Could a
Bomb Blast in Ankara Change the Outcome of the War
in Syria?
By Mike Whitney
February
19, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Counterpunch"
-
Turkish
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan seems to think so. In
fact, Erdogan is acting like Wednesday’s explosion
in the capital was a gift from God. You see, Erdogan
and his fellow Islamists think that if they pin the
blame for the bombing on luckless patsy, Salih
Neccar, who has links to the Kurdish YPG, then
they’ll be able to convince Washington that the YPG
is a terrorist organization. And if they can
convince Washington that the YPG a terrorist
organization, then Obama will have to break off
relations with the YPG even though the Kurdish
militia has been helping the US defeat ISIS in
Syria. And if Obama breaks off relations with the
YPG, then he’ll have to depend more on good old
Turkey for his footsoldiers which is just hunky-dory
with Erdogan provided that Washington meet his
numerous demands, that is.
So, could a
bomb blast in Ankara change the outcome of the 5
year-long war in Syria?
It
certainly could, if Obama is stupid enough to fall
into Erdogan’s trap. But so far that looks unlikely.
The problem
with Erdogan’s rationale is that the Obama
administration is not convinced that the YPG is a
terrorist organization. Nor are they certain that
Neccar is guilty. More important, the US maintains
a crucial alliance with the YPG in Syria which has
helped them recapture strategic cities and territory
from ISIS in the northern part of the country. The
militia has provided the boots on the ground the US
needs to prosecute its war in Syria. Naturally,
they are not going to end a relationship like that
without solid evidence that the charges are true.
And there
are plenty of reasons to believe the charges aren’t
true. For example, the head of the Syrian PYD, Salih
Muslim, has not only denied all responsibility for
the Ankara bombing, but also stated that neither he
nor any of his lieutenants have any idea who the
perpetrator is. (The PYD is the political wing of
the YPG)
“We have
never heard of this person Salih Necar,” said
Muslim, after which he added, “These accusations are
clearly related to Turkish attempts to intervene in
Syria.”
Of course,
Muslim could be lying, but you have to ask yourself
whether or not the bombing achieves its political
objectives if the perpetrators deny responsibility?
And the answer is “No, it doesn’t.” So why lie?
Here’s more
from the New York Times:
“…some
analysts questioned the plausibility of
(Erdogan’s) accusation, since mounting such an
attack would jeopardize the group’s American
support.
“These
allegations are unfounded — lies with no truth
to them,” Redur Xelil, a spokesman for the group
said via WhatsApp from Qamishli, Syria.
“We are
not enemies of Turkey, and our goal is to fight
Daesh inside the Syrian borders,” he added,
using an Arabic acronym for the Islamic State.
“We have no interest in being enemies with
Turkey.”…
“Sponsoring or being involved with car bombings
in Turkish cities would break its alliance
structure with the U.S. and Russia,” said
Michael Stephens, research fellow at the Royal
United Services Institute for Defense and
Security. “Neither of which the P.Y.D.-Y.P.G.
wants. In short, the Y.P.G. have nothing to gain
and everything to lose by being involved in
this.” (“Turkey
Blames Kurdish Militia for Ankara Attack,
Challenging U.S.”, New York Times)
So who is
responsible for Wednesday’s terrorist attack?
While no
one knows for sure, many people think the Turkish
government itself might have been involved which
isn’t too far fetched when you consider that this
same administration was implicated in a similar
incident in 2014 when the foreign minister (who is
currently the Prime Minister) was caught on tape
cooking up a false flag operation with the head of
Turkish Intel to create a pretext for invading
Syria. Sound familiar? (See
here for more.)
The
fact that the Erdogan administration has been
involved in this type of skullduggery before
suggests that they might have gone to the well one
time too often.. In any event, given what we know of
their past, the members of the Turkish government
should, at the very least, feature very prominently
on any list of probable suspects. Add to that the
fact that there’s now tons of evidence showing that
the government has been arming, training and
funding terrorists in Syria, and the only conclusion
a reasonable person can draw is that Turkey is
governed by a thoroughly untrustworthy lot of
fanatical miscreants whose spurious accusations
should be taken with a very large grain of salt..
Here’s more from yesterday’s
Hurriyet:
“Although the PKK and the PYD are denying it,
the information from the Interior Ministry and
intelligence show that they are behind [the
attack],” said Erdoğan, referring to the
Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and the
Democratic Union Party (PYD)…….
“This
process will convince our friends in the
international community to understand how tight
the PYD and YPG’s connection to the PKK is,”
Erdoğan said, repeating that Turkey had insisted
on the link, submitting documents.”
(Hurriyet)
See? This
is all about convincing Washington that they’ve
backed the wrong horse. Erdogan wants to muscle-out
the Kurds, so he can take their place as place. That
way, he can achieve his dream of annexing a 10-by-70
mile-wide strip of Syrian territory just south of
the Turkish border that he wants to convert into a
“safe zone” to provide a sanctuary for Sunni
militants. The plan will prevent the Kurds from
creating a contiguous state on the Syrian side of
the border and, also, it will help keep open vital
supply lines for jihadist allies conducting military
operations in other parts of the Syria.
The Obama
administration was sympathetic to this plan at one
time, but Russia’s entry into the war in late
September changed everything. Now the Syrian Arab
Army (SAA), Iranian Quds Forces and Hezbollah are
closing in on the Turkish border which has dashed
any chance Turkey might have had to seize and hold
Syrian territory without a direct confrontation with
Russia, which Washington definitely does not want.
Bottom line: Washington has adjusted its strategy to
the new reality on the ground while Turkey and the
Saudis are still grasping at straws thinking the war
can be won.
Sealing the
border is a top priority for Moscow which pins its
hopes for ending the war largely on its ability to
stop the flow of Sunni fighters crossing over from
Turkey. According to Russian Foreign Minister
Sergey Lavrov: “The key point for the ceasefire to
work is a task of blocking illegal trafficking
across the Turkish-Syrian border, which supports the
militants. Without closing the border it is
difficult to expect the ceasefire to take place.”
(The ceasefire is scheduled to begin on Friday)
So
Russia is going to persist in its plan to close the
border regardless of what Turkey does. At the same
time, it has tried to signal to Turkey that if it
goes ahead with its plan to invade Syria, there will
be hell to pay. Check this out from
Today’s Zaman:
A
senior Russian official threatened Turkey,
saying that it will face Russia and Iran if
carries out a ground intervention in Syria…..
Russia proved in Syria how powerful its weapons
are and showed everybody that it will not
hesitate to use them if necessary.” (“Official:
Turkey to face Russia, Iran if intervenes in
Syria“)
Interestingly, the Russian foreign ministry
delivered another chilly warning early Friday after
receiving reports that “Turkish military vehicles
had crossed into an area in Syria controlled by the
Kurds and were starting to dig trenches near Meidan
Ekbis, a town in Aleppo province…. Dozens of Turkish
military vehicles advanced 200 meters into the
Syrian Kurdish region in Aleppo province on
Thursday.” (ANHA news agency)
According
to AMN News: ”
Asked
about the implications of any ground incursion
into Syria, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman
Maria Zakharova told reporters: “We view Syria’s
territory as the territory of a sovereign state.
Any incursion into the territory of a sovereign
state is illegal.” (AMN
News)
The
question is whether Putin will engage the Turkish
military in a full-blown war just to recapture a
few hundred meters of Syrian sovereign territory. I
expect Putin will let the incident slide and chalk
it up to “frustration” on Turkey’s part. If that’s
the only victory that Erdogan requires, then it’s a
price that’s worth paying. Putin has to stay focused
on the big picture, and not get diverted by
trivialities.
Of course,
if Erdogan plans to push further into Syria, then
there’s going to be trouble. After all, Moscow’s
hands are tied. The only way it can hope to
extricate itself from the conflict in Syria is by
defeating the jihadists as quickly as possible,
clearing out the hotbeds of resistance, and
reestablishing security. If Turkey enters the war,
that throws a wrench in everything. The tit-for-tat
fighting will drag on for years, and there will
probably never be a clear winner. This is exactly
what Putin hopes to avoid. So, if Turkey launches an
invasion and sends in ground troops, Putin will be
forced to strike with everything-he’s-got to see if
one, big shock and awe display of raw military power
is enough to reverse the trend and send Erdogan’s
legions packing. If it doesn’t work, and Turkey digs
in, Syria could devolve into the mother of all
quagmires, which is why we’re a little surprised
that Obama is not pursuing a plan that would draw
Turkey deeper into the fray, after all, Washington
gains nothing strategically from its support for the
YPG. In a way, the alliance makes no sense. Does
Washington care about Kurdish aspirations for a
homeland?
No. Does
Obama want to help Putin clear the area North of
Aleppo of jihadists, militants and opposition
forces?
Of course
not. Then what does Washington get?
Nothing.
An alliance
with Erdogan, on the other hand, provides Washington
with the footsoldiers it needs to fight its proxy
war with Russia. It also creates a situation where
Russia could get bogged down for years in a conflict
that could drain its resources, undermine morale,
and precipitate social unrest at home. Isn’t that
exactly what Washington wants?
Indeed, it
is, but there’s one glitch to the strategy that
obviously has US ruling elites so worried that they
have abandoned their support for any Turkish-led
invasion into Syria.
What is
that glitch?
It’s the
fact that Turkish ground troops would require US
air-cover and that, in turn, would pave the way for
a military confrontation between Washington and
Moscow. And that’s why Obama and Co. have scrapped
the idea and moved on to Plan B.
So as
reckless as one might think US foreign policy is,
Washington still does not want to mix-it-up with
Russia. We can all be thankful for that.
Mike
Whitney lives in Washington state. He is a
contributor to Hopeless:
Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK
Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle
edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.
|