David Cameron, There Aren't 70,000 Moderate
Fighters In Syria - Whoever Heard of a Moderate with a Kalashnikov,
Anyway?
The Blairite Labour MPs are going to vote with Dave because they
loathe Corbyn more than Isis
By Robert Fisk
November 30, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "The
Independent" - Not since Hitler ordered
General Walther Wenck to send his non-existent 12th Army to rescue
him from the Red Army in Berlin has a European leader believed in
military fantasies as PR Dave Cameron did last week. Telling the
House of Commons about the 70,000 “moderate” fighters deployed in
Syria was not just lying in the sense that Tony Blair lied – because
Blair persuaded himself to believe in his own dishonesty – but
something approaching burlesque. It was whimsy – ridiculous, comic,
grotesque, ludicrous. It came close to a unique form of tragic
pantomime.
At one point last week, one of Cameron’s satraps
was even referring to this phantom army as “ground troops”. I doubt
if there are 700 active “moderate” foot soldiers in Syria – and I am
being very generous, for the figure may be nearer 70 – let alone
70,000. And the Syrian Kurds are not going to conquer Isis for us;
they’re too busy trying to survive the assaults of our Turkish
allies. Besides, aren’t the “moderates” supposed to be the folk who
don’t carry weapons at all? Who’s ever heard before of a “moderate”
with a Kalashnikov?
The Syrian regime’s army – who really are ground
troops and who never worried about the “moderate” rebels because
they always ran away – are the only regular force deployed in Syria.
And thanks to Vladimir Putin rather than PR Dave, they’re beginning
to win back territory. Yet after losing at least 60,000 soldiers –
killed largely by Isis and the al-Nusra Front – the Syrian army
would be hard put to fight off an assault on Damascus by Dave
Cameron’s 70,000 “moderates”. If this ghost army existed, it would
already have captured Damascus and hurled Bashar al-Assad from
power.
Yet in the Commons last week, we were supposed to
believe this tomfoolery – all in the cause of launching two or three
fighter bombers against Isis in Syria. It wouldn’t make us more
vulnerable, Dave told us. In fact we were already vulnerable because
we were bombing Isis in Iraq. Yet Dave knows – and we all know,
don’t we? – that Isis will most assuredly try to commit an atrocity
in Britain to revenge Dave’s latest schoolboy adventure. Then – à la
Blair after 7/7 – Dave will insist that Isis are killing us because
they hate our “values”. Then will come the inevitable video of a
suicide killer saying he killed our innocents because Dave sent his
miniature air force to bomb Isis. The odd
thing about all this is that most Brits I come across – and most
Arabs I talk to in the Middle East – are well aware of the above. So
is the Labour Party. But the Blairite MPs in the Labour Party are
going to vote with Dave because while they loathe the evil cult of
Isis, they hate the evil cult of Corbyn even more. Do they too
believe – as we are all supposed to believe – that the so-called
“Joint Intelligence Committee” is telling the truth about the
mythical 70,000 “moderates”? Is this unspeakably valiant committee
so stupid that it does not tell Dave about the role of the Saudi
Wahabi death cult, which is the direct religious and sectarian
inspiration for Isis? And if it did tell Dave, why didn’t he talk
about the Saudis in the Commons last week?
No, we are not “at war”. Isis can massacre our
innocents, but it is not invading us. Isis is not about to capture
Paris or London – as we and the Americans captured Baghdad and Mosul
in 2003. No. What Isis intends to do is to persuade us to destroy
ourselves. Isis wants us to hate our Muslim minorities. It wants
civil war in France between the elite and its disenfranchised
Muslims, most of them of Algerian origin. It wants the Belgians to
hate their Muslims. It wants us Brits to hate our Muslims. Isis must
have been outraged by the thousands of fine Europeans who welcomed
with love the million Muslim refugees who reached Germany. The
Muslims should have been heading towards the new Caliphate – not
running away from it. So now it wishes to turn us against the
refugees.
To achieve this, it must
implicate hundreds of thousands of innocent Muslim refugees in its
atrocities. It must force our EU nations to introduce States of
Emergency, suspend civil liberties, raid the homes of Muslims. It
wishes to destroy the European Union itself. It wishes to strike at
the heart of the European ideal by liquidating the very foundation
of the union: by persuading us to tear up the Schengen agreement and
to close our frontiers. And we are doing exactly that. Are we, in
some auto-panic, actually working for Isis? If that gruesome
institution did not ban alcohol, their members would be toasting
with champagne our political leaders for their vacuity, their
sophistry, the abject fear with which they now regularly try to
inject us under the dangerous old cry of “Unify the nation”.
Vladimir Putin comprehends this. He knows that
Turkey is helping Isis – this is why he is going to destroy the Isis
oil smuggling route to Turkey – and, as a former serving KGB
officer, he understands the cynicism of any crisis. If an American
aircraft had strayed into Turkish airspace, he asked at his Kremlin
press conference with François Hollande last week, does anyone
believe that Turkey would have shot down the US pilots? We all know
the answer to that. If Turkey wished to destroy Isis, why does it
bombard Isis’ Kurdish enemies? Why does it imprison two of Turkey’s
top journalists for reporting how the Turkish intelligence service
smuggled weapons to Islamist fighters in Syria? And Putin is hardly
going to object if the EU is bent on suicide-through-fear.
Amid all this, PR Dave raves on. And why not?
Having Photoshopped a fake poppy on to his lapel to honour Britain’s
war dead, why shouldn’t he get away with Photoshopping 70,000 fake
“moderates” on to a map of Syria?