A Most Convenient
Massacre
What a difference a single massacre can make!
By Dmitry OrlovNovember 17, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - Just a week ago
the EU couldn't possibly figure out anything to do to stop the
influx of “refugees” from all those countries the US and NATO had
bombed into oblivion. But now, because “Paris changed everything,”
EU's borders are being locked down and refugees are being turned
back.
• Just a week ago it seemed that the EU was going to be swamped by
resurgent nationalism, with incumbent political parties poised to
get voted out of power. But now, thanks to the Paris massacre, they
have obtained a new lease on life, because they can now safely
embrace the same policies that a week ago they branded as “fascist.”
• Just a week ago the EU and the US couldn't possibly bring
themselves admit that they are utterly incompetent when it comes to
combating their own creation—ISIS, that is—and need Russian help.
But now, at the après-Paris G-20 summit, everybody is ready to line
up and let Putin take charge of the war against terrorism. Look—the
Americans finally found those convoys of tanker trucks stretching
beyond the horizon that ISIS has been using to smuggle out stolen
Syrian crude oil—after Putin showed them the satellite photos!
Am I being crass and insensitive? Not at all—I deplore all the
deaths from terrorist attacks in Iraq, in Syria, in Lebanon, and in
all the other countries whose populations did absolutely nothing to
deserve such treatment. I only feel half as bad about the French,
who stood by quietly as their military helped destroy Libya (which
did nothing to deserve it).
Note that after the Russian jet crashed in the Sinai there weren't
all that many Facebook avatars with the Russian flag pasted over
them, and hardly any candlelight vigils or piles of wreaths and
flowers in various Western capitals. I even detected a whiff of smug
satisfaction that the Russians got their comeuppance for stepping
out of line in Syria.
Why the difference in reaction? Simple: you were told to
grieve for the French, so you did. You were not told to grieve for
the Russians, and so you didn't. Don't feel bad; you are just
following orders. The reasoning behind these orders is transparent:
the French, along with the rest of the EU, are Washington's willing
puppets; therefore, they are innocent, and when they get killed,
it's a tragedy. But the Russians are not Washington's willing
puppet, and are not innocent, and so when they get killed by
terrorists, it's punishment. And when Iraqis, or Syrians, or
Nigerians get killed by terrorists, that's not a tragedy either, for
a different reason: they are too poor to matter. In order to qualify
as a victim of a tragedy, you have to be each of these three things:
1. a US-puppet, 2. rich and 3. dead.
Also, you probably believe that the terrorist attacks in Paris were
the genuine article—nobody knew it would happen, and it couldn't
have been stopped, because these terrorists are just too clever for
the ubiquitous state surveillance to detect. Don't feel bad about
that either; you are just believing what you are told to believe.
You probably also believe that jet fuel can melt steel girders and
that skyscrapers collapse into their own footprints (whether they've
been hit by airplanes or not). You can certainly believe whatever
you like, but here are a couple of easy-to-understand tips on
telling what's real from what's fake:
1. If it's fake, the perpetrators are known immediately (and
sometimes beforehand). If it's real, then the truth is uncovered as
a result of a thorough investigation. So, for instance, on 9/11 the
guilty party were a bunch of Saudis armed with box cutters (some of
whom are, paradoxically, still alive). And in Paris we knew right
away that this was done by ISIS—even before we knew who the
perpetrators were. And when that Malaysian jet got shot down over
Ukraine, we knew right away that it was the Russians' fault (never
mind that on that day the Ukrainians deployed an air defense system,
and also scrambled a couple of jets armed with air-to-air missiles—
against an enemy that doesn't have an air force). Note, however, how
we still don't know what happened with the Russian jet over Sinai.
That case is still under investigation—as it should be. If it's
real, officials stall for time and urge caution while scrambling to
find out what happened. When it's fake, the officials are ready to
go with the Big Lie, and then do everything they can to make it
stick, suppressing what shreds of evidence can be independently
gathered.
2. If it's fake, than you should also expect cute little touches:
designer logos for publicity campaigns ready to launch at a moment's
notice, be it “Je suis Charlie” or that cute little Eiffel Tower
inscribed in a peace symbol. There weren't any props to go with the
Russian jet disaster—unless you count that tasteful Charlie Hebdo
cartoon of a jihadi rocket having anal sex with an airliner. There
might also be a few traditional titbits designed to feed a media
frenzy, such as a fake passport found lying next to one of the
perpetrators—because when terrorists go on suicide missions they
always take their fake passports with them. The people who are
charged with designing these events lack imagination and usually
just go with whatever worked before.
We should certainly expect there to be more fake massacres of this
sort—whenever the political situation becomes sufficiently fraught
to call for one—because at this point ready-to-go jihadi terrorist
cells are something of a sunk cost and can be deployed very cheaply
and effectively. Of course we should grieve for the victims, but
there is something far more important at stake than mere human
lives, which are, deplorably, becoming cheaper with each passing
year. We should grieve for the truth.
Dmitry Orlov is a Russian-American engineer and a writer on subjects
related to "potential economic, ecological and political decline and
collapse in the United States," something he has called “permanent
crisis” -
http://cluborlov.blogspot.co.uk
See also -
Syrian Passport by Stadium Stolen or Fake,
A.F.P. Reports:
Agence France-Presse is reporting, citing a source
close to the investigation, that the passport bore the name of Ahmad
al-Mohammad, a soldier in the Syrian Army who was born in 1990 and
died months ago.