Trump Didn't Vote to Kill 1 Million Muslims in
Iraq, Hillary DidBy David Swanson
December 10, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - Thanks to Glenn
Greenwald for pointing out that the
U.S. media is acting as though Donald Trump just invented
bigotry this week (one of those ugly details I'm happy to miss by
never watching television). But not only is explicit bigotry toward
Muslims not new, implicit bigotry toward Muslims has been the
foundation of the largest public project in the United States for
the past quarter century.
The driving forces behind war planning in
Washington are power, domination, profit, politics, and the inertia
of war planning as a path toward career success. These sociopaths
are happy to bomb Germans or Yugoslavians. The value they place on
sailors in Pearl Harbor or contemplated victims of Operation
Northwoods, or U.S. troops stop-lossed into insanity is negligible.
They don't think twice about overthrowing a democracy in Iran and
laying the groundwork for Islamic power. They have no qualms about
arming Muslim radicals in Afghanistan or Iraq, and toppling secular
governments in Iraq or Libya or Syria. That most ISIS weaponry is
U.S. weaponry seized from Iraq can only please the profiteers who
will sell the weapons to combat ISIS. Their best friends are the
killer Muslims running Saudi Arabia and nearby kingdoms. Their
Christian hatred for Islam is as real as Karl Rove's integrity or
Donald Trump's hair.
But you can't keep dumping $1 trillion a year into
U.S. militarism without an enemy as frightening as -- actually it
has to be more frightening than -- the Soviet Union and nuclear
holocaust. In the irrational world of fear, a throat slitting is as
frightening as a nuclear bomb, in fact more so. Many, many people in
the United States, when they stop to think about it, recognize that
the wars of recent decades have been counterproductive, creating
enemies rather than eliminating them, endangering rather than
protecting, costing a mountain of lives and of dollars, savagely
destroying the natural environment, eroding civil liberties in the
name of wars for "freedom," and brutalizing morality, justifying
murder, torture, kidnapping, etc. But with fear and hatred of
Muslims thrown into the mix, all of that clear understanding is
erased by the need to kill Muslims. Suddenly a rich stew of World
War II myths and Hollywood entertainment reminds everyone that only
war works and nothing else is acceptable.
Donald Trump didn't vote for the war on Iraq that
killed a million Muslims.
He didn't vote to fund it and escalate it over and over again.
Hillary Clinton did that. Which is not to say that Trump wouldn't
have done so too, or worse, if he thought it would get him on TV
more. The point is that the hatred is not new. Without it, basic
U.S. policy would be understood as irrational.
There are now news stories from around the United
States and the world about people shunning Trump businesses and
expressing fear about living in Trump-branded buildings. They're
concerned that there may be an attack. No doubt among those
expressing this worry are some of that majority of Americans who
tell pollsters they want more war. So, they recognize blowback. It's
not a difficult concept. Hostility toward others produces hostility
back toward you or someone taken to represent you. Pretty basic. But
in advocating more war, millions of people are willing and able to
hide their understanding of blowback in some fascist vault in a back
corner of their brains. Sure, more war will produce more blowback,
they may think, but hopefully it will hit somebody else --
especially if I unload my Trump condo and live somewhere else,
perhaps a liberal gated community with an African-American guard
whose name I even know.
I walked by a wall recently and took a photo of
it. Someone had written "Anything war can do, peace can do better."
Wisest thing I've ever seen on that wall. But someone else had
scrawled underneath a poetic piece of pure ignorance from deep
within the terrified soul of U.S. paranoia: "(Except stopping
Hitler!)" I don't think the rest of the world finds it easy to get
inside this type of U.S. thinking, in which the outside world is
full of a menacing evil constantly analogized to Hitler, the "new
Hitler," the "modern Hitler," -- and Hitler is understood as having
arisen with no help from the Treaty of Versailles, no help from Wall
Street, no assistance from the militarism of Western culture, and no
possibility of being halted short of global domination except by
massive violence.
Kids, dear world, in the United States, you should
know are compelled to pledge allegiance to a U.S. flag every
morning, and then to pray in what they call a "moment of silence."
They are then taught a mythologized U.S. history year after year
with hardly any mention of the other 96% of humanity. Then they're
told that Muslims want to slit their throats. Why? What did they do?
Nothing. They'd just been shopping and watching football and minding
their own business. They had a flag out front and plenty of
support-the-troops shit stuck to the SUV. Why? Must just be the
barbarity of the Muslims. Why not kill them off? It worked with the
Native Americans. Kill them off, but don't talk about it like that
out loud.
Only, if there's a war on al Qaeda support it, and
if there's a war with al Qaeda against Syria oppose it, and if it's
repackaged as a war on al Qaeda under a new and even scarier name,
support it with a passion. And if killing them is OK, what in the
hell is all the fuss about over torturing them? And if torturing
them is OK, what in the world could be wrong with denying them entry
into the United States? This is the logic of war propaganda. Trump
agrees with the Washington establishment, he just has some sort of
media-driven Tourette syndrome that leads him to blurt things out.
If he's made president, the second most dangerous place in this
country will be a mosque. The first will remain anywhere between
Trump and a television camera.
David Swanson is an American activist, blogger
and author.
http://davidswanson.org/node/5001