Do We Know
Why Russia Intervened In Syria
By Joe
Contrarian
January 17,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
-
"Syrian
War Update"
- The
anti-Russian propaganda keeps steady, inciting
schizophrenic narratives of Russian rogue state
threatening to world peace, an aggressor not to be
trusted or treated equally on the world stage while
tacitly recognizing positive and critical role of
Russia in sustaining of the world order. However
ineffective sanctions stayed unchanged for
propaganda purposes alone and calls for more
independent from US, balanced EU-Russia relations,
are still left unheeded while arms race on both
sides escalated to levels unheard of since 1990. The
one thing we have learned that what ever Russian
modest aims, they deliver on their promises so far.
So let’s examine once again;
Why
Russians Came?
So
everybody is asking question why after over four
years Russia has finally taken huge risk of openly
and directly militarily involve herself in the
Syrian War instantly increasing the geopolitical
stakes tenfold.
But before
that we have to realize what the Syrian War was and
still is all about.
The CIA
inspired and funded operation called “Syrian Arab
Spring” was commenced on the back of the legitimate
grievances of the Syrian people regarding Bashar
Al-Assad “new” neoliberal economic policies and
associated rampant corruption and cronyism that
slowly was destroying the social contract his father
Hafez signed with the Syrians people as a
fundamental condition of the stability of this
inherently unstable post colonial mix of nations as
well ethnic and religious groups that against all
odds and the West embarked on politically almost
impossible mission of modern nation building
following introduction in late 1950-ties of Arabic
version of nationalist/socialist movement called
Ba’athism (adopted also in Iraq) for many decades
with great success and huge social/national
sacrifice, advanced education and hard work that
built this previously nonexistent nation.
The
emissaries of the Washington D.C based, CIA backed
political adversaries of Assad rule promptly took on
terrorist tactics of murder and intimidation
attacking institutions and representatives of the
civil society, law and order but most of all they
aimed on destroying institution of “social peace”
among Syrian people responsible for internal dialog
(or what’s left of it) among all different
ethnic/religious groups of Syrian citizen after over
a decade and deterioration of the Syrian internal
political strive and marginalization of diverse
political voices by Assad regime tolerated or
supported by Bashar Al-Assad himself.
The
provocateurs attacked/manipulated Syrian religious
organizations previously providing important
foundation of the national dialog to provoke fake
conflicts that could not easily be resolved on
rational basis of political dialog. Assad however,
spending big chunk of his life in the West among
“political friends” bought almost immediately the
western propaganda of the sectarian strive as an
underlying cause of the “revolt” (which was a lie)
and put on his Alawite hat to defend his power base.
By that
fact he practically abdicated his national
leadership and gravely injured interests of his
nation and as a result, over following years, almost
completely lost control over Syria only to,
ironically, be “rescued” by the brutal aggression of
the foreign American funded proxies aimed to wipe
out the Syria as a nation from the political map of
the world.
Many
Syrians understood that fact before he did and
decided to defend their great nation even against
Assad’s ineptitude and political failure.
Almost
totally ignored, even in the independent media, is
the fact of the Bashar al-Assad slow and painful
transformation from some egotistic, scared to death
oligarch, detached from his nation into
self-sacrificing genuine leader, practically
recreated, reborn by the will of his people who made
choice to persist as a nation. Among all that
seemingly irreconcilable historical diversity, past
grievances and and apparent social incompatibility
the majority of Syrian realized that what they all
have in common is much more valuable than their
sectarian, economic and political particularisms.
They declared themselves as Syrians above all.
At this
point, in my opinion Assad stays in power only to
preserve integrity of the Syrian nation and more
precisely to redeem himself somewhat for all his
catastrophic decisions and mistaken attitudes that
aggravated the conflict into human disaster. In
other words Assad must prevail in this war in order
to leave his presidential office and be accountable
for his deeds in the court of Syrian people.
May be this
is what Putin, who so far stayed away from the
conflict except for diplomatic cover, finally
understood after years of the war and over two
hundred thousands dead and millions of refugees
resulting from reckless or genocidal policies of the
West.
Even
Russia, who in 2012 was quite willing to assist the
transition of power in Damascus and did not consider
Assad as indispensable, now sees that Syrian people
will not let him go until peace, territorial
integrity of their nation is fully restored and
assured by international treaties. That would be a
Syrian leg of the strategic interests of Russians in
the Middle East and overall political reason of
Russian open involvement in the Syrian war right
now.
But there
are many more reasons such as de facto attack on the
Syrian territorial integrity by Turkey’s undeclared
no fly zone in the north of Idlib protecting the
areas of Al-Nusra and IS operations which was
directly and immediately challenged by the Russian
air force just to make a point of legal claim by the
Syrian state over those areas.
Another
important, but omitted from most of analyses of the
conflict, factor was that over those four years
Assad regime quietly but radically changed the
policies enabling transformation of the Syrian civil
War in to the war of external aggression in mind of
average Syrian.
Surprisingly, this was accomplished via widespread
but unreported, amnesty for rebels and
reconciliation programs, local cease-fire agreements
with Syrian factions opposed to Assad as well as
extensive negotiation and even cooperation in order
to assure well-being of the local Syrian citizen
within the frontlines by restoring utilities to some
rebel areas who agreed to permanent cease-fire and
even restoring some basic social services and
allowing people unimpeded movement across the
division lines to enable economic activities. Even
elections were allowed in few areas held by the
Syrian (citizen) rebels.
However you
cut it, Assad was saved so far not by his
dilapidated guns or Hezbollah or Iran or even Russia
but by embracing Syrians on both sides as brothers
and sisters while offering bounty for Gulf State
Islamists who stirred the conflict within sectarian
communities in Syria.
Today Sunni
majority see no future for Syria under extreme
Islamists of the west concocted fascist Islamic
State of lies and propaganda and do not see
themselves in some delusional dreams of global
caliphate from hell. Unfortunately IS ideologues are
in complete agreement with delusional Washington
neocons seeking the end of history and revisions of
the post colonial divisions of the Middle East by
turning the area into gory imperial medieval kingdom
run by Saudis’ thugs.
Another
reason for Russian involvement is the fate of Kurds
who were betrayed and attacked by Turkey military
that stayed at least formally on “sidelines” for all
those years focusing on clandestine support for IS
and other Islamist groups, but this year provided
open and active cover for IS that was loosing
battles with PKK. The Russians know that the Kurds’
nation division into four state entities is the key
of holding the postcolonial map of the Middle East
intact. And that Kurds’ reunification would be
threatening the territorial integrity of Turkey
herself a member of NATO and hence would endanger
global geopolitical stability.
Russia’s
role here is to return both sides to the political
solution of containment and autonomy instead of
violent confrontation no side can win. Assad wisely,
already granted them far-reaching autonomy within
Syrian state but was slow with materiel support to
help them to defend themselves against Syrian rebels
in first years of conflict.
Another
reason could be a surprising alliance among Iran,
Iraq, Syria, Russia and China and other post soviet
states to eradicate Islamic extremism of IS only
possible after the US ignored calls of Iraq Shia
dominated pro-Iran government for help with new
weapons/aircraft to fight the IS on their territory,
even when Baghdad was threatened, forcing Iraqis to
purchase tens of new MiG 29 delivered by Russia
within months from the order. That alliance was
manifested by recent hypersonic cruise missile
bombing of the Islamic IS/ Al-Qaeda forces in Syria
that required crossing airspace of Iran and Iraq
unimpeded on the way from Caspian Sea.
What is
very interesting in the context of recent nuclear
agreement that Iran decided to decisively engage in
defending their ally, Assad regime by deployment of
ground troops of the Revolutionary Guard and massive
open military support for Hezbollah. Now Iraqi
government is in the process of designating
separated air base for Russians combating IS in
Iraq.
In the same
time previous incoherent utterances of the Netanyahu
and other right-wing theocratic lunatics running
Israeli government seem to pragmatically come to
reverse (after recent visit in Moscow) recognizing
global geopolitical reconfiguration which has its
manifestation in the current military and political
developments and exposing inept American policies
set on spreading dangerous for Israel chaos in the
region.
Undoubtedly, Russian intervention was possible only
because the US imperial power or rather an image of
the imperial power is weakening as perceived in the
Middle East and elsewhere. More and more people
recognize that US military power is just an illusion
and after years of massive theft of trillions of
dollars designated to military by Walls Street
conmen contractors the US paper tiger is capable of
empty threats and shooting anybody defenseless who
cannot shoot back while folding immediately
when confronted with those capable of defending
themselves.
Just few
days of Russian air force operations proved the
superiority of their equipment, training, logistics
and organization making Russian seemingly
untouchable by the US over Syria. The western
Europe was left in shock and awe that someone could
effectively challenge their American God militarily
and politically as just recently expressed by J.C.
Juncker, president of the European Commission who
declared that Europe should not blindly follow
Washington policies as they are not always in best
interest of the Europeans.
But in my
opinion most the direct reason of seeming urgency
of Russia’s involvement at this point were recent
developments in Lebanon (described below) and direct
threat to the Assad regime critical financing
sources due to the instability of the Lebanese
government /banking system under the western
instigated “garbage” revolution. Even more profound
financial crisis in Syria would have weakened Syrian
economy, likely to the level of the collapse at the
time when the Assad regime is making significant
progress in regaining control over the country.
However, I
have to admit that none of my reasons or Russian or
Syrian propaganda talking points about national
interest, global threat of Islamists or humanitarian
and refugee crises fully explains why Russia has
taken such a historically bold and aggressive (or
defensive?) step with so far unforeseen geopolitical
consequences.
I am not
naďve and do not believe that Russia is the only a
force for good, as much as the US never was. It was
all about direct interest of the ruling elites.
Their actions always exemplified by brutal
geopolitical calculations and drive for strategic
gain in the world of continuing confrontation of the
spheres of influence.
So what is
it that Russia may truly gain out of this? What is
Russia counting on? Breakup of NATO, a tool of
western aggression? Bringing Europe into Russia’s
sphere of alliances by marginalizing the US on world
stage? Is the price of blood sweat and tears that
will have to be paid worth it for Russian people? I
know not. It does not make sense to me so far in
context of looking at the big picture of recent
geopolitics where Russia exhibited extreme,
sometimes annoying, stoicism and conservatism
seemingly focusing of the long term
strategic objectives promoting status quo instead of
extreme “revolutionary” turmoil pushed by the US
neocons in their misguided quest for global vision
of US imperial dominance, for pipe dreams of next
American century.
But I know
one thing. What we are witnessing are first slight,
tectonic movements in the geopolitical crust that
will inevitably result in openly multipolar
political and economic world order in not so distant
future.
|