Turkey’s
Military Intervention to Syria
By South Front
During the video production, Southfront:
Analysis & Intelligence also recieved
information that at least
one Saudi motorized brigade equipped with about 90
armoured vehicles were moved to Iraqi border.
This force could become
a core of a joint force which could be used by
the Saudi-led coalition to support
Turkish military intervention to Syria.
February 13,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"South
Front" -
The
military balance in Northern Syria is shifting
rapidly. The Syrian Army and local militias
supported by the Russian Air Force have cut
terrorists from major supply lines from Turkey and
almost encircled the militant forces in the Aleppo
city. This has become possible due to the actions of
the Russian Aerospace Defense Forces which have been
destroying the terrorists’ sources of funding since
2015. Thus, we could observe a breakdown on the
battlefield which leads to a full collapse of the
terrorists forces in Syria step by step. This also
dished schemes of the foreign players interested in
overthrowing of the Assad government.
In the
contemporary situation the Erdogan’s regime acts as
a main sponsor and creator of a terrorist threat in
the Middle East. Turkey is a crucial part of
terrorist logistics network which allows terrorist
groups in Syria to receive arms supplies and
reinforcements. The Turkish elites have a strong
business ties predominantly oil smuggling with ISIS
and other terrorists in Syria. The Erdogan’s
imperial ambitions in the Middle East also plays an
important role in the conflict. Erdogan believes
that a breakdown of Syria will allow him to set a
protectorate or even occupy the northern part of the
Arab country.
The successes
of anti-terrorist forces in Syria have destroyed a
hope to realize these plans easily. Considering
this, the Erdogan’s regime launched preparations for
a direct intervention to the country without any
legal mandate. A high-level of concentration of the
Turkish military are already observed in the
Syrian-Turkish border by civil and military sources.
Furthermore, there are irresistible videos proofs
that Turkey has been conducting a series of
cross-border artillery shelling violating the Syrian
sovereignty.
Experts
suggest Turkey is ready to deploy some 18,000 troops
with substantial artillery and air support to occupy
a 30-kilometer deep territory across the border
running from the city of Jarabulus westward to the
city of Azaz. The operation would cover an area
under ISIS control, and it would provide a direct
military assistance to terrorists and facilitate
establishing of a buffer zone for the vestiges of
their forces in Northern Syria. It would drastically
escalate the tensions with the Syrian Arab Army (SAA)
and the predominantly Kurdish Syrian Democratic
Forces (SDF). However, the Turkish military is fully
capable of completing the first move aimed to push
the SAA and the SDF from the aforementioned area and
occupy a significant part of Northern Syria.
This step will
likely face a hard answer of the Russian military
grouping located in the country. The Russian land
and navy air-defense systems and fighter jets are
fully capable to neutralize the Turkish air force
which will allow the Syrian government to
counter-attack the Turkish intervention forces.
Thus, the anti-terrorist forces will get a chance to
exercise a counter-attack which will be likely
supported by the Russian Aerospace Defense Forces.
This situation
leads to 2 main scenarios:
-
If the SAA
with support by militia forces, Iran, and Russia
isn’t able to push the Turkish military from
Syria, the Erdogan’s regime will strengthen
presence at the occupied territories and use
gained time to receive at least air and
intelligence support by NATO. In this case, the
conflict could easily lead to a global war.
-
If the SAA
supported by local militias, Iran, and Russia
knock out the Turkish intervention forces from
Syria, NATO will face the fact that Syria is
de-facto liberated and the terrorists are cut
from their main supplier. It could prevent a
global escalation.
However,
the NATO countries would strengthen their
presence in Iraq and use it as a foothold to
launch further destructive actions against
Syria. The situation will also become especially
acute in Ukraine and in the Central Asia because
a destabilization in these regions could be
easily used against the Syria’s main allies:
Russia and Iran.
|