The Coup in
Turkey has Thrown a Wrench in Uncle Sam’s “Pivot”
Plan
By Mike Whitney
July 20, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Counterpunch"
- A failed coup in Turkey has changed the
geopolitical landscape overnight realigning Ankara
with Moscow while shattering Washington’s plan to
redraw the map of the Middle East. Whether Turkish
strongman Recep Tayyip Erdogan staged the coup or
not is of little importance in the bigger scheme of
things. The fact is, the incident has consolidated
his power domestically while derailing Washington’s
plan to control critical resources and pipeline
corridors from Qatar to Europe. The Obama
administrations disregard for the national security
interests of its allies, has pushed the Turkish
president into Moscow’s camp, removing the crucial
landbridge between Europe and Asia that Washington
needs to maintain its global hegemony into the new
century. Washington’s plan to pivot to Asia,
surround and break up Russia, control China’s growth
and maintain its iron grip on global power is now in
a shambles. The events of the last few days have
changed everything.
This is
from the Daily Sahbah:
“Turkey’s changing rhetoric toward Russia is
also a direct consequence of Ankara’s unmet
expectations regarding the Syria conflict.
Turkey’s disappointment with the United States’
policy in Syria has increased with time,
especially considering Washington’s continued
support for the Kurdish fighters of the People’s
Protection Units (YPG) in Syria. Ankara sees
this group as an affiliate of the Kurdistan
Workers’ Party (PKK) terrorist organization
(Daily Sabah, 12 June).
(A
Change in Turkish-Russian Relations: What Sort
of Rapprochement?, The Jamestown Foundation)
Obama can
only blame himself for the debacle that is now
unfolding. Erdogan was completely clear about
Turkey’s red lines, the most important of which is
preventing the Kurdish militias from moving west of
the Euphrates and creating a contiguous state along
the Syrian side of Turkeys southern border. Here’s
Erdogan commenting on developments a few months ago:
“Right
now, there is a serious project, plan being
implemented in northern Syria. And on this
project and plan lay the insidious aims of those
who appear as ‘friends’. This is very clear, so
I need to make clear statements.”
Instead of
addressing Erdogan’s security concerns, Obama
brushed him aside in order to pursue the US goal of
establishing bases and seizing territory in East
Syria that will eventually be used as pipeline
routes from Qatar to the EU. Naturally, Erdogan
responded in kind, forming alliances with former
enemies (Russia, Syria, Israel) in order to reset
Turkish foreign policy and address the growing
threat of an emerging Kurdish state on his southern
flank. Keep in mind, Turkey believes that America’s
new proxies in Syria–the Kurdish YPG– are linked to
the PKK, which is listed as a terror organization by
the U.S. and EU. Had Obama committed US troops to
the fight, (instead of using the YPG) Erdogan would
not have reacted at all. But the fact that Obama was
deliberately strengthening Turkey’s traditional
rivals in their westward move, was more than Erdogan
could bear.
Erdogan Apologizes
At the end
of June, Erdogan apologized to President Vladimir
Putin for the death of a Russian pilot who was
killed when Turkey downed a bomber flying over
Syrian territory last November. The shootdown
prompted Putin to break off relations with Ankara
ending all communication between the two countries.
Then, in the last week of June, Erdogan sent a
letter to Putin “expressing his deep sympathy and
condolences to the relatives of the deceased Russian
pilot.” He added that Russia was “a friend and a
strategic partner” with whom the Turkish authorities
would not want to spoil relations.” (The Turkish
pilots who shot down the Russian Su-24 have since
been arrested and charged as members of the Gulenist
coup.)
The White
House inexplicably never commented on this thawing
of relations which posed obvious risks to US
ambitions in the region.
Why?
Then, just
two weeks ago, reports began to emerge that Erdogan
was making an effort to normalize relations with
Syrian President Bashar al Assad. The news wasn’t
reported in most of the western media, but the
Guardian ran an article titled “Syrian rebels
stunned as Turkey signals normalisation of Damascus
relations”. Here’s an excerpt:
“More
than five years into Syria’s civil war, Turkey,
the country that has most helped the rebellion
against the rule of Bashar al-Assad, has hinted
it may move to normalise relations with
Damascus.
The suggestion made by the Turkish prime
minister, Binali Yıldırım, on Wednesday, stunned
the Syrian opposition leadership, which Ankara
hosts, as well as regional leaders, who had
allied with Turkey in their push to oust Assad
over a long, unforgiving war.
“I am
sure that we will return [our] ties with Syria
to normal,” he said, straying far from an
official script that has persistently called for
immediate regime change. “We need it. We
normalised our relations with Israel and Russia.
I’m sure we will go back to normal relations
with Syria as well.”
(Syrian
rebels stunned as Turkey signals normalisation
of Damascus relations, Guardian)
You’d think
that would set off alarms at the White House, after
all, if Turkey wanted to normalize relations with
Damascus, then clearly it had abandoned the war it
had supported (through its proxy militants and
jihadists) for more than five years signaling a
fundamental shift in policy that could have broader
implications for the US effort. But did the Obama
team show any interest in the announcement or make
any attempt to keep Erdogan in the fold?
Of course
not. Washington gives orders and everyone else is
expected to click their heels and stand at
attention. Obama and Co don’t bother with the
incidentals like the fear of the nascent Kurdish
state that could pose a direct threat to Turkey’s
national security. Why would they bother with
something as trivial as that? They have an empire to
run.
Then came
the coup which, by the way, Erdogan may have been
tipped off to by Russian intelligence agents who
have a strong presence in Turkey. By informing
Erdogan of the coup, Putin might have hoped that
Erdogan would return the favor and block NATOs plan
to deploy permanent fleet to the Black Sea that will
further encircle and threaten Russia. (And, yes,
Putin knows that Erdogan is a ruthless autocrat and
a backer of terrorist organizations, but he also
knows he can’t be “too picky” when NATO is making
every effort to surround and destroy Russia. Putin
must take his friends as he finds them. Besides,
some analysts have suggested that Putin will require
Erdogan to abandon his support for jihadists in
Syria as a condition of their new alliance.)
In any
event, Putin and Erdogan have settled their
differences and scheduled a meeting for the
beginning of August. In other words, the first world
leader Erdogan plans to meet after the coup, is his
new friend, Vladimir Putin. Is Erdogan trying to
make a statement? It certainly looks like it. Here’s
the story from the Turkish Daily Hurriyet:
“Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and
Russian President Vladimir Putin may meet in a
face-to-face meeting in August as part of mutual
efforts to normalize bilateral ties following
months of tension due to the downing of a
Russian warplane by the Turkish Air Forces in
November…
With
the normalization of ties, Russia removed some
sanctions on trade and restrictions on Russian
tourists, though it will continue to impose visa
regime to Turkish nationals. A deeper
conversation between the two countries over a
number of international issues like Syria and
Crimea will follow soon between the two foreign
ministers before the Putin-Erdoğan meeting.” (Putin,
Erdoğan to meet soon in bid to start new era in
Turkey-Russia ties, Hurriyet)
Is it
starting to sound like Turkey may have slipped out
of Washington’s orbit and moved on to more reliable
friends that will respect their interests?
Indeed. And
this sudden rapprochement could have catastrophic
implications for US Middle East policy. Consider,
for example, that the US not only depends on
Turkey’s Incirlik Airbase to conduct its air
campaign in Syria, but also, that that same facility
houses “roughly 90 US tactical nuclear weapons.”
What if Erdogan suddenly decides that it’s no longer
in Turkey’s interest to provide the US with access
to the base or that he would rather allow Russian
bombers and fighters to use the base? (According to
some reports, this is already in the works.) More
importantly, what happens to US plans to pivot to
Asia if the crucial landbridge (Turkey) that
connects Europe and Asia breaks with Washington and
joins the coalition of Central Asian states that are
building a new free trade zone beyond Uncle Sam’s
suffocating grip?
One last
thing: There was an important one-paragraph article
in Moscow Reuters on Monday that didn’t appear in
the western press so we’ll reprint it here:
MOSCOW
(Reuters) – Russia’s joint projects with Turkey,
including the TurkStream undersea natural gas
pipeline from Russia to Turkey, are still on the
agenda and have a future, RIA news agency quoted
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich
as saying on Monday.” (Russian
Dep PM says joint projects with Turkey still on
agenda, Reuters)
This is
big. Erdogan is now reopening the door the Obama
team tried so hard to shut. This is a major blow to
Washington’s plan to control the vital resources
flowing into Europe from Asia and to make sure they
remain denominated in US dollars. If the agreement
pans out, Putin will have access to the thriving EU
market through the southern corridor which will
strengthen ties between the two continents, expand
the use of the ruble and euro for energy
transactions, and create a free trade zone from
Lisbon to Vladivostok. And Uncle Sam will be
watching from the sidelines.
All of a
sudden, Washington’s “pivot” plan looks to be in
serious trouble.
Mike
Whitney lives in Washington state. He is a
contributor to Hopeless:
Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK
Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle
edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.
|