US-NATO-Turkey Invasion of Northern Syria
CIA
“Failed” Turkey Coup Lays Groundwork for Broader
Middle East War?
By Prof
Michel Chossudovsky
September
01, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "GR"
-
In mid-July,
President Erdogan pointed his finger at the CIA,
accusing US intelligence of having supported a
failed coup directed against his government. Turkish
officials pointed to a deterioration of US-Turkey
relations following Washington’s refusal to
extradite Fethullah Gülen, the alleged architect of
the failed coup.
Erdogan’s
Justice Minister Bekir Bozdag was categorical:
“If the US does not deliver (Gulen),
they will sacrifice
relations with Turkey for the sake of a
terrorist”
Public opinion was led to believe that
relations with the US had not
only deteriorated, but that Erdogan had vowed to
restore “an axis of friendship” with Moscow,
including “cooperation in the defence sector”. This
was a hoax.
Turkey’s Invasion of Syria
The
implementation of the Turkish invasion required
routine consultations with the US and NATO,
coordination of military logistics, intelligence,
communications systems, coordination of ground and
air operations, etc. To be effectively carried out
these military endeavors required a cohesive and
“friendly” US-Turkey relationship.
We are not
dealing with a piecemeal military initiative.
Turkey’s Operation Euphrates Shield
could not have taken place without the
active support of the Pentagon, which ultimately
calls the shots in the war on Syria.
The likely
scenario is that from mid July to mid-August US,
NATO and Turkish officials were actively involved in
planning the next stage of the war on Syria: an
(illegal) invasion led by Turkish ground-forces,
backed by the US and NATO.
Map of the
Turkish-led offensive in the northern Aleppo
Governorate, showing the ongoing developments in
west of Euphrates River. Source Wikipedia
The
Failed Coup Sets the Stage for a Ground Invasion
1. Massive
purges within the armed forces and government were
implemented in the immediate wake of the July coup.
They had been planned well in advance. ”Arrested
immediately were 2,839 army personnel with 2,745
Judges and Prosecutors ordered detained… In
under a week 60,000 people had been fired or
detained and 2,300 institutions closed” … “
(See Felicity Arbuthnot, Global
Research, August 2, 2016)
2.The coup was
intended to fail. Erdogan had advanced knowledge of
the coup and so did Washington. There was no
conspiracy directed by the CIA against Erdogan.
Quite the opposite, the failed coup was in all
likelihood engineered by the CIA in liaison with
Erdogan. It was intended to consolidate and
reinforce the Erdogan regime as well as rally the
Turkish people behind their president and his
military agenda “in the name of democracy”.
3. The purges
within the Armed Forces were intended to get rid of
members of the military hierarchy who were opposed
to an invasion of Syria. Did the CIA assist Erdogan
in establishing the lists of military officers,
judges and senior government officials to be
arrested or fired? The Turkish media was also
targeted, many of which were closed down.
4.
Erdogan used the July 15 coup to accuse Washington
of supporting the Gulen movement while seeking a
fake rapprochement with Moscow. He flew to St
Petersburg on August 9, for a behind closed doors
meeting with President Putin. In all likelihood, the
scenario of a rift between Ankara and Washington
coupled with the “my friend Putin” narrative had
been approved by the Obama administration. It was
part of a carefully designed intelligence ploy
coupled with media disinformation. President
Erdogan, vowed according to Western media reports: “to
restore an ‘axis of friendship’ between Ankara and
Moscow amid a growing rift between Turkey and the
West.”
5. While
“mending the fence” with Russia, Turkey’s military
and intelligence apparatus was involved in planning
the invasion of Northern Syria in liaison with
Washington and NATO headquarters in Brussels.
The underlying objective is
to ultimately confront and weaken Syria’s military
allies: Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.
In St
Petersburg in the immediate wake of the July 15
failed coup, Erdogan thanked his “dear friend”
Vladimir Putin.
“The fact Mr Putin called me the next day after
the coup attempt was a very strong psychological
factor,” he said at a joint press conference.
“The axis of friendship between Moscow and
Ankara will be restored,” he said.
Telegraph, August 7, 2016
Did Putin know that the failed coup,
covertly supported by the CIA, was meant to fail?
One suspects that Russian intelligence was aware of
the ploy and was also informed regarding Turkey’s
invasion plans:
“Your
visit today, despite a very difficult situation
regarding domestic politics, indicates that we
all want to restart dialogue and restore
relations between Russia and Turkey,” Mr Putin
said as the pair met in the city’s Constantine
Palace.
… Mr
Putin on Tuesday said Russia would “step by
step” lift sanctions, … Mr Erdogan in turn
promised to back major Russian energy projects
in Turkey, including the construction of the
country’s first nuclear power station and a gas
pipeline to Europe.
He also said the two countries would step up
“cooperation in
the defence sector,” but did not elaborate.
The
Putin-Erdogan Saint Petersburg meeting was
interpreted by the media as a rapprochement with
Moscow in response to the alleged involvement of the
CIA in the failed coup.
According
to the
Washington Post, an improvised about-turn in
US-NATO-Turkey relations had occurred despite
Erdogan’s “friendly” encounter with Putin:
NATO went out of its way Wednesday to insist
that Turkey — whose president this week
visited Moscow and promised a new level of
cooperation with the man he repeatedly called
his “dear friend,” Russian President
Vladimir Putin — remains
a “valued ally” whose alliance
membership “is not in question.”
In a
statement posted on its website, NATO said it
was responding to “speculative press reports
regarding NATO’s stance regarding the failed
coup in Turkey and Turkey’s NATO membership.”
A
nonsensical report. In actuality, the Pentagon,
NATO, the Turkish High Command and Israel are in
permanent liaison. Israel is a de facto member of
NATO, it has a comprehensive bilateral military and
intelligence relationship with Turkey.
With the
invasion of the border area of Northern Syria and
the influx of Turkish tanks and armoured vehicles,
the Turkey-Russia relationship is in crisis. And
that is the ultimate objective of US foreign policy.
Russian
forces are acting on behalf of their Syrian ally.
How will
the Kremlin and Russia’s High Command respond to
what constitutes a US-Turkey-NATO ground invasion of
Syria?
How will
they confront Turkish and allied forces? One assumes
that Russia will avoid direct military
confrontation.
After the
US, Turkey is NATO’s heavy weight.
Sofar the
Turkish op is limited to a small border territory.
Nonetheless it constitutes and important landmark in
the evolution of the Syria war: invasion of a
sovereign country in derogation of international
law. Washington’s endgame remains “regime change” in
Damascus.
Is the
military initiative a preamble for a larger military
undertaking on the part of Turkey supported by
US-NATO? In many regards, Turkey is acting as a US
proxy:
Turkey’s incursion was backed by US air-cover,
drones, and embedded special forces per the WSJ.
These were there largely to prevent Russia and
Syria from even thinking about taking action
against the invading forces.
Turkey
is moving into Syria not just with its own
military, but with thousands of “rebel
opposition groups” including US-backed FSA
brigades allied with AlQaeda/Nusra/Sham and the
child head-chopping al-Zinki who are reported to
form the vanguard. Syrian territory is
outright being turned over to them by the
Turkish military, simply exchanging control from
one group of terrorist jihadis (ISIS) to others
who are more media acceptable and more direct
proxies of the Erdogan regime, the U.S., Saudi
Arabia and Qatar.
That said, ISIS has not resisted the Turkish
advance at all – simply “melting away” (or
exchanging one set of uniforms for
another?). (Moon
of Alabama
Do the SAA
Syrian forces have the military capabilities of
confronting Turkish ground forces without Russian
and Iranian support? How will Tehran react to the
influx of Turkish forces? Will it come to the rescue
of its Syrian ally?
An
“incident” could be used as a pretext to justify a
broader NATO-led war. Article 5 of the Washington
Treaty (NATO’s founding document) states under the
doctrine of “collective security” that an attack
against one member state of the Atlantic Alliance
(e.g. Turkey) is an attack against all members
states of the Atlantic Alliance.
Dangerous
crossroads. With the incursion of Turkish ground
forces, military confrontation with Syria’s allies,
namely Iran and Russia, is a distinct possibility
which could lead to a process of escalation beyond
Syria’s borders.
The
Erdogan-Jo Biden Meeting
From
Washington’s perspective, this ground invasion sets
the stage for a possible annexation of part of
Northern Syria by Turkey. It also opens the door for
the deployment of US-NATO ground force operations
directed against central and southern Syria.
Erdogan met
up with Vice President Biden on August 23, following
the influx of Turkish tanks into Northern Syria. The
invasion is carefully coordinated with the US which
provided extensive air force protection. There is no
rift between Ankara and Washington, quite the
opposite:
It [is]
difficult to believe that Turkey truly suspected
the US of an attempted decapitation of the
nation’s senior leadership in a violent,
abortive coup just last month, only to be
conducting joint operations with the US inside
Syria with US military forces still based within
Turkish territory.
What is
much more likely is that the coup was staged to
feign a US-Turkish fallout, draw in Russia and
allow Turkey to make sweeping purges of any
elements within the Turkish armed forces that
might oppose a cross-border foray into Syria, a
foray that is now unfolding. (See The
New Atlas, Global Research, August 24, 2016)
Media
reports convey the illusion that the Biden-Erdogan
meetings were called to discuss the extradition of
the alleged architect of the failed coup Gulen. This
was a smokescreen. Jo Biden who had also met Erdogan
back in January, gave the green-light on behalf of
Washington for a joint US-Turkey-NATO military
incursion into Syria.
The
Kurdish Question
The
invasion is not directed against Daesh (ISIS) which
is protected by Ankara, it is geared towards
fighting SAA forces as well as Kurdish YPG forces,
which are “officially” supported by the US. The US
supported ISIS-Daesh and Al Qaeda affiliated rebels
are working hand in glove with the Turkish invaders.
The
invasion is also part of a longstanding project by
Turkey of creating a “safe-haven” within
Northern Syria (see map above) which can be
used to extend US-NATO-Turkey military operations
Southwards into Syria’s heartland.
Washington has warned
its Kurdish allies not to confront
Turkish forces:
Biden
said the Kurds, who Turkey claims intend to
establish a separate state along a border
corridor in conjunction with Turkey’s own
Kurdish population, “cannot, will not, and under
no circumstances will get American support if
they do not keep” what he said was a commitment
to return to the east.
Washington
will no doubt eventually clash with Ankara with
regard to Turkey’s project of territorial expansion
in Northern Syria. Washington’s longstanding
objective is to create a Kurdish State in Northern
Syria, within the framework of a territorial breakup
of both Syria and Iraq. (see US National War Academy
map below). In a bitter irony, this “New Middle
East” project also consists in annexing part of
Turkey to the proposed Kurdish State. In other
words, Turkey’s New Ottoman objective of
territorial expansion encroaches upon Washington’s
design to fragment Iraq, Syria, Iran as well as
Turkey. In other words, America’s ultimate imperial
design is to weaken Turkey as a regional power.
The
Pentagon has defined a military roadmap: “The road
to Tehran goes through Damascus.” The invasion of
Northern Syria creates conditions for a broader war.
Moreover,
on the US agenda is a longstanding objective, namely
to wage war on Iran. In this regard, US military
strategy largely consists in creating conditions
for America’s staunchest allies (Turkey, Saudi
Arabia, Israel) to confront Iran, and act indirectly
on behalf of US interests. i.e. “do the job for us”.
MAP
OF THE NEW MIDDLE EAST
Note: The following
map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters.
It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June
2006, Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S.
National War Academy. (Map Copyright
Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006).
Although the
map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine,
it has been used in a training program at NATO’s
Defense College for senior military officers. This
map, as well as other similar maps, has most
probably been used at the National War Academy as
well as in military planning circles.
The failed
coup was indeed supported by the CIA, but the
failure was coordinated with President Erdogan. It
was an intelligence op which was meant to fail and
mislead public opinion.
Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning
author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at
the University of Ottawa, Founder and
Director of the Centre for Research on
Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of
Global Research.
Copyright ©
Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global
Research, 2016
|