Flint’s
Crisis Is About More Than Water
By Chris Hedges
February 08, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"Truth
Dig " -
What is in the
mind of someone who knowingly poisons children and
impairs their lives? Why did the politicians,
regulators and bureaucrats who knew
the water in Flint, Mich., was toxic lie about
the danger for months? What does it say about a
society that is ruled by, and refuses to punish,
those who willfully destroy the lives of children?
The crisis in
Flint is far more ominous than lead-contaminated
water. It is symptomatic of the collapse of our
democracy. Corporate power is not held accountable
for its crimes. Everything is up for sale, including
children. Our regulatory agencies—including the
federal Environmental Protection Agency, the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention and Michigan’s
Department of Environmental Quality—have been
defunded, emasculated and handed over to
corporate-friendly stooges. Our corrupt courts are
part of a mirage of justice. The role of these
government agencies and courts, and of the
legislatures, is to sanction abuse rather than halt
it.
The primacy
of profit throughout the society takes precedence
over life itself, including the life of the most
vulnerable. This corporate system of power knows no
limits. It has no internal restraints. It will
sacrifice all of us, including our children, on the
altar of corporate greed. In a functioning judicial
system, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and Flint’s former
emergency manager, Darnell Earley, along with all
the regulatory officials who lied as a city was
being sickened,
would be in jail facing trial.
Hannah
Arendt in “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” Gitta
Sereny in “Into That Darkness,” Omer Bartov in
“Murder in Our Midst,” Alexander Solzhenitsyn in
“The Gulag Archipelago,” Primo Levi in “The Drowned
and the Saved” and Ella Lingens-Reiner in “Prisoners
of Fear” argue that the modern instrument of evil is
the technocrat, the man or woman whose sole concern
is technological and financial efficiency, whose
primary measurement of success is self-advancement,
even if it means piling up corpses or destroying the
lives of children.
“Monsters
exist,” Levi noted, “but they are too few in number
to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the common
men.” These technocrats have no real ideology, other
than the ideology that is in vogue. They want to get
ahead, to rise in the structures of power. They know
how to make the collective, or the bureaucracy, work
on behalf of power. Nothing else is of importance.
“The new state did not require holy apostles,
fanatic, inspired builders, faithful devout
disciples,” Vasily Grossman, in his book “Forever
Flowing, wrote of Stalin’s Soviet Union. “The new
state did not even require servants—just clerks.”
We churn
out millions of these technocrats or clerks in elite
universities and business schools. They are trained
to serve the system. They do not question its
assumptions and structures any more than Nazi
bureaucrats questioned the assumptions and
structures of
the “Final Solution.” They manage the huge
financial houses and banks such as Goldman Sachs.
They profit from endless war. They orchestrate the
fraud on Wall Street. They destroy the ecosystem on
behalf of the fossil fuel industry. They are elected
to office. They are empty shells of human beings who
stripped of their power and wealth are banal and
pathetic. They are not sadists. They do not delight
in cruelty. They are cogs in the machinery of
corporate power.
These
technocrats are numb to the most basic of human
emotions and devoid of empathy beyond their own tiny
inner circle. Michigan state officials, for example,
provided bottled water to their employees in Flint
for nearly a year while city residents drank the
contaminated water, and authorities spent $440,000
to pipe clean water to the local GM plant after
factory officials complained that the Flint
water was corroding their car parts. That mediocre
human beings make such systems function is what
makes them dangerous.
The long
refusal to make public the poisoning of the children
of Flint, who face the prospect of stunted growth,
neurological, speech and hearing impairment,
reproductive problems and kidney damage, mirrors the
slow-motion poisoning and exploitation of the planet
by other corporate technocrats. These are not people
we want to entrust with our future.
Theodor
Adorno warned in his essay “Education After
Auschwitz” that if we did not create an educational
system that taught us to think morally and trained
us how to make moral choices, another Auschwitz
would appear on the horizon. Schools must teach more
than vocational skills; they must teach values. They
must, as Adorno wrote, teach citizens about “the
societal play of forces that operates beneath the
surface of political forms.” And they must do this
“without fear of offending any authorities.”
We live in
an age that has eradicated social and cultural
consciousness and left us in a rootless, ahistorical,
emotionally driven void. Whole populations in our
poorest communities
are poisoned or, in countries such as Iraq,
murdered en masse. But we have no context for
measuring human actions and human evil. We find our
collective identity in childish nationalist cant and
patriotic propaganda that bombards the airwaves, not
in the cold reality of our callousness and
ruthlessness. We do not know who we are.
“People who
blindly slot themselves into the collective already
make themselves into something like inert material,
extinguish themselves as self-determined
beings,”Adorno writes about the technocrat. “With
this comes the willingness to treat others as an
amorphous mass.”
“The
manipulative character—as anyone can confirm in the
sources available about those Nazi leaders—is
distinguished by a rage for organization, by the
inability to have any immediate human experiences at
all, by a certain lack of emotion, by an overvalued
realism,” Adorno goes on to say in his 1966 essay.
“At any cost he wants to conduct supposed, even if
delusional, Realpolitik. He does not for one
second think or wish that the world were any
different than it is, he is obsessed by the desire
of doing things [Dinge zut un], indifferent
to the content of such action. He makes a cult of
action, activity, of so-called efficiency as such
which reappears in the advertising image of the
active person. If my observations do not deceive me
and if several sociological investigations permit
generalization, then this type has become much more
prevalent today than one would think.”
Humanity as
an idea, as the philosopher Alain Finkielkraut has
pointed out, is itself mortal. It can be
extinguished along with millions of human beings.
“Barbarism is not the inheritance of our
prehistory,” Finkielkraut reminds us. “It is the
companion that dogs our every step.”
“Indeed,
one of the most frightening consequences of the
Holocaust may well be that rather than serving as a
warning to preserve humanity at all cost, it has
provided a license to privilege physical survival
over moral existence,” writes Omer Bartov in
“Mirrors of Destruction.” “This may be one reason,
along with the realization that mass murder has
continued unabated since 1945, that such men as [Tadeusz]
Borowski, [Jean] Améry, Paul Celan, and [Primo] Levi
finally decided to put an end to their own lives.”
We have
turned our universities into temples dedicated to
corporate vocational training. Most graduates of
Princeton or Harvard have no more ability to
question the operating systems of the corporate
state than an inner-city boy or girl who is taught
basic functional literacy only so he or she can
stock shelves or sell fast food. We all have our
place in the great machine of corporate
self-immolation. We all are drones. The technical
skills vary from intricate and complex to
rudimentary. But the commonality is that we lack the
capacity to measure our actions against the ideas,
outrages and injustices of the past. We have ceased
to be moral beings. The devil in Goethe’s “Faust”
grasps that the element most essential to the
perpetration of evil is the obliteration of memory.
Now
it is over. What meaning can one see?
It is as if it had not come to be.
And yet it circulates as if it were.
I should prefer—Eternal Emptiness.
We do not
possess the intellectual skills—and this is by
design—that permit us to question power, to see
ourselves as part of a long human continuum. We have
forgotten, or never been taught, that each
individual must be seen as an ultimate end if we are
to retain any human decency and hope. Once we
depersonalize others, once we forget who we are and
where we came from, we make evil possible. “Act so
that humanity, both in your own person and that of
others, be used as an end in itself, and never as a
mere means,” Immanuel Kant wrote. If we cannot think
morally, if we live devoid of empathy, if our
advancement comes at the expense of the other, if we
lose touch with the wisdom of the past, we cannot
rebel. And if we do not rebel we will sustain a
system that will ultimately slay us.
Chris
Hedges, spent nearly two decades as a foreign
correspondent in Central America, the Middle East,
Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more
than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian
Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas
Morning News and The New York Times, for which he
was a foreign correspondent for 15 years. |