U.S.
Foreign Policy Flies Under Banner ‘American
Exceptionalism’
By Bruce
Fein
February 16, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"Washington
Times" -
The
modus operandi of the multi-trillion dollar
military-industrial-terrorism complex (MITC) is as
transparent as is Donald Trump's narcissism.
The MITC
manufactures conflicts by gratuitous interventions
abroad. Then it demands trillions of dollars and
limitless time to defeat the monsters it created.
The MITC
bonanza never ends.
What stuns
is not the modus operandi. All organizations covet
expansion for the sake of expansion. What amazes is
the willingness of the President, Congress, and the
American people to feed a failed enterprise.
Russia,
China, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, and ISIS are six
current examples.
The Cold War ended with the disintegration of the
Soviet Union in 1991. The United States then
confronted no existential threats. Our military
power dwarfed rivals as an oak dwarfs an acorn. We
should have dissolved NATO, ended our troop presence
in Europe, and embraced a foreign policy worthy of
our democratic dispensation and the sacrifices of
Valley Forge: "HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS FOR
SELF-DEFENSE, BUT NOT ONE CENT FOR EMPIRE.
The MITC
trembled at the thought. It wept at the prospect of
losing gold-plated cost-plus contracts,
multi-million dollar executive salaries, rich
consulting fees, and the status and celebrity that
constant conflict or warfare bring. Thus was born a
new and counter-constitutional conception of foreign
policy. The United States must bestride the world
like a colossus to ensure that no other nation or
non-state actor attains the capability of doing
anything we oppose. As others had sallied forth
under a banner of "master race," we must march under
a banner of "American exceptionalism."
Instead of
dissolving, NATO expanded cheek by jowl to the edges
of Russia's borders. It now sports 28 nations, and
occupies Russia's traditional sphere of influence in
the Baltic States and Eastern Europe. The Russian
sphere is a mirror image of our own sphere of
influence. It begot the Monroe Doctrine, Dollar
Diplomacy, and interventions in Mexico, Cuba, Haiti,
the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Chile, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Grenada, and Panama.
As the
United States went to the brink over the Cuban
Missile Crisis, President Vladimir Putin has
predictably responded to our encroachments on
Russia's sphere of influence with the conquest of
Crimea, destabilization of Ukraine, and saber
rattling on its eastern borders.
The MITC
silently rejoiced. NATO expansion had worked
perfectly. It had created conflict with Russia,
which provided cover to maintain troops in Europe
and to enhance military sales to nations vulnerable
to Russia's ambitions. Most recently, the Pentagon
announced plans to increase the deployment of heavy
weapons, armored vehicles and other equipment to
NATO members in Central and Eastern Europe. The
White House contemplates paying for the anti-Putin
gambit with a budget request exceeding $3.4 billion
to support military spending in Europe for 2017. The
weapons and equipment will be used to insure that a
full armored combat brigade can be fielded in the
region by American and NATO forces at all times.
China has
never attacked the United States. We intervened
militarily to quell the Boxer Rebellion. We assisted
Chiang Kai- shek over Mao Zedong in the Chinese
civil war. We contemplated nuclear weapons against
China in the Korean War. We sell weapons to Taiwan.
We have defense treaties with Japan, South Korea,
and the Philippines fortified with military bases
and troops. We contemplate extending our defense
commitment to shoals and islands claimed by the
Philippines in the disputed South China Sea. The
United States Marines have a training base in
Darwin, Australia.
Despite
this encirclement strengthened by the U.S. Pacific
Command, the MITC has championed a "pivot to Asia"
to confront China in its traditional sphere of
influence. It summons the specter of China to
justify a hike in defense spending.
The MITC created a dystopia in Libya featuring an
ISIS auxiliary by overthrowing Muammar Gaddafi after
he abandoned WMD. Now the MITC is poised to
re-engage militarily to attack the ISIS presence
that it created.
The MITC
turned Iraq into a sectarian and tribal nightmare
dominated by Iran and threatened by ISIS with its
2003 invasion to overthrow President Saddam Hussein.
Thirteen years later, the MITC is enhancing its
presence In Iraq to contain the threats that it
created.
The MITC
has occupied Afghanistan for more than fifteen years
following the 9/11 abominations. It has supported
corrupt, inept, tribal, unpopular governments that
have presided over record levels of opium
production. Combined with our predator drone attacks
that have killed civilians, our support for the
Afghan government has fueled a revival of Taliban
and the birth of ISIS there. The MITC is now
insisting that we remain militarily engaged in
Afghanistan for decades while it nurses a
Neanderthal political culture into the Age of
Enlightenment with bayonets and bombs.
After
giving birth to ISIS through the pulverization of
Iraq and support for repressive Middle East states
and statelets, the MITC bugled for military force to
degrade and destroy its own malevolent offspring in
Iraq, Syria, and anywhere on the globe. To rally
popular support and spiraling congressional funding,
the MITC inflated the danger of radical Islam to an
existential threat. More than 9,000 airstrikes
against ISIS have accomplished nothing militarily
significant. The MITC is now clamoring for boots on
the ground in Syria or Iraq indefinitely, a
throwback to General William Westmoreland's demand
for 200,000 more troops in Vietnam after the1968 Tet
Offensive.
What
explains the seeming inexplicability of the MITC's
success in turning failures into organizational
triumphs?
The
mindless human lust for power and domination that
crushes everything in its path, including reason,
justice, and moderation alike. |