Brzezinski’s Nightmares: Russia, China &
the Perspective of the Real War
By Umberto Pascali
July 21, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Kaethon"
- In
his last public rant (“Toward
a Global Realignment,”
), an obviously worn-out and senile
Zbigniew Brzezinski successfully shows
that old dogs can't learn new tricks.
Obviously his ego doesn’t allow this
decrepit war criminal to retire from his
bankrupt role as strategist of the US
elite. He still wants to convince the
Wall Street big sharks that he can save
them from what he say is an imminent
catastrophe. Forgetting that the foreign
policy of the US has been based on his
crazy plans (especially, but not only,
since the election of his protégé Barak
Obama), Brzezinski tells his masters
that the US could soon lose their
dominant position, and/or they could
even be soundly defeated militarily if
they go to war with their “rivals”
Russia and China.
What can be done? What is his plan? His
only solution is to split China from
Russia and to convince one of the two
“rivals” to partner with Washington
against the other. Far fetched to
pathetic, to say the least.
Clearly referring to Russia’s adamant
refusal to surrender to the economic,
financial, military and psychological
warfare unchained against it, Brzezinski
warns of a “rival” who could be able to
deploy “new weapons systems” that will
force the US to choose between a mutual
assured suicide and the loss of its
dominance.
Thus, “the sudden acquisition by some
state of the capacity to render America
militarily inferior would spell the end
of America’s global role.”
Brzezinski warns that this will mean
“probably global chaos” (sic). That is
why the US has to decouple Russia and
China, immediately; and transform one of
the two into a partner. But (painful
dilemma) which one should be the enemy
and which one should be the partner?
Zbig explains that the US elite must
“contain the least predictable but
potentially the most likely rival to
overreach…“ And who is that?
“Currently, the more likely to overreach
is Russia.” So, an alliance with China
against Putin’s Russia? Not so fast,
hisses the doubtful snake. In fact “in
the longer run [the more likely to
overreach] could be China.”
Hmmmm.
Maybe, the criminally incompetent maître
a penser of the Wall Street sharks is
trying to split the two “rivals”
offering a “partnership” to the first
who raises his hand. In this case, we
would be witnessing an abysmal delusion,
an embarrassing show of impotence!
The last sloppy lucubration of the
reptilian strategist also contains his
assessment of Europe and the Europeans;
what he thinks of them but doesn’t care
to say openly. While apparently so
hesitant on what to do globally,
Brzezinski has no doubt about the
Europeans. They are totally defanged,
under control, unable to present any
actual or potential danger for
Anglo-American dominance. They will keep
obeying every order against their
sovereignty and basic economic
interests; they will masochistically
strengthen the NATO cage; and they will
be progressively and irreversibly
weakened to irrelevance and chaos by the
well-organized migrations from the South
(known as “Awakening” in Brzezinskite
language).
The US shall make sure that the Arab
Springs and civil wars will continue and
escalate in order to get two birds with
one stone:
1)
Enabling, through covert and overt
means, the spiraling destabilization of
Middle East and North African (MENA)
countries;
2)
Favoring, through covert and overt
means, increasing refugee waves into
Europe from these destabilized
countries.
Brzezinski justifies and incites
violence from these desperate masses (a
deliberate result of his policies)
against Europe, explaining with
unlimited hypocrisy, “the currently
violent political awakening among
post-colonial Muslims is a belated
reaction to their occasionally brutal
suppression mostly by European powers…”
Thus, the Europeans must now be
subjected to revenge for their colonial
sins, stresses Brzezinski.
It is unbelievable that
no major government, party or
organization in Europe and MENA is
reacting and denouncing this coldly
engineered double assault. The
expression “Global Political Awakening”
(like the expression “Grand Chessboard”
for the plan to isolate and destabilize
Russia and the whole Eurasia), was
invented exactly by Zbigniew Brzezinski.
See The Global Political Awakening
published in the The New York Times on
December 16th, 2008, as a public
marching order for his just elected
protege’, Barak Obama.
Brzezinski, also then, in 2008, was very
busy trying to find the magic pill to
assure the survival of the Wall Street
vampires’ power that had been seriously
eroded by the criminally demented
Cheney-Bush presidency, and was facing a
growing rebellion from Europe
(especially France, Germany, Italy) who
were actively pursuing an economic and
political partnership with Russia.
In
his article, Brzezinski was visibly
boasting that Obama was in fact, his
docile Faustian homunculus. He was also
giving the Anglo-American elite his
regular magic recipe on how to save
their dominance. "A new president is
assuming office – he intoned - in the
midst of a widespread crisis of
confidence in America's capacity to
exercise effective leadership in world
affairs. That may be a stark thought,
but it is a fact…The resulting challenge
is compounded by issues such as climate,
health and social inequality - issues
that are becoming more contentious
because they have surfaced in the
context of what I call "the global
political awakening.”
What he called “global
political awakening” was nothing else
than an update of his main dirty trick
in 1978-79: the creation of Al Qaeda in
Afghanistan to “give the Russians their
Vietnam.”
The creation and manipulation of social
upheavals — variously called Color
Revolutions, Arab Springs, and so on —
were the perfecting of the same criminal
dirty tricks: how to trigger a coup
d’état without paying for the
consequences of public involvement.
Brzezinski’s so much over-estimated
geopolitical ability has been mostly
limited to the creation and manipulation
of terrorism, organized crime, media
campaigns, propaganda -- all to
obfuscate and cover up criminal
operations that otherwise would be
simply and openly acts of wars.
But now, the crumbling snake can do very
little not only to cover his long list
of war crimes, but also his impotence.
