America’s
One-Party Government
By Eric Zuesse
June 29,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- Today’s United States is a more realistic version
of the type of society that George Orwell
fictionally described in his allegorical novel
1984.
Like in
1984, the American public don’t know that
they’re merely the tools of some unseen aristocracy
who manipulate them by fear of ‘the other’, some
‘enemy’ group — manipulate the public via the media,
which the aristocracy controls. But the big failing
of Orwell’s model as a portrayal of the (when he
wrote it) coming fascist-corporate dystopia was that
he misunderstood how and why the public would
falsely believe that they live in a democracy. His
central character Winston Smith worked in an
unrealistically portrayed propaganda-mill. But in
some other fundamentals, Orwell had it right. The
public don’t know that their real enemy is their own
nation’s aristocracy who are mentally holding the
public in bondage by lies systematically implanted
into their beliefs, by means of ‘news’ media that
are controlled by their own nation’s aristocracy,
who own those media and/or control the government by
bribery (sometimes subtle) of the politicians whom
the aristocracy’s media are being paid to promote.
In any case, the aristocracy control the public’s
mind, to accept the fundamental legitimacy of the
regime the aristocrats are imposing. Aristocrats
hire the ‘news’ media.
When two
nations’ aristocracies are at war against each
other, the public in each is deceived to think that,
in the other, the rulers are evil and reign over
their public by dictatorship, but that in one’s
own nation, the rulers are truly representative
of the public and therefore in some high sense are
legitimate or even a democracy: rule by the public,
instead of by any aristocracy at all. In some of
these ‘democratic’ dictatorships, it’s called rule
by ‘the people’ or ‘the Volk’ (such as in Hitler’s
Germany), but in others, it’s called simply
‘democracy’.
In the case
of today’s America, “democracy” is the term that’s
used, because America had long been a democracy and
was founded by people who wanted their nation, which
they were creating out of (and leading their
Revolution against) a dictatorship by a foreign,
British, aristocracy, to free themselves from any
and all forms of dictatorship. So: “democracy” sells
better as the term to continue applying to what has
become America’s
dictatorship.
When
America was an authentic democracy, there were
always two Parties, one of which generally
represented the new domestically based American
aristocracy that was emerging, and the other of
which was more authentically representative of the
public and so democratic. However, starting when the
‘Democrat’ Bill Clinton came into the White House,
and threw out FDR’s AFDC, Glass-Steagall, etc.,
America’s Democratic Party became a Dixie version,
which tried to take back the South from the
Republicans and to restore control of the entire
country by Wall Street — by the megabanks. What
resulted from that is the complete takeover of the
American nation by America’s aristocracy: a
one-party government, in which the ‘Democratic
Party’ is now merely the ‘liberal wing’ of that
unseen aristocracy, so that both Parties now
differ only on domestic policies about minorities
etc., but both stand united in their foreign
policies, which have become those of an aggressive
aristocracy that’s trying to conquer all other
nations’ aristocracies and to exert a global empire
enabling America’s aristocrats to extract from the
publics everywhere, and to dole out to those
subordinate aristocracies (such as those in the
EU) a share of the booty which will purchase their
compliance and their cooperation with what U.S.
President Barack Obama repeatedly has called
“the one indispensable nation”, meaning that
each other nation is dispensable, only America (the
American aristocracy — since it’s no longer a
democracy) is not. This is America’s one-party rule
over the whole world — or so America’s aristocracy
hopes it to become.
HOW
IT’S IMPOSED
Let’s start
with a few of the liberal, Democratic Party, ‘news’
media, and show some of their underlying far-right,
Republican Party, agenda (which is sometimes even
more conservative than that of conservative ‘news’
media that appeal to self-acknowledged
Republicans and conservatives):
Did you
know that the owner of the super-liberal Daily Kos
website is an El Salvadorean aristocrat who has
worked extensively as a CIA asset and whose actual
opinions are far-right? That’s Markos
Moulitsas.
Did you
know that the founder and Editor-in-Chief at the
monotonously pro-(Clinton)Democratic-Party website
the National Memo is a close friend of Hillary
Clinton’s, and hires only ‘reporters’ who support
her neo-conservative foreign polices (such as
supporting coups in Latin America, invading Iraq in
2003, killing Gaddafi in 2011, overthrowing Assad in
forever, and overthrowing pro-Russian leaders of
nations anywhere)? That’s
Joe Conason.
Did you
know that the former owner and still top executive
at Huffington Post is a lifelong social climber who
places in charge of international reporting a group
of anti-Russian aristocrats, the
Berggruen
Foundation, and who got her own big breaks by
marrying a Republican millionaire and politician,
and by her writing a diatribe against feminism in
which she said:
“Women’s Lib claims that the achievement of total
liberation would transform the lives of all women
for the better; the truth is that it would transform
only the lives of women with strong
lesbian tendencies”?
That’s a
bigoted statement, and it’s from Arianna Huffington.
Did you
know that the person who formerly controlled
Mother Jones magazine, and currently controls
both Alternet and the Independent Media Institute as
well as his writing for Truthout and other liberal
news media, is so dedicated to the war-mongering
(backed by
Lockheed Martin etc.) side of the Democratic
Party, that in 2011 he condemned an attempt by some
Democrats to find a progressive Governor or U.S.
Senator who would contest against President Obama in
Democratic Party primaries in 2012 and provide
Democrats a progressive Democratic alternative to
the Republican-lite ‘Democrat’ Obama? This person
ridicules efforts to return the Democratic Party to
its pre-Clinton, FDR-dominant, anti-fascism and
progressivism. He’s
Don Hazen.
Actually,
the entire liberal newsmedia (except for fewer than
a dozen small online-only news sites) are basically
aristocratic right-wing pro-Wall-Street Democratic
Party propaganda that parades as an amorphous (and
typically ethnic, or Black, or Jewish, or Catholic,
or gay, or other sub-cultural) ‘leftism’ that’s
merely propaganda for the liberal aristocracy to
dominate over the conservative aristocracy to
control the public, and not at all really
progressive — which instead supports eliminating
political control by the aristocrats and returning
this country to real democracy, FDR’s
political values, in our time, no longer control by
what has become the resurgent American aristocracy,
the American Counter-Revolution — and its
ever-increasing economic inequality and therefore
increasing inequality of economic opportunity (which
inequality benefits the aristocrats and their
offspring at the expense of everyone else).
FDR ended
mega-corporate control over the U.S. government;
Republicans and Clinton-Obama ‘Democrats’ restored
mega-corporate control. And now we have one-Party,
mega-corporate government, in two flavors: liberal
and conservative.
Here’s just
one example of that liberal news-media operation,
from U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s home
computer (and with links added by me), showing how
today’s American liberals can love a
fascist whom they self-identify with,
notwithstanding her
fascism):
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/Clinton_Email_November_Release/C05797372.pdf
From: H
<hrod17@clintonemail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:23 PM
To: ‘Russorv@state.gov’
Subject: Re: Hillary….
Pis
respond.
From:
Sidney Blumenthal [here’s
his son, and some of
his son’s articles at Don Hazen’s alternet, plus
Sid’s and Hillary’s
discussions about some of them, and praise of
Sidney himself by
others of Hillary’s friends]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:33 PM Eastern
Standard Time
To: H
Subject: Hillary….
Whenever you read this, I just want you to know how
much Jackie and I have been thinking of you and
hoping for your good health and recovery. And many
of your friends have reached out to express the
same feeling, from
Gene and Diane
Lyons to
Sean Wilentz, and Joe Conason
to, yes, Cody and Derek
(Strobe
spent New Year’s with Derek), and especially Carville,
who was very upset (he’s an emotional kind of guy,
in case you hadn’t noticed), and
Begala, who was praying for you–and
many others,
Lynn Rothschild
and
Tina Brown (who wrote a very nice
column with a good swipe at the evil bridge troll
John Bolton), and on and on. (I’ve hooked up Sean,
who flew to New Orleans for a few days, with
James, who’s
giving him a tour of the music scene tomorrow,
Thursday, and bringing him to the field of the
Battle of NO. James is on the 20 0th anniversary
commission and Sean, of course, is the Andrew
Jackson expert.) So, very soon, Come Home,
America!–at least for awhile; rest up, take care of
yourself; and, then, a lot more ahead. Talk to you
whenever. As Studs Terkel used to say at the end of
his radio program, quoting Big Bill Broonzy, “Take
it easy, but take it.” Much love, Sid
CONCLUSION
Is it
hypocritical for the servants of the aristocracy to
pretend to be progressive, even when they are
supporting fascist candidates? How is this any
different from their openly supporting Republican
candidates, except for the latter politicians being
openly making their appeals in their Party primaries
to voters who are bigots against this or that group
— Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, or whatever? After all, a
fascist is bigoted against all poor people, and
respects rich people (‘entrepreneurs’); they’re
all social climbers at heart; they respect their
‘betters’; so, how big a difference, really, is
there between liberal fascists and conservative
fascists? If the rich are terrific, then the poor
must be dirt, right?
This is how
America became a
dictatorship. Instead of there being any longer
a political party that represents the aristocracy,
being opposed by a political party that represents
the people, there are two political parties that
represent two sides of the aristocracy: on the one
side (the Democratic Party) are the “noblesse
oblige” aristocrats, and on the other side are the
“greed is good” aristocrats. The people are merely
servants; they are ‘dispensable’, just like
‘dispensable’ nations are (every nation except
America).
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author,
most recently, of
They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs.
Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,
and of CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity. |