The announcement last week by the United
States of the largest military aid
package in its history – to Israel – was
a win for both sides.
Israeli prime
minister Benjamin Netanyahu could boast
that his lobbying had boosted aid from
$3.1 billion a year to $3.8bn – a 22 per
cent increase – for a decade starting in
2019.
Mr Netanyahu has presented this as a
rebuff to those who accuse him of
jeopardising Israeli security interests
with his government’s repeated affronts
to the White House.
In the past weeks alone, defence
minister Avigdor Lieberman has compared
last year’s nuclear deal between
Washington and Iran with the 1938 Munich
pact, which bolstered Hitler; and Mr
Netanyahu has implied that US opposition
to settlement expansion is the same as
support for the “ethnic cleansing” of
Jews.
American president Barack Obama,
meanwhile, hopes to stifle his own
critics who insinuate that he is
anti-Israel. The deal should serve as a
fillip too for Hillary Clinton, the
Democratic party’s candidate to succeed
Mr Obama in November’s election.
In reality, however, the Obama
administration has quietly punished Mr
Netanyahu for his misbehaviour. Israeli
expectations of a $4.5bn-a-year deal
were whittled down after Mr Netanyahu
stalled negotiations last year as he
sought to recruit Congress to his battle
against the Iran deal.
In fact, Israel already receives
roughly $3.8bn – if Congress’s
assistance on developing missile defence
programmes is factored in. Notably,
Israel has been forced to promise not to
approach Congress for extra funds.
The deal takes into account neither
inflation nor the dollar’s depreciation
against the shekel.
A bigger blow still is the White
House’s demand to phase out a special
exemption that allowed Israel to spend
nearly 40 per cent of aid locally on
weapon and fuel purchases. Israel will
soon have to buy all its armaments from
the US, ending what amounted to a
subsidy to its own arms industry.
Nonetheless, Washington’s renewed
military largesse – in the face of
almost continual insults – inevitably
fuels claims that the Israeli tail is
wagging the US dog. Even The New York
Times has described the aid package as
“too big”.
Since the 1973 war, Israel has
received at least $100bn in military
aid, with more assistance hidden from
view. Back in the 1970s, Washington paid
half of Israel’s military budget. Today
it still foots a fifth of the bill,
despite Israel’s economic success.
But the US expects a return on its
massive investment. As the late Israeli
politician-general Ariel Sharon once
observed, Israel has been a US
“aircraft carrier” in the Middle East,
acting as the regional bully and
carrying out operations that benefit
Washington.
Almost no one blames the US for
Israeli attacks that wiped out Iraq’s
and Syria’s nuclear programmes. A
nuclear-armed Iraq or Syria would have
deterred later US-backed moves at regime
overthrow, as well as countering the
strategic advantage Israel derives from
its own nuclear arsenal.
In addition, Israel’s US-sponsored
military prowess is a triple boon to the
US weapons industry, the country’s most
powerful lobby. Public funds are
siphoned off to let Israel buy goodies
from American arms makers. That, in
turn, serves as a shop window for other
customers and spurs an endless and
lucrative game of catch-up in the rest
of the Middle East.
The first F-35 fighter jets to arrive
in Israel in December – their various
components produced in 46 US states –
will increase the clamour for the
cutting-edge warplane.
Israel is also a “front-line
laboratory”, as former Israeli army
negotiator Eival Gilady admitted at the
weekend, that develops and field-tests
new technology Washington can later use
itself.
The US is planning to buy back the
missile interception system Iron Dome –
which neutralises battlefield threats of
retaliation – it largely paid for.
Israel works closely too with the US in
developing cyberwarfare, such as the
Stuxnet worm that damaged Iran’s
civilian nuclear programme.
But the clearest message from
Israel’s new aid package is one
delivered to the Palestinians:
Washington sees no pressing strategic
interest in ending the occupation. It
stood up to Mr Netanyahu over the Iran
deal but will not risk a damaging clash
over Palestinian statehood.
Some believe that Mr Obama signed the
aid package to win the credibility
necessary to overcome his domestic
Israel lobby and pull a rabbit from the
hat: an initiative, unveiled shortly
before he leaves office, that corners Mr
Netanyahu into making peace.
Hopes have been raised by an expected
meeting at the United Nations in New
York on Wednesday. But their first talks
in 10 months are planned only to
demonstrate unity to confound critics of
the aid deal.
If Mr Obama really wanted to pressure
Mr Netanyahu, he would have used the aid
agreement as leverage. Now Mr Netanyahu
need not fear US financial retaliation,
even as he intensifies effective
annexation of the West Bank.
Mr Netanyahu has drawn the right
lesson from the aid deal – he can act
against the Palestinians with continuing
US impunity.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/2016-09-19/palestinians-lose-in-us-military-aid-deal-with-israel/#sthash.fL4Eq28N.dpuf
The
Eurasian Century Is Now Unstoppable
The transfer of the geopolitical center of
gravity to Eurasia is something the West
will have to get used to
By F. William Engdah
October 07, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "NEO"
-
I
recently returned from a fascinating two
week speaking tour in China. The occasion
was the international premier of my newest
book, One Belt, One Road–China and the New
Eurasian Century. In the course of my visit
I was invited by China’s Northwest
University in Xi’an to give a lecture and
seminar on the present global political and
economic situation in the context of China’s
New Economic Silk Road as the One Belt, One
Road project is often called. What I’ve seen
in my many visits to China, and have studied
about the entirety of this enormously
impressive international infrastructure
project convinces me that a Eurasian Century
at this point is unstoppable.
The
idiotic wars of the Washington war-hawks and
their military industry–in Syria, in
Ukraine, Libya, Iraq and now the South China
Sea provocations against China–are not going
to stop what is now clearly the most
impressive and economically altering project
in more than a century.
The
term “American Century” was triumphantly
proclaimed in a famous editorial in Life
magazine in 1941 in the early phase of World
War II, before the United States had even
entered the war, to describe the system
publisher Henry Luce saw dominating the
postwar world after the fall of the rival
British Empire.
The
American Century has lasted a mere seven
decades if we date from the end of the war.
Its record has been one of dismal failure on
balance. The industrial base of the United
States, the predominant leading industrial
nation and leading scientific innovator,
today is a hollowed, rotted shell with
once-booming cities like Detroit or
Philadelphia or Los Angeles now burned-out
ghettos of unemployed and homeless.
The
Federal Debt of the United States, owing to
the endless wars its Presidents engage in,
as well as the fruitless bailouts of Wall
Street banks and Government Sponsored
Enterprises like Fannie Mae, is well over
103% of GDP at an astonishing $19.5
trillion, or more than $163,000 per
taxpaying American and Washington is adding
to the debt this year at near $600 billion.
Countries like China and Russia are moving
away from subsidizing that debt at a record
pace.
America’s economic basic
infrastructure–bridges, sewer and water
treatment plants, electric grid, railways,
highways–have been neglected for more than
four decades for a variety of reasons. The
American Society of Civil Engineers recently
estimated that gross domestic product will
be reduced by $4 trillion between 2016 and
2025 because of lost business sales, rising
costs and reduced incomes if the country
continues to underinvest in its
infrastructure. That is on top of the fact
that they estimate the country at present
urgently requires new infrastructure
investment of $3.3 trillion by the coming
decade just to
renew.
Yet US
states and cities are not able to finance
such an investment in the future in the
present debt situation, nor is the
debt-choked Federal Government, so long as a
cartel of corrupt brain-dead Wall Street
banks and financial funds hold America to
ransom. This is the sunset for the American
Century, a poorly disguised imperial
experiment in hubris and arrogance by a
gaggle of boring old patriarchs like David
Rockefeller and his friends on Wall Street
and in the military industry. It is the
starkest contrast to what is going on to the
east, across all Eurasia today.
Flowing the Thought to Transform
The
Eurasian Century is the name I give to the
economic emergence of the countries
contiguous from China across Central Asia,
Russia, Belarus, Iran and potentially
Turkey. They are being integrally linked
through the largest public infrastructure
projects in modern history, in fact the most
ambitious ever, largely concentrated on the
2013 initiative by Chinese President Xi
Jinping called the One Belt, One Road
initiative or OBOR. The project and its
implications for Europe and the rest of the
world economy have been so far greeted in
the west with a stone silence that defies
explanation.
It’s
been now three years that have transpired
since then-new Chinese President Xi Jinping
made one of his first foreign visits to
Kazakhstan where he discussed the idea of
building a vast, modern network of
high-speed train lines crossing the vast
Eurasian land space from the Pacific coast
of China and Russia through Central Asia
into Iran, into the states of the Eurasian
Economic Union, principally Russia and
potentially on to the select states of the
European Union. That initial proposal was
unveiled in detail last year by the National
Development and Reform Commission (NDRC),
China’s economic planning organization, and
the ministries of Foreign Affairs and
Commerce.
It’s a
useful point to look now more closely at
what has transpired to date. It reveals most
impressive developments, more because the
development process is creative and organic.
The great project is no simple blueprint
made by the Central Committee of the
Communist Party of China and then simply
imposed, top down, across the so-far 60
countries of Eurasia and South East Asia.
An
international conference was recently held
in Xi’an, origin of the ancient version of
One Belt, One Road, namely the Silk Road.
The purpose of the international gathering
was to review what has so far taken place.
It’s fascinating, notably, in the care
that’s being taken by China to do it in a
different way, as indications so far are,
different from the way American Robber
Barons like Cornelius Vanderbilt, E.H.
Harriman, Jay Gould or Russell Sage built
rail monopolies and deluded and defrauded
investors with railroad monopolies more than
a century ago.
The
seminar, titled the Belt and Road Initiative
(BRI): Shared Memory and Common Development,
on September 26th, brought together over 400
participants from more than 30 countries
including government officials,
universities, corporations, think tanks and
media.
A key
role is being played by Renmin University of
China’s Chongyang Institute for Financial
Studies to identify progress and problems of
the OBOR project. Their report in Xi’an
presented principles underlying the OBOR
international project: It adheres to the
principles of the UN Charter; it is
completely open for new participant nations
to cooperate; it will follow market rules
and seek mutual benefit of participating
countries.
Those
are noble words. What’s more interesting is
the flow process underway to realize such
words and to build the mammoth game-changing
infrastructure.
Notably, China’s Xi Jinping decided to
encourage input from sources other than the
state central planning agency or the
Communist Party for the complex OBOR. He
encouraged creation of private and
independent think-tanks to become a source
of new creative ideas and approaches. Today
there is a Chinese Think Tank Cooperation
Alliance group coordinating efforts around
OBOR headed by the dean of the Renmin
University. In turn they partner with think
tanks along the OBOR route including think
tanks in Iran, Turkey, India, Nepal,
Kazakhstan and other
countries.
There
will be two main routes of the OBOR. On land
there are several routes or corridors in
work. The Initiative will focus on jointly
building what is being called a new Eurasian
Land Bridge from China via Kazakhstan on to
Rotterdam. Other OBOR land rail corridors
include developing China-Mongolia-Russia,
China-Central Asia-West Asia,
China-Pakistan,
Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar, and
China-Indochina Peninsula economic
corridors.v
This is huge.
It
will build on international transport
routes, relying on core cities along the
OBOR route and using key economic industrial
parks as “cooperation platforms.” At sea,
the Initiative will focus on jointly
building smooth, secure and efficient
transport routes connecting major sea ports
along the “Belt and Road” including modern
upgraded super port construction that will
link present China ports at Haikou and
Fujian with Kuala Lumpur’s port in Malaysia
at the Malacca Strait passage, Calcutta in
India, Nairobi in Kenya and via the Suez
Canal to Athens and beyond. Crucial is that
land and sea parts of OBOR are seen as one
whole circulatory system or flow of trade.
The
OBOR Initiative will link key Eurasian ports
with interior rail and pipeline
infrastructure in a way not before seen
To
date China has signed memoranda of
understanding with 56 countries and regional
organizations regarding OBOR. Since his
initial proposal in 2013, President Xi
Jinping has personally visited 37 countries
to discuss implementation of OBOR. China
Railway Group and China Communications
Construction Company have signed contracts
for key routes and ports in 26 countries.
Power plants, electricity transmission
facilities and oil and gas pipelines,
covering 19 countries along the “Belt and
Road” in some 40 energy projects have begun.
China Unicom, China Telecom and China Mobile
are speeding up cross-border transmission
projects in countries along the “Belt and
Road” to expand international
telecommunication
infrastructure.
Already, taking the full sea and land routes
of OBOR, some $3 trillion of China trade
since June 2013 has flowed over the route,
more than a quarter of China’s total trade
volume. To date China has also invested more
than $51 billion in the countries along the
present OBOR route. The new land rail routes
will greatly reduce transportation costs
across Eurasia, enable formerly isolated
regions to connect efficiently to sea and
land markets and ignite tremendous new
economic growth across Eurasia.
The
effects of the OBOR are already beginning to
appear. Earlier this year an Iranian
container ship arrived at Qinzhou Port in
China with 978 containers from several
countries along the 21st-Century Maritime
Silk Road opening the first shipping route
linking the Middle East and the Beibu Gulf
or Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnamese. In February
2016 a container train with Chinese goods
took only 14 days to complete the 5,900 mile
(9,500km) journey from China’s eastern
Zhejiang province through Kazakhstan and
Turkmenistan. That was 30 days shorter than
the sea voyage from Shanghai to the Iranian
port of Bandar Abbas, according to the head
of the Iranian railway company. China and
Iran, now formally part of the OBOR, have
targeted bilateral trade, none in US dollars
by the way, to exceed $600 billion in the
coming
decade.
China
is presently in negotiations with 28
countries China is in talks with 28
countries including Russia, on high-speed
rail projects, China’s train maker, China
CNR reports.
It
includes a major joint China-Russia $15
billion high-speed Kazan to Moscow line. The
770 kilometers of track between Moscow and
Russia’s Tatarstan capital, Kazan, will cut
time for the journey from 12 hours now to
just 3.5 hours. China has agreed to invest
$6 billion in the project which would become
a part of a $100 billion high-speed railway
between Moscow and Beijing.
Notably, for the new high-speed track being
laid, China is developing a new generation
of trains capable of reaching speeds of 400
kilometers per hour. And the new trains will
solve the costly rail gauge switching
problem between China rails and Russian.
Trains in Russia run on a 1520mm track,
compared to the narrower 1435mm track used
in Europe and China. Jia Limin, the head of
China’s high-speed rail innovation program
told China Daily that, “The train… will have
wheels that can be adjusted to fit various
gauges on other countries’ tracks, compared
with trains now that need to have their
wheels changed before entering foreign
systems.” Given its strategy of building
thousands of kilometers of high-speed
railways and developing its domestic Chinese
rail sock manufacture as well as other rail
technology, China today is the world’s
leading producer of rail technology.
Financing the moving
Impressive is that China has secured capital
commitment for the OBOR from various sources
including the China Development Bank,
Export-Import Bank of China, the
China-initiated Asian Infrastructure
Investment Bank, the BRICS New Development
Bank and other sources including its Silk
Road Fund to finance the huge undertaking.
The Silk Road Fund has posted $40 billion to
fund the OBOR projects. So far close to a
quarter trillion US dollars of ready money
and another half trillion in supranational
institutional working capital is reasonably
within
reach.
The
Western doomsday reports of China’s economy
going down the tubes are simply either
self-serving propaganda of hedge funds or
speculators or fed by lack of understanding
of the profound transformation in the entire
structure of not only China’s but all
Eurasia’s economy through the One Belt One
Road initiative. China is undergoing a major
transformation from a cheap-labor
screwdriver assembly nation to a
high-value-added high-tech manufacturer.
Geopolitical transformation
The
One Belt, One Road initiative of Xi Jinping
and the Eurasian partners, especially
Russia, also has strategic dimensions of
major import. The construction of new
infrastructure corridors spanning across the
Eurasian landmass in the form of highways,
railways, industrial parks, and oil and gas
pipelines, OBOR is connecting for the first
time in the modern era landlocked regions of
hinterland China and Russia and Central Asia
republics with the sea ports. Linking key
Eurasian industrial hubs to ports with
efficient transportation will revolutionize
connectivity of hinterland industrial
products and raw materials of every kind.
The Russian and Eurasian lands, including
China, contain perhaps the richest untapped
concentration of every raw material known.
The
One Belt, One Road also includes oil and gas
pipeline transportation corridors. In
January 2015 the Myanmar-China Pipeline
project, 2400 km long, was completed,
linking Myanmar’s deep-water port of
Kyaukphyu on Maday Island in the Bay of
Bengal with Kunming in Yunnan province in
southeast China near Myanmar’s border. It’s
a joint project of the China Development
Bank and Myanmar Foreign Investment Bank.
The new pipeline allows China to import up
to 400,000 barrels a day of Middle East oil
over a route 1100 km shorter than the
previous Malacca Strait sea route, reducing
time to reach the large industrial hub city
of Kunming by 30%, major economic gains, and
avoiding the strategic chokepoint of the
Malacca Strait where the US Navy’s Sixth
Fleet
dominates.
Previously, 80% of Chinese oil and gas
imports crossed the Malacca straits and were
subject to US controls. Were the present
escalating tensions between Washington and
China over the South China Sea or other
issues to escalate, China would be brought
to her knees much like Japan prior to
declaring war in 1941, when the USA
embargoed her oil. A second pipeline brings
natural gas from Qatar and Myanmar gas
fields to
China.
The
OBOR includes oil and gas pipelines that
reduce time and distance to imports of
Middle East oil and gas
China
will pay $53 billion to Myanmar in pipeline
royalties over 30 years. They will also
invest $25 million in schooling and other
social development projects along the
pipeline and 10% of the gas will stay in
Burma.
Mackinder Outflanked?
The
totality of the strategy behind Xi Jinping’s
Eurasian One belt, One Road rail, sea and
pipeline initiative, which is moving quietly
and impressively forward, is transforming
the world geopolitical map. In 1904 a
British geographer, Sir Halford Mackinder, a
fervid champion of the British Empire,
unveiled a brilliant concept in a speech to
the London Royal Geographical Society titled
the Geographical Pivot of History. That
essay has shaped both British and American
global strategy of hegemony and domination
to the present. It was complemented by US
Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan’s 1890 work, The
Influence of Sea Power Upon History, which
advocated “sea power,” stating that nations
with domination of the seas, as the British
Empire or later the USA, would dominate the
world.
The
One Belt, One Road, by linking all the
contiguous land areas of Eurasia to the
related network of strategic new or enlarged
deep-water ports of OBOR’s Maritime Silk
Road, has rendered US geopolitical strategy
a devastating blow at a time the hegemony of
America is failing as never in its short
history. The Eurasian Century today is
inevitable and unstoppable. Built on
different principles of cooperation rather
than domination, it just might offer a model
for the bankrupt United States and the
soon-bankrupt European Union, to build up
true prosperity not based on looting and
debt slavery.
F. William Engdahl is
strategic risk consultant and lecturer,
he holds a degree in politics from Princeton
University and is a best-selling author on
oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the
online magazine “New
Eastern Outlook.” |