Will Russia Surrender?
By
Paul Craig Roberts
September 20, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- - The Russian government’s
sincere and diligent effort to prevent chaos
in Syria and additional massive refugee flow
into Europe, all the while avoiding conflict
with Washington and its vassals, has been
brought to an end by Washington’s
intentional attack on a known Syrian army
position, thus wrecking the cease fire
agreement that Russia sacrificed so much to
achieve.
The
response to this fact by the Obama regime’s
ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power,
reveals that Washington will lie to the hilt
in order to achieve its agenda of reducing
Syria to the same chaos as Washington has
reduced Iraq and Libya. Washington, and
Washington alone, is responsible for the war
in Syria. When the British Parliament and
the Russian government blocked Obama’s
intended US invasion of Syria, the Obama
regime armed and financed jihadist
mercenaries to invade Syria, pretending that
the jihadists were Syrian rebels fighting
for democracy in Syria.
Samantha Power turned history upside down
and blames the war on Russia’s intervention
at the request of the Syrian government
against the ISIL jihadists that Washington
sent to destabilize Syria. What Samantha
means is that if Russia had not come to the
aid of Syria, Washington and ISIL would
already have destroyed Syria, and there
would be no war.
Ambassador Vitaly Churkin,
Russia’s ambassador to the UN, said
that in his 40 years of diplomacy he had
never seen such a high-handed and demagogic
performance as Samantha’s. Churkin seemed to
imply that such an unrealistic and twisted
response to known facts as Samantha
delivered leaves him without hope of any
successful diplomatic outcome.
If
the Russian government has finally arrived
at the conclusion that Washington is
determined to destroy political stability in
Syria and to replace it with chaos, it has
taken a long time.
The
Russian government has studiously avoided
this conclusion, because once diplomacy is
acknowledged as useless, force confronts
force. In today’s context that means
thermo-nuclear war and the end of life on
Earth.
This is the reason that the Russian
government has replied diplomatically to
Washington’s coercive provocations, offering
Washington cooperation in place of conflict.
However, Washington wants conflict. The
Russians have pretended that Washington has
a common interest with Russia in combating
terrorism, but terrorism is Washington’s
tool for destabilizing Syria, then Iran, and
then the Muslim provinces of the Russian
Federation and China.
Washington wants hegemeny not cooperation.
Now that Samantha Power has made this so
clear that the Russian government can no
longer pretend otherwise, what will Russia
(and China) do?
If
Russia and China are not ready for the war
that Washington is bringing to them, will
they retreat in the face of the aggression,
sacrificing Syria, the break-away Russian
provinces from Ukraine, and the various
disputed island issues in the Pacific Ocean
while they gather their strength? Or will
they decide to break-up the NATO alliance by
making the cost of conflict very clear to
Washington’s European vassals? Clearly,
Europe has nothing to gain from Washington’s
aggression against Russia and China.
Or
is Russia unable to do anything now that
diplomacy is a proven dead-end?
Perhaps this is the over-riding question. As
far as someone who is not a member of the
Russian government can tell, Russia is not
completely in control of its destiny.
Elements in the Russian government known as
“Atlanticist Integrationists” believe that
it is more important for Russia to be part
of the West and to be integrated into the
Western system than to be a sovereign
country. They argue that if formerly great
powers, such as Great Britain, Germany, and
France, can profit from being American
vassals, so can Russia.
Atlanticist Integrationists claim that
Russia’s strategic nuclear capability and
land mass means that Russia can maintain
some sovereignty and only partially submit
as a vassal. One problem with this position
is that it assumes the neoconservatives are
content with less than complete hegemony and
would not capitalize on Russia’s weakened
position to achieve full hegemony.
The
Russian government probably still has hopes
that at least some European governments will
recognize their responsibility to avoid war
and exit NATO, thus removing political cover
for Washington’s aggression. Possibly there
is some such hope, but the main European
political figures are bought-and-paid-for by
Washington. As a high US government official
told me as long ago as the 1970s, “we own
them; they belong to us.”
Not much hope can be found in
the European media. Udo Ulfkotte, a former
editor of Germany’s Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung, published a book in which he said
that every significant European journalist
was on the CIA’s payroll.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-28/top-german-journalist-admits-mainstream-media-completely-fake-we-all-lie-cia
With politicians and media bought off, where
can European leadership come from?
Europeans have become accustomed to their
role as hired vassals. As no European
politician or newspaper editor can assume
that an act of rebellion would succeed, they
are more likely to enjoy their life enriched
by American gratuities than to take a risk
for humanity.
The
wider question is whether the extant
socio-politico-economic systems can act in
behalf of humanity. It is not clear that
capitalist civilizations are capable of
being humane, because worth is based on
money, which makes greed and power the
overpowering factors. It is possible that
human evil and incompetence have destroyed
not only the planet’s environment but also
humane social systems. Globalism is not a
scheme for cooperation. It is Washington’s
scheme for American domination.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury for Economic
Policy and associate editor of the Wall
Street Journal. He was columnist for
Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service,
and Creators Syndicate. He has had many
university appointments. His internet
columns have attracted a worldwide
following. Roberts' latest books are
The
Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and
Economic Dissolution of the West,
How
America Was Lost,
and
The
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
|