Clinton: I want to enhance benefits for low
income workers and for women who have been
disadvantaged by the current social security
system. But what Donald is proposing with
the massive tax cuts will result in a $20
trillion national debt — that will have dire
consequences for social security and
medicare. And I'll say something about the
Affordable Care Act, which he wants to
repeal: The Affordable Care Act extended the
solvency of the Medicare trust fund. So if
he repeals it, our Medicare problem gets
worse.
Trump:
Your husband disagrees with you.
Clinton: The long-term health care drivers.
We've got to get costs down, increase value,
emphasize wellness. I have a plan for doing
that. And I think that we will be able to
get entitle spending under control by with
more resources and smarter decisions.
Wallace: This is the final time probably to
both of your delight that you're going to be
on stage together in this campaign. I would
like to end it on a positive note, that you
had not agreed to closing statements. But it
seems to me in a funny way that might make
it more interesting, because you haven't
prepared closing statements. So I would like
you each to take — we're going to put a
clock up, a minute, as the final question
and the final debate to tell the American
people why they should elect you to be the
next president. This is another new mini
segment. Secretary Clinton, it's your turn
to go first.
Clinton: Well, I would like to say to
everyone watching tonight, that I'm reaching
out to all Americans — Democrats,
Republicans and Independents — because we
need everybody to help make our country what
it should be to grow the economy, to make it
fairer, to make it work for everyone. We
need your talents, your skills, your
commitment, your energy, your ambition. I've
been privileged to see the presidency up
close.
And I
know the awesome responsibility of
protecting our country and the incredible
opportunity of working to try to make life
better for you. I have made the cause of
children and families really my life's work.
That's
what my mission will be in the presidency. I
will stand up for families against powerful
interests, against corporations. I will do
everything that I can to make sure that you
have good jobs with rising incomes, that
your kids have good educations from
preschool through college. I hope you will
give me a chance to serve as your president.
Wallace: Secretary Clinton, thank you. Mr.
Trump?
Trump:
She is raising the money from the people she
wants to control. It doesn't work that way.
When I started this campaign, I started it
very strongly. It's called make America
great again.
We're
going to make America great. We have a
depleted military. It has to be helped. It
has to be fixed. We have the greatest people
on Earth in our military.
Well
don't take care off our veterans. We take
care of illegal immigrants better than we
take care of our military. That can't
happen. Our policemen and women are
disrespected. We need law and order, but we
need justice too. Our inner cities are a
disaster. You get shot walking to the store.
They have no education, they have no jobs. I
will do more for African Americans and
Latinos than she can ever do in ten
lifetimes. All she has done is talk to the
African Americans and to the Latinos.
But
they get the vote and then they come back —
they say we'll see you in four years. We are
going to make America strong again. And we
are going to make America great again. And
it has to start now. We cannot take four
more years of Barack Obama. And that's what
you get when you get her.
Wallace: Thank you, both. Secretary Clinton
— hold on just a moment, folks — Secretary
Clinton, and Mr.Trump, I want to thank you
both for participating in all three of these
debates that brings to an end this year's
debate sponsored by the commission on
presidential debates.
We
want to thank the University of Nevada, Las
Vegas and its students for having us. Now
the decision is up to you.
Well,
millions have already voted election day,
November 8th is just 20 days away. One thing
everyone here can agree on. We hope you will
go vote. It's one of the honors and
obligations of living in this great country.
Thank you and good night.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)