December 23, 2015 "Information
Clearing House"
-
Donald Trump,
judging by polls as of December 21, 2015, is the
most likely candidate to be the next president of
the US.
Trump is
popular not so much for his stance on issues as for
the fact that he is not another Washington politican,
and he is respected for not backing down and
apologizing when he makes strong statements for
which he is criticized. What people see in Trump is
strength and leadership. This is what is unusual
about a political candidate, and it is this strength
to which voters are responding.
The
corrupt American political establishment has issued
a “get Trump” command to its presstitute media.
Media whore George Stephanopoulos, a loyal follower
of orders, went after Trump on national television.
But Trump made mincemeat of the whore.
Stephanopoulos tried to go after Trump because the
world’s favorite leader, President Putin of Russia,
said complimentary things about Trump, and Trump
replied in kind.
According
to Stephanopoulos, “Putin has murdered journalists,”
and Trump should be ashamed of praising a murderer
of journalists. Trump asked Stephanopoulos for
evidence, and Stephanopoulos didn’t have any. In
other words, Stephanopoulos confirmed Trump’s
statement that American politicians just make things
up and rely on the presstitutes to support invented
“facts” as if they are true. Trump made reference to
Washington’s many murders.
Stephanopoulos wanted to know what journalists
Washington had murdered. Trump responded with
Washington’s murders and dislocation of millions of
peoples who are now overrunning Europe as refugees
from Washington’s wars. But Trumps advisors were not
sufficiently competent to have armed him with the
story of Washington’s murder of Al Jazerra’s
reporters.
Here is a
report from Al Jazeera, a far more trustworthy news
organization than the US print and TV media:
“On April
8, 2003, during the US-led invasion of Iraq, Al
Jazeera correspondent Tareq Ayoub was killed when a
US warplane bombed Al Jazeera’s headquarters in
Baghdad.
“The
invasion and subsequent nine-year occupation of Iraq
claimed the lives of a record number of journalists.
It was undisputedly the deadliest war for
journalists in recorded history.
“Disturbingly, more journalists were murdered in
targeted killings in Iraq than died in
combat-related circumstances, according to the group
Committee to Protect Journalists.
“CPJ
research shows that “at least 150 journalists and 54
media support workers were killed in Iraq from the
US-led invasion in March 2003 to the declared end of
the war in December 2011.”
A political
candidate with a competent staff would have
immediately fired back at Stephanopoulos with the
facts of Washington’s murder of journalists and
compared these facts with the purely propagandistic
accusations against Putin which have no basis
whatsoever in fact.
The problem
with Trump is the issues on which the public is not
carefully judging him. I don’t
blame the public. It is refreshing to have a
billionaire who can’t be bought expose the
insubstantialality of all the Democratic and
Repulican candidates for president. A collection of
total zeros.
Unlike
Washington, Putin supports the sovereignty of
countries. He does not believe that the US
or any country has the right to overthrow
governments and install a puppet or vassal.
Recently Putin said: “I hope no person is insane
enough on planet earth who would dare to use nuclear
weapons.”
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com
Unfortunately for Putin and for Trump, if news
reports can be believed, Trump recently said that
he would use nuclear weapons against ISIS. This is a
disqulifying statement. There is no reason to need
nukes to defeat a force as small as ISIS. More
importantly, as the US is the only country to use
nuclear weapons against the population of another
country, for the US to do so again would confirm for
the Russian and Chinese governments that the US
government is insane, untrustworthy, and in need of
extermination before Russia and China are attacked.
You cannot use nuclear weapons without consequence.
As I have
said in a number of interviews, Trump’s problem is
that he has no movement behind him, no advisors that
he can trust, and he does not understand the issues.
Trump has learned
that forceful statements are appreciated by voters.
Therefore, he doesn’t differentiate intelligent
forceful statements from insane statements. As long
as his statements are forceful, Trump thinks that
they work.
Recently I
watched a video of a woman described as a “Trump
advisor” who repeaded neocon nazi William Kristol’s
statement: “What’s the use of nuclear weapons if you
can’t use them?”
How did a
William Kristol neocon nazi get on Trump’s staff?
What more proof do we need that even if Trump is
elected, the establishment will prevail despite
Trump.
Trump
cannot be a dissident politician without a dissident
staff. He doesn’t know the people who would comprise
a dissident staff. Trump knows how to make deals,
and the Establishment will staff up a Trump
presidency with deals. The minute Trump takes
office, he would be already captured.
In France
Marine Le Pen’s National Front Party could bring
political change. In the UK Nigel Farage’s UK
Independence Party or Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party
could bring political change. But in the US there is
no prospect of change from elections. Change can
only come from collapse or from bloody revolution.
The American Establishment will not accept change.
And most
likely, the American Establishment would assassinate
Le Pen and Farage and Corbyn before accepting change
in France and the UK.
These are
the facts on the ground. How Russia and China deal
with them remains to be seen.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)