Latin America: The Aborted Neo-Liberal Offensive
By James Petras
December 10, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "Pundits
and commentators on the Left and Right are pronouncing ‘the end of
the progressive cycle in Latin America’. They cite the recent
presidential elections:
- Argentina,
where hard-right Mauricio Macri was elected;
- Brazil, where
President Dilma Rousseff has appointed a neo-liberal ‘Chicago
Boy’ economist, Joaquin Levy, as Finance Minister and launched
an IMF-style regressive structural adjustment policy designed to
reduce social expenditures and attract financial speculators;
and
- Venezuela,
where Washington channeled millions of dollars to far-right
parties, as well as violent extra-parliamentary and paramilitary
groups, to destabilize the center-left Maduro government;
right-wing Democratic Unity Coalition (MUD) won the legislative
elections in December 2015 with more than 2:1 margin over the
Chavista Venezuelan United Socialist Party (PSUV).
No doubt progressive social legislation has come
to a virtual halt, even
before the recent political advances of the US-backed
right-wing parties with their neo-liberal economic agenda.
But paralysis,
and even retreat and electoral defeats of the center-left regimes,
do not mean the return to the neo-liberal 1990’s, a period
of privatizations, pillage and plunder, which had plunged millions
into poverty, unemployment and marginality.
Whatever the current voting results, the
collective memory of mass hardship, resulting from ‘free market’
policies, is seared in the memory of the vast majority of the
working population.
Any attempt by the newly elected officials to ‘unmake
and reverse’ the
social advances of the past decade will be met with (1)
militant resistance, if not open class warfare; (2) institutional
and political constraints; (3) and low commodity prices drastically
limiting export revenues.
A careful analysis of the policies proposed by the
neo-liberal right, their implementation and impact will demonstrate
their likely failure and the rapid demise of any new right-wing
offensive. This will abort the neoliberal cycle.
Argentina: President Macri and Wall
Street
In the upper income neighborhoods of Buenos Aires,
there was singing and dancing in the streets as the Presidential
election results rolled in and Mauricio Macri was pronounced the
victor. Wall Street, the City of London and their financial
mouthpieces, the Wall
Street Journal and
the Financial Times, announced the coming of a new era and
the end of ‘anti-investor,
populism and nationalism, wasteful social spending’referring to
increases in pensions, family allowances and wages, approved by the
previous center-left government
Mauricio Macri
does not merely represent
the plutocracy; he is one of the richest plutocrats in Argentina. He
not only boasts of a ‘carnal relationship’ with Washington
in his acceptance speech, he pleasured US President Obama by
announcing he would work to expel Venezuela from MERCOSUR, Latin
America’s foremost regional economic integration organization.
Macri announced a cabinet made up of hard-core
neo-liberal economists, former supporters of the military
dictatorship and even a rabid rightwing rabbi. He then spelled out
his policy agenda, which had been cleverly
hidden during his
electoral campaign when his raucous rhetoric for ‘change’,
spoke to everybody and nobody.
Macri promises to
(1) end capital
controls, export taxes and retentions on agro-business exports,
(2) devaluate the peso,
(3) pay over $1.2
billion dollars of Argentine public money to the Wall Street
vulture-speculator, Paul Singer, who had bought $49 million dollars
of old Argentine debt (a profit of astronomical proportions for
buying paper),
(4) privatize and
de-nationalize the state-owned airline, oil company and pension
funds
(5)sign-off on EU and
US-centered free trade agreements, thus undermining Latin America
integration projects like MERCOSUR;
(6) tear up the jointmemo
of understanding with Iran regarding an investigation into a
terror bombing as requested by Israel; and
(7) expel Venezuela
from MERCOSUR.
In a word, the multi-millionaire playboy President
plans harsh austerity for the Argentine working class and bountiful
handouts for the economic elite.
The day after the elections, local and overseas
speculators boosted Argentine stocks 40% anticipating the free
market bonanza. George Soros and hedge fund mogul, Daniel Loeb, ‘piled
into Argentine assets’. Investment fund managers urged Macri to
act swiftly in imposing his ‘sweeping reforms’ before
Argentina’s famous capacity for mass popular resistance could be
organized to resist his policies.
Macri’s Wall Street and Washington patrons are
well aware that their clients’ boisterous big business bombast faces
serious political obstacles because his policies will provoke severe
economic hardships.
President Macri does not even have a majority in
Congress to approve his radical proposals. The congress is
controlled by a coalition of rightwing and center-left Peronist
parties, which will need to be coaxed, bought or coerced.
The Argentine Congress will balk at supporting his
entire neoliberal agenda. When he resorts to ‘executive decrees’
to bypass Congress, he will be contested in the courts, streets and
legislature. It is doubtful he will be able to neutralize all his
critics and implement his radical neoliberal agenda.
The head of the Central Bank, Alejandro Vanoli,
who was appointed by the previous center-left Fernandez government,
is not likely to go along with Macri’s tight money policy, radical
devaluation and fiscal austerity. Macri will likely look for a
pretext to purge the incumbent and nominate a free market crony.
However, the institutional damage will increase the general sense of
a lawless regime willing to trample the constitutional order to
impose his free market dogma.
Macri’s promise to end the ‘tax’ retention on
agro-exports will decrease government revenues, exacerbating the
fiscal deficit and necessitating deeper reductions in social
expenditures. The contrast between higher earnings for the
agro-business elite and lower living standards for labor is an
invitation to greater class hostility and strife. Even more decisive
Macri’s “export strategy” will be undermined by the low
world demand and prices of Argentine commodity exports.
Macri’s promise to end capital and price controls
on his first day in office will provoke a major devaluation of the
peso which may exceed 60%. This will automatically result in severe
increases in the price of consumer goods and increased profits for
the export elites, provoking mass unrest across the occupational
spectrum.
Macri promises to meet with the 7% of speculator
hold-outs of old Argentine debt (from the pillage years of the
1990’s) demanding full payment with interest, especially the
‘vulture funds’ led by Wall Street’s Paul Singer of Elliott Capital
Management. Pay-offs of over $1.3 billion on an original $49 million
purchase of Argentine debt to Wall Street speculators will provoke
fury among Argentine workers and nationalists who will shoulder the
added burden on top of austerity and cuts in social welfare.
Moreover, the 93% of debt holders, who had agreed to the ‘financial
haircut’ and discounted the debt at 70% will
now demand
full payment
multiplying tenfold the demands on the Treasury with disastrous
consequences.
The devaluation and decline of purchasing power
will not attract the ‘tidal wave of foreign investment’ to
lift the economy and provide jobs and general prosperity as Macri
had promised during his campaign. Foreign capital will not create
new enterprises; they will concentrate on
buying existing
privatized public enterprises at fire-sale prices. Incoming capital
will not increase
the productive forces; it will only shift the direction of the flow
of profits from public coffers to private pockets, from the domestic
economy to overseas investors.
Neoliberalism: Then and Now
The general foreign and domestic political climate
is vastly different today from the 1990’s when the previous
neo-liberal experiment was launched with such disastrous
consequences. In the late 1980’s, Argentina was suffering from acute
inflation, stagnation and declining income. The working class
organizations were still recovering from the murderous decade of
military rule. Moreover, in the 1990’s the US was at thepinnacle
of imperial power in Latin America. China was only
beginning its
dynamic growth cycle. The USSR had disintegrated and Russia was a
struggling vassal state. Latin America was ruled by a motley
collection of neo-liberal clones under the thumb of the IMF.
Today Macri faces an organized working class. The
trade unions and militant popular movements are
intact and have
experienced a decade of substantial gains under a center-left
government. The IMF experience remains a poisonous memory for
hundreds of thousands of Argentines. Hundreds of military officials
responsible for crimes against humanity have been arrested, tried
and prosecuted under the out-going regime. The threat of a military
coup, ever-present in the 1980’s and 90’s, is non-existent.
China has become the
key market for Argentine agro exports (soya). Macri, despite his
declared passion to serve Washington, is obligated to accommodate to
the Chinese market.
Any moves out of MERCOSUR and into the arms of the
Transpacific Trade Agreement will prejudice Argentina’s strategic
trade links with Brazil, Venezuela, Uruguay and Paraguay. Today
Macri will find a hostile climate in Latin America for his proposed
embrace of the US. His promise to ‘expel Venezuela from
MERCOSUR’ has already been rejected by its members.
In summary, Macri will find it impossible to
replicate the neoliberal policies of the 1990’s for all the above
reasons. There is one
additional factor to consider: The earlier version of the ‘free-market
experiment’ led to the most severe economic depression in
Argentine history with double-digit negative growth, unemployment
exceeding 50% in working class districts (and 25% nationally) and
poverty and extreme misery in some Argentine provinces exceeding
Sub-Sahara Africa.
If Macri believes he can rush through the “harsh
medicine” – and avoid the inevitable mass protest– while
attracting a massive inflow of capital with which to rapidly grow
the economy, he is gravely mistaken. After the initial giveaways and
uptake of the stock market, the Soros and Loeb speculators will grab
their profits and run. Weakened domestic consumption and the
depressed global commodity market do not attract long term,
large-scale capital.
The real question is not (as the financial pundits
claim) whether Macri will ‘seize the opportunity’ but
how soon after he
tries to impose his free market model his regime will crash amid the
ruins of a depressed economy, raging inflation and general strikes.
Brazil: Right Turn or a Left Opportunity
Commentators left and right cite the vertical
decline of support for President Dilma Rousseff
from over 50% to less than 10% as a sign of the ‘decline of the
left’. Judicial investigations have led to the arrest and
prosecution of dozens of Congressional leaders of the so-called
‘Workers Party”’(PT) for wholesale bribery, money laundering and
illicit transfers of millions of dollars!
Prosecutors have jailed scores of PT officials,
legislators and senior executives of the giant public petroleum
company, Petrobras, the directors of the biggest construction
companies and investment banks
who were partners in crime
with former PT President Lula Da Silva. The one-time trade
union leader, President Lula, turned into a poster boy for Wall
Street and more recently a notorious influence peddler for Brazilian
big businesses.
Prosecutors have arrested 117 officials from
Petrobras, the giant state oil corporation, and Brazil’s biggest
company. They have arrested two of Brazil’s most powerful
capitalists: Marcelo Odebrecht, president of Constructora Norberto
Odebrecht, and Octavio Marquez de Azevedo of the Andrade Gutierrez
Corporation. Both contributed to the Workers Party electoral
campaign of ex-President Lula Da Silva and current President Dilma
Rousseff.
Big business contributors, currently under
investigation or jailed, had received forty-times the value of their
political donations in terms of lucrative PT government contracts (a
4000% return on investment!).
Criminal cases and arrests for ‘bribes for
contracts’ schemes have affected the financial sector,
including the billionaire financier Andre Esteves, founder-President
of BTG Pactual , a close friend and associate of Lula Da Silva.
The entire elite of Brazil’s capitalist and
financial class has been indicted, jailed or is under investigation.
The Treasurer of the PT, Senate and Congressional leaders and
Presidential advisers of the ‘Workers’ Party have been
arrested and jailed for bribes, money laundering and fraud, in
connection with the Petrobras and other corporate corruption
scandals.
The judicial investigation demonstrates that the
PT had become a party of
the corporate elite. PT leaders and officials work closely
with business elites in channeling billions to corporate treasuries.
In contrast, the PT’s so-called “poverty program” donated
$60 a month to poor families, just above subsistence level. This
poverty program was part of a vast patronage machine designed to
secure votes to elect corrupt officials embedded with big capital
and financiers!
While the prosecutors are not explicitly
anti-capitalist, the investigations have exposed the corrupt basis
of capitalist rule. In the course of one year Brazilian prosecutors
have conducted deeper and more thorough research on the power elite
and determined how it rules, exploits and pillages the wealth of the
country than any analysis by the vast majority of ‘leftist’
academics and journalists over the fifteen years of PT
mis-governance.
The prosecutors have acted against the entire
class of capitalist executives and their political partners in the
PT with greater force and integrity than the major ‘left’
trade union (the CUT) and social movement (Landless Rural Workers
(MST) leaders. The CUT and MST leaders secured minor regime
concessions, in exchange for ignoring the large-scale, long-term
criminal links between bankers, agro- businesspeople, industrialists
and the PT.
While leaders of the MST, the CUT and the National
Union of Students gave ‘critical’ support to Presidents
Lula and Dilma and their entourage of corrupt Congresspeople, the
prosecutors exposed years of endemic fraud, swindles and bribes
which had enabled the PT leaders to buy luxury BMWs, Rolex watches
and million-dollar villas and luxury condos in exclusive
neighborhoods.
Deltan Dallagnol, one of the prosecutors leading
the investigation, has demonstrated that the PT
works for the rich
and powerful, foreign and domestic capitalists and deceives the
poor. His investigations demonstrate that the PT is not a ‘center-left’
party – it is a party of kleptocrats working for capitalists.
One thing is sure: the PT is
not a party
embracing diverse popular classes; it is not an arena for popular
struggle. It is a party that serves
diverse capitalist
sectors, including finance, construction, petroleum and agro
business.
Because of corruption, the cost of government
projects doubled and tripled. As a result vital social services were
starved of funds and deteriorated and public transport construction
was delayed for years.
In summary, the
decline and discredit of
the PT is not a defeat for the Left because the PT regime
never was on the left. On the contrary, the discredit of the PT is a
positive victory for
anti-capitalist forces struggling against the ruling class and
political elite.
Conclusion
The victory of hard right neo-liberal Mauricio
Macri in Argentina and the disintegration of the PT
do not augur a new
rightwing cycle in Latin America. Macri’s economic team will
quickly confront mass opposition and, outside the upper class
neighborhoods, they lack any political mass support. Their policies
will polarize the country and undermine the stability, which
investors require. Brutal devaluations and the end of capital
controls are formulas, not for economic development, but for
inciting general strikes. Conflict, stagnation and hyperinflation
will put an end to the enthusiasm of local and foreign investors.
Moreover, Macri cannot embrace Washington’s entire
agenda because Argentina’s natural trading partner is China.
Macri’s regime is the
beginning and the end
of a reversion to the neo-liberal disaster, similar to what took
place at the end of the 1990’s.
The fall of the PT,
more a product of
conscientious prosecutors than the action of trade unions and
social movements, opens
political space for new working class struggles, free from
the constraints of corrupt leaders and bureaucrats.
Even if the Right returns to power in Brazil– it
is tainted with the same stench of corruption; its capitalist
partners are in jail or facing prosecution. In other words, the fall
of the PT is only part of the decline and decay of all the
capitalist parties.
Over time, soon after the collapse of the ‘New
Right’, a new authentic left may emerge, free of corruption and
links to big business. Hopefully, an authentic working class party
will form, which can pursue socio-economic policies to end
exploitation of labor, the pillage of the public treasury and the
destruction of the Amazon rainforest. This should be a left, which
sustains the environment, respects nature and upholds the rights of
Afro-Brazilians, indigenous people and women.
ames Petras is a Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of
Sociology at Binghamton University, New York.