The
Weaponisation of the Refugee
Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism's War on
Europe
(Part
1 -
2
of an 11 part series)
By by Gearóid Ó Colmáin
February
02, 2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"Dissident
Voice"
-
Artificial
mass migration as imperial policy has a long
history. To illustrate this, we will cite a few
historical examples. According to Bulgarian
historian A, Eminov, civil wars in the Balkans in
the 13th and 14th centuries led to significant
population decline, which greatly
facilitated colonisation of the Balkans by the
Ottoman Empire. The deportation of nomads and
organised transportation of Muslim refugees by the
Ottoman Empire played a significant role in the
colonisation of this region.
Though
Turks comprise over 8 percent of the Bulgarian
population today, Turkey’s neo-Ottomanism has
sparked accusations from Bulgaria’s nationalist
party Attack that Turkey has plans to re-colonise
the country. Bulgaria has the highest number of
mosques in Europe per capita.
Given the
fact that Turkey is supporting the Islamic State in
Syria, while harbouring neo-colonial plans for the
Balkans, the decision by the Bulgarian government to
erect a fence along the border with Turkey is the
right one. Opposition politicians in Bulgaria have
described the subservience of their government to
the EU and NATO as treachery and tantamount to
genocide against ethnic Bulgarians, whose population
has been declining drastically since the fall of
communism.
In the 19th
century the British Empire organised the mass
migration of Bengali Muslims to Burma to work
plantations in the predominantly Buddhist Rakhine
State. The purpose of the migration was to create an
artificial ruling class that would depend on the
protection of the British Empire. The result was
more than a century of tension with the indigenous
Buddhist inhabitants and the Muslim settlers, a
tension that has led to the ethnic cleansing of
today, whereby Takfiri fanatics, financed by
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are committing genocide
against local Buddhist peasants with the full
complicity of ‘human rights’ organizations and the
mass media as part of a US/Israeli geostrategic
initiative to kossovise the Rakhine State by
separating it from Myanmar, thereby securing a
foothold for Western neo-colonial interests in the
highly strategic Bay of Bengal. The so-called
‘Rohingya crisis’ attests to a new phase in
imperialist policy; namely, the ruthless
weaponization of the refugee.
In the
nineteenth century, Imperial Belgium imported
hundreds of thousands of Rwandan Tutsi workers to
the Congo to staff their work colonies. This
artificial migration policy of Belgian imperialism
has played a major role in the context fueling the
current ethnic cleansing and ongoing neo-colonial
proxy wars being carried out by the US/Israeli and
European powers in the Democratic Republic of Congo,
where the US /Israeli Tutsi puppet regime of Paul
Kagame is
murdering and pillaging on behalf of Western
corporations. The Wall Street Journal has
ironically
described Kagame’s Zionist puppet regime ‘The
Israel of Africa’.
Here Hutu
refugees fleeing Kagame’s genocidal regime have been
systematically bombed and slaughtered by the Zionist
backed Rwandan military. Refugees fleeing war have
been used by the aggressors as a pretext to wage
further war and conquest. The US and EU have been
destabilizing Burundi since April 2015. Now,
terrorists are attacking the country from refugee
camps in Rwanda, with full backing by Western
powers.
A
population explosion in London in the 16th and 17th
centuries provided much of the impetus behind the
colonisation of America. Over two-thirds of the
first settlers in North America were indentured
servants, 75 percent of whom were young men under
the age of 25. The youth were needed to expand the
labour capacity of the Empire’s colonies. The
settler culture, imbued with religious fanaticism
and a complex of superiority, did not take long to
decimate the native American population. One of the
reasons for the population decline of the Powatan
native peoples was their tolerance and kindness
towards the settler culture.
Comparing
the mass migration of people from the Global South
to Europe today to the European colonisation of the
United States might appear strained and
inappropriate but there are important similarities,
nonetheless. Like the 16th and 17th centuries, the
world is experiencing a recrudescence of religious
war, while population explosions and war in the
developing world are driving mass migration. This
time, however, as the world has already been divided
through centuries of European colonisation, people
of the Global South are now moving North. The
potential for conflict between a declining native
population and an assertive, Muslim-dominated
settler culture is great, particularly when this
serves the interests of Europe’s ruling elite who
are in cahoots with the Wahhabi sheiks of the Middle
East. Whilst the people of the Global South are
fleeing the consequences of European imperialism,
the indoctrination of Wahhabi Islam among Muslim
immigrants constitutes a serious impediment to an
awakening of class consciousness necessary for the
unification with non-Muslim natives against their
internationalist bourgeois oppressors.
In
seventeenth century Ireland the British government
settled lands in the northern province of Ulster
with Protestant and Presbyterian settlers who lived
in fear of the Catholic neighbours they had
displaced. It was an imperial policy of divide and
rule which lasted for centuries. In the nineteenth
century, famine and mass emigration from Ireland to
America were caused by the British state’s refusal
to allow Irish peasants the right to eat the fruit
of their labour. The mass migrations benefited the
emerging ruling class of the United States who
required cheap labour as well as the British
government who wanted to reduce the population of
Ireland. In other words, mass migration enabled the
trans-Atlantic Anglo Saxon financial elite to turn
the very social and economic problems they had
created to their own advantage. The loss for Ireland
was irreparable. Western Europe’s oldest literary
vernacular language was reduced to minority status,
while the loss in youthful resourcefulness worked in
favour of the status quo, ensuring Ireland’s
subjugation to the British imperial elite, both
before and after formal independence.
A more
recent example of migration used as a tool of
imperialism is Eritrea. Since the country’s
independence from Ethiopia in 1993, Eritrea has
chartered a unique independent path to national
liberation and socio-economic development. The
results have been astounding, with economic growth
rates surpassing most other developing countries.
However, the socially-oriented policies of the
Eritrean government have brought it into conflict
with neo-colonial interests. As a consequence,
sanctions were imposed by the United States in 2009
on the only country in the Horn of Africa that has
never failed to feed, clothe and educate its
children.
Meanwhile,
millions flee hunger and poverty in the US client
state of Ethiopia, which is currently occupying part
of Eritrea since the US backed Ethiopian invasion of
that country in 1998. US geostrategy against Eritrea
involves smuggling Eritreans into Europe in a vast,
logistical operation involving officials in the
United Nations and ‘human rights’ NGOs such as Watch
the Met.
This
neo-colonial outfit is heavily involved in the
smuggling of Middle Eastern and Central Asian
refugees from Turkey.
Watch the
Med is a cogent example of how petty bourgeois
European prejudice against developing nations is
harnessed by elites to further their globalisation
agenda. The NGO, which claims to oppose the EU
‘militarization’ of the Mediterranean and fortress
Europe’ slammed Colonel Gaddafi’s Libya for its
alleged ‘abuse of migrants’ rights’, in spite of the
fact that Gaddafi’s Libya was praised by the UN for
its respect for human rights and was integrating
thousands of sub-Saharen migrants in the Libyan
Jamahirya, where they were able to work and benefit
from free health care, education and accommodation.
A key
figure in this criminal operation is a Nobel Prize
candidate who goes by the name of “Father” Mussie
Zerai, a phony Catholic priest who has been
coordinating the smuggling of East Africans to
Europe from war-torn Libya, earning him lots of
cash, kudos and the epithet ‘Archangel of
Refugees’. Zerai collaborates closely with Watch
the Med.
It is
impossible to tell if Watch the Med is receiving
funding from captains of globalisation such as
George Soros, but these European do-gooders would
certainly
deserve decent salaries from the Jewish
oligarch.
As part of
the destabilisation of Eritrea, the EU is giving
preferential treatment to refugees if they register
as Eritreans. Eritrean researchers have shown that
most of the migrants from East Africa are from
Ethiopia and Somalia. Yet, they register upon
arrival in the EU as Eritreans. The migrants are
often lost at sea. Al Jazeera recently did an
interview with a trafficker from Ethiopia who
confirmed that thousands of citizens from that
country are being smuggled into Europe. Yet Eurostat
figures for 2013-14
show no Ethniopian citizens whatsoever while
Eritreans are astonishingly high.
In a
Market Watch article entitled “Here’s my plan
to solve the asylum chaos”, George Soros slams
Victor Orbans’ policies stating that they threaten
to ‘divide and destroy the EU’. Soros
strongly advocates the creation of ‘NGOs’ to
facilitate the mass migration into Europe.
Orban has
pointed out that those welcoming the
refugees/migrants into Europe are playing into the
hands of Soros and global financial oligarchs.
The
Eritrean government has
proof of the CIA’s role in smuggling desperate
people from the Horn of Africa. They also have proof
of Amnesty International’s attempt to foment
political unrest and violence in the country.
The phony
‘Eritrean’ refugee crisis is being cynically used by
the corporate media to slander Africa’s only free
and truly democratic, post-colonial nation,
hampering its development while filling the coffers
of the heinous ‘human rights’ murder machine, all in
the service of empire. This again attests to the
weaponization of the refugee. The current
escalation of the refugee crisis in Europe should be
analyzed in this context.
So what is
the purpose of weaponizing refugees?
In the book
Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement,
Coercion and Foreign Policy, Kelly M.
Greenhill, US foreign policy consultant, argues that
coercive engineered migration is a strategy which
has been used by governments to gain concessions
from other governments. In other words, governments
often use refugees as weapons in order to exert
pressure on other governments for political ends.
Greenhill documents over 59 examples of refugees
being used as weapons since the Second World War.
While there
are undoubtedly many women and children and innocent
victims of NATO/Zionist fomented war among the flux
of people migrating to Europe who deserve all the
help they can get, it is deeply reactionary and
dishonest to ignore the obvious instrumentalisation
of migration by imperialism. Rational and honest
analysis of this complex phenomenon tends to prevail
in developing countries such as Russia and Iran,
whose press agencies have provided extensive
evidence of this problem. However, spurious
political correctness often stifles constructive
debate in Western countries with some analysts such
as this author being slandered on social media as
‘fascists’ and ‘racists’ by soi-disant ‘leftists’
for discussing these facts. George Soros and company
would certainly agree with them.
Gearóid Ó
Colmáin is a journalist and political analyst based
in Paris. His work focuses on globalization,
geopolitics and class struggle. He is a regular
contributor to Dissident Voice, Global Research,
Russia Today International, Press TV, Sputnik Radio
France, Sputnik English, Al Etijah TV, Sahar TV, and
has also appeared on Al Jazeera and Al Mayadeen. He
writes in English, Gaelic, and French
|