The announcement last week by the United
States of the largest military aid
package in its history – to Israel – was
a win for both sides.
Israeli prime
minister Benjamin Netanyahu could boast
that his lobbying had boosted aid from
$3.1 billion a year to $3.8bn – a 22 per
cent increase – for a decade starting in
2019.
Mr Netanyahu has presented this as a
rebuff to those who accuse him of
jeopardising Israeli security interests
with his government’s repeated affronts
to the White House.
In the past weeks alone, defence
minister Avigdor Lieberman has compared
last year’s nuclear deal between
Washington and Iran with the 1938 Munich
pact, which bolstered Hitler; and Mr
Netanyahu has implied that US opposition
to settlement expansion is the same as
support for the “ethnic cleansing” of
Jews.
American president Barack Obama,
meanwhile, hopes to stifle his own
critics who insinuate that he is
anti-Israel. The deal should serve as a
fillip too for Hillary Clinton, the
Democratic party’s candidate to succeed
Mr Obama in November’s election.
In reality, however, the Obama
administration has quietly punished Mr
Netanyahu for his misbehaviour. Israeli
expectations of a $4.5bn-a-year deal
were whittled down after Mr Netanyahu
stalled negotiations last year as he
sought to recruit Congress to his battle
against the Iran deal.
In fact, Israel already receives
roughly $3.8bn – if Congress’s
assistance on developing missile defence
programmes is factored in. Notably,
Israel has been forced to promise not to
approach Congress for extra funds.
The deal takes into account neither
inflation nor the dollar’s depreciation
against the shekel.
A bigger blow still is the White
House’s demand to phase out a special
exemption that allowed Israel to spend
nearly 40 per cent of aid locally on
weapon and fuel purchases. Israel will
soon have to buy all its armaments from
the US, ending what amounted to a
subsidy to its own arms industry.
Nonetheless, Washington’s renewed
military largesse – in the face of
almost continual insults – inevitably
fuels claims that the Israeli tail is
wagging the US dog. Even The New York
Times has described the aid package as
“too big”.
Since the 1973 war, Israel has
received at least $100bn in military
aid, with more assistance hidden from
view. Back in the 1970s, Washington paid
half of Israel’s military budget. Today
it still foots a fifth of the bill,
despite Israel’s economic success.
But the US expects a return on its
massive investment. As the late Israeli
politician-general Ariel Sharon once
observed, Israel has been a US
“aircraft carrier” in the Middle East,
acting as the regional bully and
carrying out operations that benefit
Washington.
Almost no one blames the US for
Israeli attacks that wiped out Iraq’s
and Syria’s nuclear programmes. A
nuclear-armed Iraq or Syria would have
deterred later US-backed moves at regime
overthrow, as well as countering the
strategic advantage Israel derives from
its own nuclear arsenal.
In addition, Israel’s US-sponsored
military prowess is a triple boon to the
US weapons industry, the country’s most
powerful lobby. Public funds are
siphoned off to let Israel buy goodies
from American arms makers. That, in
turn, serves as a shop window for other
customers and spurs an endless and
lucrative game of catch-up in the rest
of the Middle East.
The first F-35 fighter jets to arrive
in Israel in December – their various
components produced in 46 US states –
will increase the clamour for the
cutting-edge warplane.
Israel is also a “front-line
laboratory”, as former Israeli army
negotiator Eival Gilady admitted at the
weekend, that develops and field-tests
new technology Washington can later use
itself.
The US is planning to buy back the
missile interception system Iron Dome –
which neutralises battlefield threats of
retaliation – it largely paid for.
Israel works closely too with the US in
developing cyberwarfare, such as the
Stuxnet worm that damaged Iran’s
civilian nuclear programme.
But the clearest message from
Israel’s new aid package is one
delivered to the Palestinians:
Washington sees no pressing strategic
interest in ending the occupation. It
stood up to Mr Netanyahu over the Iran
deal but will not risk a damaging clash
over Palestinian statehood.
Some believe that Mr Obama signed the
aid package to win the credibility
necessary to overcome his domestic
Israel lobby and pull a rabbit from the
hat: an initiative, unveiled shortly
before he leaves office, that corners Mr
Netanyahu into making peace.
Hopes have been raised by an expected
meeting at the United Nations in New
York on Wednesday. But their first talks
in 10 months are planned only to
demonstrate unity to confound critics of
the aid deal.
If Mr Obama really wanted to pressure
Mr Netanyahu, he would have used the aid
agreement as leverage. Now Mr Netanyahu
need not fear US financial retaliation,
even as he intensifies effective
annexation of the West Bank.
Mr Netanyahu has drawn the right
lesson from the aid deal – he can act
against the Palestinians with continuing
US impunity.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/2016-09-19/palestinians-lose-in-us-military-aid-deal-with-israel/#sthash.fL4Eq28N.dpuf
The New Slave Revolt
By Chris Hedges
October 10, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"Truth
Dig" -
A
nationwide prison work stoppage and hunger
strike, begun on Sept. 9, the 45th
anniversary of the Attica uprising, have
seen over 20,000 prisoners in about 30
prisons do what we on the outside should
do—refuse to cooperate. “We will not only
demand the end to prison slavery, we will
end it ourselves by ceasing to be slaves,”
prisoners of the Free Alabama Movement, the
Free Ohio Movement and the IWW Incarcerated
Workers Organizing Committee
wrote in a communique.
This round of prison strikes—there will be
more—has had little outside support and
press coverage. There have been few protests
outside prison walls. Prison
authorities—unlike during
the 1971 Attica uprising when the press
was allowed into the yard to interview the
rebellious prisoners—have shut out a
compliant media. They have identified strike
leaders and placed them in isolation. Whole
prisons in states such as Texas were put on
lockdown on the eve of the strike. It is
hard to know how many prisoners are still on
strike, just as it is hard to know how many
stopped work or started to fast on Sept. 9.
Before the strike I was able to speak to
prisoner leaders including
Melvin Ray, James Pleasant and Robert Earl
Council, all of whom led work stoppages
in Alabama prisons in January 2014 as part
of the Free Alabama Movement, as well as
Siddique Hasan, one of five leaders of
the April 1993 uprising at the Southern Ohio
Correctional Facility at Lucasville, Ohio.
(The Ohio revolt saw prisoners take control
of the facility for 11 days after numerous
grievances, including complaints about
deaths allegedly caused by beatings from
guards, went unanswered.) Now, authorities
have cut off the access of these and other
prisoner leaders to the press and the rest
of the outside world. I have not been able
to communicate with the four men since the
strike began.
These prison strike leaders put no hope in a
“national conversation” about race and mass
incarceration. They know that corporations,
the courts and politicians will never halt
the lethal police violence against unarmed
men and women of color or dismantle the vast
gulags for the poor that dot the country.
The mechanisms of repression are by design.
They are the logical consequence of
deindustrialization. The corporate state
uses fear, police violence and huge networks
of jails and prisons to keep hundreds of
millions of underemployed and unemployed
poor people from revolting.
“We
have to shut down the prisons,” Council,
known as Kinetik, one of the founders of the
Free Alabama Movement, told me by phone
from the Holman Correctional Facility in
Escambia County, Ala. He has been in prison
21 years, serving a sentence of life without
parole. “We will not work for free anymore.
All the work in prisons, from cleaning to
cutting grass to working in the kitchen, is
done by inmate labor. [Almost no prisoner]
in Alabama is paid. Without us the prisons,
which are slave empires, cannot function.
Prisons, at the same time, charge us a
variety of fees, such as for our
identification cards or wrist bracelets, and
[impose] numerous fines, especially for
possession of contraband. They charge us
high phone and commissary prices. Prisons
each year are taking larger and larger sums
of money from the inmates and their
families. The state gets from us millions of
dollars in free labor and then imposes fees
and fines. You have brothers that work in
kitchens 12 to 15 hours a day and have done
this for years and have never been paid.”
These strike leaders say that, inside and
outside the prison walls, rebellion is the
only option.
“We
are not going to call for protests outside
of statehouses,” Ray said. “Legislators are
owned by corporations. To go up there with
the achy-breaky heart is not going to do any
good. These politicians are in it for the
money. If you are fighting mass
incarceration, the people who are
incarcerated are not in the statehouse. They
are not in the parks. They are in the
prisons. If you are going to fight for the
people in prison, join them at the prison.
The kryptonite to fight the prison system,
which is a $500 billion enterprise, is the
work strike. And we need people to come to
the prisons to let guys on the inside know
they have outside support to shut the prison
down. Once we take our labor back, prisons
will again become places for correction and
rehabilitation rather than centers of
corporate profit.”
These striking prisoners are far more
effective, and far more threatening to the
corporate state, than the outside multitudes
entranced and manipulated by the Donald
Trump and Hillary Clinton Goon Show. Denied
the right to employment, to vote and to
public assistance because of felony
convictions, denied the right to justice
because they are poor, and denied a voice
because they have been silenced by state
censorship and a bankrupt media, these
prisoners were some of the first to
understand the totalitarian nature of the
corporate state.
“We
do not believe in the political process,”
said Ray, who spoke from the St. Clair
Correctional Facility in Springville, Ala.,
and who is serving life without parole. “We
are not looking to politicians to submit
reform bills. We aren’t giving more money to
lawyers. We don’t believe in the courts. We
will rely only on protests inside and
outside of prisons and on targeting the
corporations that exploit prison labor and
finance the school-to-prison pipeline.”
The
2.3 million human beings, most of them poor
people of color, who are locked in cages
across the country provide billions in
salaries and other revenues for depressed
rural towns with large prisons. They provide
billions more in profits to phone card
companies, money transfer companies, food
service companies, merchandise vendors,
construction companies, laundry services,
uniform companies, prison equipment vendors
and the manufacturers of pepper spray, body
armor and the many other medieval
instruments used for the physical restraint
of prisoners. They also make billions for
corporations—Whole Foods, Verizon,
Starbucks, McDonald’s, Sprint, Victoria’s
Secret, American Airlines, J.C. Penney,
Sears, Wal-Mart, Kmart, Eddie Bauer,
Wendy’s, Procter & Gamble, Johnson &
Johnson, Fruit of the Loom, Motorola,
Caterpillar and dozens of others—that
collectively exploit 1 million prison
laborers.
Why
pay workers outside the walls the minimum
wage when you can pay workers behind walls
only a couple of dollars a day? Why exploit
sweatshop workers in countries like
Bangladesh when you can exploit sweatshop
workers in U.S. prisons? Why permit prison
reform that would impede profits? Why not
expand a system that reduces labor costs to
slave wages?
“The beauty of a work stoppage is that the
prison administrators have to bring in
compensated labor,” Hasan told me last year
when I visited him on death row in Ohio.
“This is what happened in the Georgia prison
system in 2010 when the prisoners held a
work stoppage for six days. It cost the
state a lot of money.”
Prisoners are the ideal workers in corporate
America. They earn from 8 cents to about 44
cents an hour. In some states, such as
Alabama, they earn nothing. They receive no
Social Security, pensions or other benefits.
They do not get paid overtime. They are
prohibited from organizing or carrying out
strikes. They always show up on time. They
are not paid for sick days or granted
vacations. They cannot complain about poor
working conditions or safety hazards. If
they protest their meager wages or working
conditions they instantly lose their jobs
and are placed in isolation cells. They live
in an environment where they daily face the
possibility of torture, beatings, prolonged
isolation, sensory deprivation, racial
profiling, rancid food, inadequate medical
care, little or no heating and ventilation,
and rape. In short, they are slaves.
The
bondage that prisoners endure is, little by
little, being imposed on us. The fight
inside prison walls is our own. And the
harsh repression inside prisons to halt the
new strike mirrors the harsh repression that
awaits us if we resist.
Kevin “Rashid” Johnson, the minister of
defense of the New Afrikan Black Panther
Party (Prison Chapter),
sent this message out of his Texas
prison a few days ago:
Monday, September 5, 2016: Labor Day.
Here at the William P. Clements Unit, a
prison in remote Amarillo, Texas, the
prisoners awoke to a late breakfast. A
single PBJ sandwich, a small bowl of dry
cereal, and no beverage.
This grossly inadequate meal, which is
our common fare during institution-wide
lockdowns, signaled that a weeks—or
months—long lockdown was in effect.
Hunger pangs set in almost immediately.
Such lockdowns are routinely imposed
twice yearly so guards can conduct a
prison-wide search of each prisoner’s
living area and property. But this was
not a routine lockdown. For one, those
lockdowns almost never occur during
holidays (however minor). If a holiday
is set to fall during the period of a
scheduled lockdown, the lockdown is
postponed until the day after the
holiday. Secondly, those lockdowns
happen exactly six months apart,
almost to the day. The next one wasn’t
due until mid-October, making this
lockdown over a month ahead of schedule.
Thirdly, for a couple months preceding
this lockdown, officials had been
rejecting a lot of mail and media on
grounds that it contained information on
or “advocating” “prison strikes,”
“prison disruption,” or “work strikes.”
During late August and early September I
received a number of these rejections,
including for letters from the editor of
the San Francisco Bay View
newspaper, Comrades from the Houston, TX
branch of the Industrial Workers of the
World, and others.
Officials were also illegally opening
and reading privileged legal and media
mail outside my presence. They were
obviously focused on discovering,
scrutinizing, and blocking any
information coming into the prison about
the work stoppage/strike planned for
prisons across the U.S. in protest of
prison slave labor and perpetual abuses,
which were set to begin on September 9,
2016—the 45th anniversary of the
uprising at Attica State Prison, that
exposed to the world the inhumanity and
savage brutality that Amerika imposes on
those it imprisons.
And here we find the clue to this
untimely lockdown which officials here
have been falsely portraying to us as
just another routine lockdown.
The actual aim of this lockdown was/is
to pre-empt the prisoners at this Unit
from participating in the September 9th
protest by confining everyone to their
cells in advance of it, and well into
the period during which it might last.
Johnson and other prison strike leaders see
through the political theater and illusions
that the corporate elites employ to mask
Americans’ surrender of freedom. They are
not fooled by the clever branding—including
the presidency of a black man and possibly
the presidency of a woman—used to cover over
oppression.
“To
say that we have a black president does not
say anything,” Melvin Ray said. “The
politicians are the ones who orchestrated
this system. They are either directly
involved as businessmen—many are already
millionaires or billionaires, or they are
controlled by millionaires and billionaires.
We are not blindsided by titles. We are
looking at what is going on behind the
scenes. We see a coordinated effort by the
Koch brothers, ALEC [the
American Legislative Exchange Council]
and political action committees that see in
prisons a business opportunity. Their goal
is to increase [corporate] earnings. And
once you look at it like this, it does not
matter if we have a black or white
president. That is why the policies have not
changed. The laws, such as mandatory minimum
[sentences], were put in place by big
business so they would have access to cheap
labor. The anti-terrorism laws were enacted
to close the doors on the access to justice
so people would be in prison longer. Big
business finances campaigns. Big business
writes the laws and legislation. And Obama
takes money from these people. He is as
vested in this system as they are.”
Items once provided to prisoners, such as
shoes, extra blankets and toilet paper, now
often must be bought from the prison
commissary, run by corporations such as
Keefe Supply Co. These commissaries are, in
effect, company stores where prices are
exorbitant and the buyers are hostage.
Companies such as GTL force prisoners to pay
phone rates five or six times higher than
those on the outside. JPay, a money transfer
service for prisoners, imposes fees as high
as 25 percent. The incarcerated are
increasingly being charged for electricity
and room and board. This bleeds the
prisoners and their families of the little
income they possess. Those who run out of
money are forced to take out prison loans to
buy medications, cover legal and medical
fees and purchase commissary items such as
soap and deodorant. Debt peonage is as
common among prisoners as it is among the
wider public. And when prisoners are
released they often owe the state thousands
of dollars in debt they incurred while
locked up. When they can’t pay it back they
are tossed back into prison. The U.S. Bureau
of Justice Statistics reports that 75
percent of released prisoners are rearrested
within five years. This keeps the perpetual
cycle of neoslavery lubricated.
“For years we were called niggers to
indicate we had no value or worth and that
anything could be done to us,” Ray told me.
“Then the word ‘nigger’ became politically
incorrect. So they began calling us
criminals. When you say a person is a
criminal it means that what happens to them
does not matter. It means he or she is a
nigger. It means they deserve what they
get.”
Chris Hedges, spent nearly two decades as a
foreign correspondent in Central America,
the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He
has reported from more than 50 countries and
has worked for The Christian Science
Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas
Morning News and The New York Times, for
which he was a foreign correspondent for 15
years. |