After Me, the
Jihad
Gaddafi’s Unheeded Warning to the West
By Dan Sanchez
January 16,
2016 "Information
Clearing House"
- Before the French Revolution and its Reign of
Terror, Louis XV
predicted, “After me, the Deluge.” Before being
overthrown, Libya’s secular dictator tried to warn
the West of a new Reign of Terror, essentially
foretelling, “After me, the Jihad.”
This was
disclosed with the recent release of
phone conversations from early 2011 between
Muammar Gaddafi and former British Prime Minister
Tony Blair.
The West was then gearing up to use unrest in
Libya as a pretext for military intervention and
regime change. Gaddafi desperately tried to convey
through Blair the folly of such a war, pleading that
he was trying to defend Libya from Al Qaeda, which
had set up base in the country. He said:
“They have managed to get arms and terrify
people. people can’t leave their homes…
It’s a jihad situation. They have arms
and are terrorising people in the street.”
Gaddafi’s warning went unheeded, and NATO, led by
the U.S. and France, launched an air war that
toppled Libya’s government. Later that year, Gaddafi
(himself a brutal oppressor, like all heads of
state) was forced out of a drainage pipe, and then
beaten, sodomized, and shot in the street by a mob.
His corpse was then draped over the hood of a car.
Since then, Gaddafi has been proven tragically
right. As Libya descended into civil war and
failed-state chaos, jihadi groups connected to Al
Qaeda conquered much of the country. Libya underwent
the same American “liberation” that had already
befallen Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia — and would
soon be visited on Syria and Yemen.
Shortly after Gaddafi’s overthrow, some of the
now-rampant jihadis helped the CIA
run guns from Benghazi to fellow jihadis in
Syria.
Benghazi had been a rebel stronghold. The Obama
administration claimed a Gaddafi-perpetrated
“genocide” was imminent in that city, using that
claim as the chief justification for the war. There
was zero indication of such an impending atrocity.
But there was ample evidence of an Al Qaeda
presence in Benghazi, as Gaddafi tried to tell
Blair, saying that members had
“…managed to set
up local stations and in Benghazi have spread the
thoughts and ideas of al Qaeda.”
After the regime change, on September 11, 2012,
the jihadis turned on their U.S. allies in Benghazi,
sacked the U.S. diplomatic compound, and murdered
Ambassador Chris Stevens.
Now ISIS has spread throughout Libya. Just days
ago, ISIS perpetrated a truck bombing that killed
dozens at a Libyan
police academy in Sirte, a former Gaddafi
stronghold. Indeed, Gaddafi informed Blair that
jihadis had “attacked police stations” back
in 2011.
Gaddafi further warned Blair:
“They want to control the Mediterranean and
then they will attack Europe.”
And ISIS has, indeed, been battling to take
control of
Libya’s main oil ports in recent weeks. The
group has also long been planning to
use Libya as a base from which to launch attacks
on nearby southern Europe. ISIS did strike Europe
recently, most famously in Paris.
And it was not just Gaddafi personally who had
been ringing such alarms to the Western powers
thirsting for his blood. His intelligence officers
produced
reports demonstrating that heavy weapons being
sent to the Libyan opposition, with NATO approval
and Qatari financing, were being funneled to
militants with ties to Al Qaeda. At least one of
those reports was even prepared in English to
facilitate its transmission to key members of
Congress via U.S. intelligence.
Yet, there was no need for the West to rely on
the Libyan regime for information about the jihadi
threat. Indeed, as
emails recently released by the State Department
reveal, Hillary Clinton’s own right-hand man had
informed her before Gaddafi’s overthrow that rebels
were committing
war crimes, and that “…radical/terrorist
groups such as the Libyan Fighting Groups and Al
Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) are
infiltrating the NLC and its military command.”
As Brad Hoff
reports, that same email discloses that, very
early in the Libyan crisis,
“British, French, and
Egyptian special operations units were training
Libyan militants along the Egyptian-Libyan border,
as well as in Benghazi suburbs.”
The war in Libya that Hillary Clinton, U.N.
Ambassador Susan Rice, and Samantha Power of the
National Security Council were driving toward was so
predictably a fiasco-to-come that, behind the backs
of the Amazon Warriors Three, America’s
top generals conspired with leftie peacenik
Congressman Dennis Kucinich to try to arrange a
peaceful resolution to the crisis. But the
war-making diplomats triumphed over the
diplomacy-making soldiers. Hillary buffaloed the
brass and got her war.
Abundant warnings of a Jihadi Deluge continued
after the regime change, as well. As Nancy Youssef
wrote at
The Daily Beast:
“…many celebrated Libya as a success story of
limited U.S. intervention despite obvious signs
there of looming instability. The British consulate
in Benghazi came under an attempted assassination
attack the previous summer and other nations pulled
out amid rising violence. The U.S. consulate in
Benghazi suffered an improvised bomb attack around
the time of the strike on the British. And there
were early signs of a rising jihadist presence in
the eastern city. In Tripoli, Sufi shrines were
destroyed. (…)
“In the months leading up to the [2012
Benghazi] attack, flags belonging to a jihadist
group, Ansar al Sharia, appeared in Benghazi. Ansar
al Sharia members also controlled security around
certain government buildings, including the hospital
that would try to save Stevens.
“In that ensuing power vacuum, jihadists began
claiming territory, making it difficult for the
moderate government to control the country. By 2013,
Libya’s oil production all but stopped as the nation
plunged toward civil war and a state led by two
rival governments on opposite ends of the country.
Efforts to create a unity government have so far
faltered. Benghazi, the birthplace of the 2011
uprising, became a terrorist haven. And today, many
Libyans yearn for the return of Gaddafi, however
dictatorial his regime was, because of the security
that came with him.”
Conservative politicos have long strained to use
Benghazi to torpedo Hillary’s bid for the
presidency. But their efforts are crippled by their
own fundamental agreement with Hillary’s militarism.
They support the general policy of employing jihadis
to overthrow secular dictators (not only in Libya,
but
Syria too). So they limit themselves to whining
about Hillary’s security measures.
The true Benghazi scandal indicts not just
Hillary, but the entire Western power elite, whose
wars have, as Gaddafi warned,
flooded the world with a Jihadi Deluge and
installed a postdiluvian
Reign of Terror over us all.
Dan Sanchez currently resides in Auburn,
Alabama. You can find his work on
DanSanchez.me.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)