Will The
November US Presidential Election Bring The End Of
The World?
By Paul Craig
Roberts
May 24,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- “We have been watching for nearly a month a steady
buildup of American and NATO forces along Russia’s
borders – on land, on sea and in the air. There has
been nothing like this on Russia’s borders, such an
amassing of hostile military force, since the German
invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.”
So concludes America’s leading Russian expert,
Professor Stephen Cohen (Princeton and New
York University).
Professor
Cohen asks if Washington is sleepwalking and needs
to wake up or whether Washington has gone crazy and
intends war.
Pepe
Escobar advises Washington to “beware what you wish
for:
Russia is
ready for war.”
Escobar
reports that recently the Rand Corporation,
“essentially a CIA outpost,” concluded that “Russia
could overrun NATO in a mere 60 hours, if not less.”
On the level of nukes and missile systems, Russia is
four generations ahead of the US military/security
complex, which is mainly interested in inflating
profits with cost overruns. US weapons systems are
simply outclassed.
Nevertheless, the Russian high command is concerned
with the Russian government’s low-key response to
Washington’s aggression. The generals blame the
“Atlanticists Integrationists” who infect Putin’s
government. This faction is believed to be organized
around Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and believes
Russia should make concessions to Washington in
order to be accepted as part of the West. The
incompetent Russian central bank and neoliberal
economists are part of the faction whose goal is to
be part of the West regardless of its impact on
Russian independence from Washington’s Empire.
Stephen Cohen and Alastair Crooke, a former British
secret agent, almost alone in the West have noticed
that the Russian military and predominant part of
the government that emphasizes national sovereignty
are putting
pressure on President Putin
to eliminate those in the government who are willing
to compromise Russia’s independence in order to gain
acceptance by Washington.
This has
been my own opinion for some time. It is impossible
to adequately stand up to an external threat when
unreliable elements are part of the threatened
government.
If Putin is
forced to remove Washington’s agents from his
government, as he must do if Russia is to survive
Washington’s plots, he must not let them leave
Russia. If they escape, they will end up in
Washington to be used as Washington’s Russian
government in exile. If Putin doesn’t want to put
them on trial for treason, then a form of national
house arrest would be a solution.
Alastair
Crooke writes
that
Washington is miscalulating by seeking unipolar
hegemony and, thus, is forcing Putin into the camp
of the nationalists who value Russia’s sovereignty
more than Western acceptance. Washington’s use of
NATO in an effort to corner Russia with military
buildups on Russia’s land and sea borders is forcing
compromise out of Russia’s response to Washington’s
aggression.
Regardless
of Escobar’s description of Russian military
superiority over the West, Russian independence is
between a rock and a hard place. The rock is the
American neoconservatives’ determination to achieve
hegemony over Russia. The hard place is those within
the Russian government who are more Western than
Russian in their orientation.
If Trump
becomes US president, there is some possibility,
perhaps, that the neoconservatives will cease to
dominate US foreign and military policies. Should
this turn out to be the case, the Russian
nationalists might ease their pressure on Putin to
remove the Atlanticist Integrationists from the
government.
If Hillary
becomes US president, the neoconservative threat to
Russia will escalate. The Atlanticist
Integrationists will be eliminated from the Russian
government, and Russia will move to full war
standing.
Remember
what an unprepared Russia did to the German
Wehrmacht, at that time the most powerful army ever
assembled. Imagine what a prepared Russia would do
to the crazed Hillary and the incompetent
neoconservatives.
As I have
previously written, pushing Russia to war means the
demise of the US and Europe and, considering the
destructive power of nuclear weapons, most likely of
all life on earth.
The main
cause of this danger is the arrogance, hubris, and
utter stupidity of the American neoconservatives who
are ensconced in positions of power and influence
and in Hillary’s presidential campaign. A secondary
cause is Europe’s vassal status, which deprives
Europe of a sensible foreign policy and forces
Europe to enable Washington’s aggression.
What this
means is that no matter what you think of Trump, if
you vote for Hillary you are definitely voting for
the end of the world.
Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist
for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and
Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a
worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are
The Failure
of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution
of the West,
How America
Was Lost,
and
The
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
|