To See
the Real Story in Brazil, Look at Who Is Being
Installed as President — and Finance Chiefs
By Glenn
Greenwald
April 24, 2016
"Information
Clearing House"
- "The
Intercept"-
It’s not easy for
outsiders to sort through all the competing claims
about Brazil’s political crisis and the ongoing
effort to oust its president, Dilma Rousseff, who
won re-election a mere 18 months ago with 54 million
votes. But the most important means for
understanding the truly anti-democratic nature of
what’s taking place is to look at the person whom
Brazilian oligarchs and their media organs are
trying to install as president: the
corruption-tainted, deeply unpopular,
oligarch-serving Vice President Michel Temer
(above). Doing so shines a bright light on what’s
really going on, and why the world should be deeply
disturbed.
The New
York Times’s Brazil bureau chief, Simon Romero,
interviewed Temer this week, and this is how
his excellent article begins:
RIO DE
JANEIRO — One recent poll found that only 2
percent of Brazilians would vote for him. He is
under scrutiny over testimony linking him to
a colossal graft scandal. And a high court
justice ruled that Congress should consider
impeachment proceedings against him.
Michel
Temer, Brazil’s vice president, is preparing to
take the helm of Brazil next month if the Senate
decides to put President Dilma Rousseff on
trial.
How can anyone
rational believe that anti-corruption anger is
driving the elite effort to remove Dilma when
they are now installing someone as president who is
accused of corruption far more serious than
she is? It’s an obvious farce. But there’s something
even worse.
The person who
is third in line to the presidency, right behind
Temer, has been exposed as shamelessly corrupt: the
evangelical zealot and House speaker Eduardo Cunha.
He’s the one who spearheaded the impeachment
proceedings even though he
got caught last year squirreling away millions of
dollars in bribes in Swiss bank accounts, after
having lied to Congress when falsely denying that he
had any accounts in foreign banks. When Romero asked
Temer about his posture toward Cunha once he takes
power, this is how Temer responded:
Mr.
Temer defended himself and top allies who are
under a cloud of accusations in the scheme. He
expressed support for Eduardo Cunha, the
scandal-plagued speaker of the lower house who
is leading the impeachment effort in Congress,
saying he would not ask Mr. Cunha to resign. Mr.
Cunha will be the next in line for the
presidency if Mr. Temer takes over.
By itself,
this demonstrates the massive scam taking place
here. As my partner, David Miranda, wrote this
morning in
his Guardian op-ed: “It has now become
clear that corruption is not the cause of the effort
to oust Brazil’s twice-elected president; rather,
corruption is merely the pretext.” In response,
Brazil’s media elites will claim (as Temer did) that
once Dilma is impeached, then the other corrupt
politicians will most certainly be held accountable,
but
they know this is false, and
Temer’s shocking support for Cunha makes that
clear. Indeed, press reports show that Temer is
planning to install as attorney general — the
key government contact for the corruption
investigation — a politician
specifically urged for that position by Cunha.
As Miranda’s op-ed explains, “The real plan behind
Rousseff’s impeachment is to put an end to the
ongoing investigation, thus protecting corruption,
not punishing it.”
But there’s
one more vital motive driving all of this. Look at
who is going to take over Brazil’s economy and
finances once Dilma’s election victory is nullified.
Two weeks ago, Reuters
reported that Temer’s leading choice to run the
central bank is the chair of Goldman Sachs in
Brazil, Paulo Leme. Today, Reuters
reported that “Murilo Portugal, the head
of Brazil’s most powerful banking industry lobby”
— and a
long-time IMF official — “has emerged as a
strong candidate to become finance minister if Temer
takes power.” Temer also vowed that he
would embrace austerity for Brazil’s
already-suffering population: He “intends to
downsize the government” and “slash spending.”
In an earning
calls last Friday with JP Morgan, the celebratory
CEO of Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior
SA, Rubens Amaral, explicitly described Dilma’s
impeachment as “one of the first steps to
normalization in Brazil,” and said that if Temer’s
new government implements the “structural reforms”
that the financial community desires, then
“definitely there will be opportunities.” News of
Temer’s preferred appointees strongly suggests Mr.
Amaral — and his fellow plutocrats — will be
pleased.
Meanwhile,
the dominant Brazilian media organs of Globo, Abril
(Veja), Estadão — which Miranda’s op-ed discusses at
length — are virtually unified in support of
impeachment, as in No Dissent Allowed, and have been
inciting the street protests from the start. Why is
that revealing? Reporters Without Borders just
yesterday released its
2016 Press Freedom Rankings, and ranked Brazil
103 in the world because of violence against
journalists but also because of
this key fact:
“Media ownership continues to be very concentrated,
especially in the hands of big industrial
families that are often close to the political class.”
Is it not crystal clear what’s going on here?
So to
summarize: Brazilian financial and media elites are
pretending that corruption is the reason for
removing the twice-elected president of the country
as they conspire to install and empower the
country’s most corrupted political figures.
Brazilian oligarchs will have succeeded in removing
from power a moderately left-wing government that
won four straight elections in the name of
representing the country’s poor, and are literally
handing control over the Brazilian economy (the
world’s seventh largest) to Goldman Sachs and bank
industry lobbyists.
This fraud
being perpetrated here is as blatant as it
is devastating. But it’s the same pattern that has
been repeatedly seen around the world, particularly
in Latin America, when a tiny elite wages a
self-protective, self-serving war on the
fundamentals of democracy. Brazil, the world’s fifth
most populous country, has been an inspiring example
of how a young democracy can mature and thrive. But
now, those democratic institutions and principles
are being fully assaulted by the very same financial
and media factions that suppressed democracy and
imposed tyranny in that country for decades. |