Erdogan
Had It Coming: The Turkish Coup Failed, But Another
Will Succeed
Too late did Erdogan realise the cost of the role he
had chosen for his country – when you can no longer
trust your army, there are serious issues that need
to be addressed
By Robert Fisk
July 16,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "-
The Independent"
-
Recep Tayyip
Erdogan had it coming. The Turkish army was never
going to remain compliant while the man who would
recreate the Ottoman Empire turned his neighbours
into enemies and his country into a mockery of
itself. But it would be a grave mistake to assume
two things: that the putting down of a military coup
is a momentary matter after which the Turkish army
will remain obedient to its sultan; and to regard at
least 161 deaths and more than 2,839 detained in
isolation from the collapse of the nation-states of
the Middle East.
For the
weekend’s events in Istanbul and Ankara are
intimately related to the breakdown of frontiers and
state-belief – the assumption that Middle East
nations have permanent institutions and borders –
that has inflicted such wounds across Iraq, Syria,
Egypt and other countries in the Arab world.
Instability is now as contagious as corruption in
the region, especially among its potentates and
dictators, a class of autocrat of which Erdogan has
been a member ever since he changed the constitution
for his own benefit and restarted his wicked
conflict with the Kurds.
Needless to
say, Washington’s first reaction was instructive.
Turks must support their “democratically elected
government”. The “democracy” bit was rather hard to
swallow; even more painful to recall, however,
was the very same government’s reaction to the
overthrow of Mohamed Morsi’s “democratically
elected” government in Egypt in 2013 –
when Washington very definitely did not ask Egypt’s
people to support Morsi and quickly gave its support
to a military coup far more bloody than
the attempted putsch in Turkey. Had the Turkish army
been successful, be sure Erdogan would have been
treated as dismissively as the unfortunate Morsi.
But what do
you expect when Western nations prefer stability to
freedom and dignity? That’s why they are prepared to
accept Iran’s troops and loyal Iraqi militiaman
joining in the battle against Isis – as well as
the poor 700 missing Sunnis who “disappeared” after
the recapture of Fallujah – and that’s why the
“Assad must go” routine has been quietly dropped.
Now that Bashar al-Assad has outlived David
Cameron’s premiership – and will almost certainly
outlast Obama’s presidency – the regime in Damascus
will look with wondering eyes at the events
in Turkey this weekend.
The
victorious powers in the First World War destroyed
the Ottoman Empire – which was one of the purposes
of the 1914-18 conflict after the Sublime Porte made
the fatal mistake of siding with Germany – and
the ruins of that empire were then chopped into bits
by the Allies and handed over to brutal kings,
vicious colonels and dictators galore. Erdogan
and the bulk of the army which has decided to
maintain him in power – for now – fit into this same
matrix of broken states.
The warning
signs were there for Erdogan – and the West – to
see, if only they had recalled the experience of
Pakistan. Shamelessly used by the Americans to
funnel missiles, guns and cash to the “mujahedin”
who were fighting the Russians, Pakistan – another
“bit” chopped off an empire (the Indian one) turned
into a failed state, its cities torn apart
with massive bombs, its own corrupt army and
intelligence service cooperating with Russia’s
enemies – including the Taliban – and
then infiltrated by Islamists who would eventually
threaten the state itself.
When Turkey
began playing the same role for the US in Syria –
sending weapons to the insurgents, its corrupt
intelligence service cooperating with the Islamists,
fighting the state power in Syria – it, too, took
the path of a failed state, its cities torn apart by
massive bombs, its countryside infiltrated by the
Islamists. The only difference is that Turkey also relaunched
a war on its Kurds in the south-east of the country
where parts of Diyabakir are now as devastated as
large areas of Homs or Aleppo. Too late did Erdogan
realise the cost of the role he had chosen for his
country. It’s one thing to say sorry to Putin and
patch up relations with Benjamin Netanyahu; but when
you can no longer trust your army, there are more
serious matters to concentrate on.
Two
thousand or so arrests are quite a coup for Erdogan
– rather larger, in fact, than the coup the army
planned for him. But they must be just a few of
the thousands of men in the Turkish officer corps
who believe the Sultan of Istanbul is destroying his
country. It’s not just a case of reckoning the
degree of horror which Nato and the EU will
have felt at these events. The real question will be
the degree to which his (momentary) success
will embolden Erdogan to undertake more trials,
imprison more journalists, close down more
newspapers, kill more Kurds and, for that matter, go
on denying the 1915 Armenian genocide.
For
outsiders, it’s sometimes difficult to understand
the degree of fear and almost racist disgust with
which Turkey regards any form of Kurdish militancy;
America, Russia, Europe – the West in general – has
so desomaticised the word “terrorist” that we fail
to comprehend the extent to which Turks call the
Kurds “terrorists” and see them as a danger to
the very existence of the Turkish state; which is
just how they saw the Armenians in the First World
War. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk may have been a good old
secular autocrat admired even by Adolf Hitler, but
his struggle to unify Turkey was caused by the very
factions which have always haunted the Turkish
heartland – along with dark (and
rational) suspicions about the plotting of Western
powers against the state.
All in all,
then, a far more dramatic series of events
have taken place in Turkey this weekend than may at
first appear. From the frontier of the EU, through
Turkey and Syria and Iraq and large parts of
Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula and on to Libya and – dare
one mention this after Nice? – Tunisia, there is now
a trail of anarchy and failed states. Sir Mark Sykes
and François Georges-Picot began the Ottoman
Empire’s dismemberment – with help from Arthur
Balfour — but it continues to this day.
In this
grim historical framework must we view the
coup-that-wasn’t in Ankara. Stand by for another one
in the months or years to come.
|