The Clintons Earned Over $3.5 Million in Paid
Addresses to Pro-Israel Organizations
Bill Clinton said he “would grab a rifle” and fight
for Israel during paid speech.
By Sarah Lazare, Max Blumenthal
February 12, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"Alternet"
-
Bill and
Hillary Clinton are under increasing scrutiny from
the mainstream press over paid speeches they have
given to big banks in exchange for millions of
dollars.
According to CNN, the couple has earned a total
of $153 million in lecture fees from companies and
organizations affiliated with the financial
industry.
But
the media has been conspicuously silent about the
large sums the Clintons have raked in from paid
addresses to pro-Israel organizations, including the
Jewish National Fund (JNF), which directly
participates in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians
and Bedouin citizens of Israel. An evaluation of
Hillary Clinton’s
public disclosures from 2001 to 2015 shows that
she and Bill, and their daughter, Chelsea, have
earned roughly $4 million in speaking fees from
pro-Israel organizations, including JNF and
organizations allied with the right-wing government
of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The
vast majority of these documented
payments—$3,599,999—have gone toward the Clintons’
personal income, and up to $450,000 has been
funneled into the Clinton Foundation.
Ramah
Kudaimi, membership outreach coordinator for the
U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, told
AlterNet, "It is the right of voters to know what
every single candidate earns in speaking fees,
whether from banks or pro-Israel groups that engage
in oppressive policies against Palestinians. It is
the voters’ right to know if we have candidates
running to be president who plan to continue
horrific U.S. policies that make us all complicit in
Israel’s denial of Palestinian rights.”
The
Wages of Blaming Palestinians
Bill
Clinton’s presidency ended with the collapse of the
U.S.-led peace process at Camp David in 2000. After
leaving office, Clinton
publicly blamed Palestinian Authority Chairman
Yasser Arafat for the failure of negotiations,
explicitly violating
a promise he made to Arafat at the start of the
Camp David process. The former president thus
reinforced then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s
infamous talking point that there was “no
Palestinian partner” for peace.
Bill
Clinton declared in
the summer of 2002, at the Toronto chapter of the
pro-Israel group Hadassah-WIZO, “If Iraq came across
the Jordan River, I would grab a rifle and get in
the trench and fight and die,” reportedly earning
wild applause from attendees of the $1000-a-plate
dinner. According to a New York Post reporter in
attendance, Clinton again blamed Palestinians for
his failure at Camp David, “accusing Arafat of
making a ‘disastrous mistake’ by turning down past
peace proposals that would have given the
Palestinian leader control of 97 percent of the West
Bank.” Clinton earned $125,000 for the speech.
Payments From Obama’s Opponents
Bill
Clinton received $425,000 for two speeches to
Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a right-wing
group that generally supports the Likud-run
government of Benjamin Netanyahu and is hostile to
Democrats. Simon Wiesenthal Center president Marvin
Hier, who
addressed the 2000 Republican National
Convention, has
compared President Barack Obama to Neville
Chamberlain and described the Iran nuclear deal as
“another Munich.” In 2011, three years before Bill
Clinton’s second paid speech before the
organization, Hier
accused then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
of “a sell out” to anti-Semitism for opening
diplomatic discussions with Egypt’s democratically
elected Muslim Brotherhood.
While
unmentioned in public disclosures, the Clinton
Foundation website
notes that the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, the main arm of America’s pro-Israel
lobby, contributed between $10,001 and $25,000 to
the organization for at least one speech delivered
by Bill Clinton, with the exact date or amount paid
unspecified. S. Daniel Abraham, the Slim Fast diet
mogul who serves on the board of AIPAC, has
given as much as $5 million to the Clinton
Foundation. Through a series of front groups, ad
campaigns and Israel propaganda tours for freshman
members of Congress, AIPAC
spent upward of $40 million last year in a
failed attempt to derail the Obama administration’s
Iran nuclear deal.
Among the
Clintons’ pro-Israel speaking fees, only one was
received from an organization that could be
classified as part of Israel’s peace camp. The
Abraham Fund,
which says its aim is to “promote coexistence and
equality among Israel’s Jewish and Arab-Palestinian
citizens,” paid Bill Clinton $125,000 for a single
speech in 2002.
Chelsea
Clinton raked in as much as $325,000 in speaking
fees from the United Jewish Appeal and its
affiliate, the Jewish Federations, a pro-Israel
umbrella group of Jewish American establishment
organizations that
actively combats the Palestinian-led BDS
(boycott, bivestment and sanctions) movement. She
remits 100 percent of her speaking fees to the
Clinton Foundation, where she is a board member and
helps decide how the foundation spends its $180
million annual budget.
Bill
Clinton took in six-figure lecture fees from
pro-Israel
synagogues around the
country. Our calculations include only Jewish
instutions whose pro-Israel programming could be
identified; we excluded hundreds of thousands of
dollars in speaking fees paid to the Clintons by
Jewish instutions whose online materials do not
explicitly promote Israel.
In
addition, Bill Clinton received $250,000 for a
speech to Univision Management Company, the media
corporation co-owned by pro-Israel billionaire Haim
Saban. As AlterNet’s Grayzone Project
recently reported, Saban and his wife Cheryl
contributed $5 million to the pro-Hillary Clinton
super PAC, Priorities USA Action, this February.
Saban has also
contributed between $5 and $10 million to the
Clinton Foundation. “I’m a one-issue guy, and my
issue is Israel,” Saban said in 2004.
Whopping Fees From Ethnic Cleansers
Public
records show that Bill Clinton earned a total of
$549,999 in four speeches to the JNF. The
disclosures do not mention the JNF’s most generous
fee. JNF provoked an outcry within pro-Israel
circles when it
transferred half a million dollars to the
Clinton Foundation through the Peres Academic Center
to pay for a single speech by Bill Clinton. Bill
Clinton later said he
donated his large fee back to the Peres Academic
Center, but there are
lingering questions about where all the money
went, including funds from the JNF.
Formed in
1901, JNF has spent over a century driving
Palestinians off their land, including through the
creation of the paramilitary force euphemistically
named the Green Patrol. Former JNF director
Yosef Weitz outlined
detailed plans for the mass ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians in 1948, demanding that their villages
be destroyed and they “be harassed continually” to
prevent them from returning.
In recent
years, JNF has teamed up with the Israeli military,
police and
Christian Zionist donors to violently expel the
residents of unrecognized Bedouin villages in
Israel’s Negev Desert. Among them is Al Arakib,
which as of October 2015, has been razed to the
ground a staggering
90 times.
Video below
by Max Blumenthal, a co-author of this article,
shows the destruction of Al Arakib by Israeli
bulldozers in 2010 — the third time it was
demolished — in order to
make way for a JNF-funded “forest” and Jews-only
town. The JNF is widely opposed in Palestinian civil
society and controversial even within Israel, where
it owns roughly 13
percent of state land and vows to lease it to
exclusively Jewish tenants.
Will Hillary Honor Her Commitments?
Hillary
Clinton has made her unflinching support for Israel
a centerpiece of her foreign policy agenda. In
November 2015, she
promised to “reaffirm” the “unbreakable bond
with Israel, and Benjamin Netanyahu,” suggesting she
would adopt a friendlier posture to Israel’s
right-wing leader than Obama had.
In a July
2015
letter to mega-donor Haim Saban, which her
campaign distributed to the press, Clinton declared
“we need to make countering BDS a priority.” It was
the first time in American history that a
presidential candidate mentioned by name the
grassroots movement to boycott Israel.
As the
challenge to her primary candidacy from Senator
Bernie Sanders grows, Hillary Clinton is tacking
left. During her concession speech in New Hampshire,
Clinton insisted to local supporters, “I believe so
strongly that we have to keep up with every fiber of
our being the argument for, the campaign for human
rights.”
Whether a
Clinton presidency would alter the U.S.-Israeli
special relationship remains to be seen. But as long
as she honors the wishes of her family’s top
contributors, as she has pledged to do, her argument
for human rights must exclude Palestinians.
The
following list shows Bill and Hillary Clinton's
personal income from speaking fees to pro-Israel
groups between 2001 and 2015, based on public
disclosures.
The
following list shows the Clintons' speaking events
to pro-Israel groups, which were compensated by
payments to the Clinton Foundation. The Foundation's
website does not provide information about the exact
date of the engagements or the amount given.
Sarah Lazare is a staff writer for AlterNet.
A former staff writer for Common Dreams,
Sarah co-edited the book About Face:
Military Resisters Turn Against War. Follow
her on Twitter at @sarahlazare.
Max Blumenthal is a senior
editor of the
Grayzone Project at AlterNet,
and the award-winning author of
Goliath and Republican
Gomorrah. His most recent book
is The 51 Day War: Ruin and
Resistance in Gaza. Follow
him on Twitter at
@MaxBlumenthal.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)