Trump’s
Decision to Debate Sanders is Genius Move
By Michael
Krieger
Here,
a Clinton match-up is highly likely to be an
unmitigated electoral disaster, whereas a
Sanders candidacy stands a far better
chance. Every one of Clinton’s
(considerable) weaknesses plays to every one
of Trump’s strengths, whereas every one of
Trump’s (few) weaknesses plays to every one
of Sanders’s strengths. From a purely
pragmatic standpoint, running Clinton
against Trump is a disastrous, suicidal
proposition.
– From the February article: Why
Hillary Clinton Cannot Beat Donald Trump
May 27,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Liberty
Blitzkrieg"
- If the Trump/Sanders debate proceeds as
planned in California, you’re about to witness one
of the most important moments of a 2016 general
election that hasn’t even begun yet. To say such a
debate would be an unmitigated disaster for Hillary
Clinton would be the understatement of the century.
Let’s explore why.
First
of all, Hillary Clinton outright rejected a debate
request from Bernie Sanders ahead of the June 7th
California primary. Given Sanders’ recent momentum,
as well as her need to persuade a significant number
of his supporters to back her in November; such a
denial was not only arrogant, it was highly
insulting to voters in America’s largest state. From
team Clinton’s perspective there was little upside
to agreeing to a debate, versus easily manageable
downside from a few days of negative media coverage.
Or so they thought…
The above
strategic thought process would’ve worked in almost
every other election season and against any other
candidate. Unfortunately for her, it doesn’t work in
2016, and it certainly doesn’t work against Donald
Trump.
Trump
understands human nature as well as anyone I’ve ever
observed. He’s also likely the most skilled natural
politician of my lifetime, with perhaps the
exception of Bill Clinton in his prime. Under
conventional thinking, Trump would also certainly
deny a Sanders debate request for the same reasons
Clinton declined it. There’s little to gain in
publicly battling a guy with nothing to lose, and
you’ve already wrapped up the Republican nomination
anyway. That said, Trump is far too savvy to fall
victim to such straightforward thinking. He
understands that debating Sanders in California
ahead of the primary presents a once in a lifetime
opportunity to embarrass and belittle Clinton in
front of the whole world before the general election
even begins.
Think about
it for a second. Who cares what happens during the
debate itself. Think about what the media will be
saying. Think about how weak, irrelevant and stupid
a Trump/Sanders contest will make Hillary
Clinton look. As the largest state in the union
heads to the voting booths Hillary Clinton can’t be
bothered to have a discussion with Bernie Sanders,
yet Donald Trump is more than willing. I can see the
headlines already:
Hillary MIA in California?
Where in the World is Hillary?
Hillary Nowhere to be Found in California Primary.
You get the
point. Trump will appear Presidential, while Hillary
will look like a discredited Goldman Sachs crook
hiding from a 74-year-old socialist. Which, by the
way, is exactly what she’s doing.
Naturally,
the whining hordes of Clinton sycophants and paid
online trolls who don’t think they should have to
work to secure the Presidency, will bitch and moan
at Sanders. They’ll blame him for all her problems,
when the truth is this disaster, like most of her
disasters, is entirely of her own making. Hillary
Clinton was offered the opportunity to debate
Sanders in California. She declined. You can’t blame
Trump for jumping on the opportunity to make her
look extraordinarily stupid. That’s just politics.
© 2016
Liberty Blitzkrieg LLC.
See Also
Triumphant Trump says bring
it on: I’ll debate both Bernie and “big mouth”
Elizabeth Warren:
Trump clarified that he isn't bluffing about taking
on Sanders and made clear that Warren is getting
under his skin |