You Were
Not Allowed to Know That Bankers Can Be Jailed
Mainstream media’s well-kept secret
By Joe Clifford
February 04, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- The 2008 financial crises and meltdown occurred
because large banks were speculating in fraudulent
risky loans that failed. When the meltdown occurred,
banks turned to the federal government, who
immediately bought into the idea that banks were too
large to fail, and taxpayers subsidized banks to the
tune of trillions of dollars. No one really knows
how much the bailout cost, but here is partial list
of banks you generously helped out:
Citigroup - $2.513 trillion
Morgan Stanley - $2.041 trillion
Merrill Lynch - $1.949 trillion
Bank of America - $1.344 trillion
Barclays PLC - $868 billion
Bear Sterns - $853 billion
Goldman Sachs - $814 billion
Royal Bank of Scotland - $541 billion
JP Morgan Chase - $391 billion
Deutsche Bank - $354 billion
UBS - $287 billion
Credit Suisse - $262 billion
Lehman Brothers - $183 billion
Bank of Scotland - $181 billion
BNP Paribas - $175 billion
Wells Fargo - $159 billion
Dexia - $159 billion
Wachovia - $142 billion
Dresdner Bank - $135 billion
Societe Generale - $124 billion
"All Other Borrowers" - $2.639 trillion
Taxpayers were not consulted or asked their opinion;
it was an example of how fast government can respond
to the moneyed class. Even though it was disclosed
that banks were lying and speculating in fraudulent
loans, including money laundering to drug cartels,
no one was indicted or found guilty of any criminal
charges, while millions of citizens were ruined.
Banks, who had committed a variety of felonies,
simply turned to the government and asked with their
checkbook, how much do you want to keep our
executives out of jail? The government responded by
a fine on banks, which amounts to nothing because
banks simply pass the fine on to consumers, who pay
yet again.
Corporate media has deliberately not informed the US
public of how other countries, namely Iceland, faced
their crises. If you were told, you might demand we
act like Iceland, but if you don’t know about
Iceland, you will not demand. Iceland was one of the
hardest hit by the bank collapse, but they, unlike
us, handled things differently. The first major
difference is that Iceland decided since banks
speculated and made stupid loans, it was not the
responsibility of the taxpayers to bail out
irresponsible banks for their stupidity, and
therefore decided to allow large banks to fail. The
financial world predicted this would cause
irreversible difficulty for Iceland, and financiers
argued Iceland would never recover from their
defiance, but citizens persisted. Despite the
warnings, the Icelandic people on two occasions were
allowed to vote and decide if they wanted to bail
out banks or let them fail. Great pressure was put
on the voters by the financial sector, but citizens
held fast and democratically voted to let banks
fail. We, on the other hand were not given the
luxury of a democratic vote; the money was simply
taken from taxpayers and handed to banks. The
American public, who naively think they have
democracy, were not allowed to vote on whether they
wanted to bail out large banks; it was just a done
deal.
Meanwhile when Iceland refused to bail out banks,
they failed. Iceland did have economic problems as a
result, but if one compares their economy with the
rest of the world, they currently have the strongest
economy in Europe. During hard times Iceland shunned
austerity and maintained all social programs,
allowing people to spend, which of course stimulated
the economy. All the doomsday prophecy failed to
materialize and today Iceland is stronger than ever.
Icelanders were not done however; they took an even
bolder step. They decided to legally prosecute bank
leaders who were responsible for the financial
collapse of 2008, and so far have put 26 bankers in
jail. A novel concept; bankers being held
accountable as ordinary citizens. Doesn’t happen
here. Banks simply buy their way out of jail time,
but little Iceland took a different approach, and so
far has found 26 bankers guilty of fraud, and they
will serve a total of 74 years in jail. Iceland is
not done with their prosecutions.
It would be a democratic concept for the US to hold
bankers in the same legal regard as the rest of us,
and it would have been very democratic to allow
citizens the right to vote and decide if they wanted
to pay for a bank bailout, but unfortunately, in
this county bankers are our superiors and are not
accountable, and we are, apparently, far less
democratic than Iceland. Little Iceland is offering
great lessons to big USA, but who is listening to
the lessons of equality before the law, and the
right of the citizens to vote? Not our federal
government that’s for sure. We are not even allowed
to know what others like Iceland did. Boy are we
saps! |