Warsaw
Summit: Western Leaders Ignore Reality
The Saker
July 11, 2016
"Information
Clearing House"
- So the much advertised NATO summit in Warsaw
finally took place. It was a total success, at
least if the criterion is that the outcome matched
the expectations:
-
Poroshenko and Nadezhda Savchenko were invited
and treated like a respected guest
- Russia
was condemned for her “aggressions” in Georgia,
Crimea and the Ukraine
- The
Poles plastered Warsaw with posters saying
“ACHTUNG RUϟϟIA”
- The
Balts each got one NATO battalion to deter the
Russian Bear
- Russia
was condemned for not abiding by the Minks2
Agreement
- Enough
hot air was released to worsen global warming by
at least 10 degrees
Frankly, I
don’t feel like commenting on all this idiocy.
Besides, all these pseudo-decisions never were the
true purpose of this summit. This summit had a
totally different objective and that objective too
was fully achieved.
The real
purpose of the summit was to force each western
political leader to chose between reality and
ideology. And they all made the correct choice, of
course. They categorically rejected reality and
enthusiastically embraced ideology.
This is why
Russia was accused of not complying with an
agreement she is not even a part to.
This is why
Russia was accused of “aggression” against Georgia
even though even the EU concluded that Georgia had
started the war
This is why
a non-existing Russian threat was denounced
This is why
the Russian armed forces were declared deterred by a
few NATO battalions
This is why
the Russian invasion of the Donbass was denounced
This is why
the 100% legal referendum in Crimea was completely
ignored
The unanimous determination of all
the western leaders to ignore reality and to firmly
and
publicly hold on and proclaim ideological
nonsense as truthful was, in reality, the expected
goal of the summit.
AngloZionists love to “send messages” and here
several messages were sent loud and clear.
Message to Russia:
you dared to oppose us and you thought that being in
the right might help you. Well, Russia, screw you
Russia, and screw reality! You either are with us
(i.e. under our control), or you will be treated
like a pariah.
Message to the European people:
least any of you consider defying us, we are showing
you a united front. A united from of the parasitic
superstructure ruling the EU on behalf of the local
1%er comprador elites of Russia and on
behalf of the AngloZionist Empire. So don’t even
think of being independent, free or any other such
nonsense. We run the planet and you obey.
Message to the rest of the planet:
don’t even think of joining or even supporting
Russia because if you do, we will snap you like a
twig. We run the planet and we make and break
anybody.
Last but
not least,
Message to themselves:
we are in control, we will prevail, the Russians
will have to back down, we are invulnerable.
I would
submit that this last message might be the most
important of them all. Because, of course, the
AngloZionist leaders are afraid. Afraid mainly of
Russia, of course, but even more by what Russia
represents. They are afraid of a Dollar which is
sustained by nothing, not oil and not even USN
aircraft carriers. They are afraid by the growing
realization that less and less people out there are
afraid of them. They are afraid by countries such
as Russia, Iran or China daring to openly declare
that they will follow another economic and
civilizational model. But more than anything else
they are terrified by the growing realization that
“their own people” (at least theoretically) hate
and despise them.
The most
pathetic thing about all this is how the
AngloZionists are misreading the Russians. From a
Russian cultural point of view, everything the West
and NATO has been doing as signs of weakness. Why
would a strong alliance need to engage in
meaningless threats (NATO battalions or ABM
systems)? Why would a strong alliance seek safety
in numbers? Why would a strong alliance act is if
reality did not exist? From a Russian point of view
all that saber-rattling and grandstanding amount to
a gigantic admission weakness and they are totally
unimpressed. And they are not shy about expressing
their contempt for what they see as a pathetic
display of incompetence by a clueless western
leadership.
That is not
to say that the Russians are not worried. They
are. Very. Because they also understand that for
all their pathetic lack of political vision and even
basic professionalism, the AngloZionists are still
very dangerous. It does not take a great deal of
intelligence to trigger a nuclear war. So while the
Russians are now openly contemptuous of the Empire,
they still realize that it is precisely the lack of
competence of the West which will require a
tremendous amount of caution and patience from the
Russian leadership to “softly land” the Empire
without triggering a planetary nuclear war.
You could
say that Russia fears the US/NATO/EU weakness a
great deal more than she fear the US/NATO/EU
strength.
Finally,
many Russians realize that the Western civilization
is as discredited, morally bankrupt and, basically,
dead, as the Soviet civilization was by the late
1980s. There are no more “western values”, at least
not in any quality other then as the object of jokes
and disgusted sneers. Everybody pretends, but
nobody really believes any of it. All the grand
conceptual building composed of notions such as
‘democracy’, ‘human rights’, ‘freedom’, ‘justice’
has come crushing down and is now beyond repair.
The good news is that this collapse is not final,
and just as Russia eventually re-discovered herself
after 2000, so will the West, both in the USA and
the Europe. I can easily imaging the people of the
West eventually turning back to their ancient
historical roots, but they will do that in a new,
modern way. Just like the Russia of 2000-2016 is
not the Russia of before 1917, so the new West will
emerge as something new, but with roots in the
distant past. But before that happens the West will
have to undergo a painful and very dangerous process
of disintegration similar to what the Soviet Union
went through between roughly 1980 and 2000.
Dmitry
Orlov is absolutely correct. The collapse of the
West is inevitable and the study of the collapse of
the Soviet Union yields many interesting lessons.
But for the
time being we are stuck in our current reality. A
world split in two with, on one hand, a dying,
delusional and weak Empire and, on the other, pretty
much the rest of mankind. In this dying and
unstable world, the NATO summit in Warsaw played the
same role as the XXVIth Congress of the CPSU in the
Soviet Union in 1981: a touching show of unity in
the face of an inevitable collapse.
If we
remember what happened to the USSR and Russia in the
following two decades we can only conclude that we
are about to enter a most difficult and dangerous
period of history.
|