War Party
Republicans
America First -- or World War III
By Patrick J. Buchanan
December 18, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" -
"If you're in favor of World War III, you have your
candidate."
So said Rand
Paul, looking directly at Gov. Chris Christie, who
had just responded to a question from CNN's Wolf
Blitzer as to whether he would shoot down a Russian
plane that violated his no-fly zone in Syria.
"Not only
would I be prepared to do it, I would do it,"
blurted Christie: "I would talk to Vladimir Putin
... I'd say to him, 'Listen, Mr. President, there's
a no-fly zone in Syria; you fly in, it applies to
you.'
"Yes, we
would shoot down the planes of Russian pilots if in
fact they were stupid enough to think that this
president was the same feckless weakling ... we have
in the Oval Office ... right now."
Ex-Gov.
George Pataki and ex-Sen. Rick Santorum would also
impose a no-fly zone and shoot down Russian planes
that violated it. Said Gov. John Kasich, "It's time
we punched the Russians in the nose."
Carly
Fiorina would impose a no-fly zone and not even talk
to Putin until we've conducted "military exercises
in the Baltic States" on Russia's border. Jeb Bush,
too, would impose a no-fly zone.
These
warhawks apparently assume that President Putin is a
coward who, if you shoot down his warplanes, will
back away from a fight.
Are we
sure? After the Turks shot down that Sukhoi SU-24,
Moscow sent fighter planes to Syria to escort its
bombers and has reportedly deployed its lethal S-300
antiaircraft system there.
A U.S.
Marine Corps aviator describes the S-300: "A
complete game changer for all fourth-gen aircraft
[like the F-15, F-16 and F/A-18]. That thing is a
beast and you don't want to get near it." There are
press reports that an angry Putin has ordered the
even more advanced S-400 system moved into Syria.
Is Putin
bluffing? Are we prepared to ride the up-escalator,
at the top of which is nuclear war, if Putin, who
has been boasting of his modernized nuclear forces,
is also willing to ride it rather than back down?
Uber-hawk
Lindsey Graham wants to send tens of thousands of
American troops to fight ISIS, and refuses to work
with Iran, Russia, or Syria's Bashar Assad to crush
our common enemy ISIS.
Graham
prefers "allies," like the Saudis and Gulf Arabs.
But both
have bailed out of the air war on ISIS, and sent
troops and bombers instead to attack the Houthi
rebels in Yemen. Result: The Houthis have been in
retreat and al-Qaida and ISIS are moving into the
vacated territory.
Another
Mideast base camp for terrorists is being created —
by us.
"I miss
George W. Bush!" wailed Graham in the undercard
debate.
How many
other Americans are, like Graham, pining for the
return of a Bush foreign policy that gave us Barack
Obama?
Yet, now, a
rival school is taking center stage in the
Republican presidential campaign, rejecting the
knee-jerk hostility to working with Putin. Not only
does Rand Paul belong to this school, so,
apparently, do Donald Trump and his strongest
challenger, Sen. Ted Cruz.
Cruz had
previously disparaged the legacy of the "neocons"
who prodded Bush into war in Iraq and championed a
democracy crusade in the Middle East. In Las Vegas,
he spoke of a new national-interest-based foreign
policy, a policy that puts "America First."
"If we
topple Assad ... ISIS will take over Syria, and it
will worsen national security interests. And the
approach — instead of being ... a democracy
promoter, we ought to hunt down our enemies and kill
ISIS rather than creating opportunities for ISIS to
control new countries."
Cruz
rejects the Manichaean worldview of the neocons and
their reflexive hostility to Russia, and appears
willing to work with a Russian autocrat to crush a
monstrous evil like ISIS, as U.S. presidents did in
working with anti-Communist dictators to win the
Cold War.
Midway
through the debate, Trump cut loose with a sweeping
indictment of mindless American interventionism in
the Middle East:
"We've
spent $4 trillion trying to topple various people
that, frankly, if they were there and if we could
have spent that $4 trillion in the United States to
fix our roads, our bridges, and all of the other
problems — our airports and all the other problems
we have — we would have been a lot better off. ...
"We have
done a tremendous disservice not only to the Middle
East — we've done a tremendous disservice to
humanity. The people that have been killed, the
people that have been wiped away — and for what?
It's not like we had victory. It's a mess. The
Middle East is totally destabilized, a total and
complete mess. I wish we had the 4 trillion dollars
or 5 trillion dollars. I wish it were spent right
here in the United States on schools, hospitals,
roads, airports, and everything else that are all
falling apart!"
If we do
not want Syria in 2016 to become what Sarajevo
became in 1914, the powder keg that explodes into a
world war, the War Party Republicans, who have
learned nothing from the past, should be relegated
to the past.
Patrick
J. Buchanan is the author of the new book "The
Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From
Defeat to Create the New Majority." To find out more
about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other
Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators
Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT
2015 CREATORS.COM |