Why The
British Said No To Europe
By John Pilger
June 26, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- The majority vote by Britons to leave the European
Union was an act of raw democracy. Millions of
ordinary people refused to be bullied, intimidated
and dismissed with open contempt by their presumed
betters in the major parties, the leaders of the
business and banking oligarchy and the media.
This was, in
great part, a vote by those angered and demoralised
by the sheer arrogance of the apologists for the
"remain" campaign and the dismemberment of a
socially just civil life in Britain. The last
bastion of the historic reforms of 1945, the
National Health Service, has been so subverted by
Tory and Labour-supported privateers it is fighting
for its life.
A
forewarning came when the Treasurer, George Osborne,
the embodiment of both Britain's ancient regime and
the banking mafia in Europe, threatened to cut £30
billion from public services if people voted the
wrong way; it was blackmail on a shocking scale.
Immigration
was exploited in the campaign with consummate
cynicism, not only by populist politicians from the
lunar right, but by Labour politicians drawing on
their own venerable tradition of promoting and
nurturing racism, a symptom of corruption not at the
bottom but at the top. The reason millions of
refugees have fled the Middle East - irst Iraq, now
Syria - are the invasions and imperial mayhem of
Britain, the United States, France, the European
Union and Nato. Before that, there was the wilful
destruction of Yugoslavia. Before that, there was
the theft of Palestine and the imposition of Israel.
The pith
helmets may have long gone, but the blood has never
dried. A nineteenth century contempt for countries
and peoples, depending on their degree of colonial
usefulness, remains a centrepiece of modern "globalisation",
with its perverse socialism for the rich and
capitalism for the poor: its freedom for capital and
denial of freedom to labour; its perfidious
politicians and politicised civil servants.
All this
has now come home to Europe, enriching the likes of
Tony Blair and impoverishing and disempowering
millions. On 23 June, the British said no more.
The most
effective propagandists of the "European ideal" have
not been the far right, but an insufferably
patrician class for whom metropolitan London is the
United Kingdom. Its leading members see themselves
as liberal, enlightened, cultivated tribunes of the
21st century zeitgeist, even "cool". What they
really are is a bourgeoisie with insatiable
consumerist tastes and ancient instincts of their
own superiority. In their house paper, the Guardian,
they have gloated, day after day, at those who would
even consider the EU profoundly undemocratic, a
source of social injustice and a virulent extremism
known as "neoliberalism".
The aim of
this extremism is to install a permanent, capitalist
theocracy that ensures a two-thirds society, with
the majority divided and indebted, managed by a
corporate class, and a permanent working poor. In
Britain today, 63 per cent of poor children grow up
in families where one member is working. For them,
the trap has closed. More than 600,000 residents of
Britain's second city, Greater Manchester, are,
reports a study, "experiencing the effects of
extreme poverty" and 1.6 million are slipping into
penury.
Little of
this social catastrophe is acknowledged in the
bourgeois controlled media, notably the Oxbridge
dominated BBC. During the referendum campaign,
almost no insightful analysis was allowed to intrude
upon the clichéd hysteria about "leaving Europe", as
if Britain was about to be towed in hostile currents
somewhere north of Iceland.
On the
morning after the vote, a BBC radio reporter
welcomed politicians to his studio as old chums.
"Well," he said to "Lord" Peter Mandelson, the
disgraced architect of Blairism, "why do these
people want it so badly?" The "these people" are the
majority of Britons.
The wealthy
war criminal Tony Blair remains a hero of the
Mandelson "European" class, though few will say so
these days. The Guardian once described Blair as
"mystical" and has been true to his "project" of
rapacious war. The day after the vote, the
columnist Martin Kettle offered a Brechtian solution
to the misuse of democracy by the masses. "Now
surely we can agree referendums are bad for
Britain", said the headline over his full-page
piece. The "we" was unexplained but understood -
just as "these people" is understood. "The
referendum has conferred less legitimacy on
politics, not more," wrote Kettle. " ... the verdict
on referendums should be a ruthless one. Never
again."
The kind of
ruthlessness Kettle longs for is found in Greece, a
country now airbrushed. There, they had a referendum
and the result was ignored. Like the Labour Party
in Britain, the leaders of the Syriza government in
Athens are the products of an affluent, highly
privileged, educated middle class, groomed in the
fakery and political treachery of post-modernism.
The Greek people courageously used the referendum to
demand their government sought "better terms" with a
venal status quo in Brussels that was crushing the
life out of their country. They were betrayed, as
the British would have been betrayed.
On Friday,
the Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was asked by
the BBC if he would pay tribute to the departed
Cameron, his comrade in the "remain" campaign.
Corbyn fulsomely praised Cameron's "dignity" and
noted his backing for gay marriage and his apology
to the Irish families of the dead of Bloody Sunday.
He said nothing about Cameron's divisiveness, his
brutal austerity policies, his lies about
"protecting" the Health Service. Neither did he
remind people of the war mongering of the Cameron
government: the dispatch of British special forces
to Libya and British bomb aimers to Saudi Arabia
and, above all, the beckoning of world war three.
In the week
of the referendum vote, no British politician and,
to my knowledge, no journalist referred to Vladimir
Putin's speech in St. Petersburg commemorating the
seventy-fifth anniversary of Nazi Germany's invasion
of the Soviet Union on 22 June, 1941. The Soviet
victory - at a cost of 27 million Soviet lives and
the majority of all German forces - won the Second
World War.
Putin
likened the current frenzied build up of Nato troops
and war material on Russia's western borders to the
Third Reich's Operation Barbarossa. Nato's exercises
in Poland were the biggest since the Nazi invasion;
Operation Anaconda had simulated an attack on
Russia, presumably with nuclear weapons. On the eve
of the referendum, the quisling secretary-general of
Nato, Jens Stoltenberg, warned Britons they would be
endangering "peace and security" if they voted to
leave the EU. The millions who ignored him and
Cameron, Osborne, Corbyn, Obama and the man who runs
the Bank of England may, just may, have struck a
blow for real peace and democracy in Europe.
Follow John Pilger on twitter @johnpilger and on
Facebook |