Europe is
Disintegrating While its Citizens Watch Indifferent
By Roberto
Savio
February
04, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- "IPS"
- - We are witnessing the slow agony of the dream of
European integration, disintegrating without a
single demonstration occuring anywhere, among its
500 millions of citizens. It is clear that European
institutions are in an existential crisis but the
debate is only at intergovernmental level.
This proves
clearly that European citizens do not feel close to
Brussels. Gone are the 1950s, when young people
mobilized in the Youth Federalist Movement, with
activists from the Federal Movement led by Altiero
Spinelli, and the massive campaign for a Europe that
would transcend national boundaries, a rallying
theme of the intellectuals of the time.
It has been
a crescendo of crisis. First came the North-South
divide, with a North that did not want to rescue the
South, and made austerity a monolithic taboo, with
Germany as its inflexible leader. Greece was the
chosen place to clash and win, even if its budget
was just 4 percent of the whole European Union. The
front for fiscal discipline and austerity easily
overran those pleading for development and growth as
a priority and it alienated many of citizens caught
in the fight.
Then come
the East-West divide. It become clear that the
countries which were under the Soviet Union, joined
the EU purely for economic reasons, and did not
identify with the so called European values, the
basis for the founding treaties. Solidarity was not
only ignored, but actively rejected, first with
Greece, and now with the refugees. There are now two
countries, first Hungary and now Poland, which
explicitly reject the “European model and values”,
one to defend an autocratic model of governance, and
the other Christian values, ignoring any
declarations emanating from Brussels.
At the same
time, another ominous development emerged. British
Prime Minister David Cameron used threats to get
special conditions, or in order to leave the EU
altogether. At Davos, he explicitly said that
Britain was in the EU for the market, but rejects
everything else, and especially any possible further
integration. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has
been sending soothing signs, and all European
countries are in the process of trying to recover as
much sovereignty as possible. Therefore, whatever
Britain may get in the end will serve as a benchmark
for everyone else. It is revealing that in Britain,
the pro-Europe lobby is run by the financial and
economic sector, and there is no citizen’s movement.
All this is
happening within a framework of economic stagnation
that even unprecedented financial injections from
the European Central Bank have not been able to
lift.
The list of
countries in trouble does not cover only countries
from the South. Leaders of fiscal rectitude, like
the Netherlands and Finland, are in serious
difficulty. The only country which is doing
relatively well, Germany, enjoys a positive trade
balance with the rest of Europe, has a much lower
rate of interest mainly due to its generally better
performance; it has been calculated that over half
of its positive budget comes from its asymmetric
relations with the rest of Europe. Yet, Germany has
stubbornly refused to use some of these revenues to
create any pact to socialize its assets, like a
European Fund to bail out countries, or anything
similar. Hardly a shining example of solidarity….as
its minister of finance, Wolfgang Schauble, famously
said, “we are not going to give the gains that we
have sweated for to those who have not worked hard
the way we have…”
Finally,
the refugee crisis has been the last blow to an
institution which was already breathing with great
effort. Last year, more than 1,3 million people
escaping conflicts in Iraq, Libya and Syria, arrived
in Europe. This year, according the High
Commissioner for Refugees, at least another million
are expected to find their way to Europe.
What has
been happening, shows the European reality. The
Commission determined that 40.000 people, a mere
drop in the ocean, should be relocated from Syria
and Ethiopia. This led to a furious process of
bargaining, with the Eastern European countries
flatly refusing to take part and in spite of threats
by the Commission. As of today, the total number of
people who have relocated is a mere 201.
Meanwhile
Angela Merkel decided to open Germany up to one
million refugees, mainly Syrians. But a smart
interpretation of the Treaty on Refugees made clear
that economic refugees (as well as climate) were
excluded, and it was then declared that the Balkans
were safe and secure, thereby excluding any
Europeans coming to Germany by way of Albania,
Kosovo and other countries not yet part of the EU.
It is
interesting that, at the same time, Montenegro was
invited to join Nato, which, by coincidence also
serves to increase the containment of Russia, thanks
to a standing army of 3.000. But of course, the
flood of people made it difficult to process the
paperwork required, and so each country was forced
to resort to its own way of doing things, without
any relation with Brussels.
Austria
declared that it would admit only 37.500 asylum
applications.
Denmark,
besides creating a campaign to announce to refugees
that they were not welcome, passed a law that delays
family reunification for three years, and authorises
the authorities to seize asylum seekers’ cash and
jewels exceeding US$1.400.
Sweden
announced that it would give shorter residence
permits, and that strict controls will be imposed on
trains coming from Denmark.
Finland and
Holland have indicated that they will immediately
expel all those who do not fit under strict norms as
refugees. Great Britain, which was responsible
together with the United States for the Iraq
invasion (from which ISIS was born) has announced
that it will take 27.000 refugees.
There has
been a veritable flourishing of wall construction,
constructed in Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and
Austria. Meanwhile Europe tried to buy the Turkish
president Recep Tayyip Erdogan, with three billion
euros, as a way to stop the flow of refugees but it
didn’t work. Now Greece is the culprit, because it
was not able to adequately process the nearly
800.000 people who transitted the country.
Austria has
asked to exclude Greece from the Schengen agreement,
and move European borders “further north” . This
chapter is now being concluded by the German
initiative to introduce, once again national border
controls, for a period of two years. Last year,
there were 56 million trucks crossing between
countries, and every day 1,7 million people crossed
between borders.
To
eliminate the Schengen agreement for free movement
of Europeans, would be a very powerful signal. But
more critically are the imminent political changes
which see anti-European and xenophobic parties all
riding the wave of fear and insecurity crossing
Europe.
In Germany,
where Angela Merkel is increasingly losing support,
the Party for an Alternative, which has been
relatively marginal, could achieve representation in
at least three provinces. Across Europe, from France
to Italy, from Great Britain to the Netherlands,
right wing parties are on the rise.
These
parties all use some form of left wing rhetoric: Let
us renationalize industries and banks, increase
social safety nets, fight against neoliberal
globalization…
Hungary has
heavily taxed foreign banks to get them to leave,
and Poland is using similar language. Their target
is very simple: the unemployed, the under employed,
retirees, all those with precarious livelihoods,
those who feel that they have been left out of the
political system and dream of a glorious yesterday.
If it is working in the United States with the likes
of DonaldTrump, it will work here.
Therefore,
there is no doubt that at this moment a referendum
for Europe would never pass. Citizens do not feel
that this is ‘their’ Europe. This is a serious
problem for a democratic Europe.
Will the
European Union survive? Probably, but it will be
more a kind of common market for finance and
business rather than a citizen’s project. It will
also hasten the reduction of European power in the
world, and the loss of European identity, once the
most revolutionary project in modern history.
Roberto
Savio, IPS news agency founder and president
emeritus and publisher of Other News |