President
Assad: Aleppo Battle Last Card Played by Turks,
Qataris & Saudis
By Editor
July 21, 2016
"Information
Clearing House"
- "Al-Manar"
- Syrian President Bashar al-Assad gave interview to
Cuba’s official state news agency Prensa Latina in
which he said the Turks, Qataris and Saudis lost
most of their cards on the battlefields in Syria and
that Aleppo battle is their last card, affirming
that there is strong harmony between Syria and Latin
America, especially Cuba, on the political and
historical levels and that hard work is needed in
order to invigorate the different sectors of this
relation, SANA reported.
The following is the full text of the interview:
Question 1: Mr. President, thanks for giving Prensa
Latina this historic opportunity of conveying your
point of view to the rest of the world about the
reality in Syria, because as you know, there is a
lot of misinformation out there about your country,
about the foreign aggression that is taking place
against this beautiful country.
Mr. President, how would you evaluate the current
military situation of the external aggression
against Syria, and what are the main challenges of
Syrian forces on the ground to fight anti-government
groups? If it is possible, we would like to know
your opinion about the battles or combats in Aleppo,
in Homs.
Aleppo battle is the last card for the Turks,
Qataris and Saudis
President Assad: Of course, there was a lot of
support to the terrorists from around the world. We
have more than one hundred nationalities
participating in the aggression against Syria with
the support of certain countries like Saudi Arabia
and Qatar with their money and Turkey with the
logistical support, and of course with the
endorsement and supervision of the Western
countries, mainly the United States, France, and the
UK, and some other allies. But since the Russians
decided to intervene in supporting legally the
Syrian Army in fighting the terrorists in Syria,
mainly al-Nusra and ISIL and some other affiliated
groups, the scales have been tipped against those
terrorists, and the Syrian Army has made many
advances in different areas in Syria. And we are
still moving forward, and the Syrian Army is
determined to destroy and to defeat those
terrorists. You mentioned Homs and Aleppo. Of
course, the situation in Homs, since the terrorists
left Homs more than a year ago, the situation has
been much, much better, more stable. You have some
suburbs of the city which were infiltrated by
terrorists. Now there is a process of reconciliation
in those areas in which either the terrorists give
up their armaments and go back to their normal life
with amnesty from the government, or they can leave
Homs to any other place within Syria, like what
happened more than a year ago in the center of the
city.
For Aleppo it is a different situation, because the
Turks and their allies like the Saudis and Qataris
lost most of their cards on the battlefields in
Syria, so the last card for them, especially for
Erdogan, is Aleppo. That is why he worked hard with
the Saudis to send as much as they can of the
terrorists – the estimation is more than 5,000
terrorists – to Aleppo.
Question 2: Through the Turkish borders?
President Assad: Yes, from Turkey to Aleppo, during
the last two months, in order to recapture the city
of Aleppo, and that didn’t work. Actually, our army
has been making advancement in Aleppo and the
suburbs of Aleppo in order to encircle the
terrorists, then, let’s say, either to negotiate
their going back to their normal life as part of
reconciliation, or for the terrorists to leave the
city of Aleppo, or to be defeated. There’s no other
solution.
Question 3: Thank you, thank you very much. Mr.
President, which are the priorities of the Syrian
Army in the confrontation with the terrorist groups?
And we’re particularly interested, because in Cuba
we had something similar in the past, in the role of
the popular defense groups; what is the role that
the popular defense groups are playing in the
theater of operations?
Syrian army’s priority is to fight al-Qaeda-linked
organizations of ISIL, al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Cham and
Jaish al-Islam
President Assad: The priority of the Syrian Army,
first of all, is to fight ISIL and al-Nusra and
Ahrar al-Cham and Jaish al-Islam. These four
organizations are directly linked to Al Qaeda
through the ideology; they have the same ideology,
they are Islamic extremist groups who want to kill
anyone who doesn’t look or doesn’t feel or behave
like them. But regarding what you called the popular
militia groups, actually, at the beginning of the
war, the terrorists started an unconventional war
against our army, and our army is a traditional
army, like any other army in the world, so the
support of those popular defence groups was very
important in order to defeat the terrorists in an
unconventional way. That was very helpful to the
Syrian Army, because those fighters, those national
fighters, they fight in their regions, in their
cities, in their villages, so they know the area
very well, they know the region very well, I mean
the pathways, the terrain, let’s say, very well. So,
they can be very huge assets for the Syrian Army.
That is their role.
Question 4: Mr. President, how does the resistance
of the Syrian people take place in the economic
front to foreign aggression, I mean the economy, and
please, what is your opinion on which sectors of the
Syrian economy have remained functioning despite the
war, economic blockade, looting, and so forth?
President Assad: Actually, the war on Syria is a
full-blown war; it is not only supporting
terrorists. They support the terrorists, and at the
same time they launched a political war against
Syria on the international level, and the third
front was the economic front, in which they dictate
to their terrorists, to their surrogate mercenaries,
to start destroying the infrastructure in Syria that
helped the economy and the daily needs of the Syrian
citizens.
At the same time, they started an embargo directly
on the borders of Syria through the terrorists and
abroad through the banking systems around the world.
In spite of that, the Syrian people were determined
to live as much normal life as they can. That
prompted many Syrian businessmen or the owners of,
let’s say, the industry, which is mainly medium and
small industry, to move from the conflict areas and
unstable areas toward more stable areas, on a
smaller scale of business, in order to survive and
to keep the economy running and to keep the needs of
the Syrian people available. So, in that regard,
most of the sectors are still working. For example,
the pharmaceutical sector is still working in more
than 60% of its capacity, which is very important,
helpful, and very supportive to our economy in such
circumstances. And I think now we are doing our best
in order to re-expand the base of the economy in
spite of the situation, especially after the Syrian
Army made many advancements in different areas.
Question 5: Mr. President, let’s talk a little bit
about the international environment, please give me
your opinion about the role of the United Nations in
the Syrian conflict, the attempts of Washington and
its allies to impose their will on the Security
Council and in the Geneva peace talks.
So far, there is no UN role in the Syrian conflict;
there is only Russian and American dialogue
President Assad: Talking about the role of the
United Nations or Security Council could be
illusive, because actually the United Nations is now
an American arm, where they can use it the way they
want, they can impose their double standards on it
instead of the Charter. They can use it like any
other institution within the American
administration. Without some Russian and Chinese
stances in certain issues, it would be a full
American institution. So, the Russian and Chinese
role has made some balance within these
institutions, mainly regarding the Syrian issue
during the last five years. But if you want to talk
about their role through their mediators or their
envoys, like recently de Mistura, and before that
Kofi Annan, and in between Brahimi, and so on. Let’s
say that those mediators are not independent; they
reflect either the pressure from the Western
countries, or sometimes the dialogue between the
main powers, mainly Russia and the United States.
So, they’re not independent, so you cannot talk
about the role of the United Nations; it is a
reflection of that balance. That is why so far,
there is no United Nations role in the Syrian
conflict; there is only Russian and American
dialogue, and we know that the Russians are working
hard and seriously and genuinely in order to defeat
the terrorists, while the Americans always play
games in order to use the terrorists, not to defeat
them.
Question 6: Mr. President, how do you see at the
present time the coexistence among Syrian ethnic and
religious groups against this foreign intervention?
How do they contribute or not in this regard?
President Assad: The most important thing about this
harmony between the different spectrums of the
Syrian fabric, is that it is genuine, because that
has been built up through the history, through
centuries, so for such a conflict, it cannot destroy
that social fabric. That is why if you go around and
visit different areas under the control of the
government, you will see all the colors of the
Syrian society living with each other.
Intervention: I saw it in Damascus.
President Assad: Exactly. And I would say, I would
add to this, that during the conflict, this harmony
has become much better and stronger, and this is not
rhetoric; actually, this is reality, for different
reasons, because this conflict is a lesson. This
diversity that you have, it is either to be a
richness to your country, or a problem. There’s no
something in the middle. So, the people learned that
we need to work more on this harmony, because the
first rhetoric used by the terrorists and by their
allies in the region and in the West regarding the
Syrian conflict at the very beginning was sectarian
rhetoric. They wanted people to divide in order to
have conflict with each other, to stoke the fire
within Syria, and it didn’t work. And the Syrians
learned that lesson, that we had harmony; we had had
harmony before the conflict, in the normal times,
but we have to work more in order to make it much
stronger.
So, I can say without any exaggeration that the
situation regarding this part is good. In spite of
that, I would say the areas under the control of the
terrorists – and as you know those terrorists are
mainly extremist groups affiliated to Al Qaeda – in
which they worked very hard in order to indoctrinate
the young generation with their dark ideology, and
they succeeded in some areas, this dark ideology
with the killing and beheading and all these
horrible practices. With the time, it is going to be
more difficult to deal with this new generation of
young people who have been indoctrinated with Al
Qaeda and Wahabi doctrine and ideology. So this is
the only danger that we are going to face regarding
our society, harmony, and coexistence that you just
mentioned.
Question 7: Mr. President, I would like to go again
to the international arena. What is in your opinion
the role of the U.S.-led international coalition in
relation to the groups that operate in northern
Syria, in particular regarding the Kurds group. I
mean the bombing of the American airplanes and the
coalition in the northern part of the country. What
to do you think about that?
President Assad: You know, traditionally, the
American administrations, when they had relations
with any group or community in any country, it is
not for the sake of the country, it is not for the
interest of the people; it is for the agenda of the
United States. So, that is what we have to ask
ourselves: why would the Americans support any group
in Syria? Not for Syria. They must have their
agenda, and the American agenda has always been
divisive in any country. They don’t work to unite
the people; they work to make division between the
different kinds of people. Sometimes they choose a
sectarian group, sometimes they choose an ethnic
group in order to support them against other
ethnicities or to push them in a way that takes them
far from the rest of the society. This is their
agenda. So, it is very clear that this American
support is not related to ISIL, it is not related to
al-Nusra, it is not related to fighting terrorism,
because since the beginning of the American
intervention, ISIL was expanding, not shrinking. It
has only started to shrink when the Russian support
to the Syrian Army took place last September.
Question 8: Mr. President, what is your opinion
about the recent coup d’état in Turkey, and its
impact on the current situation in that country, and
on the international level, and on the Syrian
conflict also?
Coup in Turkey is a reflection of instability and
disturbances within the country
President Assad: Such a coup d’état, we have to look
at it as a reflection of instability and
disturbances within Turkey, mainly on the social
level. It could be political, it could be whatever,
but at the end, the society is the main issue when
you have instability. Regardless of who is going to
govern Turkey, who is going to be the president, who
is going to be the leader of Turkey; this is an
internal issue. We don’t interfere, we don’t make
the mistake to say that Erdogan should go or should
stay. This is a Turkish issue, and the Turkish
people have to decide.
Erdogan used the coup to implement his Muslim
Brotherhood agenda
But what is more important than the coup d’état
itself, we have to look at the procedures and the
steps that are being taken by Erdogan and his
coterie recently during the last few days, when they
started attacking the judges; they removed more than
2,700 judges from their positions, more than 1,500
professors in the universities, more than 15,000
employees in the education sector. What do the
universities and the judges and that civil society
have to do with the coup d’état? So, that reflects
the bad intentions of Erdogan and his misconduct and
his real intentions toward what happened, because
the investigation hasn’t been finalized yet. How did
they take the decision to remove all those? So, he
used the coup d’état in order to implement his own
extremist agenda, Muslim Brotherhood agenda, within
Turkey, and that is dangerous for Turkey and for the
neighboring countries, including Syria.
Question 9: Mr. President, how do you evaluate the
Syrian government’s relations with the opposition
inside Syria? What is the difference between these
opposition organizations and those based outside
Syria?
“Oppositions” outside Syria are traitors…the real
opposition is the one based inside and works for the
Syrian people
President Assad: We have good relations with the
opposition within Syria based on the national
principles. Of course, they have their own political
agenda and they have their own beliefs, and we have
our own agenda and our beliefs, and the way we can
make the dialogue either directly or through the
ballot boxes; it could be a different way of
dialogue, which is the situation in every country.
But we cannot compare them with the other
oppositions outside Syria, because the word
“opposition” means to resort to peaceful means, not
to support terrorists, and not to be formed outside
your country, and to have grassroots, to have real
grassroots made of Syrian people. You cannot have
your grassroots be the foreign ministry in the UK,
France or the intelligence in Qatar and Saudi Arabia
and the United States. This is not opposition, this
is called, in that case, you are called a traitor.
So, they call them oppositions, we call them
traitors. The real opposition is the one that works
for the Syrian people and is based in Syria and its
agenda derived its vision from the Syrian people and
the Syrian interests.
Question 10: Mr. President, how do you evaluate the
insistence of the U.S. and its allies that you leave
power in addition to the campaign to distort the
image of your government? I mean, in the foreign
environment. How do you see that insistence from
them that you leave power?
President Assad: Regarding their wish for me to
leave power, they have been talking about this for
the last five years, and we never responded even
with a statement. We never cared about them.
Actually, this is a Syrian issue; only the Syrian
people can say who should come and go, who should
stay in his position, who should leave, and the West
knows our position very well regarding this. So, we
don’t care and don’t have to waste our time with
their rhetoric. I am here because of the support of
the Syrian people. Without that, I wouldn’t be here.
That is very simple.
It is part of the American politics to demonize
presidents
About how they defame, or try to demonize certain
presidents, this is the American way, at least since
the second World War, since they substituted British
colonization in this region, and maybe in the world,
the American administrations and the American
politicians haven’t said a single honest word
regarding anything. They always lie. And as time
goes by, they are becoming more inveterate liars, so
this is part of their politics. So, to demonize me
is like how they tried to demonize President Putin
during the last two years and they did the same with
the leader Castro during the last five and six
decades. This is their way. So, we have to know that
this is the American way. We don’t have to worry
about it. The most important thing is to have good
reputation among your own people. That is what we
have to worry about.
Question 11: Mr. President, what is your opinion on
Syria’s relation with Latin America, particularly
the historical links with Cuba
President Assad: In spite of the long distance
between Syria and Latin America, we are always
surprised how much the people in Latin America, not
only the politicians, know about this region. I
think this has many reasons, but one of them is the
historical similarities and commonalities between
our region, between Syria and Latin America. Latin
America was under direct occupation for long time
ago but after that it was under the occupation of
the American companies, and the American coup
d’états and the American intervention.
Intervention: Yes, a lot of them.
Latin America People understand that the war in
Syria is about independence…there is strong harmony
between Syria and Latin America, especially Cuba
President Assad: So, they know what is the meaning
of being independent or not to be independent. They
understand that the war in Syria is about
independence. But the most important thing is the
role of Cuba. Cuba was the spearhead of the
independence movement within Latin America and Fidel
Castro was the iconic figure in that regard. So, on
the political level and the knowledge level, there
is a strong harmony between Syria and Latin America,
especially Cuba. But I do not think we work enough
to improve the other part of the relation; to be on
the same level mainly on the educational and the
economic level. That was my ambition before the
crisis and that is why I visited Latin America,
Cuba, Venezuela, Argentine and Brazil, in order to
invigorate this relation. Then, we had this conflict
started and it was a big obstacle to do anything in
that regard, but I think that we have not to
restrain the relation on the historical and the
political levels. That is not enough. You have so
many other sectors, people should know more about
each other. The long distance could be an obstacle,
but it shouldn’t because we have strong relations
with the rest of the world, east and west. So, it is
not an obstacle in these days. So, I think if we
overcome this crisis and this war, we should work
harder in order to invigorate the different sectors
of this relation with Latin America and especially
with Cuba.
Question 12: Mr. President, do you have an
expectation for… I mean would you tell me your
opinion about the electoral process in the United
States mainly for the president? Now, we have two
candidates; the Republican one is Mr. Donald Trump
and the Democratic one is Mrs. Hillary Clinton; and
we know her very well, but what is your opinion
about this process, about the result of this process
and how it could impact the conflict here, in the
war in Syria?
No US president in the near future will come to make
dramatic change in the politics of the United States
President Assad: We resumed our relation with the
United States in 1974. Now, it has been 42 years
since then and we witnessed many American presidents
in different situations and the lesson that we have
learned is that no one should bet on any American
president, that is the most important thing. So, it
is not about the name. They have institutions, they
have their own agenda and every president should
come to implement that agenda in his own way, but at
the end he has to implement that agenda.
All of them have militaristic agendas, and the only
difference is the way. One of them sends his army
like Bush and the other one sends mercenaries and
proxies like Obama, but all of them have to
implement this agenda. So, I do not believe that the
president is allowed completely to fulfill his own
political convictions in the United States, he has
to obey the institutions and the lobbies, and the
lobbies have not changed and the institutions’
agenda has not changed. So, no president in the near
future will come to make a serious and dramatic
change regarding the politics of the United States.
Question 13: Mr. President, one final question: what
message would you send using this interview with
Prensa Latina to the governments and people of Latin
America, the Caribbean, and also why not the
American people, about the importance of supporting
Syria against terrorism?
Message to Latin America: We have to keep our
independence as the US will not stop trying to
topple every independent government
President Assad: Latin America is a very good and
important example to the world about how the people
and their governments regain their independence.
They are the backyard of the United States as the
United States sees, but this backyard was used by
the United States to play its own games, to
implement its own agenda and the people in Latin
America sacrificed a lot in order to regain their
independence and everybody knows that.
After regaining their independence, those countries
moved from being developing countries, or sometimes
under-developed countries, to be developed
countries. So, independence is a very important
thing and it is very dear for every Latin American
citizen. We think they have to keep this
independence because the United States will not stop
trying to topple every independent government, every
government that reflects the vast majority of the
people in every country in Latin America.
And again, Cuba knows this, knows what I am talking
about more than any other one in the world; you
suffered more than anyone from the American attempts
and you succeeded in withstanding all these attempts
during the last sixty years or more just because the
government reflected the Cuban people.
So, holding strongly to this independence, I think,
is the crucial thing, the most important thing for
the future of Latin America. Regarding Syria, we can
say that Syria is paying the price of its
independence because we never worked against the
United States; we never worked against France or the
UK. We always try to have good relations with the
West.
But their problem is that they do not accept any
independent country and I think this is same for
Cuba. You never tried to do any harm to the American
people but they do not accept you as an independent
country. The same is true for other countries in
Latin America and that’s why you always have coup
d’états mainly between the sixties and the
seventies.
So, I think preserving the independence of a certain
country is not only an isolated case; if I want to
be independent, I have to support the independence
in the rest of the world. So, the independence
anywhere in the world, including Latin America, will
support my independence. If I am alone, I will be
weak. Supporting Syria will be mainly in the
international arena. There are many international
organizations, mainly the United Nation, in spite of
its impotence, but at the end, their support could
play a vital role in supporting Syria and, of
course, the Security Council; it depends on who is
going to be the temporary member in the Security
Council, and any other organization supporting Syria
will be very important.
Question 14: Mr. President, I know that you are a
very busy person, that is why I appreciate very much
your time that you have dedicated to Prensa Latina
interview in this moment. I hope this would not be
the last interview that we have with you.
President Assad: You are welcome anytime.
|