Psychological Warfare, False Narratives And
Deception
Psychological operations are spreading information
to a population or a target group to influence their
emotions, their motivation, their way of thinking
and, finally; how they act. Psychological operations
target foreign governments, organizations, groups
and individuals. In psychological operations
disinformation and deceit is routine. This is
included in the standard arsenal of for instance the
US military forces.
By Pål Steigan
Guidelines for deception and fraud/hoax
Is this
something I merely claim to be true? Far from; the
opening to this article is found in the manual for
The United States (US) Army Psychological
Operations (PSYOP) doctrine currently in force.
The document
can be downloaded here (pdf). The manual opens
as follows:
PSYOP
are planned operations that convey selected
information and indicators to foreign target
audiences (TAs) to influence their emotions,
motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately,
the behavior of foreign governments,
organizations, groups, and individuals. The
purpose of all PSYOP is to create in neutral,
friendly, or hostile foreign groups the
emotions, attitudes, or desired behavior that
support the achievement of U.S. national
objectives and the military mission. In doing
so, PSYOP influence not only policy and
decisions, but also the ability to govern, the
ability to command, the will to fight, the will
to obey, and the will to support.
The
US Army isn’t exceptional. Psychological warfare is
ancient as warfare itself. I examined this in the
article “The
art of storytelling in times of war”.
The American manual quotes the German military
theorist Carl von Clausewitz, who
wrote that “In war everything is
intertwined with psychological forces and effects”
in his most notable work
“On War”.
All
military commands of any significance practice
psychological warfare as part of their arsenal, but
fortunately the US Joint Chiefs of Staff mapped out
the guidelines in a manual which is available for
everyone to read. And it spells out that deceits,
misleads and false narratives are part of the
standard methods. For deceit to work it must appear
trustworthy and it must derive from sources the
target group has confidence in. All of this is
discussed in the manual. It’s part of standard
procedures that the commanding officer should
consider whether a “deception story” needs to be
created.
Such
a deception story is the narrative of the
Gulf of Tonkin Incident. A story was
released from the US Joint Chiefs of Staff that the
North Vietnamese navy had attacked US marine vessels
in international waters. This lead to President
Lyndon B Johnson’s appearance on national
television, stating that the USA would strike back
at North Vietnam. The problem is that the whole
story is a hoax and it was known to be false.
US Naval Institute writes
this on their Internet homepage:
…
once-classified documents and tapes released in
the past several years, combined with previously
uncovered facts, make clear that high government
officials distorted facts and deceived the
American public about events that led to full
U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
Eleven years later the defeat of the USA was a fact.
The Vietnam War had then killed possibly as many as
3.8 million people and caused three countries
nearly irreparable damages. Millions of others were
wounded and damaged for life. People are still dying
from the poison USA poured down from their
aircrafts. USA’s own losses were 58.000 killed and
303.000 wounded. And
the whole thing started with a false narrative.
The truth and the permanent war
Since
George W Bush declared the war on
terror in 2001 the world has been in a permanent
state of war where the war theatres have changed
from Afghanistan and Iraq to Libya, Ukraine, Yemen
and Syria. All these wars have been motivated by
false narratives and in part tear dripping stories
with the aim of influencing people’s emotions and
positions, as described in the manual, in order to
make them support the wars. One of the most famous –
or rather; infamous – was Colin Powell’s
speech in the UN in 2003 where he presented no less
than propaganda lies about Iraq.
Lawrence Wilkerson,
former Pentagon Chief of Staff, was one of the
writers behind the speech, which presented false
information about the so called weapons of mass
destruction. Which again lead to the disastrous war
on Iraq.
Wilkerson is aware of the forgery
that took place, and today he refers to this as
«probably the biggest mistake of my life».
As the
saying goes: In war, truth is the first casualty.
And this has been proved over and over again during
the years of this new century. Norway’s war on
Libya, which the whole Parliament supported, and
which destroyed that country, was, as is well known,
built on lies that Moammar al Gadaffi was about to
kill his own people.
Social media, «soft power» and
NGOs
In her
tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary
Clinton took over the baton from Bush and
Powell. During her leadership, psychological
warfare, now referred to as
“soft power”, was developed several steps
further. The US State Department specialized in
delivering the message via the so called
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO), and the
message was often styled in a “feminist” or
“progressive” fashion.
This has
turned out to be a great success. Whereas in 2003
there was a worldwide anti-war movement against the
war on Iraq, including the largest rally ever taking
place in Oslo, protests have hardly occurred against
the wars in Libya, Syria and Yemen or the USA
directed coup d’état in Ukraine.
Now
humanitarian organizations like Amnesty
International and Human Rights
Watch or, as in Syria, White
Helmets, are used as messengers of the
narratives that serve the war and The Pentagon the
best.
Since
2003 the social media have become an entirely new
and tremendously powerful tool for spreading
disinformation and emotions which drive the war. And
because a critical press hardly exists, this has
turned out very effective. The CIA, NSA and MI6 all
have their own units performing psychological
warfare in social media. Specific software has been
developed for so called sentiment analysis as well
as several techniques for creating and direct public
opinion.
There is software available to run false profiles on
the Internet and this is used by the secret
services.
In the
article
«I sosiale medier blir vi manipulert med
følelser» (In social media we’re
being emotionally manipulated) I wrote about this:
Financial Times
reports that CIA has developed
a taste for social media. The financial
newspaper writes that CIA is going to expand the
use of Amazon’s commercial software. According
to CIA’s Chief Information Officer Doug
Wolfe, the CIA is so satisfied with
this; they’re already going to move parts of
their operations to Amazon’s platforms.
And The Pentagon is researching
how to use Twitter in order to influence
people’s mindsets.
The Guardian
reports that The
British army is creating a special force of
Facebook warriors, skilled in psychological
operations and the use of social media to engage
in unconventional warfare in the information
age. This force will use their competence in the
use of social media attempting to control the
narrative, according to the newspaper.
Israel
Defense Forces (IDF) has been leading the way in
this area of governmental/military use of social
media, like they did during Operation Cast Lead
in Gaza in 2008-2009. IDF is active on 30
platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, YouTube
and Instagram, and in six different languages.
Several countries have contacted IDF to learn
from their methods.
In step with
NATO’s increasing military arming and a growing
number of countries being involved in conflicts and
wars, the psychological warfare will escalate as
well. Then it’s crucial to know how to recognize
these tactics, and a place to start learning is to
read what the psychological warriors themselves have
to say on the topic, like in the manual for The
United States (U.S.) Army Psychological Operations.
English
translation: Anne Merethe Erstad |