Palestine
after Abbas: The Future of a People at Stake
By Ramzy Baroud
January 06,
2015 "Information
Clearing House"
- Although intended to inspire his Fatah Party
followers, a
televised speech by Mahmoud Abbas on the 51st
Anniversary of the group’s launch highlighted,
instead, the unprecedented crisis that continues to
wreak havoc on the Palestinian people. Not only did
Abbas sound defensive and lacking in any serious or
new initiatives, but his ultimate intention appeared
as if it was about his political survival, and
nothing else.
In his
speech on December 31, he tossed in many of the old
clichés, chastising Israel at times, although in
carefully-worded language, and insisted that any
vital decisions concerned with “the future of the
land, people and national rights” would be “subject
to general elections and (voted on by the Palestine)
National Council (PNC), because our people made
heavy sacrifices and they are the source of all
authorities.”
Ironically,
Abbas presides over the Palestinian Authority (PA)
with a mandate that expired in January 2009 and his
party, Fatah, which refused to accept the results of
democratic elections in the Occupied Territories in
2006, continues to behave as the ‘ruling party’ with
no mandate, aside from the political validation it
receives from Israel, the US and their allies.
As for the
PNC, it served as the legislative body of the
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) until the PA
was established in 1994. Propped up by international
funds, the PA was initially formed as a means to an
end, that being ‘final status’ negotiations and a
Palestinian State. Instead, it became a status quo
in itself, and its institutions, which largely
reflected the political interests of a specific
branch within Fatah, replaced the PLO, the PNC,
together with all other institutions that expressed
a degree of democracy and inclusiveness.
Whatever
PLO structure that symbolically remained in place
after the PA soft coup is now arubber
stamp that does not merely reflect the wishes of
a single party, Fatah (which lost its majority among
Palestinians in 2006), but an elitist, wealthy group
within the once-leading party. In some way, Abbas’
current role is largely to serve the interest of
this group, as opposed to charting a path of
liberation for the entire Palestinian collective, at
home, in refugee camps or in the Diaspora.
Nothing was
as telling about Abbas’ real mission at the helm of
the PA than his statement in his speech of December
31, where he completely ruled out the dismantling of
the PA – now that it has failed in its mission, and
while an elaborate PLO political structure already
exists, which is capable of replacing it. Oddly,
Abbas described the PA as one of the greatest
achievements of the Palestinian people.
I say,
‘oddly’ because the PA was the outcome of the now
practically defunct Oslo ‘peace process’, which was
negotiated by Abbas and a few others in secret with
Israel, at the behest of the late Palestinian Fatah
leader, Yasser Arafat. The whole initiative was
founded on secrecy and deceit and was signed without
taking the Palestinian people into account. Worse,
when Palestinians attempted to vote to challenge the
status quo wrought by Oslo, the outcome of the
elections was dismissed by Fatah, which led to a
civil war in 2007 where hundreds of Palestinians
were killed.
But aside
from the historical lapses of Abbas, who is now
80-years-old, his words – although meant to assure
his supporters – are, in fact, a stark reminder that
the Palestinian people, who have been undergoing a
violent uprising since October, are practically
leaderless.
While Abbas
explains that the reason behind the ‘habba’ or the
‘rising’ – a reference to the current Intifada – is
Israel’s continued violations and illegal
settlement, he failed to endorse the current
uprising or behave as if he is the leader of that
national mobilization. He constantly tries to hold
the proverbial stick in the middle so that he does
not invite the ire of his people nor that of Israel.
Like a
crafty politician, he is also trying to reap
multiple benefits, siding with the people at times,
as if a revolutionary leader, to remind Israel and
the US of his importance as someone who represents
the non-violent strand of Palestinian politics, and
ride the wave of the intifada until the old
order is restored. In fact, signs of that old order
– interminable negotiations – are still evident. The
PA’s Chief Negotiator, Saeb Erekat,
has recently announced that talks between the PA and
Israel are still taking place, a terrible omen
at a time when Palestinians are in desperate need
for a complete overhaul of their failed approach to
politics and national liberation.
However,
the problem is much bigger than Mahmoud Abbas.
Reducing the Palestinian failure to the character of
a single person is deeply rooted in most political
analyses pertaining to Palestine for many years.
(This is actually more pronounced in Western media
than in Arabic media). Alas, once aging Abbas is no
longer on the political scene, the problem is likely
to persist, if not addressed.
While Fatah
has made marked contributions to Palestinian
Resistance, its greatest contribution was liberating
the Palestinian cause, as much as is practically
possible, from the confines and manipulation of Arab
politics. Thanks to that generation of young
Palestinian leaders, which also included leaders of
the
PFLP and other socialist groups, there was, for
once, a relatively unified Palestinian platform that
did represent a degree of Palestinian priorities and
objectives.
But that
relative unity was splintered among Palestinian
factionalism: within the PLO itself, and then
outside the PLO, where groups and sub-groups grew
into a variety of ideological directions, many of
whom were funded by Arab regimes which utilized the
Palestinian struggle to serve national and regional
agendas. A long and tragic episode of
national collapse followed. When the Palestinian
Resistance was exiled from Lebanon in 1982,
following the Israeli invasion of that country, the
PLO and all of its institutions were mostly ruled by
a single party. Fatah, by then, grew older and more
corrupt, operating within geographical spheres that
were far away from Palestine. It dominated the PLO
which, by then, grew into a body mired in political
tribalism and financial corruption.
True, Abbas
is an essential character in that sorry episode
which led to the Oslo fiasco in 1993; however, the
burgeoning political culture that he partly espoused
will continue to operate independent from the
aspirations of the Palestinian people, with or
without Abbas.
It is this
class, which is fed with US-Western money and perks
and happily tolerated by Israel, which must be
confronted by Palestinians themselves, if they are
to have a real chance at reclaiming their national
objectives once more.
The current
wisdom conveyed by some, that today’s Intifada has
superseded the PA, is utter nonsense. No popular
mobilization has a chance of succeeding if it is
impeded by such a powerful group as those invested
in the PA, all unified by a great tug of
self-interest.
Moreover,
waiting for Abbas to articulate a stronger, more
convincing message is also a waste of time, since
the ailment is not Abbas’ use of vocabulary, but his
group’s refusal to cede an inch of their undeserved
privilege, in order to open up space for a more
democratic environment – so that all Palestinians,
secularists, Islamists and socialists take equal
part in the struggle for Palestine.
A starting
point would be a unified leadership in the Occupied
Territories that manages the Intifada outside the
confines of factions, combined with a vision for
revamping PLO institutions to become more inclusive
and to bring all Palestinians, everywhere, together.
Abbas is
soon to depart the political scene, either because
of an
internal Fatah coup, or as a result of old age.
Either way, the future of Palestine cannot be left
to his followers, to manage as they see fit and to
protect their own interests. The future of an entire
nation is at stake.
– Dr.
Ramzy Baroud has been writing about the Middle East
for over 20 years. He is an
internationally-syndicated columnist, a media
consultant, an author of several books and the
founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His books include
‘Searching Jenin’, ‘The Second Palestinian Intifada’
and his latest ‘My Father Was a Freedom Fighter:
Gaza’s Untold Story’. His website is:
www.ramzybaroud.net. |