Jerusalem Chaos is a Warning of Things to Come
By Jonathan Cook
Among Palestinians
and Israelis, the recent upsurge in violence has been variously
described as the children’s, lone-wolf, Jerusalem and smartphone
intifadas. Each describes a distinguishing feature of this round
of clashes.
The steady erosion of Fatah and Hamas’
authority during the post-Oslo years, as the Palestinian
factions proved incapable of protecting their people from the
structural violence of the occupation, has driven Palestine’s
orphaned children to the streets, armed with stones.
The growing hopelessness and sense of
abandonment have led a few so-called “lone wolves” to vent their
fury on Israelis with improvised weapons such as knives,
screwdrivers and cars. These attacks have attracted the most
publicity, becoming the equivalent of the second intifada’s
suicide bomber. But they serve chiefly as a barometer of
Palestinian despair.
Jerusalem is the centre of events, with the
Palestinians’ only unifying symbol, Al Aqsa mosque, at its
heart. For Palestinians, the incremental takeover of the
compound – and the West’s indifference – is like watching the
mass dispossession of 1948 play out again in slow motion.
In addition, Jerusalem is the main fault line.
Israel’s illegal annexation of the city has left Palestinians
there in an extreme form of isolation – indefinitely stateless
and supremely vulnerable.
And finally, the smartphone camera has allowed
Palestinians to document their suffering and witness unmediated
their compatriots’ personal acts of resistance and
self-sacrifice.
Futile knife attacks may appal outsiders, but
for many Palestinians they are the moment when an individual
briefly reclaims his or her agency and fights back on behalf of
a collectively subjugated and humiliated people.
The need for so many different labels for
these events reveals another important facet of the current
Palestinian struggle: its disorganised nature.
Israel has almost completed the division and
enclosure of Palestinians into disconnected enclaves. As they
hear the sound of the prison doors closing, Palestinian youths
are lashing out at the guards closest to hand.
Because the divisions between Palestinian
populations have become so entrenched geographically, and their
leaders politically, it is hard for Palestinians to find any
unifying vision or organising principle. Do they fight first
against their occupiers or their spent leadership?
But the lack of planning and discipline has
exposed Israel’s own limitations too.
Israel has little but stopgap measures to
defend against the protests. Its intelligence agencies cannot
predict the lone wolf, its guns cannot deter the knife, its
military might cannot subdue the craving for justice and
dignity.
Strangely, in the face of all this, there are
signs of a parallel breakdown of order and leadership on the
Israeli side.
Lynch mobs of Jews patrol Jerusalem and
Israeli cities, calling out “Death to the Arabs!” A jittery
soldier causes pandemonium by firing his rifle in a train
carriage after a bogus terror alert. An Israeli Jew stabs
another because he looks “Arab”.
Meanwhile, politicians and police commanders
stoke the fear. They call for citizens to take the law into
their own hands. Palestinian workers are banned from Jewish
towns. Israeli supermarkets remove knives from shelves, while
8,000 Israelis queue up for guns in the first 24 hours after
permit rules are eased.
Some of this reflects a hysteria, a heightened
sense of victimhood among Israelis, fuelled by the knife attack
videos. But the mood dates to before the current upheavals.
It is also a sign of the gradual leaching of
the settler’s lawlessness into the mainstream. A popular slogan
from the past weeks is: “The army’s hands are tied.” Israeli
civilians presumably believe they must take up arms instead.
After six uninterrupted years of the extreme
right in power, Israelis don’t blame their government’s policy
of relentless force for the backlash. They demand yet more force
against the Palestinians.
Polls show Avigdor Lieberman, the former
Moldovan bouncer who became the hard man of the Israeli right,
is most favoured to lead the nation out of the crisis.
Solutions are being applied most savagely in
East Jerusalem, where Palestinians are being locked even more
tightly into neighbourhood ghettoes. Israel’s “eternal, unified
capital” is being carved up by roadblocks. Palestinian residents
are made to endure daily searches and insults that will sow the
seeds of yet more fury and resistance.
As Israel tries to slam shut the door of one
prison cell in Jerusalem, the inmates threaten to break open the
door of another, in Gaza. Israel’s leadership has watched
uneasily the repeated breaches of Gaza’s fence over the past
week by youths enraged by their own misery and what they see
happening in the other prison wings.
The current unrest may recede, but more waves
of protest of ever greater intensity are surely not far behind.
Jafar Farah, a Palestinian leader in Israel,
has warned of it heading slowly from a national conflict into a
civil war, one defined by the kind of debased one-state solution
Israel is imposing.
The chaotic violence of the past weeks looks
like a warning from the future – a future Israel is hurtling
towards.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/2015-10-19/jerusalem-chaos-is-a-warning-of-things-to-come/#sthash.F9oWloz6.dpuf
October 23, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - Among Palestinians and
Israelis, the recent upsurge in violence has been variously
described as the children’s, lone-wolf, Jerusalem and smartphone
intifadas. Each describes a distinguishing feature of this round of
clashes.
The steady erosion of Fatah and Hamas’ authority
during the post-Oslo years, as the Palestinian factions proved
incapable of protecting their people from the structural violence of
the occupation, has driven Palestine’s orphaned children to the
streets, armed with stones.
The growing hopelessness and sense of abandonment
have led a few so-called “lone wolves” to vent their fury on
Israelis with improvised weapons such as knives, screwdrivers and
cars. These attacks have attracted the most publicity, becoming the
equivalent of the second intifada’s suicide bomber. But they serve
chiefly as a barometer of Palestinian despair.
Jerusalem is the centre of events, with the
Palestinians’ only unifying symbol, Al Aqsa mosque, at its heart.
For Palestinians, the incremental takeover of the compound – and the
West’s indifference – is like watching the mass dispossession of
1948 play out again in slow motion.
In addition, Jerusalem is the main fault line.
Israel’s illegal annexation of the city has left Palestinians there
in an extreme form of isolation – indefinitely stateless and
supremely vulnerable.
And finally, the smartphone camera has allowed
Palestinians to document their suffering and witness unmediated
their compatriots’ personal acts of resistance and self-sacrifice.
Futile knife attacks may appal outsiders, but for
many Palestinians they are the moment when an individual briefly
reclaims his or her agency and fights back on behalf of a
collectively subjugated and humiliated people.
The need for so many different labels for these
events reveals another important facet of the current Palestinian
struggle: its disorganised nature.
Israel has almost completed the division and
enclosure of Palestinians into disconnected enclaves. As they hear
the sound of the prison doors closing, Palestinian youths are
lashing out at the guards closest to hand.
Because the divisions between Palestinian
populations have become so entrenched geographically, and their
leaders politically, it is hard for Palestinians to find any
unifying vision or organising principle. Do they fight first against
their occupiers or their spent leadership?
But the lack of planning and discipline has
exposed Israel’s own limitations too.
Israel has little but stopgap measures to defend
against the protests. Its intelligence agencies cannot predict the
lone wolf, its guns cannot deter the knife, its military might
cannot subdue the craving for justice and dignity.
Strangely, in the face of all this, there are
signs of a parallel breakdown of order and leadership on the Israeli
side.
Lynch mobs of Jews patrol Jerusalem and Israeli
cities, calling out “Death to the Arabs!” A jittery soldier causes
pandemonium by firing his rifle in a train carriage after a bogus
terror alert. An Israeli Jew stabs another because he looks “Arab”.
Meanwhile, politicians and police commanders stoke
the fear. They call for citizens to take the law into their own
hands. Palestinian workers are banned from Jewish towns. Israeli
supermarkets remove knives from shelves, while 8,000 Israelis queue
up for guns in the first 24 hours after permit rules are eased.
Some of this reflects a hysteria, a heightened
sense of victimhood among Israelis, fuelled by the knife attack
videos. But the mood dates to before the current upheavals.
It is also a sign of the gradual leaching of the
settler’s lawlessness into the mainstream. A popular slogan from the
past weeks is: “The army’s hands are tied.” Israeli civilians
presumably believe they must take up arms instead.
After six uninterrupted years of the extreme right
in power, Israelis don’t blame their government’s policy of
relentless force for the backlash. They demand yet more force
against the Palestinians.
Polls show Avigdor Lieberman, the former Moldovan
bouncer who became the hard man of the Israeli right, is most
favoured to lead the nation out of the crisis.
Solutions are being applied most savagely in East
Jerusalem, where Palestinians are being locked even more tightly
into neighbourhood ghettoes. Israel’s “eternal, unified capital” is
being carved up by roadblocks. Palestinian residents are made to
endure daily searches and insults that will sow the seeds of yet
more fury and resistance.
As Israel tries to slam shut the door of one
prison cell in Jerusalem, the inmates threaten to break open the
door of another, in Gaza. Israel’s leadership has watched uneasily
the repeated breaches of Gaza’s fence over the past week by youths
enraged by their own misery and what they see happening in the other
prison wings.
The current unrest may recede, but more waves of
protest of ever greater intensity are surely not far behind.
Jafar Farah, a Palestinian leader in Israel, has
warned of it heading slowly from a national conflict into a civil
war, one defined by the kind of debased one-state solution Israel is
imposing.
The chaotic violence of the past weeks looks like
a warning from the future – a future Israel is hurtling towards.
Jonathan Cook is a Nazareth- based journalist
and winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism.
http://www.jonathan-cook.net