Terror
in Turkey: Is Erdogan Playing Washington?
By
Finian Cunningham
February 19, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"RT"
-
A
massive apparent terror attack in Turkey’s
capital comes at a crucial time just when the
Erdogan government is trying to woo Washington’s
support for its military intervention in Syria.
The
Turkish capital Ankara on Wednesday was hit with
a deadly car bomb outside its military
headquarters. Reports
put the dead at 28 with more than 60 injured in
what appears to have been a highly sophisticated
attack during evening rush hour.
The
powerful blast went off just as two buses
ferrying military personnel stopped at traffic
lights outside the army headquarters at a busy
intersection which is also near ministerial and
parliament buildings. This part of the capital
is normally kept under tight security.
Turkish
Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has accused forces
linked with the Syrian Kurdish YPG militia of the
terrorist attack.
The Turkish
military have been shelling YPG units across the
border in northern Syria. Erdogan and Davutoglu had
issued several statements prior to the Wednesday
bombing in Ankara denouncing the YPG as
“terrorists” owing to their links to separatist
Kurdish militants in Turkey belonging to the PKK.
This was at
least the fourth major apparent terror attack inside
Turkey over the past seven months. In January this
year, a suicide bomber killed 10, mainly German
tourists, in the city of Istanbul. Last October, a
blast at a Kurdish peace rally in Ankara killed
nearly 100 people. Both attacks were blamed on the
Islamic State (IS) terror group, although Kurdish
activists accused Turkish state intelligence agents
of clandestine involvement in the October atrocity.
Turkish
military intelligence, MIT, has been implicated
in colluding with the IS group - from gun-running
and oil smuggling across the Syrian border, to
facilitating the jihadists access to chemical
weapons. Several Turkish opposition lawmakers have
openly accused
the Erdogan government of complicity in criminal
activities and sponsoring extremists in Syria for
the purpose of regime change in Damascus.
Can Dundar,
the editor of Cumhuriyet, as well as several other
Turkish journalists have been arrested in recent
months for publishing newspaper articles that
exposed the MIT in providing weapons to terror
groups in Syria. Those claims corroborate extensive
information gathered by Russian military
surveillance since its intervention in Syria last
September, implicating Turkish state involvement in
cross-border terror supply routes.
The notion
that IS or some other Al Qaeda-linked network would
carry out the latest attack in Ankara does not
therefore seem plausible. The Erdogan government may
publicly claim to be part of the US-led coalition
fighting against Islamist terrorism, but, as noted,
there is more evidence to implicate the Ankara
authorities in covertly liaising with the very same
terrorists.
Why would
the terror group then bite the Turkish hand that
feeds it?
As for the
speculation that the Ankara car bombing could have
been carried out by Kurdish militants, that doesn’t
make sense either. The YPG have gained a lot of
favorable international media attention recently
from their effective fight against IS and related
jihadist terror brigades in northern Syria,
including Jabhat al Nusra and Ahrar al Shams.
Working
with Russian warplanes and Syrian army forces, the
YPG has captured several key villages and towns
north of the strategically important city of Aleppo.
The Kurdish fighters are this week set to close in
on the jihadist stronghold of Azaz, a town on the
Syrian-Turkish border. Azaz is a major supply route
for the regime-change insurgents, which the MIT has
been implicated in facilitating.
In a
complex situation, the YPG is also backed by the
United States, even though Washington has given its
support covertly to the anti-government militants in
Syria. Washington labels this latter group
“moderate rebels”. But there is evidence that
weapons supplied by the US have ended up in the
hands of hardline al-Qaeda brigades, like IS and
Nusra. This has led to the bizarre scenario where
US-backed militants are fighting against other
US-backed militants in northern Syria.
Voice
of America news outlet quoted
one US-based analyst this week as saying:
“It’s a complete wreck. There are
literally US-backed groups fighting other US-backed
groups right now. Specifically, the US-backed
opposition in northern Aleppo is fighting the
US-backed YPG. I have never seen a situation where
one CIA-backed group is fighting another with this
kind of intensity.”
The Turkish
government has become almost apoplectic over
Washington’s support for the Kurdish militants in
Syria. Erdogan this week repeated an ultimatum to US
President Barack Obama “to back us, not the
terrorists” – referring to the YPG. Ankara
fears that the emboldened Syrian Kurds might
eventually carve out a separatist state with their
PKK comrades in southeast Turkey.
In the
dirty business of covert war for regime change, it
seems reasonable to claim, as the Syrian government
has, that the Turkish military are shelling across
the border in order to give their jihadist assets
cover from the combined assault of Russian air
power, the Syrian army and the YPG.
Meanwhile,
Ankara has come in for sharp criticism from the
United Nations, Washington and Paris for its
cross-border artillery fire, which, on the face of
it, constitutes an act of aggression against a
sovereign state. The US has even called on Ankara to
cease firing. Erdogan snubbed the appeal and vowed
to continue the cross-border shelling.
In this
context, it would seem entirely stupid of the YPG or
its Kurdish affiliates in Turkey to carry out a
terror attack in the capital. The Kurds would only
be squandering valuable international political
support by committing such an atrocity.
However, if
the terror attack can be pinned on the YPG, that
would serve Erdogan very conveniently. Which raises
the question: who really did pull it off? The
sophisticated style, in the heart of Ankara, with
precision timing strongly suggests a state military
agency. In short, a false flag terror attack.
The
political consequences play to Erdogan’s advantage.
It bolsters his claims that the Kurdish militants
are “terrorists” and unworthy of
Washington’s support. At the same time, it allows
the Turks to step up their military campaign in
Syria, calling for a no-fly zone and, furthermore,
to solicit the go-ahead from Obama for a ground
invasion.
But we need
to keep in mind the bigger picture here. Turkey
wants to go into Syria not to fight terrorism, as
claimed, but rather to assist their covert
“brothers-in-arms” among the regime-change
jihadist terror brigades. That would inevitably
bring NATO member Turkey into a head-on
confrontation with the Syrian army and Russia.
Does
Washington really want to go there?
Finian
Cunningham (born 1963) has worked as an editor and
writer in major news media organizations, including
The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. Now a
freelance journalist based in East Africa, his
columns appear on RT, Sputnik, Strategic Culture
Foundation and Press TV. |