How Long
Can Economic Reality Be Ignored?
By Paul Craig
Roberts
August 11,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- Trump and Hitlery have come out with the
obligatory “economic plans.” Neither them nor their
advisors, have any idea about what really needs to
be done, but this is of no concern to the media.
The
presstitutes operate according to “pay and say.”
They say what they are paid to say and that is
whatever serves the corporations and the government.
This means that the presstitutes like Hitlery’s
economic plan and do not like Trump’s.
Yesterday I
listened to the NPR presstitutes say how Trump
pretends to be in favor of free trade but really is
against it, because he is against all the free trade
agreements such as NAFTA, the Trans-Pacific and
Trans-Atlantic partnerships. The presstitutes don’t
know that these are not trade agreements. NAFTA is a
“give away American jobs” agreement, and the
so-called partnerships give away the sovereignty of
countries in order to award global corporations
immunity from laws.
As I have
reported on many occasions, the Oligarchs’
government lies to us about everything, including
economic statistics. For example, we are told that
we have been enjoying an economic recovery since
June, 2009, that we are more or less at full
emploment with an unemployment rate of 5% or less,
and that there is no inflation. We are told this
despite the facts that the “recovery” is based on
the under-reporting of the inflation rate, the
unemployment rate is 23%, and inflation is high.
GDP is
measured in current prices. If GDP rises 3% this
year over last year, the output of real goods and
services might have risen 3% or prices might have
gone up by 3% or real output might have dropped but
is masked by price increases. To know what really
happened the nominal GDP number has to be deflated
by the amount of inflation.
In times
past we could get a reasonable idea of how the
economy was doing, because the measure of inflation
was reasonable. That is no longer the case. Various
“reforms” have taken inflation out of the measures
of inflation. For example, if the price of an item
in the inflation index goes up, the item is taken
out and a cheaper item put in its place.
Alternatively, the price rise is called a “quality
improvement” and not counted as a price rise.
In other
words, by defining inflation away, price increases
are transformed into an increase in real output.
The same
thing happens to the measure of unemployment.
Unemployment simply isn’t counted by the reported
unemployment rate. No matter how long and hard an
unemployed person has looked for a job, if that
person hasn’t job hunted in the past four weeks the
person is not considered to be unemployed. This is
how the unemployment rate is said to be 5% when the
labor-force participation rate has collapsed, half
of American 25-year-olds live with their parents,
and more Americans age 24-34 live with parents than
independently.
Finanial reporters never inquire why government
statistics are designed to provide an incorrect
picture of the economy. Anyone who purchases food,
clothing, visits a hardware store, and pays repair
bills and utility bills knows that there is a lot of
inflation. Consider prescription drugs. AARP reports
that the annual cost of prescription drugs used by
retirees has risen from $5,571 in 2006 to $11,341 in
2013, but their incomes have not kept up. Indeed,
the main reason for “reforming” the measurement of
inflation was to eliminate COLA adjustments to
Social Security benefits.
https://www.rt.com/usa/334004-drug-prices-doubled-years/
Charles
Hugh Smith has come up with a clever way of
estimating the real rate of inflation—the Burrito
Index. From 2001 to 2016 the cost of a burrito has
risen 160 percent from $2.50 to $6.50. During these
15 years the officially measured rate of inflation
is 35 percent.
And
it is not only burritos. The cost of higher
education has risen 137% since 2000. The Milliman
Medical Index shows medical costs to have risen far
above official inflation from 2005 to 2016. The
costs of medical insurance, trash collection, you
name it, are dramatically higher than the official
rate of inflation.
http://www.oftwominds.com/blogaug16/burrito-index8-16.html
Food,
tuiton and medical costs are major outlays for
households. Add zero interest on savings to the
problem of coping with major cost increases when
real incomes are stagnant and falling. For example,
grandparents cannot help grandchildren with their
student loan debt when zero interest rates force
grandparents to draw down their savings in order to
supplement essentially frozen Social Security
benefits during a time of high inflation. Savings
are being taken out of the economy. Many families
exist by paying only the minimum payment on their
credit card balance, which means that their debt
grows monthly.
Real
economists, if there were any, looking at the real
economic picture would see an economy collapsing
into widespread debt deflation and impoverishment.
Debt deflation is when consumers after they service
their debts have no discretionary income left with
which to drive the economy with purchases.
The reason
that Americans have no income from their savings is
that public authorities put the welfare of a handful
of “banks too big to fail” above the welfare of the
American people. The enormous liquidity created by
the Federal Reserve has gone into the financial
system where it has driven up the prices of
financial instruments. There has been a stock market
recovery but not an economic recovery.
In the past
liquidity implied economic growth. When the Federal
Reserve loosened monetary policy, the increase in
consumer demand caused an increase in the output of
goods and services. Stock prices would rise
anticipating higher profits. But in recent years
financial markets have not been driven by
fundamentals, which are adverse, but by the
liquidity that the Federal Reserve has pumped into
the banking system in order to save a handful of
over-sized banks and insurance giant AIG, all of
which should have been allowed to fail. The
liquidity had to go somewhere and it went into the
prices of stocks and bonds, causing a tremendous
asset inflation.
What sense
does it make to have zero interest rates when high
inflation is eating away the real value of money?
What sense does it make to have high price/earnings
ratios when the consumer market cannot expand? What
sense does it make to have a stable dollar when the
Federal Reserve has created far more dollars than
the economy has created goods and services? What
sense does it make to undermine the financial
condition of pension funds and insurance companies
with zero interest rates, leaving them with no fixed
income hedge against the stock market?
It makes no
sense. We are in a trap in which collapse seems the
only way out. If interest rates reflected the real
rate of inflation, the hundreds of trillions in
derivatives would blow up, the stock market would
collapse, unemployment could not be hidden with
under-measurement, budget deficits would rise. What
would public authorities do?
When crisis
hits, what happens to corporations that used profits
and borrowed money, that is, debt, to buy back their
own stocks in order to keep the price high and,
thereby, executive bonuses high and shareholders
happy and disinclined to support takeovers? Chaos
and its companion Fear take over from Contentment.
Hell breaks loose.
Is more
money printed? Does the money find its way into
consumer prices? Do we experience simultaneously
massive inflation and massive unemployment?
Don’t
expect the presstitutes, the politicians, or Wall
Street to confront any of these questions.
When the
crisis occurs, it will be blamed on Russia or China.
Dr. Paul
Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of
the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for
Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and
Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a
worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are
The Failure
of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution
of the West,
How America
Was Lost,
and
The
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
|