The
International Criminal Court (ICC) Will Not
Prosecute Tony Blair
By Felicity
Arbuthnot
“But then, once in a lifetime the
longed for tidal wave of
justice can rise up,
and
hope and history rhyme. Believe
that a further shore is
reachable from here. Believe
in miracles.” (Seamus Heaney,
1939-2013, “The Cure at Troy.”)
July 04, 2016
"Information
Clearing House"
- "Global
Research"-
In an astonishing revelation, the Daily Telegraph
has established that Prosecutors at the
International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague will
examine the Chilcot Inquiry Report in to the Iraq
invasion – due to be released on Wednesday 6th July:
“ … for
evidence of abuse and torture by British
soldiers but have already ruled out putting Tony
Blair on trial for war crimes …” (1)
Whilst the
Report is “expected to strongly criticize” Blair’s
role in the illegal invasion:
“It
means individual soldiers could be prosecuted
for war crimes but not Mr. Blair.”
This, in
spite of the fact that it is now confirmed that
Blair’s commitment to George W. Bush’s determination
to invade Iraq was made personally, a year before
the assault, at a meeting at Bush’s ranch in
Crawford, Texas, without the knowledge of
Parliament. The ICC however, whilst considering the
introduction of a crime of aggression, thus brining
illegal invasions in to their legal remit – to which
Bush and Blair’s actions would seemingly be relevant
– would “not apply retrospectively.”
Thus,
currently the:
“decision by the UK to go to war in Iraq falls
outside the Court’s jurisdiction.”
Whilst any
British or US soldier responsible for the litany of
appalling crimes committed in Iraq should be pursued
relentlessly – which has broadly been less than the
case to date – the ultimate responsibility for the
whole tragic disaster for which both countries’
leaders and military brass will surely be haunted
throughout history, lies with those at the political
top. Their blatant mistruths led to the invasion and
its bloody, inhuman, ignorant, culturally clueless,
unending aftermath. Of the ICC decision, Reg Keys,
who stood against Blair in the 2005 election and
whose twenty year old son, Tom was killed in Iraq
said: “It makes me very angry. They don’t call him
Teflon Tony for nothing.”
However,
Anthony Charles Linton Blair, QC, will still have to
spend a lot of time looking over his shoulder. In
what the Daily Mail describes as: “a dramatic
attempt to impeach Tony Blair for misleading
Parliament over the Iraq war”, a cross party group
of MPs are building support: “for an attempted
prosecution of the former Prime Minister”, after
Wednesday’s publication of the Inquiry’s findings.
(2)
The MPs are
using an ancient parliamentary power, unused since
1806 to bring Blair to trial in Parliament. The
groups charge is that:
“he
should be impeached over allegations (that) he
breached his constitutional duties as Premier.”
His pivotal
claims regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction
– which, he had asserted, could reach the West “in
45 minutes” had been “contradicted by his own
intelligence (agencies) assessments”, points out the
Mail. A parliamentary source told the Mail:
“Impeachment is on our minds, but we will need to
digest the Report.
There is
definitely a feeling that Blair must be properly
held to account for his actions in the run up to
what was a disastrous war.” Not so much a war but
the near annihilation of a sovereign nation without
even the minimal wherewithal of self defense, many
will reflect. If the impeachment attempt is approved
by MPs, the defendant is delivered the top
parliamentary ceremonial official, known as Black
Rod, ahead of a trial.
“A
simple majority is required to convict, at which
point a sentence can be passed, which could, in
theory, involve Mr. Blair being sent to prison.”
The MPs are
not alone in their potential plans. Whatever the
Chilcot Report may lack in judgmental findings, it
will deliver to relevant legal experts a wealth of
potential for civil litigation against all
responsible for crimes against sovereignty,
humanity, the peace – and what many will argue has
been genocide.
The Chilcot
Inquiry is 2.6 million words. Many figures show that
between the embargo, the 1991 desert slaughter, the
silent holocaust of the residual deaths from the
Depleted Uranium weapons (radioactive residue 4.5
million years) and the 2003 invasion – massacres
ongoing -that may represent less than one word for
every Iraqi death.
Notes
1. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/02/outrage-as-war-crimes-prosecutors-say-tony-blair-will-not-be-inv/
2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3670751/MPs-say-ll-use-ancient-law-impeach-Tony-Blair-misleading-Parliament-Iraq-war-wake-Chilcot-report.html
Copyright ©
Felicity Arbuthnot, Global Research, 2016
See
also
Tony Blair Won't Be Tried for
War Crimes, Could Go to Jail:
British lawmakers will try to enact an ancient law
not used in over 200 years to impeach former prime
minister Tony Blair when the Chilcot report, due to
be released Wednesday, potentially reveals whether
he lied when making the decision to send British
troops to Iraq. |