How
Propaganda Feeds War on Syria
Western
propaganda against countries targeted for “regime
change” can be especially insidious
because mainstream journalists abandon skepticism
and go with the flow, such as the case of Syrian
“torture” photos.
By Rick
Sterling
March 18, 2016
"Information
Clearing House"
- "Consortium
News"-
There
has been a pattern of sensational but untrue reports
that lead to public acceptance of U.S. and Western
military intervention in countries around the world.
For
instance, in Gulf War 1 (1990-91), there were
reports of Iraqi troops stealing incubators
from Kuwait, leaving babies to die on the cold
floor. Relying on the testimony of a Red Crescent
doctor,
Amnesty Interenational ‘verified’ the
false claims.
Ten years
later, there were
reports of yellow cake uranium going to
Iraq for development of weapons of mass destruction.
One decade
later, there were
reports of Libyan soldiers drugged on
viagra and raping women as they advanced.
In 2012,
NBC broadcaster Richard Engel was
supposedly kidnapped by a pro-Assad
Syrian militia but luckily freed by Syrian
opposition fighters, the “Free Syrian Army.”
All these
reports were later confirmed to be fabrications and
lies. They all had the goal of manipulating public
opinion and they all succeeded in one way or
another. Despite the consequences, which were often
disastrous, none of the perpetrators were punished
or paid any price.
It has been
famously said, “Those who do not learn from the past
are doomed to repeat it.” This report is a critical
review of the so-called “Caesar Torture Photos”
story. As will be shown, there is strong evidence
the accusations are entirely or substantially false.
Overview of ‘Caesar Torture Photos’
On Jan. 20,
2014, two days before negotiations about the Syrian
conflict were scheduled to begin in Switzerland, a
sensational report burst onto television and front
pages around the world. The story was that a former
Syrian army photographer had 55,000 photographs
documenting the torture and killing of 11,000
detainees by the Syrian security establishment.
The Syrian
photographer was given the code-name “Caesar.” The
story became known as the “Caesar Torture Photos.” A
team of lawyers plus digital and forensic experts
were hired by the Carter-Ruck law firm, on contract
to Qatar, to go to the Middle East and check the
veracity of “Caesar” and his story. They concluded
that “Caesar” was truthful and the photographs
indicated “industrial scale killing.”
CNN,
London’s Guardian and LeMonde broke the story which
was subsequently broadcast in news reports around
the world. The Caesar photo accusations were
announced as negotiations began in Switzerland. With
the opposition demanding the resignation of the
Syrian government, negotiations quickly broke down.
For the
past two years the story has been preserved with
occasional bursts of publicity and supposedly
corroborating reports. Most recently, in December
2015 Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report
titled “If the Dead Could Speak” with significant
focus on the Caesar accusations.
Following
are 12 significant problems with the “Caesar torture
photos” story:
-
Almost
half the photos show the opposite of the
allegations.
The Carter
Ruck Inquiry Team claimed there were about 55,000
photos total with about half of them taken by
“Caesar” and the other half by other photographers.
The Carter Ruck team claimed the photos were all
“similar.” Together they are all known as “Caesar’s
Torture Photos.”
The
photographs are in the custody of an opposition
organization called the Syrian Association for
Missing and Conscience Detainees (SAFMCD). In 2015,
they allowed Human Rights Watch (HRW) to study all
the photographs which have otherwise been secret. In
December 2015, HRW released their report titled “If
the Dead Could Speak.”
The biggest
revelation is that over 46 percent of the
photographs (24,568) do not show people “tortured to
death” by the Syrian government. On the contrary,
they show dead Syrian soldiers and victims of car
bombs and other violence (HRW pp 2-3). Thus, nearly
half the photos show the opposite of what was
alleged. These photos, never revealed to the public,
confirm that the opposition is violent and has
killed large numbers of Syrian security forces and
civilians.
-
The claim
that other photos only show “tortured detainees”
is exaggerated or false.
The Carter
Ruck report says “Caesar” only photographed bodies
brought from Syrian government detention centers. In
its December 2015 report, HRW said, “ The largest
category of photographs, 28,707 images, are
photographs Human Rights Watch understands to have
died in government custody, either in one of several
detention facilities or after being transferred to a
military hospital.” They estimate 6,786 dead
individuals in the set.
The photos
and the deceased are real, but how they died and the
circumstances are unclear. There is strong evidence
some died in conflict. Others died in the hospital.
Others died and their bodies were decomposing before
they were picked up. These photographs seem to
document a war-time situation where many combatants
and civilians are killed.
It seems
the military hospital was doing what it had always
done: maintaining a photographic and documentary
record of the deceased. Bodies were picked up by
different military or intelligence branches. While
some may have died in detention; the big majority
probably died in the conflict zones. The accusations
by “Caesar.” the Carter Ruck report and HRW that
these are all victims of “death in detention” or
“death by torture” or death in “government custody”
are almost certainly false.
-
The true
identity of “Caesar” is probably not as claimed.
The Carter
Ruck Report says “This witness who defected from
Syria and who had been working for the Syrian
government was given the code-name ‘Caesar’ by the
inquiry team to protect the witness and members of
his family.” (CRR p12)
However if
his story is true, it would be easy for the Syrian
government to determine who he really is. After all,
how many military photographers took photos at
Tishreen and Military 601 Hospitals during those
years and then disappeared? According to the Carter
Ruck report, Caesar’s family left Syria around the
same time. Considering this, why is “Caesar” keeping
his identity secret from the Western audience? Why
does “Caesar” refuse to meet even with highly
sympathetic journalists or researchers?
The fact
that 46 percent of the total photographic set is
substantially the opposite of what was claimed
indicates two possibilities: Caesar and his
promoters knew the contents but lied about them
expecting nobody to look. Or, Caesar and his
promoters did not know the contents and falsely
assumed they were like the others. The latter seems
more likely which supports the theory that Caesar is
not who he claims to be.
-
The Carter
Ruck Inquiry was faulty, rushed and politically
biased.
The
credibility of the “Caesar” story has been
substantially based on the Carter-Ruck Inquiry Team
which “verified” the defecting photographer and his
photographs. The following facts suggest the team
was biased with a political motive:
–The
investigation was financed by the government of
Qatar which is a major supporter of the armed
opposition.
–The
contracted law firm, Carter Ruck and Co, has
previously represented Turkey’s President Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, also known for his avid support of
the armed opposition.
–The
American on the legal inquiry team, Professor David
M. Crane, has a long history working for the U.S.
Defense Department and Defense Intelligence Agency.
The U.S. government has been deeply involved in the
attempt at “regime change” with demands that
President Bashar “Assad must go” beginning in summer
2011 and continuing until recently.
–Crane is
personally partisan in the conflict. He has
campaigned for a Syrian War Crimes Tribunal and
testified before Congress in October 2013, three
months before the Caesar revelations.
–By their
own admission, the inquiry team was under “time
constraints” (CRR, p11).
–By their
own admission, the inquiry team did not even survey
most of the photographs
–The
inquiry team was either ignorant of the content or
intentionally lied about the 46 percent showing dead
Syrian soldiers and attack victims.
–The
inquiry team did its last interview with “Caesar” on
Jan. 18, 2014, quickly finalized a report and rushed
it into the media on Jan. 20, two days prior to the
start of United Nations-sponsored negotiations.
The
self-proclaimed “rigor” of the Carter Ruck
investigation is without foundation. The claims to a
“scientific” investigation are similarly without
substance and verging on the ludicrous.
-
The U.S.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is involved.
In an
interview on France24, David Crane of the
inquiry team describes how “Caesar” was brought to
meet them by “his handler, his case officer.” The
expression “case officer” usually refers to the CIA.
This would be a common expression for Professor
Crane who previously worked in the Defense
Intelligence Agency. The involvement of the CIA
additionally makes sense since there was a
CIA budget of $1 billion for Syria
operations in 2013. Crane’s “Syria Accountability
Project” is based at Syracuse University where the
CIA
actively recruits new officers despite
student resistance.
Why does it
matter if the CIA is connected to the “Caesar”
story? Because the CIA has a long history of
disinformation campaigns. In 2011, false reports of
viagra fueled rape by Libyan soldiers were widely
broadcast in Western media as the U.S. pushed for a
military mandate. Decades earlier, the world was
shocked to hear about Cuban troops fighting in
Angola raping Angolan women. The CIA chief of
station for Angola, John Stockwell, later described
how they invented the false report and spread it
around the world. The CIA was very proud of that
disinformation achievement. Stockwell’s book, In
Search of Enemies, is still
relevant.
-
The
accusers portray simple administrative
procedures as mysterious and sinister.
The Carter
Ruck inquiry team falsely claimed there were about
11,000 tortured and killed detainees. They then
posed the question: Why would the Syrian government
photograph and document the people they just
killed? The Carter Ruck Report speculates that the
military hospital photographed the dead to prove
that the “orders to kill” had been followed. The
“orders to kill” are assumed.
A more
logical explanation is that dead bodies were
photographed as part of normal hospital / morgue
procedure to maintain a file of the deceased who
were received or treated at the hospital. The same
applies to the body labeling / numbering system. The
Carter Ruck report suggests there is something
mysterious and possibly sinister in the coded
tagging system. But all morgues need to have a
tagging and identification system.
-
The photos
have been manipulated.
Many of the
photos at the SAFMCD website have been manipulated.
The information card and tape identity are covered
over and sections of documents are obscured. It must
have been very time-consuming to do this for
thousands of photos. The explanation that they are
doing this to “protect identity” is not credible
since the faces of victims are visible. What are
they hiding?
-
The Photo
Catalog has duplicates and other errors.
There are
numerous errors and anomalies in the photo catalog
as presented at the SAFMCD website. For example,
some deceased persons are shown twice with different
case numbers and dates. There are other errors where
different individuals are given the same identity
number.
Researcher
Adam Larson at A Closer Look at Syria website has
done
detailed investigation which reveals more
errors and curious error patterns in the SAFMCD
photo catalog.
9.
With few exceptions,
Western media uncritically accepted and promoted the
story.
The Carter
Ruck report was labeled “Confidential” but
distributed to CNN, the Guardian and LeMonde. CNN’s
Christiane Amanpour
gushed over the story as she interviewed
three of the inquiry team under the headline
“EXCLUSIVE: Gruesome Syria photos may prove torture
by Assad regime.” Critical journalism was replaced
by leading questions and affirmation. David Crane
said “This is a smoking gun.” Desmond de Silva
“likened the images to those of holocaust
survivors.”
The Guardian report
was titled “Syrian regime
document trove shows evidence of ‘industrial scale’
killing of detainees” with the subtitle, “Senior war
crimes prosecutors say photographs and documents
provide ‘clear evidence’ of systematic killing of
11,000 detainees”
One of the
very few
skeptical reports was by Dan Murphy in
the Christian Science Monitor. Murphy echoed
standard accusations about Syria but went on to say
incisively, “the report itself is nowhere near as
credible as it makes out and should be viewed for
what it is: A well-timed propaganda exercise funded
by
Qatar, a regime opponent who has funded
rebels fighting Assad who have committed war crimes
of their own.”
Unfortunately that was one of very few critical
reports in the mainstream media. In 2012, foreign
affairs journalist Jonathan Steele wrote an article
describing the overall media bias on Syria. His
article was titled “Most Syrians back
Assad but you’d never know from western media.” The
media campaign and propaganda has continued without
stop. It was in this context that the Carter Ruck
Report was delivered and widely accepted without
question.
-
Politicians have used the Caesar story to push
for more US/NATO aggression.
Politicians
seeking direct U.S. intervention for “regime change”
in Syria were quick to accept and broadcast the
“Caesar” story. They used it to demonize the Assad
government and argue that the U.S. must act so as to
prevent “another holocaust,” “another Rwanda,”
“another Cambodia.”
When
Caesar’s photos were displayed at the House Foreign
Affairs Committee in Congress, Chairman Ed Royce
said “It is far past time that the world
act…. It is far past time for the United States to
say there is going to be a safe zone across this
area in northern Syria.”
The
top-ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs
Committee is Eliot Engel. In November 2015 he
said, “We’re reminded of the
photographer, known as Caesar, who sat in this room
a year ago, showing us in searing, graphic detail
what Assad has done to his own people.” Engel went
on to advocate for a new authorization for the use
of military force.
Rep. Adam
Kinzinger is another advocate for aggression against
Syria. At an
event at the Holocaust Memorial Museum in
July 2015, he said, “If we want to destroy ISIS we
have to destroy the incubator of ISIS, Bashar
al-Assad.”
The irony
and hypocrisy is doubly profound since Rep.
Kinzinger has
met and coordinated with opposition leader Okaidi
who is a
confirmed ally of ISIS. In contrast with
Kinzinger’s false claims, it is widely known that
ISIS ideology and initial funding came from Saudi
Arabia and much of its recent wealth from oil sales
via Turkey. The Syrian Army has fought huge battles
against ISIS, winning some but losing others with
horrific scenes of mass beheading carried out by
ISIS.
-
The Human
Rights Watch assessment is biased.
HRW has
been very active around Syria. After the chemical
attacks in greater Damascus on Aug. 21, 2013, HRW
rushed a report which concluded that, based on a
vector analysis of incoming projectiles, the source
of the sarin carrying rockets must have been Syrian
government territory. This analysis was later
debunked as a “junk
heap of bad evidence” by highly respected
investigative journalist Robert Parry.
HRW’s
assumption about the chemical weapon rocket flight
distance was faulty. Additionally it was unrealistic
to think you could determine rocket trajectory with
1 percent accuracy from a canister on the ground,
especially from a canister on the ground that had
deflected off a building wall.
In spite of
this, HRW stuck by its analysis which blamed the
Assad government. HRW Director Ken Roth publicly
indicated dissatisfaction when an agreement to
remove Syrian chemical weapons was reached. Roth
wanted more than a “symbolic” attack on
Syrian government forces.
Regarding
the claims of “Caesar,” HRW seems to be the only
non-governmental organization to receive the full
set of photo files from the custodian. To its
credit, HRW acknowledged that nearly half the photos
do not show what has been claimed for two
years: they show dead Syrian soldiers and militia
along with scenes from crime scenes, car bombings,
etc.
But HRW’s
bias is clearly shown in how it handles this huge
contradiction. Amazingly, HRW suggests the
incorrectly identified photographs support the
overall claim. They say, “This report focuses on
deaths in detention. However other types of
photographs are also important. From an evidentiary
perspective, they reinforce the credibility of the
claims of Caesar about his role as a forensic
photographer of the Syrian security forces or at
least with someone who has access to their
photographs.” (HRW, p31) This seems like saying if
someone lies to you half the time that proves they
are truthful.
The files
disprove the assertion that the files all show
people who were tortured and killed. The photographs
show a wide range of deceased persons, from Syrian
soldiers to Syrian militia members to opposition
fighters to civilians trapped in conflict zones to
regular deaths in the military hospital. There may
be some photos of detainees who died in custody
after being tortured, or who were simply executed.
We know that this happened in Iraqi detention
centers under U.S. occupation. Ugly and brutal
things happen in war times. But the facts strongly
suggest that the “Caesar” account is basically
untrue or a gross exaggeration.
It is
striking that the HRW report has no acknowledgment
of the war conditions and circumstances in Syria.
There is no acknowledgment that the government and
Syrian Arab Army have been under attack by tens of
thousands of weaponized fighters openly funded and
supported by many of the wealthiest countries in the
world.
There is no
hint at the huge loss of life suffered by the Syrian
army and supporters defending their country. The
current estimates indicate from 80,000 to 120,000
Syrian soldiers, militia and allies having died in
the conflict. During the three years 2011-2013,
including the period covered by the “Caesar” photos,
it is
estimated that over 52,000 Syrian
soldiers and civilian militia died versus 29,000
anti-government forces.
HRW had
access to the full set of photographs including the
Syrian army and civilian militia members killed in
the conflict. Why did they not list the number of
Syrian soldiers and security forces they identified?
Why did they not show a single image of those
victims?
HRW goes
beyond endorsing the falsehoods in the “Caesar
story”; HRW suggests the cataloguing is only a
partial listing. On page 5, the report says,
“Therefore, the number of bodies from detention
facilities that appear in the Caesar photographs
represent only a part of those who died in detention
in Damascus.”
On the
contrary, the Caesar photographs seem to mostly show
victims who died in a variety of ways in the armed
conflict. The HRW assertions seem to be biased and
inaccurate.
-
The legal
accusations are biased and ignore the supreme
crime of aggression.
The
Christian Science Monitor journalist Dan Murphy gave
an apt warning in his article on the Carter Ruck
report about “Caesar.” While many journalists
treated the prosecutors with uncritical deference,
he said, “Association with war crime
prosecutions is no guarantor of credibility – far
from it. Just consider
Luis Moreno Ocampo’s absurd claims about Viagra
and mass rape in Muammar Qaddafi’s Libya in 2011.
War crimes prosecutors have, unsurprisingly, a bias
towards wanting to bolster cases against people they
consider war criminals (like Assad or Qaddafi) and
so should be treated with caution. They also
frequently favor, as a class, humanitarian
interventions.”
The Carter
Ruck legal team demonstrated how accurate Murphy’s
cautions could be. The legal team was eager to
accuse the Syrian government of “crimes against
humanity” but the evidence of “industrial killing,”
“mass killing,” “torturing to kill” is dubious and
much of the hard evidence shows something else.
In
contrast, there is clear and solid evidence that a
“Crime against Peace” is being committed against
Syria. It is public knowledge that the “armed
opposition” in Syria has been funded, supplied and
supported in myriad ways by various outside
governments. Most of the fighters, both Syrian and
foreign, receive salaries from one or another
outside power. Their supplies, weapons and necessary
equipment are all supplied to them. Like the
“Contras” in Nicaragua in the 1980’s, the use of
such proxy armies is a violation of customary
international law.
It is also
a violation of the UN Charter which says “All
Members shall refrain in their international
relations from the threat or use of force against
the territorial integrity or political independence
of any state, or in any other matter inconsistent
with the Purposes of the United Nations”.
The
government of Qatar has been a major supporter of
the mercenaries and fanatics attacking the sovereign
state of Syria. Given that fact, isn’t it hugely
ironic to hear the legal contractors for Qatar
accusing the Syrian government of “crimes against
humanity”?
Isn’t it
time for the United Nations to make reforms so that
it can start living up to its purposes? That will
require demanding and enforcing compliance with the
UN Charter and International Law.
Rick Sterling
is an independent research/writer and member of
Syria Solidarity Movement. He can be contacted at
rsterling1@gmail.com . |