If
Sanders is a True Progressive, He Has One Winnable
Option Left
By Joe Clifford
July 06, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- Bernie Sanders has played all his cards and has
nothing to show except for a frustrated generation
of populists trying to figure out what they should
do. Sanders argued he would fight the Democratic
bureaucracy at the convention, but his fight is
already over. Last week the Democrats held their
Platform Committee meeting in DC, and while Sanders
had nominated five great populists and progressives,
they were steamrolled by the stacked delegates of
the corporatists candidate Hillary Clinton. The
results of the meeting received very little
corporate media attention in a usual attempt to
cover for Hillary Clinton. All of the Sanders’
proposals were voted down by Clintonites, including:
a ban on fracking, a proposal to oppose TPP, the $15
per hour minimum wage proposal, a call for
single-payer health care, and a statement of
opposition to the illegal Israeli occupation. All
were defeated by the Clinton team of delegates.
Despite Clinton’s ambiguous rhetoric on the issues,
her platform is much clearer, denying anything that
smacks of progressive change. So we are at a
crossroads. What cards does Sanders have left? None.
So he is done. He capitulated by showing his hand
and gave away his leverage by agreeing to support
the eventual candidate, so he is now finished with
nothing else to do.
The important question is, what do the Bernie
followers do now? First, one would hope they have
learned a very bitter lesson, that the duopoly is
thoroughly corrupt and cannot be reformed. It is too
far gone and controlled by the war party, financial
interests, and the corporatists. They have a
vice-grip like stranglehold over the party, and they
will never surrender power. They hold all the cards.
Some Sanders supporters may have figured this out on
the campaign trail, with masses of people being
deprived of a vote by election rules set up by the
established leaders of the party. Sanders supporters
should have seen they had no chance when Clinton
started the race with an insurmountable lead in “superdelegates,”
before one popular vote was even cast. The
Democratic deck was rigged from the git-go, and
hopefully some Sanders’ followers now see the ruse
of giving voters the illusion of voting. The real
decision was never to be made by voters, for they
might select the wrong candidate. Party leaders
stacked the deck so they would always have the
ultimate say and let the people be dammed.
There is no realistic hope of reforming the
Democratic party, so the only alternative, if the
populist movement is to survive, is to bolt the
party. An outside or third party is the only hope of
reforming this nation. Sanders is correct in saying
Wall Street, corporations, health care industries,
and the military industrial complex, have total and
complete control of both major parties. In actuality
there is little philosophical difference between the
two major parties.
Can a third party buck the tide and break the
corruption of the other two? Yes, in this particular
political environment it could easily win the
election because no one is enamored with the choice
of candidates put forth by the of the leadership of
the two parties. Both Clinton and Trump have the
highest unfavorable ratings in the history of US
politics. People will vote for Clinton because they
hate Trump, and people will vote for Trump because
they hate Clinton. It is a bizarre election which
clearly demonstrates just how out of touch the
leadership of both parties are with the people. If
these two candidates represent the best two people
in this country to run for the president, then throw
in the towel, for the country is doomed.
Meanwhile, beneath the radar, kept a secret by
corporate media, are candidates such as Jill Stein.
You might never get the chance to hear her, due to
the corporate black out of her campaign, but if by
chance you do, you might be astounded. She is
bright, she is reasoned, she is rational, she is
articulate, and she he is presidential. She is
everything the two major candidates are not.
Jill Stein has reached out to Sanders and offered
him the position of president on the Green Party
ticket, with she as the VP, but so far Sanders has
not taken the bait because it looks like he may be
beholden to the Democratic party leadership. If
Sanders is a true Progressive populist he only has
one option left, and that is to join a third party.
Joining with Jill Stein would could very well mean a
third party victory, in light of the resentment of
the masses towards both duopoly candidates. Sanders
and Stein only need 34% to insure victory, and that
should not be difficult as most voters are thirsting
for an alternative that is sane, rational, reasoned
and civil. Will Sanders prove himself to be a true
populist progressive, or will he cave to the
democratic leadership, fold up his hot air filled
progressive tent and go home?
|