Is China a
House of Cards?
By Pepe
Escobar
May 19,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Sputnik"
- Let’s
start by examining what the Dragon himself –
President Xi Jinping – has to say about China being
largely derided in influential Beltway circles as a
House of Cards.
Xi has
forcefully dismissed the notion that a House
of Cards power struggle has been raging at the
rarified heights of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Yet at the same time he’s adamant; “conspirators”,
“careerists”, “cabals” and “cliques” are attempting
to undermine the CCP from within.
Thus,
with ironic/poetic justice, a
42-part series on corruption in China – titled
In the Name of the People and financed by the Middle
Kingdom’s top law enforcement agency – is bound
to go live before the end of 2016, featuring a CCP
stalwart as the bad guy (that’s a first). Call him
the Chinese Frank Underwood.
This means
that what Xi is saying – and acting — live will be
mirrored on hundreds of millions of Chinese screens,
pitting conflicting factions within the 88
million-member CCP. Xi’s war on corruption has
produced a rash of severely disgruntled CCP
officials – to put it mildly.
Xi not only
is the Commander-in-Chief in the fight
against corruption; he’s now Commander-in-Chief
of China’s joint battle command center as well. He
monitors a [Central Military Commission] Chairman
Responsibility System as well as the central guard
corps, which monitors the security of all other CCP
heavyweights.
Add
to these Xi’s status as CCP’s general secretary,
chairman of the Central Military Commission,
president of the national security commission and
head of the top group for reform of the Chinese
system, and a Harvard academic who refers to him as
“the chairman of everything” does not seem to be
that far off the mark.
Yet even
this awesome concentration of power does not mean
that Xi is an unassailable deity. On the key drama –
the state of the economy – it
has emerged that in a recent interview by the
People’s Daily with an anonymous “authoritative
person”, printed on the front page and exposing deep
economic divergence among the CCP leadership, the
“authoritative person” in question was none other
than Xi.
He had
to take to the key media read by anyone who’s anyone
in China to press his point on how to fix China’s
debt-ridden economy; low growth is OK, and the new
normal; as for blind credit expansion/monetary
easing, that’s not OK. Xi, once again, is adamant;
it’s now or never to
start a painful restructuring of the Chinese
system.
Beware the “nests of foreign spies”
Xi Jinping
does wield astonishing power. There can’t be any
other way. Imagine the man on top of a
civilization-state of 5,000 years who needs,
among myriad other crucial issues, to; tweak/manage
an economic system that was successful for over 30
years but now needs to be upgraded; shift the system
from export-led demand to domestic consumption;
manage the aspirations – and broken dreams – of a
vast working class including millions of newly
unemployed; reorganize monster state-owned
enterprises (SOEs); find ways to get rid
of Himalayas of bad bank loans and “nonperforming”
investments; downsize and at the same time vitally
upgrade the Chinese military.
And if that
was not enough, Beijing has to be fully alert 24/7
about all those non-stop Pentagon provocations –
actual and rhetorical – centered in the South China
Sea.
You’ve got
to be alert. Full time. All the time. And be alert
at “foreign hostile forces” or, more plainly, “nests
of foreign spies” who want you to be mired in chaos.
Thus the new law on NGOs operating in China. There
are too many — over 7,000. And the (hidden) agenda
for quite a few – from NED to the Soros gang — is
to try to promote pure, unadulterated color
revolution, as difficult as that may be
in ultra-regimented China.
Yet it
worked in Brazil – a BRICS weak link. The CCP
leadership has carefully – and silently – understood
the Brazilian lesson, and is fully aware that
Exceptionalistan would stop at nothing to slow
down China’s already spectacular global reach. So if
you’re a NGO operating in China, from now on you
need to find an official Chinese sponsor and
register with local police.
Back to the
Chinese economy, the mantra across multiple,
powerful Beltway factions is that a crash is
imminent. Once again; the House of Cards theme.
China’s
total debt is now a whopping 280% of GDP. That
includes the 115% that apply to SOEs’ debts;
in Japan, for instance, that SOE figure is only 31%.
Yet what really matters is that only a maximum
of 25% of Chinese SOEs’ debts will need to be
restructured.
Xi’s
strategy is that the Goddess of the Market will
turbo-charge those SOEs, not kill them. So forget
about the CPP handing out control of the Chinese
economy to companies that the CCP itself does not
control. No wonder what’s left for
US Big Capital’s spokespersons is to carp
about a House of Cards.
All
eyes on 2021
It’s never
enough to remind everyone that absolutely everything
that’s happening in China now is subordinated
to Xi’s official target of achieving “a moderately
prosperous society” (xiaokang shehui) by the 100th
anniversary of the CCP’s founding, in 2021.
That’s a
mere five years from now. More long term, 2049, is
the target of achieving a “socialist modernized
society” (shehuizhuyi xiandaihua shehui) with a
$30,000 GDP per capita; that should tie in with the
celebration of the 100th anniversary of the founding
of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Beijing’s
army of planners estimate that this overwhelming
target is achievable if the Middle Kingdom is able
to produce over 30% of global GDP by 2049;
for comparison, that’s about 1 and ½ times more
than the proportion currently produced by the US
(and considering that the US does not manufacture
much apart from weapons and infotech.)
As
breathtaking as this vision may be, it’s always
reduced by the same old catastrophist Western
“experts”
to variations of Xi being the new Mao Zedong.
That’s so pedestrian. The men – and the historical
contexts – are radically diverse. Mao decided on a
few core issues by himself – and left the rest
to his underlings. The Little Helmsman Deng Xiaoping
was a man of consensus. Xi decides by himself
on virtually everything – but he does pay attention
to some selected advisers. Examples include the
Ministry of Trade, which first came up with the
concept that developed into the New Silk Roads, and
Liu He, the advisor who conceptualized Xi’s current
economic strategy.
The fact
that Xi is now designated as the “core” (hexin)
of the Beijing leadership is not such a big (Maoist)
deal. The word in Beijing is that an assembly line
of editors is now compiling a book of Xi thought (sixiang)
that would make him as crucial as Mao as a
contributor to Sino-Marxist theory. So what? Xi is a
man in a rush, on a roll and with a mission – and
2021 is just around the corner. House of Cards? No;
this looks more like a case of Xi landing a Full
House on the table.
Pepe Escobar is an independent
geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and
TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to
websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US
to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent
for Asia Times Online, where he wrote the column The
Roving Eye from 2000 to 2014. Born in Brazil, he's
been a foreign correspondent since 1985, and has
lived in London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles,
Washington, Bangkok and Hong Kong. Even before 9/11
he specialized in covering the arc from the Middle
East to Central and East Asia, with an emphasis on
Big Power geopolitics and energy wars. He is the
author of "Globalistan" (2007), "Red Zone Blues"
(2007), "Obama does Globalistan" (2009) and "Empire
of Chaos" (2014), all published by Nimble Books. His
latest book is "2030", also by Nimble Books, out in
December 2015. He currently lives between Paris and
Bangkok. Follow him on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377
|