Can Russia
Survive Washington’s Attack?
By Paul Craig
Roberts
May 22,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- It is not only American generals who are
irresponsible and declare on the basis of no
evidence whatsoever that “Russia is an existential
threat to the United States” and also to the Baltic
states, Poland, Georgia, Ukraine, and all of Europe.
British generals also participate in the
warmongering. UK retired general and former NATO
commander Sir Richard Shirreff, Deputy Supreme
Allied Commander in Europe until 2014, has just
declared that
nuclear war
with Russia is “entirely possible” within the year.
My loyal
readers know that I, myself, have been warning for
some time about the likelihood of nuclear war.
However, there is a vast difference between me and
the Western generals. I see the war as the
consequence of the neoconservative drive for US
world hegemony. The neoconservative drive for world
hegemony is acknowledged by the neoconservatives
themselves in their public position papers, and it
has a 15 year record of being implemented in
America’s many and ongoing wars in the Middle East
and Africa. Although the Presstitute media does its
best to keep our focus away from the known facts,
the facts remain known.
The
position of the Western generals is that “Russian
aggression” is driving an innocent America/NATO to
nuclear war.
Here is
General Shirreff’s list of “Russian aggressions”:
“He [Putin] has invaded Georgia, he has invaded the
Crimea, he has invaded Ukraine. He has used force
and got away with it. In a period of tension, an
attack on the Baltic states… is entirely plausible.”
Shirreff is talking about make-believe happenings
that even if real would be taking place inside what
were until recently Russia’s long-standing national
boundaries.
General
Shirreff strikes me as either uninformed or a
dissembler. It is the United States and Israel who
use force and get away with it. The Russian invasion
of the former Russian province, Georgia, was a
response to the American puppet government’s
invasion of South Ossetia in which the American and
israeli trained and equipped Georgian troops killed
Russian peace-keeping troops and a large number of
South Ossetian civilians while the Russian
government was at the Beijing olympics.
It only
took a small fraction of the Russian Army a few
hours to roll up the American and Israeli trained
Georgian Army. Putin had the former Russian
province in his hand. He could have hung the
American puppet president and reincorporated Georgia
back into Russia, where if probably belongs, having
spent all of modern history in that location.
But Putin
did not see Georgia as a prize, and having made his
point, let the Americans have their puppet state
back. The president at the time, a scummy
scoundrel, was thrown out of the country by
Georgians and now serves the American puppet state
of Ukraine, like so many others who are not
Ukrainian. Apparently, Washington can’t find enough
Ukrainians who will sell out their country for
Washington and has to bring in foreigners to help
Washington rule Ukraine.
There has
been, alas, no Russian invasion of Ukraine. Putin
would not even accept the pleas of the Russian
majority populations in the breakaway provinces of
Donetsk and Luhansk to be reincorporated back into
Russia where they belong. If Putin actually wanted
Ukraine, he doesn’t need to send in an army. He can
take back the eastern and southern parts just by
accepting the pleas of the people to again be a part
of Russia.
The only
plea that Putin accepted was that of the Crimeans,
who with an extremely high turnout never experienced
in “western democracies” voted 97.6 percent to
rejoin Russia, where Crimea resided for longer than
the US has existed, until Khrushchev, a Ukrainian,
transferred Crimea from the Russian Soviet Republic
to the Ukrainian Soviet Republic when both were
provinces of the Soviet Union.
Little
doubt that Putin accepted Crimea’s plea because
Russia’s only warm water port and entrance into the
Mediterranean Sea is Russia’s naval base in Crimea,
and little doubt that Putin refused Donetsk and
Luhansk in order to deflect Washington’s
propagandistic charges, such as those of former
general Shirreff. Putin reasoned, mistakenly in my
view, that his refusal to accept Donetsk and Luhansk
would reassure Washington’s NATO puppet states and
lessen Washington’s influence over Europe. For the
corrupt Europeans, facts are of no consequence.
Washington’s money prevails.
Putin
doesn’t understand the power of Washington’s money.
In the entire West only money counts. There is no
such thing as Washington’s word, government
integrity, truth, or even empirical facts. There
are only well-propagated lies. The entire West is a
lie. The West exists for one reason only–corporate
profits.
The retired
general Shirreff claims, without any evidence, which
is typical, that Putin “used force and got away with
it.”
What force
is the general talking about? Can he identify the
force? The independent international observers of
the Crimean voting report that it was completely
fair, that there was no intimidation, no troops or
any Russian intimidation present.
The former
NATO general Shirreff believes that a Russian attack
“on the Baltic states is entirely possible.” For
what reason? The Baltic states, former provinces of
the Soviet Union, comprise no threat whatsoever to
Russia. The Russians have no reason whatsoever to
attack the Baltic states. It was Russia that gave
the Baltic states their independence. Just as it
was Russia that gave Ukraine and Georgia their
independence.
Imperial
Washington is leveraging the reasonableness of the
Russian government to put Russia in a propagandistic
light. The Russian government has permitted itself
to be put on the defensive and has given the attack
to Washington.
Russia has
not attacked anyone except the terrorist group ISIS.
Allegedly, Washington is opposed to terrorism, but
Washington has been using ISIS in an effort to
overthrow the Syrian government with terrorism.
Russia has put a halt to that. The question before
us is whether the Russian government so desires to
be accepted by the West that Putin sells out Syria
to Washington/Israeli dismemberment in order to show
that Russia is a good partner for the West.
If Russia
doesn’t get over its affection for the West, Russia
will lose its independence.
My
understanding is that Russia has been resurrected as
a Christian, morally principally country, perhaps
the only one on earth. The question that the
Russian people and their Russian government need,
desperately, to ask themselves is: Do we want to be
associated with the War Criminal West that disobeys
not only its own laws, but also international laws?
The vast
majority of the evil in the world resides in the
West. It is the west with its lies and greed that
has devastated millions of people in 7 countries
during the new 21st century. This is the most
threatening beginning of a new millennium in modern
times.
Unsatisfied
with its looting of the Third World, South America,
Greece, Portugal, Latvia, Argentina, and now Brazil
and Ukraine, the Western Capitalists have their
sights set on Russia, China, India, and South
Africa.
What a
prize it would be to get Russia with all that vast
expanse of Siberia that can be environmentally
brutalized and destroyed for capitalist profits. The
Russian government’s offering of free land in
Siberia had better be limited to Russian citizens
Otherwise, the land is likely to be bought up by the
West, which will use its ownership of Russia to
destroy the country.
The
Russians and the Chinese are blinded by the fact
that they lived for decades under oppressive and
failed regimes. They look to the West as success.
Their misreading of the West endangers their
independence.
Neither
Russia nor China seek conflict. It is a gratuitous
and reckless act for Washington to send the message
to Russia and China that they must choose vassalage
or war.
Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist
for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and
Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a
worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are
The Failure
of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution
of the West,
How America
Was Lost,
and
The
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
|