Why Kerry
Blames The Opposition For The Continuing Bombing In
Syria
By Moon Of
Alabama
February
08, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "
Moon Of
Alabama
"
-
According to
this report from Middle East Eye U.S. Secretary
of State blamed the opposition for the continuing
bombing in Syria:
US
Secretary of State John Kerry told Syrian aid
workers, hours after the Geneva peace talks fell
apart, that the country should expect
another three months of bombing that would
“decimate” the opposition.
During
a conversation on the sidelines of this week’s
Syria donor conference in London, sources say,
Kerry blamed the Syrian opposition for leaving
the talks and paving the way for a joint
offensive by the Syrian government and Russia on
Aleppo.
“‘He
said, ‘Don’t blame me – go and blame your
opposition,’” one of the aid workers, who asked
to remain anonymous to protect her organisation,
told Middle East Eye.
...
"He said that basically, it was the opposition
that didn’t want to negotiate and didn’t want a
ceasefire, and they walked away,” the second of
the aid workers told MEE in a separate
conversation and also on the basis of anonymity.
“‘What
do you want me to do? Go to war with Russia? Is
that what you want?’” the aid worker said Kerry
told her.
The hapless
State Department spokesperson
claimed that the story was wrong:
John Kirby
Verified account @statedeptspox
@Charles_Lister Story wrong. @JohnKerry didn't
blame oppo for collapse of talks, doesn't have
comms w/regime & hasn't wavered on Asad.
But
this lets me believe that the report of Kerry
chastising the opposition is right on point:
U.S.
Embassy Syria @USEmbassySyria
#SecKerry on bombardment of civilians in #Syria:
This has to stop. But it’s not going to stop by
walking away from the table or not engaging
So while
the State Department spokesperson denies that the
U.S. blames the opposition, another part of the
State Department does exactly that: "it’s not going
to stop by walking away from the table or not
engaging". Kerry is clearly embarrassed that the
Saudi opposition group ran away from the UN talks in
Vienna. He should blame his "allies".
The Wall
Street Journal
says the opposition group ended the talks before
they began on Turkish and Saudi orders:
The Syrian
opposition abruptly withdrew from peace talks in
Geneva this week under pressure from Saudi
Arabia and Turkey, two of the main backers of
the rebels, according to diplomats and at least
a half-dozen opposition figures.
After
sabotaging the talks the Saudis came out with
an offer to send ground troops to invade Syria
if the U.S. would take the command of such an
operation. No one is taking that offer seriously.
The Saudi troops who try to invade Yemen get beaten
to pulp. The Saudis themselves say they had to
closed 500 school and evacuate 12 villages with
7,000 people in Saudi Arabia because the Yemenis are
now invading them. Their army has lots of expensive
toys but is clearly not able to put them to use. The
offer to send troops is simply to goad the U.S. into
starting a war with Russia.
That is not
going to work. The U.S. is now trying to find some
end to the conflict in Syria. Someone finally told
Kerry that Russia is not in a "quagmire" in Syria
but is winning. The U.S. is in a hurry now
as it knows that it will have zero influence left on
the issue should the Syrian government and Russia
have the time to kill off the opposition. It needs a
ceasefire to stay relevant. As Kerry says
himself that "whining"
about the situation and skipping negotiations will
not help the opposition. It will kill it.
Secretary
Kerry also called on the Russians to stop their
bombing campaign in Aleppo province. But that
contradicts the UN resolution 2254 under which the
talks in Geneva are held. That resolution clearly
calls for a continuation of the Russian and
Syrian campaign: THE UNSC
[r]eiterates
its call in resolution 2249 (2015) for Member
States to prevent and suppress
terrorist acts committed specifically by Islamic
State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known
as Da’esh), Al-Nusra Front (ANF), and
all other individuals, groups, undertakings, and
entities associated with Al Qaeda or
ISIL, and other terrorist groups, [...] and
to eradicate the safe haven they have
established over significant parts of
Syria, and notes that the aforementioned
ceasefire will not apply to offensive or
defensive actions against these individuals,
groups, undertakings and entities, as set forth
in the 14 November 2015 ISSG Statement;
The
insurgents in Aleppo province as well as in Idleb
province are officially allied with the Nusra Front
which is Al-Qaeda in Syria. They are clearly a
target of the above resolution and thereby a
legitimate target of Russian bombs.
Indeed
those who criticize Kerry for blaming the opposition
because it ran away from Geneva ignore the
resolution. It is the plan the U.S. and Russia have
agreed to follow. That plan ends the war in Syria in
a ceasefire but only when the opposition agrees to
one AND cuts all ties with al-Qaeda and ISIS. As the
opposition, and its sponsors, are unwilling to do so
the Syrian-Russian campaign against them will
continue, as agreed upon by the UNSC, until their
end.
|